Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 06:02 AM Feb 2015

Owners of cabin where Christopher Dorner died to get $200,000

Source: Los Angeles Times

Owners of cabin where Christopher Dorner died to get $200,000

By JOSEPH SERNA

FEBRUARY 17, 2015

The owners of the cabin that burned down during the final showdown between ex-LAPD Officer Christopher Dorner and law enforcement in 2013 will be paid $200,000 for their loss.

The cabin in the Angelus Oaks neighborhood of Big Bear burned down Feb. 12, 2013, after the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s SWAT team fired in gas that ignited and consumed the building in fire.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Dorner was spotted trying to make his escape from the mountain and was chased into a cabin belonging to Candace Martin and Eric Funnell – where authorities surrounded him and engaged in a dramatic gun battle that left a San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputy dead.

Dorner shot himself in the cabin’s basement as the building went up in flames.

In a claim against San Bernardino County, Martin and Funnell sought compensation for their cabin, attorneys fees and emotional distress. The $200,000 will be paid out by March 5, according to a copy of the agreement.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-dorner-big-bear-cabin-settlement-20150217-story.html
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Owners of cabin where Christopher Dorner died to get $200,000 (Original Post) Eugene Feb 2015 OP
I don't know a lot about California real estate values... MrScorpio Feb 2015 #1
Is that in addition to insurance? Sancho Feb 2015 #2
Hopefully the policy covered acts of cop. nt MrScorpio Feb 2015 #3
They had no intention of giving him a chance to surrender glasshouses Feb 2015 #4
You mean he had no intention of surrendering, right? Oklahoma_Liberal Feb 2015 #5
Well considering how they shot up those two women delivering news papers I think chances are dilby Feb 2015 #43
Well considering that it was LAPD that did that, GGJohn Feb 2015 #44
Same officers? Oklahoma_Liberal Feb 2015 #64
You mean he had no intention of surrendering? GGJohn Feb 2015 #6
They were in no danger at the pointthey had him trapped in the cabin glasshouses Feb 2015 #8
Well let's just pick apart your absurd statement here. GGJohn Feb 2015 #9
. glasshouses Feb 2015 #10
Do you have a link? GGJohn Feb 2015 #11
Two types made glasshouses Feb 2015 #13
They knew there was a possibility of it starting a fire, GGJohn Feb 2015 #16
Listen to it your self glasshouses Feb 2015 #17
So why don't you tell us where LE said this: GGJohn Feb 2015 #19
look below glasshouses Feb 2015 #21
Tell us again where LE said what I bolded. GGJohn Feb 2015 #25
Why don't you concede you are wrong on this? glasshouses Feb 2015 #22
Why don't you concede that you're wrong and Dorner GGJohn Feb 2015 #24
Another one here glasshouses Feb 2015 #20
Uh, no, you can't really understand what was said for the most part. GGJohn Feb 2015 #23
Bull shit glasshouses Feb 2015 #26
Yeah, I know your claims of LE purposely burning down that cabin are bullshit. GGJohn Feb 2015 #27
At about the 42 mark BURN THIS MOTHER FUCKER glasshouses Feb 2015 #28
Wow, one person said this. GGJohn Feb 2015 #31
You asked me for all these links and I provided them for you glasshouses Feb 2015 #33
You provided one link that actually had one person saying GGJohn Feb 2015 #34
You really hate to admit you're wrong glasshouses Feb 2015 #35
And you really hate to admit that you embellished GGJohn Feb 2015 #36
DU'ers can read the thread and come to their own conclusion glasshouses Feb 2015 #40
No, this thread was about the cabin owners being compensated for GGJohn Feb 2015 #45
Should I have written our discussion or sub thread of the OP... glasshouses Feb 2015 #47
You're the one who went off topic here, GGJohn Feb 2015 #48
It was relevent to the OP glasshouses Feb 2015 #51
No, it wasn't relevant to the thread, GGJohn Feb 2015 #54
You had nothing to push back with glasshouses Feb 2015 #56
This tape is a bit clearer where they are getting ready to deploy the burners glasshouses Feb 2015 #58
Yes because they don't have NVG glasshouses Feb 2015 #12
IOW, you don't have a link? eom. GGJohn Feb 2015 #14
look above glasshouses Feb 2015 #18
He had plenty of opportunities to surrender. HappyMe Feb 2015 #7
you think he believed he wasnt dead already? reddread Feb 2015 #37
He pretty much had to know that through HappyMe Feb 2015 #38
that is for certain reddread Feb 2015 #15
He was never going to get out of there alive , this was personal glasshouses Feb 2015 #29
He was never going to come out of there alive because he had GGJohn Feb 2015 #30
Probably an eminent domain type of transaction. geek tragedy Feb 2015 #32
It already was federal or state land. tammywammy Feb 2015 #41
Classic media new speak: Where he "died" not where he was "killed by police" Taitertots Feb 2015 #39
Except Dorner wasn't killed by the police, GGJohn Feb 2015 #46
Why keep saying something you know isn't true? glasshouses Feb 2015 #49
Because I know it to be true, GGJohn Feb 2015 #52
So it's personal for you glasshouses Feb 2015 #59
No need to back off, we've been pretty civil so far, GGJohn Feb 2015 #60
you as well glasshouses Feb 2015 #61
They are right, and you are wrong, so you should really apologize for attacking geek tragedy Feb 2015 #53
That's not the discussion we are having glasshouses Feb 2015 #55
Except police didn't kill him. He killed himself and yes he was responsible geek tragedy Feb 2015 #50
I actually drove by the cabin: it looks bad, like "Bosnia 1993" bad MisterP Feb 2015 #42
I don't know who owned the cabin, but if it was mine I wouldn't want to go back. hunter Feb 2015 #57
They were rental cabins n/t tammywammy Feb 2015 #62
Thanks. hunter Feb 2015 #63

