Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:13 PM Feb 2015

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Model Defends Cover As Empowering

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- If Nashville fans thought they'd be rubbing elbows with models clad in bikinis at Wednesday's celebration of the 2015 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, they were disappointed, as all the models were fully clothed.

But the issue's cover model - Hannah Davis - did address the backlash about her provocative photo, in which she's pulling her bikini bottom down - a pose some critics have suggested is, well, overly suggestive.

''There's controversy every year, so I think it's kind of just silly that they're making it out to be the big thing; I mean it's the swimsuit issue,'' Davis said. ''There are far more scandalous pictures in the magazine if you open it up. It's a girl in a bikini, and I think it's empowering; I've been hearing it's degrading. I think the people who are saying that aren't feminists, because I think when you're a woman and you look at that picture and if you overanalyze it as anything more than just a full picture, it's just silly to me.''

https://celebrity.yahoo.com/news/sports-illustrated-swimsuit-issue-model-defends-cover-163547129--spt.html

211 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Model Defends Cover As Empowering (Original Post) NaturalHigh Feb 2015 OP
yes! Beaverhausen Feb 2015 #1
Certainly it empowered her bank account. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2015 #2
Undoubtedly. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #3
Good for her. nt RiffRandell Feb 2015 #6
And her fame Auggie Feb 2015 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Feb 2015 #20
+1 it is not empowering for women generally treestar Feb 2015 #52
you don't give society enough credit snooper2 Feb 2015 #165
Who is there and where did she get the wig? treestar Feb 2015 #173
you really don't know the greatness that is Kathy Griffin? snooper2 Feb 2015 #178
The last time I felt "empowered" and started to pull down my pants, I GummyBearz Feb 2015 #181
Empowering for whom and how? Spider Jerusalem Feb 2015 #4
It's her quote, not mine. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #9
I don't doubt it's empowering for her. kcr Feb 2015 #53
I agree and will defend a woman's right to control her own body every time. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2015 #149
No, you are speaking for her. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #11
I'm not, actually, speaking for her. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2015 #12
She never said that, but if were questioned she could answer like RiffRandell Feb 2015 #16
Except she did in fact say that. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2015 #17
Please! RiffRandell Feb 2015 #19
she's presuming to speak for other women. and to decide they're not feminists if they disagree ND-Dem Feb 2015 #105
Well damn... one_voice Feb 2015 #118
right, that's exactly what i said. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #121
You should give her a call and explain this in detail snooper2 Feb 2015 #168
personal attack on the poster is a good way to demonstrate one's lack of an argument ND-Dem Feb 2015 #176
grass is greener on the other side of the moon snooper2 Feb 2015 #179
Why? Why is she not allowed to have an opinion on what constitutes objectification, but others are? Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #58
What does it matter? Okay, so she's "allowed" to have that opinion. kcr Feb 2015 #66
I also don't see how bagging on the damn magazine endlessly is going to empower those women, either. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #80
If swimsuit models were paid less and ordinary women workers were paid more, it would be empowering. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #108
It would also have less than nothing to do with the point in question. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #114
They are genetic anomalies...which is why woolldog Feb 2015 #115
um...no. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #122
No what? Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #123
those fake grapefruits have nothing to do with genetics. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #133
Au contraire Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #148
try saline and plastic bags. which is why they look so preternaturally round and sharp edged. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #154
You spend way too much time looking at SI covers snooper2 Feb 2015 #169
attack the poster is always a good way to demonstrate one's lack of an argument ND-Dem Feb 2015 #175
Actually, yes. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #126
Thank you! smirkymonkey Feb 2015 #159
Well, when you think about it Bobbie Jo Feb 2015 #160
I look at it like this. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #195
Nothing pertaining to this topic is ever that simple for people to grasp. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #199
I know, but you would think that progressives... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #200
I caught on during the porn wars which I stayed out of as it seemed RiffRandell Feb 2015 #201
You were the catalyst for the 2014 SI wars? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #202
Not in a good way, though. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #203
Yeah, while she's young and pretty. smirkymonkey Feb 2015 #205
When she's older and babysitting her grandchildren... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #209
yes, I'm sure models are the only people featured in sports illustrated Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #210
I don't think so. She was responding to the statement as presented in the OP. Hekate Feb 2015 #96
What constitutes more "experienced?" RiffRandell Feb 2015 #99
You funny. I'm old enough to be her grandma, and I've lived and observed my whole life. Hekate Feb 2015 #104
Her life on her terms, that's empowerment. pintobean Feb 2015 #158
Well, maybe she feels sexy, healthy, and happy. Saboburns Feb 2015 #15
