Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:29 AM Feb 2015

Is there a downside to Homeland Security being shut down?

Republican legislators are on the hot seat due to their budget shenanigans putting the funding of DHS at risk. So what?


2 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Oh nos! The terrorists would win if DHS is shut down.
0 (0%)
Hey, it's OK. DHS just eats a lot of tax dollars without making us any safer anyway.
2 (100%)
I like polls.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is there a downside to Homeland Security being shut down? (Original Post) Scuba Feb 2015 OP
How about we move the money marym625 Feb 2015 #1
who would feel up my boobs at the airport? KentuckyWoman Feb 2015 #2
Is it known for sure that TSA would be unfunded? dixiegrrrrl Feb 2015 #23
in some defense handmade34 Feb 2015 #29
Well, FEMA is a part of DHS. NuclearDem Feb 2015 #3
That worked out really well during Katrina. nt RiffRandell Feb 2015 #6
So even though the agency has been repaired/revamped after the Bush II sabotage... NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #8
No, you made a good point; I made a bad joke. nt RiffRandell Feb 2015 #9
Oh. Sorry. NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #10
I'm on my first cup myself and had 2 extra teens spend the night. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #12
FEMA is still working in Louisiana. bluedigger Feb 2015 #24
FEMA Existed Anyway ProfessorGAC Feb 2015 #17
separate issue from the immediate possibility of shutting DHS down now. KittyWampus Feb 2015 #21
Doesn't really address the issue NuclearDem Feb 2015 #25
Well, lots of Civil Servants with families to feed would not be paid. NutmegYankee Feb 2015 #4
Remember that ranger out in the boonies RiffRandell Feb 2015 #5
So much falls under that umbrella that some part of it must be useful. winter is coming Feb 2015 #7
DHS was just a way to consolidate and strengthen intelligence agencies and "put them in line." MADem Feb 2015 #11
Suspicious containers JustAnotherGen Feb 2015 #13
I thought the industrial X-raying of containers took care of that problem. leveymg Feb 2015 #27
All depends, hope your not flying any where..... Historic NY Feb 2015 #14
Passports are still done at the State Fepartment, no? n/t Adrahil Feb 2015 #18
Downside Is Nearly Zero ProfessorGAC Feb 2015 #15
OMG our borders might be unprotected!!! Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #16
No matter what happens Homeland Security will not shut down. former9thward Feb 2015 #19
How did we ever get by before DHS and cell phones? L0oniX Feb 2015 #20
There are real, immediate implications for every day citizens if DHS is shut down. KittyWampus Feb 2015 #22
... handmade34 Feb 2015 #31
+1 It is just silly to dismiss it out of hand treestar Feb 2015 #34
I miss my Daily Color-Coded Alerts leveymg Feb 2015 #26
I think Katrina answered that question. RandySF Feb 2015 #28
Approximately 388,000 people work for Homeland Security Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #30
Isn't the Secret Service now a part of DHS? Lifelong Protester Feb 2015 #32
There's only one way to find out... CJCRANE Feb 2015 #33

marym625

(17,997 posts)
1. How about we move the money
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:31 AM
Feb 2015

To things like feeding the children, caring for the elderly, the disabled? Maybe some job growth that doesn't only help the top 3%?

KentuckyWoman

(6,692 posts)
2. who would feel up my boobs at the airport?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:08 AM
Feb 2015

If we fire the DHS no one would be paying the TSA agents who steal my stuff and grope me.... and I'm pretty sure they won't do that for free.

Seriously. It's not right I should fly without being groped and told my lipstick is a weapon.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
23. Is it known for sure that TSA would be unfunded?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 01:18 PM
Feb 2015

Often these threats to defund some part of Gov. turn out to be only the inconsequential segments of the budget.

IF TSA has to stand down, I am all for it.

handmade34

(22,757 posts)
29. in some defense
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:44 PM
Feb 2015

and explanation... my daughter was TSA until she hired onto ICE... defunding DHS would just cause the people that work for the agencies to have to work for delayed pay... it is a really stupid, bad idea all 'round...

as always it is the workers (such as my daughter) that get hurt

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
8. So even though the agency has been repaired/revamped after the Bush II sabotage...
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:18 AM
Feb 2015

The choice just because of Katrina is "Shet err down"?