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
1. I don't know a lot about California real estate values...
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 06:24 AM
Feb 2015

But I get the distinct feeling that the County is getting off pretty cheaply here.

I could be wrong, but it's just a hunch.

 

Oklahoma_Liberal

(69 posts)
5. You mean he had no intention of surrendering, right?
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:34 AM
Feb 2015

He was still killing cops on the lawn of the very cabin where he met his own demise.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
44. Well considering that it was LAPD that did that,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:24 PM
Feb 2015

not San Bernardino County Sheriffs Office, who were in charge during the final confrontation.
LAPD wasn't even involved in the standoff.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
6. You mean he had no intention of surrendering?
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:51 AM
Feb 2015

He had every chance to surrender during the ordeal, he decided it would be better to go out with a bang and take as many with him as he could.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
8. They were in no danger at the pointthey had him trapped in the cabin
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:55 AM
Feb 2015

They were all behind cover and he wasn't going any where

They decided to burn the cabin down

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
9. Well let's just pick apart your absurd statement here.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:01 AM
Feb 2015

He had already killed one deputy while retreating into the cabin, darkness was falling and LE was afraid that he could slip through their lines and escape again, killing more people, LE didn't DECIDE to burn down the cabin, Dorner DECIDED to die rather than surrender and face charges in a court of law.
Why are you blaming LE for the actions of the murderous Dorner?

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
10. .
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:02 AM
Feb 2015

We’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burner.” “The burner’s deployed and we have a fire.” “Burn that fucking house down.” “Fucking burn this motherfucker.” And, “Because the fire is contained, I’m gonna let that heat burn through the basement,” officers were stated over the police scanner

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
11. Do you have a link?
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:04 AM
Feb 2015

Do you even know what a burner is?

