General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOK, how about instead of "Islamic Terrorism"
we just call it "religious terrorism"? Think that would get the right-wingers panties in a wad?
randys1
(16,286 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Now that this is all cleared up I am sure the war effort will be much better??
What a ridiculous state the trolling American media has descended into.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)it is how I learn
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)What they do is 100% legal in their system. In fact they ARE law enforcement.
War criminals? No. They are not signatories to any war crime treaty.
As far as ISIS, there are no legal protections, like pirates. They should be hung on site or capture.
A law is a mutual thing. No rules for them? Fine. No rules for us.
randys1
(16,286 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)If they recant, away they go. If no, they get killed. Plata o plomo, as they say.
randys1
(16,286 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Honestly, what is in it for us? Other than guatanteed good treatment for our soldiers?
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)there's no way to use that word in honest discussion, for two reasons:
1) it has no fixed meaning
2) it's an emotional trigger word designed to suppress rational thought
on point
(2,506 posts)Understanding the latter two i9n perhaps getting to a change in the how
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)What does the word "terrorism" mean, precisely?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)noun
1.
the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
2.
the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3.
a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)A definition so broad it covers any military and law enforcement action anywhere.
unblock
(52,230 posts)the main concept behind the word is that the perpetrators are trying to terrorize, i.e., scare, us.
which in turn implies that we can be scared, which in turn encourages them to try.
we're the land of the free and the home of the brave, dammit, this crap can't frighten us.
in fact, it's the idiots running around screaming "terrorism" who are scaring us. a real statesman would say something like "we have nothing to fear but fear itself", but then, goodness, republicans can't go THERE....
more objectively, it should be called asymmetric warfare, which of course was perfectly legitimate when we used comparable tactics taking pot shots against the regimented, rank-and-file formations the british and then fleeing into the woods during the american revolution.
but this, of course, would allow that the perpetrators are not simple and pure evil, and again, goodness, we can't solve complex world problems by allowing for any complexity in our discourse....
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)I wanted to toy with this a bit before the big reveal but you beat me to it!
When you reason the term out to its logical conclusion, people trying to make you afraid of "terrorism" are practically by definition "terrorists". They are trying to cause fear to achieve political ends, meaning the very (non-sarcastic/ironic) invocation of the term makes the speaker a "terrorist"!
Most people, of course, don't reason it all the way through, since the invocation of a fear stimulus is a primary method of shutting down rational thought. Or, to put it another way, "fear is the mind killer".
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)It covers a lot of ground and is completely accurate.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)So yeah, I'm cool with that.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)These religious terrorists, with their extremist views. Fricken yes.