General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums8 Senators go after TPP Fast Track
...."Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Bob Casey (D-Pa.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Edward Markey (D-Mass.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) took to the Senate floor to speak about fast track, TPP and fair trade.
There was apparently not a single report of this in the nation's news media, continuing the blackout of news on fast track and TPP.
A fight is coming because past trade deals have cost jobs and wages, devastated entire regions, and accelerated corporate power and income/wealth inequality which it is becoming clear was the intent. Whitehouse, for example, said parts of TPP are "a question of pure raw economic power by massive corporate interests being used to make governments knuckle under."
Sanders said, "Enough is enough. This country now is in a major race to the bottom."
http://crooksandliars.com/2015/03/senate-blockbuster-showdown-trade-media
More at the link...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)But when the 1-percent controls the media consumed by 99-percent, there's a problem in awareness.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)They don't want The People to know about the TPP because they will be against it.
The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)You're right too: Very little talk of this in the MSM. Only at crunch time when they try to give us the bum's rush and ram this down our gullets will the MSM talk of this.....as shills of course.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Media has to cover themselves.
And Hillary has already expressed her position on the TPP and has been off having fun, not a word about it.
Within the populist Democratic movement, there is a rising tide against once-popular trade deals. Clinton has been involved with many of the pacts from her time as first lady, in the Senate and finally, as part of the Obama administration.
Clinton saw herself in the middle of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) during her husband's presidency. She supported deals with Oman, Chile and Singapore during her tenure in the Senate. As secretary of State, she was a chief advocate as talks commenced surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), one of the largest worldwide deals in recent history.
Many proponents of the agreements argue that negotiations need to take place in secret in order to protect the fragile interests of participating countries. This has not sat well with public interest groups and more liberal members of the Democratic Party.
Source: Megan R. Wilson in TheHill.com weblog, "Clinton vs. Warren" , Aug 24, 2014
TPP agreement creates more growth and better growth
Many proponents of the agreements argue that negotiations need to take place in secret in order to protect the fragile interests of participating countries.
At the State Department, Clinton didn't address specifics in the negotiating process, but told attendees at an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum conference that she hoped it would "create a new high standard for multilateral free trade." Critics have said that the agreement would ease regulations protecting both laborers & the environment, despite claims from Clinton to the contrary: "Our goal for TPP is to create not just more growth, but better growth. We believe the TPP needs to include strong protections for workers, the environment, intellectual property, and innovation," Clinton said at the event in 2011. "It should also promote the free flow of information technology and the spread of green technology, as well as the coherence of our regulatory system and the efficiency of supply chains."
Source: Megan R. Wilson in TheHill.com weblog, "Clinton vs. Warren" , Aug 24, 2014
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Free_Trade.htm
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Warren is going to run on the Hillary Ticket!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)HRC is unfit to represent the Democratic Party.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Warren has everything that Clinton needs to win, and without her she's got nothing.
Warren has too much integrity to leave her Senate seat to help a Clinton win.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)TBF
(32,060 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Auggie
(31,169 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... with Hatch and the Republicans FOR GOOD! We had indications from Wyden's office last week that negotiations had stopped, but still waiting for him to firmly say that he's no longer on the Fast Track bandwagon. Would like to think that Senator Merkley can put a lot of pressure on Senator Wyden!
LWolf
(46,179 posts)He demonstrates again why I support him.