General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs there a downside to Homeland Security being shut down?
Republican legislators are on the hot seat due to their budget shenanigans putting the funding of DHS at risk. So what?
2 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Oh nos! The terrorists would win if DHS is shut down. | |
0 (0%) |
|
Hey, it's OK. DHS just eats a lot of tax dollars without making us any safer anyway. | |
2 (100%) |
|
I like polls. | |
0 (0%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
marym625
(17,997 posts)To things like feeding the children, caring for the elderly, the disabled? Maybe some job growth that doesn't only help the top 3%?
KentuckyWoman
(6,692 posts)If we fire the DHS no one would be paying the TSA agents who steal my stuff and grope me.... and I'm pretty sure they won't do that for free.
Seriously. It's not right I should fly without being groped and told my lipstick is a weapon.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Often these threats to defund some part of Gov. turn out to be only the inconsequential segments of the budget.
IF TSA has to stand down, I am all for it.
handmade34
(22,757 posts)and explanation... my daughter was TSA until she hired onto ICE... defunding DHS would just cause the people that work for the agencies to have to work for delayed pay... it is a really stupid, bad idea all 'round...
as always it is the workers (such as my daughter) that get hurt
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)The choice just because of Katrina is "Shet err down"?
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)My funny meter is tagged out waiting for coffee input.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)bluedigger
(17,087 posts)I have a lot of friends there and spent three years myself as a civilian contractor for them. They are doing good work under difficult circumstances (i.e. working with Bobby Jindal's state government). I'd just as soon not see them laid off.
ProfessorGAC
(65,168 posts)Take them back out of DHS. They don't belong there anyway.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)So while I agree about FEMA and Secret Service out of DHS it's not immediately practical.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)In the midst of snowstorms and freezing temperatures, FEMA has to remain operating to help deal with potential emergencies.
On top of that, if FEMA shuts down, pre-disaster mitigation programs go with it, and a lot of local communities depend on FEMA funding for that sort of preparation.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)But most would still be required to work.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)in Fahrenheit 911? Talk about a waste of $$$$.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Personally, I'd like to see the DHS disbanded. I detest the word "homeland" and I don't believe that lumping all those agencies together did anything to foster communication between them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Frankly, I think they do better if they're a bit adversarial. You risk having some asshole not share needed information on the one hand, but that is balanced by avoiding 'groupthink' which can get us in huge trouble (see Vietnam, invasion of Iraq, stuff like that).
I say dump it--give the POTUS a WH advisor who can ride herd on intelligence agencies without the stupid "department" and the associated bloated staff full of political appointees. DHS is like Reagan's "Star Wars" -- a bigass government welfare project, designed to employ loyal stooges.
JustAnotherGen
(31,879 posts)At ports/points of entry. From a commerce perspective it's sometimes better to be safe than make money. I also believe down in the Savannah Georgia area they do a good job of stepping in and helping people who are "shipped". Not sure if that's still going on but when I completed my import control and CTPAT training with the owner of a port control company owner in June 2011 there was a lot of that going on.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Sorry about that - a bit of Homeland Security humor.
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)it could close, immigration, passport, federal facilities, a whole host of protective stuff including cybesecurity.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,168 posts)The whole thing required only one team of IT specialists who would create system interfaces so all intelligence agencies knew what the others knew.
Would have cost $50 million a year instead of 50 billion
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Snicker
former9thward
(32,077 posts)They have already said 90% of the employees will keep working. Only the "non essential" employees will be furloughed so the average person will not know the difference.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)I would prefer to see it broken apart but until that is done properly saying you want it shut down now BEFORE things have been sorted out or that it wouldn't impact regular people in America is flatly stupid.
handmade34
(22,757 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)There are a lot of things we are not aware of that it likely does that are things that need doing.
And there are terrorists who do plan attacks - I love the way they dismiss that out of hand as though it is impossible.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Made me feel snuggly and safe.
RandySF
(59,224 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)200,000 contractors and188,000 federal employees.
Even those who are considered critical and must come to work will not get paid.
Unless Congress acts and allows those who are not critical employees to get retroactive pay because Congressional Douche-bags could not come to an agreement, they are going to hurt by the loss of money.
The downside is that American citizens who have jobs will be hurt because Congress is occupied by partisan idiots. Partisan douche-bag idiots will be paid as usual.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Shut it down and see what happens.