so you're saying that in order to feel that way, one must appear mostly naked in a men's magazine? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #109
But it's on someone else's terms. alarimer Feb 2015 #162
"I don't know why people keep ignoring the elephant in the room" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #174
Maybe you're correct Saboburns Feb 2015 #188
I think what is truly "problematic" is self-appointed arbiters of morality trying to tell consenting Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #24
Appalling. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #5
I feel empowered too. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #7
LOL! LondonReign2 Feb 2015 #93
Huh... one_voice Feb 2015 #10
Isn't it? RiffRandell Feb 2015 #21
Indeed. I read things... one_voice Feb 2015 #50
Apparently the whole "choice" thing only goes so far for some. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #59
I can't even explain as somehow we'll be mocked. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #71
Not to our 'faces' we won't be... one_voice Feb 2015 #102
So awesome! RiffRandell Feb 2015 #103
thanks! one_voice Feb 2015 #119
Sometimes referred to as "controlling the gaze" by women's studies types... HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #13
the models don't control where and at what men look. they're low on the totem pole. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #110
Whatever... when I wrote that it seemed the point of view was missing from the discussion HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #161
The models aren't 'controlling the gaze'. They don't own the media, they don't set up the shots, ND-Dem Feb 2015 #180
But they DO choose to work in the industry HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #183
please link me to any claims of slavery for SI swimsuit models. Models are the least powerful ND-Dem Feb 2015 #186
If anyone finds sexy naked or near-naked pics of me on usenet... hunter Feb 2015 #14
I looked just like Andy Gibb in my younger days. Now it's more like Andy Rooney. nt benz380 Feb 2015 #23
There are naked daguerrotypes of me out there, somewhere Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #26
They're not coming. Chellee Feb 2015 #31
I think the pony was spooked by something he saw Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #63
Don't frighten the horses! Comrade Grumpy Feb 2015 #131
You are tempting me. hunter Feb 2015 #33
Nothin' wrong with being preserved, artistically, in the old prime. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #55
Two of my high school classmates were featured in Playboy, and one in Penthouse. hunter Feb 2015 #92
Oh, puh-leeze. Laffy Kat Feb 2015 #18
Care to elaborate? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #22
Not really because I will be raked over the coals. Laffy Kat Feb 2015 #72
I truly can't see how this magazine cover hurts anyone. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #76
Obviously. Is that why you felt compelled to bring it to everyone's attention? Laffy Kat Feb 2015 #78
I wanted to reiterate that this woman... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #81
Well, she obviously doesn't know what she's saying. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #25
She's hoping for a pat on the head. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #27
She's hoping no one will notice Warpy Feb 2015 #30
What are we supposed to "get"? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #34
empowerment is a subjective concept. At most basic level, "empowerment" shakes out to Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #51
Women on the "M' side of "S&M" find that to be an empowering experience also. n/t DebJ Feb 2015 #137
Do they? Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #147
LOL HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #36
Well... she's a model. Marr Feb 2015 #28
+1000. I'm sure the $$ helped make it empowering as well nt riderinthestorm Feb 2015 #44
Yeah, like it's empowering dhol82 Feb 2015 #29
You think she bought them? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #32
Ummmmmmm dhol82 Feb 2015 #35
I consider myself a pretty good judge of such things... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #37
Don't care how young you are dhol82 Feb 2015 #39
Well, I've seen my fair share. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #40
What did they look like? dhol82 Feb 2015 #43
Let me think how to put this... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #45
Well dhol82 Feb 2015 #46
LOL...I can't argue with the lost youth part.... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #47
I agree with Naturalhigh--- I've seen them up close too. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #82
You're right. prayin4rain Feb 2015 #153
you need to get out of the boonies and walk around in a city sometime snooper2 Feb 2015 #170
Um - not sure what you think you are saying dhol82 Feb 2015 #189
yes. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #113
If I were a parent I would not want them to see that cover. leftyladyfrommo Feb 2015 #38
Agree dhol82 Feb 2015 #41
It is sad. leftyladyfrommo Feb 2015 #48
"they are too young and naïve to see just how they are being used"... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #54
Ummm, yeah dhol82 Feb 2015 #60
"When men do the same thing they are judged poorly also"... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #73
OK dhol82 Feb 2015 #75
This is the calendar I've bought the last couple years tammywammy Feb 2015 #84
I see nothing wrong with it. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #85
agreed. tammywammy Feb 2015 #86
I think I need that calandar. one_voice Feb 2015 #90
I've bought it for myself and given it as a gift. tammywammy Feb 2015 #98
Nice pix dhol82 Feb 2015 #157
the career athlete will also likely have a short career. and despite the big bucks, most players ND-Dem Feb 2015 #112
Those professions really are a lot alike. leftyladyfrommo Feb 2015 #164
That's undoubtedly true. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #198
I know, at 25 years old we need to take her under our wing and teach her more snooper2 Feb 2015 #171
