Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:51 PM Feb 2015

This Is The End Of The Line For The USAF's Most Versatile Cargo Jet

The C-17 has been in production for 25 years, with 279 Globemasters emerging from Boeing's (and once McDonnell Douglas') historic Long Beach factory. Yesterday, the final aircraft had its wings mated to its massive fuselage, ending not just the production run of the C-17, but the 72-year-old plant that produced it.

Although the quad-engine transport found some export success later in its production life – with Canada, Australia, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, India, and NATO's heavy lift wing receiving copies – the demand for large transport aircraft has softened as defense budgets around the globe retract. Add in the fact that out-sized cargo transport can be purchased by the hour from commercial vendors, including operators that fly the larger Soviet-designed An-124, and the high operating and sustainment costs of owning the C-17 begin to look like a waste.

When it comes to the USAF, the C-17 may be a victim of its own success. The jet is so effective at its job that more units aren't required to "take up the slack" for the USAF's aging transport fleet.

In many ways, the C-17 was the perfect aircraft for the last 15 years of conflict in the Middle East, with its ability to take large loads into and out of combat zones, even on short and less than perfect runways. But that capability came at the price of high-fuel usage while cruising.

more

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/this-is-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-usafs-most-versatil-1688525621/+damon

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Is The End Of The Line For The USAF's Most Versatile Cargo Jet (Original Post) n2doc Feb 2015 OP
Catch-22 Octafish Feb 2015 #1
Husband and I were stationed at Charleston AFB when they got the first C-17 TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #2
Don't talk like that, I flew the C-124. Downwinder Feb 2015 #3
You win. TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #4
Flew in the C-124 that delivered our Huey's to Nam. GGJohn Feb 2015 #6
I spent over ten years at Charleston AFB, SC cpwm17 Mar 2015 #8
The C-141's had a distinctive, loud, rattle-y, jangly engine sound-- TwilightGardener Mar 2015 #9
I felt fortunate to work on the much quieter C-17 cpwm17 Mar 2015 #10
I remember the Boxcar! yortsed snacilbuper Feb 2015 #5
The last C-119 I saw had been re-configured HubertHeaver Mar 2015 #7

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. Catch-22
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:11 PM
Feb 2015

Jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight wars for oil that the used a lot of oil war the jet helped fight for oil.

The DoD accounted for around 1 percent of the US energy consumption and 80 percent of the federal government energy consumption. Although this may seem small, the fact is that the Pentagon is the largest single consumer of energy in the World. Nigeria, with a population of more than 160 million, consumes as much energy and emits as much CO2 as the US military.

SOURCE: http://www.dailyenergyreport.com/how-much-energy-does-the-u-s-military-consume-an-update/

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
2. Husband and I were stationed at Charleston AFB when they got the first C-17
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 09:33 PM
Feb 2015

to replace the C-141's. Feel old now.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
8. I spent over ten years at Charleston AFB, SC
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 01:01 AM
Mar 2015

and I worked flight-line maintenance on the C-17. We kept busy. It was my favorite job I had in the Air Force. They already had some C-17's when I got there, but the C-141's were still operational.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. The C-141's had a distinctive, loud, rattle-y, jangly engine sound--
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 01:12 AM
Mar 2015

to me, anyway. No matter where you were in Charleston/North Charleston, you could hear them circling around. The C-17's seemed much quieter, just came in with a low hum or "whoooosh". The coolest were the occasional C-5's--big, loud low-pitched constant BUZZZZZ, like a giant bumble bee.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
10. I felt fortunate to work on the much quieter C-17
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 01:20 AM
Mar 2015

It saved me from hearing damage. When I was working while a C-5 taxied by I didn't always have a chance to grab my hearing protection. The sound is almost terrifying up close.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
7. The last C-119 I saw had been re-configured
Sun Mar 1, 2015, 12:04 AM
Mar 2015

Last edited Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:45 AM - Edit history (1)

as a gunship--the AC-119 Shadow, if I recall correctly (been accused of having trouble with the 'correctly' part, lately).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Is The End Of The Li...