Regardless, Dorner is responsible for the death of Dorner. he had ample opportunities to surrender, instead, he decided to keep on killing and refusing to surrender.
Quit blaming LE for the actions of Dorner.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
13. Two types made
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:07 AM
Feb 2015

the one they deployed they knew was going to start a fire any where it landed inside a home

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
16. They knew there was a possibility of it starting a fire,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:10 AM
Feb 2015

but they didn't deploy it to start a fire.
Once again, you're blaming LE for the actions of Dorner.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
19. So why don't you tell us where LE said this:
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:24 AM
Feb 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026241871#post10

We’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burner.” “The burner’s deployed and we have a fire.” “Burn that fucking house down.” “Fucking burn this motherfucker.” And, “Because the fire is contained, I’m gonna let that heat burn through the basement,” officers were stated over the police scanner


Listened to the whole clip, not once did anyone say any of the bolded words.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
25. Tell us again where LE said what I bolded.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:36 AM
Feb 2015
” “Burn that fucking house down.” “Fucking burn this motherfucker.” And, “Because the fire is contained, I’m gonna let that heat burn through the basement,” officers were stated over the police scanner

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
24. Why don't you concede that you're wrong and Dorner
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:35 AM
Feb 2015

is responsible for the death of Dorner? He had ample opportunity to surrender in the days he was on the run killing people, sorry, but I'm not blaming LE in the least for Dorner being dead.
BTW, Dorner took his own life rather than surrender, he never had any intention of giving up to face charges in a court of law.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
20. Another one here
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:26 AM
Feb 2015

Burners is a term they use for smoke canisters , two types
In this audio you can here the cop say "Burn it Down"

They knew what this type of smoke grenade was going to do deployed inside a home.




GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
23. Uh, no, you can't really understand what was said for the most part.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:32 AM
Feb 2015

You're hearing that because you want to blame LE for the death of Dorner, when in reality, Dorner is responsible for the death of Dorner.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
27. Yeah, I know your claims of LE purposely burning down that cabin are bullshit.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:39 AM
Feb 2015


Tell us again where in that clip LE said this.

“Burn that fucking house down.” “Fucking burn this motherfucker.” And, “Because the fire is contained, I’m gonna let that heat burn through the basement,” officers were stated over the police scanner

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
31. Wow, one person said this.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:54 AM
Feb 2015

Was that person in charge? Did he have the authority to deploy the canisters?
Given the tense situation, and the fact that Dorner had already shot and killed several LE, I'm not going to condemn the cops for their actions that day on the mountain.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
33. You asked me for all these links and I provided them for you
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:03 AM
Feb 2015


I guess you can go on believing what you want to believe but....

I'm pretty sure you being an intelligent person and ex military you have come to the conclusion that the police
had every intention of burning the cabin down with the method they choose to deploy.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
34. You provided one link that actually had one person saying
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:06 AM
Feb 2015

burn that motherfucker, that's it. And was that person the commanding officer in charge? Or just a pissed off cop who had saw other cops murdered by Dorner?

You sure seem to be trying to blame the cops for Dorner's death.

“Burn that fucking house down.” “Fucking burn this motherfucker.” And, “Because the fire is contained, I’m gonna let that heat burn through the basement,” officers were stated over the police scanner


Where's the rest of what you claimed was said by LE

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
36. And you really hate to admit that you embellished
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:34 AM
Feb 2015

and are wrong about the cops purposely burning down the cabin.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
40. DU'ers can read the thread and come to their own conclusion
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:49 AM
Feb 2015

Remember this thread was about whether the cops knew what would
be the conclusion when they decided to pop burners inside a log cabin.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
47. Should I have written our discussion or sub thread of the OP...
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:33 PM
Feb 2015

My point was proven over and over again in this thread.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
48. You're the one who went off topic here,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:38 PM
Feb 2015

which happens far too often on DU, I've been guilty of it myself, like right now.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
54. No, it wasn't relevant to the thread,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:46 PM
Feb 2015

it was about the owners being compensated for their cabin being burned down, nothing more, but you decided to make it about something else, so don't act so surprised when you get push back.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
56. You had nothing to push back with
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:58 PM
Feb 2015


You heard the tapes

This isn't about if Donner deserved to die by the state for murder.
If you support the death penalty then clearly he was guilty of premeditated murder.