When someone says they're not a prude melman Feb 2015 #49
Excellent dhol82 Feb 2015 #56
If that's "gynecological", it's the most non-invasive gynecological exam I've ever heard of. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #61
Referred to pix dhol82 Feb 2015 #64
I know, so am I. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #65
Sorry dhol82 Feb 2015 #69
I think the anecdotal horrified parent in the supermarket checkout line thing is overplayed. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #79
aging men appear to be pro-'empowerment'. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #116
I disagree. Babies dying of measels is sad. Fundamentalists murdering cartoonists is sad. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #57
OK dhol82 Feb 2015 #62
You are also a prude Augustus Feb 2015 #70
Looks like he can be added dhol82 Feb 2015 #74
I'm sorry to say that you are a prude Augustus Feb 2015 #68
No problem dhol82 Feb 2015 #77
Well said, Hannah LittleBlue Feb 2015 #42
porn! porn! porn! porn! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2015 #67
It didn't used to be 'empowering' to feminisits for women to show off skin; ND-Dem Feb 2015 #83
It's certainly not for me to decide... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #87
I don't think it's sad at all. Children being bombed is sad. People starving is sad. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #107
You're absolutely right. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #141
no, it's not a bit sad. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #143
LOL...okay. Thanks for that bit of "education." NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #152
I guess the flesh trade can be empowering to prayin4rain Feb 2015 #88
Well, I fail to see how it has any NEGATIVE effects. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #91
I have never understood why some feminists believe .... MicaelS Feb 2015 #89
It's the Andrea Dworkin syndrome. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #97
Where the fuck were you last year when I got hammered RiffRandell Feb 2015 #101
I got in on the SI wars late last year. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #117
I'll forgive you as I like you. RiffRandell Feb 2015 #167
Thank you very much! NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #185
the andrea dworkin syndrome is fat middle-aged male pornography consumers' pretense that all ND-Dem Feb 2015 #120
Well, I don't actually watch pornography. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #124
Quite interesting and telling you had to throw in the "fat" eptihet. n/t MicaelS Feb 2015 #128
i found the dworkin reference quite interesting and telling as well. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #129
I thought it was very accurate. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #130
i assumed you would. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #132
I have never understood people who think women have *ever* had veto power over other women. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #106
I don't think I should have veto power. But I do have, and will continue to always have DebJ Feb 2015 #136
You pretty much hit the nail on the head. HappyMe Feb 2015 #182
that is not the point treestar Feb 2015 #184
"Choices men don't have to make." NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #197
Holy cow treestar Feb 2015 #206
Who says women can't be the best artists or scientists? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #208
Is it time for the annual SI Swimsuit issue wars so soon? LondonReign2 Feb 2015 #94
Yeah, sure it is. I don't think it's "degrading," but all it does is use sex to sell whatever... Hekate Feb 2015 #95
my thing is CatWoman Feb 2015 #100
Empowering for her if she says so; made me want to barf closeupready Feb 2015 #111
Sigh. I remember when I was an empowered sex object. hunter Feb 2015 #125
LOL...my "selfie" would undoubtedly be hidden. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #127
There are pictures of my naked hot young self on the internet... hunter Feb 2015 #151
I hope to live long enough to see a discussion on here about a man in such a pose on the SI cover. DebJ Feb 2015 #134
I can guarantee you won't see... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #138
To be honest, if you read my other comments, I don't think much of them myself. DebJ Feb 2015 #140
Of course you're entitled to your opinion... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #150
We do seem to be going thru a wierd nudity thing leftyladyfrommo Feb 2015 #166
Men do pose in sexually-suggestive ways in magazines davidn3600 Feb 2015 #139
Good catch! When I clicked on it, the one in the top row far right DebJ Feb 2015 #142
Because no one cares when a male model does it davidn3600 Feb 2015 #146
That's a great point. You hit the nail on the head. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #193
actually, supposedly playgirl was for men more than women -- had more male subscribers. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #145
We have been taught from the cradle treestar Feb 2015 #207
We are also taught to respect women as people. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #211
Of course she'll defend it...she posed for it! Catherine Vincent Feb 2015 #135
The buyers and sellers will both defend it. prayin4rain Feb 2015 #144
Why? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #192
It's a nice picture. PeteSelman Feb 2015 #155
Me either. polly7 Feb 2015 #156
Look, it is a magazine Bettie Feb 2015 #163
I suppose in some small way it is. Orsino Feb 2015 #172
How is it the opposite of empowerment? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #191
Seriously. It is what it is. Her pose clearly invites viewers Ninga Feb 2015 #177
Her first modeling shoot was done at my buddy's pool AngryAmish Feb 2015 #187
Are you being serious? NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #190
Yes. but it wasn't my pool. AngryAmish Feb 2015 #204
Meanwhile, my fundy SIL went ballistic over the "pornographic" swimsuit issue Ex Lurker Feb 2015 #194
I know it's a stereotype... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #196

