Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,017 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:00 PM Mar 2015

Senate fails to override Obama's veto of Keystone XL pipeline

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-82971488/

The Senate failed Wednesday to override President Obama's veto of Keystone XL pipeline legislation, ending for now attempts by Congress to speed up approval of the controversial energy project.

Falling short of the two-thirds majority needed, Republicans backers of the pipeline could not peel off enough Democratic supporters to join them. The vote was 62-37, with all Republicans and eight Democrats in favor.

The outcome was the latest setback for the GOP-led Congress, which made passage of Keystone a top priority. It served up a victory for the White House on the first major veto of Obama's administration.

"For a long time, projects like Keystone used to be no-brainers -- they were often approved without much controversy at all," said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who made the bill the first order of business when he took control of the chamber in January. "But that was before powerful special interest groups and ideological extremists decided to embark on a quixotic quest."

Noting the significance of the override attempt, McConnell asked senators to take the roll call vote from their desks, a rare practice reserved for landmark votes.

(end snip)

Is Mitchy talking about his own party there? "powerful special interest groups and idological extremists"? I think he must be.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. Good question for prospective 2016 Dem presidential hopefuls
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:08 PM
Mar 2015

"If you had been in the Senate, would you have voted to override President Obama's veto of the Keystone Pipeline?"

A yes answer should be required for nomination on the party's ticket.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
2. Nine Democrats voted to overturn the veto.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:11 PM
Mar 2015

1. Michael Bennet, Colo.

2. Thomas Carper, Del.

3. Robert Casey, Pa.

4. Joe Donnelly, Ind.

5. Heidi Heitkamp, N.D.

6. Joe Manchin, W. Va.

7. Claire McCaskill, Mo.

8. Jon Tester, Mont.

9. Mark Warner, Va.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
8. Thanks. I'm waiting for the "they live in red states" excuses.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:28 PM
Mar 2015

Accompanied with the "you're not allowed to 'bash' Democrats on DU" tune.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. GOOD! If those Keystone XL investors in our Senate want to pass a bill to build the dang thing,
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:12 PM
Mar 2015

they must add safeguards that any spills will be billed to the oil shippers and tar sands landowners (Koch Bros) and not the American taxpayer.

Add that they will FIRST seek approval by the Native tribes over whose lands they have to build the dang thang.

Add that a fair percentage of tar sands oil refined in the United States will go to the U.S. market at significant discounts.

Add that they retain those 35,000 or so jobs throughout the existence of the pipeline, not only after it's been built.

Add that if tar sands oil hog up refineris, they have to build new refineries in order not to shutdown the refinery of "cleaner" oil - which it will do.

Add that they route the pipeline away from aquifers as much as they can, and where they can't, guarantee that those sections of the pipeline are triple enforced.

Maybe, just maybe, it's something to reconsider. Otherwise? NO.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
7. I suppose it could be because they are dirty rotten Dems.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:26 PM
Mar 2015

In my wildest imagination however, I'd like to think that they wanted to tantalize the Reps and get them so close they could smell victory...just so it all could be yanked away and feel that sweet pain of defeat a little more poignantly. But then of course, that's only my imagination.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate fails to override ...