General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre You a Public Servant? Then Serve the Public
If you're a public servant, you don't get to choose which parts of your job you will do and which you won't. If an action falls within your job responsibilities and scope of duties, you have to do it unless you've been granted an accommodation due to a disability. That's how I've always understood things.
But apparently, some North Carolina magistrates and clerks in county register of deeds offices find it unconscionable that they be asked to perform marriage ceremonies for same-sex couples now that Amendment One, the 2012 voter-approved law prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying, has been struck down. (A federal judge ruled it unconstitutional in the fall, after which same-sex couples began marrying throughout the state, and some magistrates and clerks resigned in protest.)
Rather than do the "honorable" thing and resign from their positions because the thought of marrying the same-sex couples in front of them apparently appalls them, some magistrates and clerks contend that their First Amendment rights are being infringed upon now that equal marriage has become the law in North Carolina. Ridiculous, right?
Not to our legislators. Just this week, the North Carolina Senate passed a bill, by a vote of 32-16, that would allow magistrates and clerks to opt out of performing same-sex marriage ceremonies if they feel that doing so would conflict with their religious freedom. It now goes to the state House. Although the bill would prevent these magistrates and clerks from performing any marriage ceremonies, even for heterosexual couples, let's not buy into the notion that the proposed law is in any way neutral. It's clearly targeted at LGB North Carolinians and is meant to be one more barrier to realizing our constitutional rights.
http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/02/27/op-ed-are-you-public-servant-then-serve-public
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)what if my religious beliefs forbid it?
Much in line with the so-called conscience clauses which allow pharmacists to refuse to provide birth control. Nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with establishing a theocracy.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)What the fuck is wrong with these people?
William769
(55,147 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)for the Civil Rights Act and Roe v. Wade. Incremental progress over many years. Thanks for the link.
William769
(55,147 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)why are so many in the US so intent on "taking their country back" to the 19th Century? Whether it is Roe v. Wade, or the Affordable Care Act, or the Civil Rights Act, so many of these Tea Party know-nothings insist on showing the world how hateful and ignorant they are. A real mystery.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And they are freaking the fuck out at every step to make it a more level playing field for others.
And they are assholes.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)they would know that life was only awesome for the 1%. Most people worked until they died.
Reminds me of the Civil War re-enactors who obviously feel the pre-civil war glorious south meant every white man had a plantation.
glasshouses
(484 posts)I seriously wouldn't get upset over this.
Fact now it's legal in NC