Response to Auggie (Reply #8)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
52. +1 it is not empowering for women generally
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:06 PM
Feb 2015

and not even for her, as the same society will find her too "old" to be "empowered" soon enough.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
165. you don't give society enough credit
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 11:35 AM
Feb 2015

society still finds lots of woman smart AND beautiful....

like the greatness that is!










 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
4. Empowering for whom and how?
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:20 PM
Feb 2015

It seems to be empowering the notion that women are there to be attractive objects for men to look at, yes; I am not really sure that this is "empowering" in a broader social sense, though. Certainly the idea that women own their own sexuality is empowering, but arguing that's what's being presented in this particular context seems problematic, at best.

kcr

(15,318 posts)
53. I don't doubt it's empowering for her.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:06 PM
Feb 2015

That gig pays big bucks. Life changing kind of money. But if she thinks it's empowering for anyone else, I don't know what world she's living in where a significant portion of women are making liveable wages posing in bikinis. Most can't do that. And it's not like a gorgeous woman in a bikini is some huge paradigm shift. What is so empowering about that? Now, a woman who isn't considered conventonally attractive? An older woman, for example? Well, the day a woman breaks the mold and can manage to sell her image successfully? That's when I'll stop rolling my eyes at talk of empowerment in that context.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
11. No, you are speaking for her.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:26 PM
Feb 2015

If you have a problem I suggest you join an anti-magazine crusade.

And take lessons on not speaking for other people.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
12. I'm not, actually, speaking for her.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:27 PM
Feb 2015

However she's presuming to speak for all women everywhere on the subject of what constitutes objectification (which she certainly doesn't have the right to do, either).

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
16. She never said that, but if were questioned she could answer like
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:38 PM
Feb 2015

several people on this site...or imagine this...HERSELF!

Just like she already did.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
17. Except she did in fact say that.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:40 PM
Feb 2015
"I've been hearing it's degrading. I think the people who are saying that aren't feminists"


That's a direct quote. I am not making things up, here.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
19. Please!
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:45 PM
Feb 2015

I got out of it exactly what she said. It's a picture!

Nice try.

I've been hearing it's degrading. I think the people who are saying that aren't feminists, because I think when you're a woman and you look at that picture and if you overanalyze it as anything more than just a full picture, it's just silly to me.''
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
105. she's presuming to speak for other women. and to decide they're not feminists if they disagree
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Feb 2015

with her. (and also to brand herself as some 'true feminist')

in fact, she's selling her sexuality, same as a 19th century prostitute did. and heaven knows, that was certainly 'empowering'.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
118. Well damn...
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:02 AM
Feb 2015

she's all but called a prostitute on a liberal message board. Seriously, what the fuck universe did I stumble into.

she's selling her sexuality, same as a 19th century prostitute did. and heaven knows, that was certainly 'empowering'.







Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
58. Why? Why is she not allowed to have an opinion on what constitutes objectification, but others are?
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:12 PM
Feb 2015

Oh, right, there's only one set of viewpoints about that gibberish that people are "allowed" to have.

kcr

(15,318 posts)
66. What does it matter? Okay, so she's "allowed" to have that opinion.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:22 PM
Feb 2015

I was no more empowered the second before she took that picture than I was the second after. It didn't affect me one bit. I'm not empowered. Maybe, somehow it did empower the rest of the billions of other women on this planet that are not highly paid swimsuit models, but I"m struggling to see how that could be. Good for her self empowered self.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
80. I also don't see how bagging on the damn magazine endlessly is going to empower those women, either.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:02 PM
Feb 2015

Although someone tried to argue the other day that the thing would be directly detrimental to Hillary's campaign.

Which strikes me as a bit o' a stretch.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
108. If swimsuit models were paid less and ordinary women workers were paid more, it would be empowering.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:48 PM
Feb 2015

High wages for a handful of young women to expose skin ain't empowering to anyone but them -- and then just because of the money.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
114. It would also have less than nothing to do with the point in question.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:01 AM
Feb 2015

I think the minimum wage should be higher, too, but it isnt sports illustrated that underpays McDonalds workers.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
115. They are genetic anomalies...which is why
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:01 AM
Feb 2015

they are paid so much. Similar to why great athletes are paid so much. Models' looks are a rare commodity just as athletic prowess as well is a rare commodity. Both make a lot of money and as a result pay those blessed with those qualities well. Simple supply and demand

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
123. No what?
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:21 AM
Feb 2015

He's right. They're paid what they're paid because lots of people want to buy the magazine.