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
24. FEMA is still working in Louisiana.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 01:23 PM
Feb 2015

I have a lot of friends there and spent three years myself as a civilian contractor for them. They are doing good work under difficult circumstances (i.e. working with Bobby Jindal's state government). I'd just as soon not see them laid off.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
21. separate issue from the immediate possibility of shutting DHS down now.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:31 PM
Feb 2015

So while I agree about FEMA and Secret Service out of DHS… it's not immediately practical.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
25. Doesn't really address the issue
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:37 PM
Feb 2015

In the midst of snowstorms and freezing temperatures, FEMA has to remain operating to help deal with potential emergencies.

On top of that, if FEMA shuts down, pre-disaster mitigation programs go with it, and a lot of local communities depend on FEMA funding for that sort of preparation.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
4. Well, lots of Civil Servants with families to feed would not be paid.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:12 AM
Feb 2015

But most would still be required to work.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
7. So much falls under that umbrella that some part of it must be useful.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:16 AM
Feb 2015

Personally, I'd like to see the DHS disbanded. I detest the word "homeland" and I don't believe that lumping all those agencies together did anything to foster communication between them.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. DHS was just a way to consolidate and strengthen intelligence agencies and "put them in line."
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:27 AM
Feb 2015

Frankly, I think they do better if they're a bit adversarial. You risk having some asshole not share needed information on the one hand, but that is balanced by avoiding 'groupthink' which can get us in huge trouble (see Vietnam, invasion of Iraq, stuff like that).

I say dump it--give the POTUS a WH advisor who can ride herd on intelligence agencies without the stupid "department" and the associated bloated staff full of political appointees. DHS is like Reagan's "Star Wars" -- a bigass government welfare project, designed to employ loyal stooges.

JustAnotherGen

(31,879 posts)
13. Suspicious containers
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:29 AM
Feb 2015

At ports/points of entry. From a commerce perspective it's sometimes better to be safe than make money. I also believe down in the Savannah Georgia area they do a good job of stepping in and helping people who are "shipped". Not sure if that's still going on but when I completed my import control and CTPAT training with the owner of a port control company owner in June 2011 there was a lot of that going on.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. I thought the industrial X-raying of containers took care of that problem.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:41 PM
Feb 2015

Sorry about that - a bit of Homeland Security humor.

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
14. All depends, hope your not flying any where.....
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:06 PM
Feb 2015

it could close, immigration, passport, federal facilities, a whole host of protective stuff including cybesecurity.

ProfessorGAC

(65,168 posts)
15. Downside Is Nearly Zero
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:07 PM
Feb 2015

The whole thing required only one team of IT specialists who would create system interfaces so all intelligence agencies knew what the others knew.

Would have cost $50 million a year instead of 50 billion

former9thward

(32,077 posts)
19. No matter what happens Homeland Security will not shut down.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:16 PM
Feb 2015

They have already said 90% of the employees will keep working. Only the "non essential" employees will be furloughed so the average person will not know the difference.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
22. There are real, immediate implications for every day citizens if DHS is shut down.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:33 PM
Feb 2015

I would prefer to see it broken apart but until that is done properly saying you want it shut down now BEFORE things have been sorted out or that it wouldn't impact regular people in America is flatly stupid.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
34. +1 It is just silly to dismiss it out of hand
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 03:11 PM
Feb 2015

There are a lot of things we are not aware of that it likely does that are things that need doing.

And there are terrorists who do plan attacks - I love the way they dismiss that out of hand as though it is impossible.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
30. Approximately 388,000 people work for Homeland Security
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:46 PM
Feb 2015

200,000 contractors and188,000 federal employees.

Even those who are considered critical and must come to work will not get paid.

Unless Congress acts and allows those who are not critical employees to get retroactive pay because Congressional Douche-bags could not come to an agreement, they are going to hurt by the loss of money.

The downside is that American citizens who have jobs will be hurt because Congress is occupied by partisan idiots. Partisan douche-bag idiots will be paid as usual.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there a downside to Ho...