Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The next time I see a post, criticizing Hillary for not announcing without explaining why Elizabeth (Original Post) BootinUp Feb 2015 OP
lol! HappyMe Feb 2015 #1
Hillary would be president RobertEarl Feb 2015 #11
But Hillary had to vote for the IWR in order to maintain her political viability... Fumesucker Feb 2015 #12
They do not like peaceniks RobertEarl Feb 2015 #13
Has Clinton said she is not running? TexasProgresive Feb 2015 #2
+1 Gman Feb 2015 #9
Fair warning, I will respond thusly : Autumn Feb 2015 #3
Someone at DU calling a fellow DUer a name? Buzz Clik Feb 2015 #4
WTF does this even mean? nt Logical Feb 2015 #5
I think it's supposed to sound enlightenment Feb 2015 #6
Then there are those who chastize us for even talking about it cause it's Too Soon. libdem4life Feb 2015 #7
Warren isn't running. Believe me many Hillary fans have made that clear. tracks29 Feb 2015 #8
Martn O'Malley and Jim Webb have established exploratory committee's. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2015 #10

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
1. lol!
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 06:23 PM
Feb 2015


Warren isn't running.

Nobody is at this point. Not until spring sometime.

What about people whining about criticism of not yet a candidate Hillary?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
12. But Hillary had to vote for the IWR in order to maintain her political viability...
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 08:16 PM
Feb 2015

Being seen as a peacenik would get her thrown a long way out of the Very Serious People caucus.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
2. Has Clinton said she is not running?
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 06:27 PM
Feb 2015

It seems I've heard Warren say she is not.

Makes no difference to me- I will vote for the Democratic party nominee in the general.

tracks29

(98 posts)
8. Warren isn't running. Believe me many Hillary fans have made that clear.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 06:59 PM
Feb 2015

And sadly they're correct.

To the main issue, there's no need for Hillary to announce yet. However if we get to July and there's no sign of it coming, I will start to get a little upset.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
10. Martn O'Malley and Jim Webb have established exploratory committee's.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 07:31 PM
Feb 2015

Hillary Clinton has expressed interest, and has tapped a large group of people to work on a Campaign if she says yes.

Biden has expressed interest but hasn't so far as I've seen done anything else.

Bernie Sanders expressed interest, has indicated he would run as a Democrat, and expressed that he does not think he can raise enough money.

There were some rumors that Andrew Cuomo would run, but he hasn't done anything about it.

Finally, there are three perennial candidates. Jeff Boss, Vermin Supreme, and Robby Wells.

And, of course, Elizabeth Warner who has stated five times publicly that she is not running, and further more she has not tapped people to work in her possible campaign, and not she wrote a letter to the Federal Election Commission disavowing any link with various groups trying to draft her to run.

Now, is that enough of a disclaimer to place when discussing a possible candidacy of Hillary Clinton?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The next time I see a pos...