That's what people do, they buy stuff they want, with money, and if enough people want something the price of it goes up.

it's not that complicated.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
148. Au contraire
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:10 AM
Feb 2015

It took billions of years of evolution to get the human brain to the point where it could invent and use photoshop.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
159. Thank you!
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 09:18 AM
Feb 2015

It's really all about the money. It kind of makes me sick when they throw the "empowerment" term around so loosely.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
195. I look at it like this.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:14 PM
Feb 2015

She enjoys modeling, and she landed one of the most coveted modeling jobs in the world. She's secure enough to ignore all the hand wringers who tsk-tsk at her career choice. That's pretty empowering.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
200. I know, but you would think that progressives...
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:40 PM
Feb 2015

would be on board with the whole "her body, her choice" thing. Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic on that point.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
201. I caught on during the porn wars which I stayed out of as it seemed
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015

useless, but yes, I was the catalyst for the SI cover last year.

I was in a silly mood as in my part of the woods we had unexpected storms where kids were home all week and my husband came home from an international trip.

Made friends, enemies but no regrets.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
203. Not in a good way, though.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:53 PM
Feb 2015

It caused a bunch of shit. I honestly did not realize people would freak over it...seriously.

Jesus...it's a magazine.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
205. Yeah, while she's young and pretty.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 10:25 PM
Feb 2015

Then she will be discarded. Hope she saves her money. We'll see how empowering her irrelevance gets as she ages.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
209. When she's older and babysitting her grandchildren...
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:03 PM
Feb 2015

she will be able to pull out that magazine and show them. They'll undoubtedly think grandma has lived a pretty cool life.

Athletes get old and have to find different things to do too. They too need to save their money and plan for the future. There's a lot less hand wringing for them, though, even though their chosen careers often lead to crippling injuries and life-altering brain trauma.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
210. yes, I'm sure models are the only people featured in sports illustrated
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 12:05 AM
Feb 2015

Whose career prospects diminish after, say, age 30.

Hekate

(90,743 posts)
96. I don't think so. She was responding to the statement as presented in the OP.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:59 PM
Feb 2015

I did the same thing in my response to the OP downthread. I'm not "speaking for" the bikini model; but as an older and more experienced woman, I am in a sense "talking to" her or at least using that as a springboard for the discussion here.

Unless that makes you uncomfortable?

Hekate

(90,743 posts)
104. You funny. I'm old enough to be her grandma, and I've lived and observed my whole life.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:40 PM
Feb 2015

At least one of my bosses loved to empower women right into bed. One even got promoted, but mostly they didn't get anything so useful as that. I was a good looking chick myself, but I had other goals in mind than getting shtupped by him so I finally left.

My life on my terms, that's empowerment.

If you are in a position to do so, Helping other women get ahead, blazing a path for other women -- those are all forms of empowerment.

Pulling your bikini bottom almost off? Not so much. Hope she enjoys the paycheck, but it'll be a short lived career, and surely won't be helping very many other women.

Like I said, a lifetime goes into my comments. Not a modeling gig.



 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
158. Her life on her terms, that's empowerment.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 08:43 AM
Feb 2015

She is an adult woman, capable of making her own decisions. I'm sure she's aware of opinions like yours.

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
15. Well, maybe she feels sexy, healthy, and happy.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:30 PM
Feb 2015

You know, it's ok to feel sexy, healthy, and happy.

Even for girls.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
109. so you're saying that in order to feel that way, one must appear mostly naked in a men's magazine?
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:49 PM
Feb 2015

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
162. But it's on someone else's terms.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 09:55 AM
Feb 2015

If she looked some way other than she does, she wouldn't feel so empowered.

She (probably with some help) looks the way women are "supposed" to look: hot.

When she no longer does, she will be ignored as non-hot women (whatever the definition of that is at the time) ALWAYS are, in pop culture.

I don't know why people keep ignoring the elephant in the room: that women are expected to always look or be a certain way, so as to turn the men on. They claim that is it a choice to do so or not do so. I'd say that it is not really a choice. There is an enormous amount of societal pressure (on women, especially, but on men too) to be pleasing to someone else's eye.

The thing is, we have all absorbed that message, unconsciously. Put someone else on the cover of that magazine and see the howls of outrage as someone not "hot" dares to exist.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
174. "I don't know why people keep ignoring the elephant in the room"
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:13 PM
Feb 2015

Because nobody wants to see an elephant in a string bikini?

Saboburns

(2,807 posts)
188. Maybe you're correct
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

She would be much happier putting down people for appearing as she does, by posting messages on an internet message board.