This is about a tactic the police used that day that they knew would result in the wooden cabin going up in flames.
 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
58. This tape is a bit clearer where they are getting ready to deploy the burners
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:04 PM
Feb 2015

you can hear them say we are going to burn him out.

They knew when you pop 7 burners inside a wooden structure it's going to burn down



Seriously how many times do you need to hear this




http://news1.linktv.org/videos/burning-question-did-us-police-intentionally-kill-fugitive-la-cop

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
37. you think he believed he wasnt dead already?
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:39 AM
Feb 2015

he would have been the last to know, if that were the case.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
38. He pretty much had to know that through
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:43 AM
Feb 2015

most of the whole thing.

He could have surrendered peacefully very early on. Instead, he decided to keep going.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
15. that is for certain
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:08 AM
Feb 2015

shoot a cop and you are all set for public execution.
brandishing a cell phone will get the same result.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
30. He was never going to come out of there alive because he had
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:52 AM
Feb 2015

no intention of surrendering, he was going to take as many with him as he could.
Oh wah that Dorner died a violent death at his own hands, I, and the vast majority of Americans didn't lose any sleep with that POS's death.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. Probably an eminent domain type of transaction.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:54 AM
Feb 2015

They had to seize the land and cabin to get Dorner.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
41. It already was federal or state land.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:04 PM
Feb 2015

Can't temember which, but it's in a park (state or national). The cabins were permitted to be there in order to increase visitation to the park.

Most likely answer, they did an appraisal based on the cabin before the fire, and it was much less than what the owner thought it was worth.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
39. Classic media new speak: Where he "died" not where he was "killed by police"
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:44 AM
Feb 2015

Only the police can intentionally burn down a building and claim the occupants were responsible.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
46. Except Dorner wasn't killed by the police,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:28 PM
Feb 2015

he took his own life, and the cops didn't intentionally burn the cabin down, it was an accident, they were trying to force him to come out by firing tear gas into the cabin.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
52. Because I know it to be true,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:44 PM
Feb 2015

one of my brothers is with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Office.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
60. No need to back off, we've been pretty civil so far,
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:24 PM
Feb 2015

and I intend to keep it that way, as I'm quite sure you will.
My brother was one of the responding deputy's that day, from what he told me, it was a very scary and intense incident that day.
Anyway, we'll just have to agree to disagree on this subject.
You have a great evening and a just and peaceful life.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
53. They are right, and you are wrong, so you should really apologize for attacking
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:45 PM
Feb 2015

someone for telling the truth when you are the one who has their facts wrong.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Autopsy-Report-Confirms-Suicide-for-Christopher-Dorner-278095681.html

Rogue ex-LAPD Officer Christopher Dorner fatally shot himself in the head as he was holed up in a burning cabin during a firefight last year with authorities hunting down the fugitive murderer, an autopsy report released Friday said.

The report confirms what sheriff's officials had said about how Dorner died on Feb. 12, 2013 and sheds light on his final moments.


The autopsy revealed that a single gunshot wound, from a handgun, caused Dorner's death and that he had barricaded himself inside the basement of a cabin in the Big Bear area.


 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
55. That's not the discussion we are having
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:57 PM
Feb 2015

It was about deploying 7 burners, incendiary tear gas canisters made for outdoor use inside a wooden cabin

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
50. Except police didn't kill him. He killed himself and yes he was responsible
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 07:40 PM
Feb 2015

since he was the one who want on a mass killing spree, taking hostages, and shooting at anything that moved outside the cabin.

he was the villain, not a victim.

So, in short the media is correct and your version is not.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
57. I don't know who owned the cabin, but if it was mine I wouldn't want to go back.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 08:00 PM
Feb 2015

Restarting family traditional properties usually costs at least twice, maybe three times "replacement" cost.

They might have starved, thirsted, or forced this guy out by simple sleep deprivation, but they did not.

Surround the house, cut the power and water, and wait. That's the proper way handle a situation like this.

$200,000 seems cheap.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Owners of cabin where Chr...