And damn her for looking like she does. The fool.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. I think what is truly "problematic" is self-appointed arbiters of morality trying to tell consenting
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:53 PM
Feb 2015

adults what they "should" or "shouldn't" do with their own bodies.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
10. Huh...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:24 PM
Feb 2015
It's a girl in a bikini, and I think it's empowering; I've been hearing it's degrading. I think the people who are saying that aren't feminists, because I think when you're a woman and you look at that picture and if you overanalyze it as anything more than just a full picture, it's just silly to me.''


Interesting....

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
50. Indeed. I read things...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:03 PM
Feb 2015

and I'm shaking my head at some of the things that are said about the women that CHOOSE to do this. If men or other women were to insult women in the same manner or use some of the same language a fire would rain down. I don't understand it.

They're paid well. Many are married and live a very fulfilled life. If modeling isn't your cup of tea that's find but is it necessary to berate and belittle women that CHOOSE do to it?

I've said it before and I'll say it again, women are the women's worst enemies. They can be the most hurtful and the cruelest. How are we supposed to build each other up when we're busy tearing each other down.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
59. Apparently the whole "choice" thing only goes so far for some.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:12 PM
Feb 2015

This young woman is doing nothing illegal, nothing immoral, is making big money and enjoying herself. Why is that such a bad thing for some? Is it just because men (and many women) enjoy looking at her?

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
71. I can't even explain as somehow we'll be mocked.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:36 PM
Feb 2015

Yet deep down they are ugly (personality) and unfulfilled so it's taken out on other people....the more prettier the better.

You and I should take it as a compliment!

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
102. Not to our 'faces' we won't be...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:26 PM
Feb 2015

and if that happens I'll just say my peace. I'm comfortable with who I am. I raised a very independent strong woman. She has a masters degree, owns her own home. She does a lot of volunteer work. She's physically fit--she a runner and does races/marathons/spartan races. And she's been in bikini contests when she was in Vegas. She was in 2 magazines. No one EVER uses her or degrades her.

This is her finishing her first marathon. Before this she'd done 1/2 marathons.




I'll brag about my son another time.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
13. Sometimes referred to as "controlling the gaze" by women's studies types...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:28 PM
Feb 2015

SO was a director of Women's Studies so the notion of 'empowering' woke a memory...

The phenomenon is related to but even more engaged than claiming a disparaging identifier as one's own.

There is no doubt that men look. Controlling where and what they are looking at is the source of power...and of course for models there is also money from the gig.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
161. Whatever... when I wrote that it seemed the point of view was missing from the discussion
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 09:27 AM
Feb 2015

I inserted it.

People can agree with it, pick at it, argue that activists and/or scholars who think and write about empowerment via control of the gaze (at women's bodies) are deluded or debased, it doesn't matter to me.

Awareness that this is a developed concept in the discipline of Women's Studies is something that people who argue over these issues would benefit by, if only because having foreknowledge means better capacity to engage in discussions on the topic and to understand that single points of view are limiting when dealing with attempts to understand human behavior.

It seems very likely that people who work in industries that involve controlling the gaze at women are aware of the concept, whether or not an individual model makes the choices of clothing, posture, etc for a particular photo. That the woman in the photo on the SI cover used the word empowerment suggests that she does have a grasp of the concept and that she experienced the positive feedback of empowerment from that work.

Knowing the vocabulary used in discussing the concept, whatever ones feelings are about erotica or psychological manipulation of advertising and magazine layout, facilitates seeking understanding of what empowerment might mean in those contexts with just an internet search of key phrases "empowerment" and "control of the gaze".


 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
180. The models aren't 'controlling the gaze'. They don't own the media, they don't set up the shots,
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:37 PM
Feb 2015

they aren't the advertisers or corporate owners, they're just (sometimes) well-paid workers.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
183. But they DO choose to work in the industry
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 05:17 PM
Feb 2015

I'm not sure you can validate claims of slavery for SI swimsuit models. You can try... I'll read your attempt with an open mind.

Anyone who stands in front of groups, literally as actors and teachers do, or figuratively as models do vicariously, or both literally and figuratively as many politicians do will tell you that there is tremendous emotional feedback from that process.

To deny that psychological boost that people get, is simply to try to suppress expression of what is widely felt.

I don't make that as a claim to goodness of people who employ female (or male) bodies to attract attention. I only recognize that people are attracted to look. And the looking is controlled.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
186. please link me to any claims of slavery for SI swimsuit models. Models are the least powerful
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 08:54 PM
Feb 2015

actors in modeling. To claim that they're in 'control' of anything is ridiculous, except in some high profile special cases.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
14. If anyone finds sexy naked or near-naked pics of me on usenet...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:29 PM
Feb 2015

... feel free to post them here.

No, I will not provide keywords, but damn, for a couple of years there I was hot.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
26. There are naked daguerrotypes of me out there, somewhere
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:56 PM
Feb 2015

probably still being transmitted by telegraph wire. Or smoke signal.

Chellee

(2,101 posts)
31. They're not coming.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:18 PM
Feb 2015

They were sent by pony express.

But the pony was old, and he died on the way.



In lieu of flowers, please send memoriums to 'Old West Home for Retired Ponies.'

hunter

(38,321 posts)
33. You are tempting me.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:19 PM
Feb 2015

When I was young a girlfriend convinced me to pose nude for a drawing class.

The best drawings were later displayed in the college administration building.

So I was standing there looking at a drawing of me.

A woman, maybe twenty years older than I was, old enough to be my mom, walked up, examined the drawing, and suddenly exclaimed "Oh! That's you!"

We both blushed and walked off in opposite directions.

I'm not sure why I was embarrassed. Even my mom has seen me naked plenty of times before that, and after that.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
92. Two of my high school classmates were featured in Playboy, and one in Penthouse.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:47 PM
Feb 2015

Another was a successfully suicidal porn star.

In my Southern California high school class of 600+ I don't know if this is a statistical anomaly or not.

I have tales too ticklish to tell about the Penthouse model, and another about one of the Playboy models.

In high school I wanted to be a television engineer and that was my first major in college. After my second year I applied for a summer job/internship and it seemed fairly innocuous by the advertisements, I only had to manage cables and such. But during the interview I walked onto a San Fernando Valley film set and people were fucking.



The guy who was interviewing me immediately noticed my distress, and handed me more than enough cash to pay for my time, gasoline, and lunch. No more of that. Forget it ever happened.

It could've been worse, I met a woman years later, someone I'd gone to grade school and middle school with, who told me the same guy had once grabbed her head with one hand, her breast with the other, and stuck his tongue in her mouth.



She'd fled too, but she didn't get any money.

That fall I changed my major to biology, for a couple of reasons, one of them being that unlike the engineering classes, the majority of biology majors were women and they were all less likely to talk about cars and "babes" in the labs, hallways, or dining halls.

In the curious life of Hunter, my first serious girlfriend, and my always in-between-the-crashing-and-burning relationships-girlfriend, was a future network engineer with a fondness for cars and babes and flat chested very messed up and damaged waifs.

I tell myself I was an exception, and not just another one of her messed up waifs, one who just happened to have a penis.

Laffy Kat

(16,384 posts)
72. Not really because I will be raked over the coals.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:51 PM
Feb 2015

Yes, I believe all people should do whatever they want with their bodies as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. And, yes, I believe the magazine is exploitative and hurts women and girls. It's insidious. But I grow weary of this fight. I know the drill. My fellow leftists will accuse me of being asexual and a poor sport. That's why I usually sit these posts out.

Laffy Kat

(16,384 posts)
78. Obviously. Is that why you felt compelled to bring it to everyone's attention?
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:59 PM
Feb 2015

You wanted to declare how empowering it is to women? Good for you. Go in peace.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
81. I wanted to reiterate that this woman...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:05 PM
Feb 2015

is not the victim of the "patriarchy" that some paint her to be. She made a choice to be photographed in a provocative pose, and she was undoubtedly well compensated for it. Where is the harm in that?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. Well, she obviously doesn't know what she's saying.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 07:55 PM
Feb 2015

Clearly she has been brainwashed to believe this horrific wrongthink

Warpy

(111,300 posts)
30. She's hoping no one will notice
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:16 PM
Feb 2015

the huge gap between empowerment and doing a striptease.

After all, the swimsuit itself was OK for the average exhibitionist. It was the bottom pulled halfway down that made it cross the line.

Not that I expect many straight males to get it.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
51. empowerment is a subjective concept. At most basic level, "empowerment" shakes out to
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:05 PM
Feb 2015

"feeling empowered".

If she says it empowered her, or made her feel empowered, it did.

I realize that some people think that the only real "Truth" is the gibberish-heavy gospel they learned in their postgrad sociology classes, but the simple fact is that folks can't order people to not feel empowered by something just because it makes them personally, mad.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
147. Do they?
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:08 AM
Feb 2015

I'm not one, so I can't verify that blanket statement, or not.

I suspect at least some do, or some would assert that they do, which again, isn't all that different to my mind.

And again, if everyone's a consenting adult, I see no problem with any of it.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
29. Yeah, like it's empowering
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:15 PM
Feb 2015

to have the most expensive boobs money can buy and expose myself to within a hairsbreadth of not being able to be on the magazine rack.

Ummmmm - not my taste. Don't deny anyone else. Just not what I would consider empowering.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
37. I consider myself a pretty good judge of such things...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:27 PM
Feb 2015

and I didn't think they were fake. Mind you, I'm not being critical one way or the other.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
39. Don't care how young you are
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:31 PM
Feb 2015

the boobs do not stand up like that and have edges if they are just natural boobs.

Perhaps you have seen many fakes?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
40. Well, I've seen my fair share.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:34 PM
Feb 2015

When I was in my early twenties, I dated an older woman with implants. They didn't look like these.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
45. Let me think how to put this...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:50 PM
Feb 2015

Very large, very...stationary. I was young and thought it was the greatest thing ever. Of course, just being with an older woman was exciting at the time.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
46. Well
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:54 PM
Feb 2015

that's what those boobs on the model look like.

You might be remembering with the haze of lost youth.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
82. I agree with Naturalhigh--- I've seen them up close too.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:07 PM
Feb 2015

Who knows, maybe the medical technology has changed since those days, but those don't look like implants on the cover of the SI issue to me.

Photoshopped? Totally possible.

prayin4rain

(2,065 posts)
153. You're right.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:25 AM
Feb 2015

I was curious because it never occurred to me that they were fake, so i looked it up. Google has lots of images of her in bikinis pre-breast implants and there's nothing there.... like a double A, maybe. Breast implants have certainly improved in the last ten years.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
189. Um - not sure what you think you are saying
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

I live in NYC. Home of millions of fake boobs.

What should I be looking at?

leftyladyfrommo

(18,869 posts)
38. If I were a parent I would not want them to see that cover.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:30 PM
Feb 2015

And I'm hardly a prude. I just saw that magazine at Walgreens right out front on the counter and just went "Whoa." I really think they pushed that one too far.

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
41. Agree
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:35 PM
Feb 2015

I am not a prude at all. But, that sweep of the bikini bottom is way beyond propriety.

In essence, the mons pubis is exposed. Frankly looks like they had to airbrush out the top part of the labia.

What is the point? What statement are they making?

The sweet young thing is just playing her points and trying to buff up her bank account before she gets aged out of the mix.

Whole thing is just sad.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,869 posts)
48. It is sad.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 08:57 PM
Feb 2015

I hate to see young women exploited like this. I hate to see them buying into the whole "being hot" thing.

They are being exploited because they are too young and naïve to see just how they are being used.

I hate it.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
54. "they are too young and naïve to see just how they are being used"...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:07 PM
Feb 2015

Are you serious? How well do you think she was paid for this photo shoot? How big a boost will this be for her career?

Why is it that when a woman uses her looks to her advantage people think it's such a bad thing? Does the same standard apply to men when they appear scantily clothed?

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
60. Ummm, yeah
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:14 PM
Feb 2015

When men do the same thing they are judged poorly also.

I am sure she was paid handsomely for this photo shoot. Hope that she is of the saving sort. She will need it. Women in this profession have a short life. It is good that she has hooked up with a wealthy professional athlete.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
73. "When men do the same thing they are judged poorly also"...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:51 PM
Feb 2015

I beg to differ. If a man were on the cover of a magazine slightly pulling down a speedo, there would be no backlash like what we've seen toward this woman. In fact, I've never seen such vitriol when a man posed while dressed in skimpy attire.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
84. This is the calendar I've bought the last couple years
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:17 PM
Feb 2015

Hangs in my kitchen.

http://www.warwickrowers.org/product/2015-calendar/

Those men are celebrated because they make a donation to an excellent cause. They're actually naked, with bare butts, but never pictured full frontal.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
90. I think I need that calandar.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:45 PM
Feb 2015


I'm looking forward to the ESPN body edition. I think the pictures in there (all naked) are gorgeous. Men and women. My husband buys it for me every year.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
98. I've bought it for myself and given it as a gift.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:01 PM
Feb 2015

It's a lovely calendar, and they do donate to a good cause.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
112. the career athlete will also likely have a short career. and despite the big bucks, most players
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:59 PM
Feb 2015

and models typically don't wind up rich in their old age.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,869 posts)
164. Those professions really are a lot alike.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 11:30 AM
Feb 2015

They both treat people like they are a piece of meat.

When the sell by date expires they are both gone.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
198. That's undoubtedly true.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:35 PM
Feb 2015

The difference is few people call athletic careers degrading or wring their hands at the example being set.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
171. I know, at 25 years old we need to take her under our wing and teach her more
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:00 PM
Feb 2015

I think a burqa training camp would be a good start LOL

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
56. Excellent
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:10 PM
Feb 2015

You would like your child to see the gynecological pix, I am sure. Do tell.

Have no problem with any porn you would like to present. Do have a problem with the SI cover on the news stands.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
61. If that's "gynecological", it's the most non-invasive gynecological exam I've ever heard of.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:14 PM
Feb 2015

You could make a mint, selling that gynecologist's office to women.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
65. I know, so am I.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:20 PM
Feb 2015

There is nothing "gynecological" about that picture. She is pulling her bathing suit bottom down a little, but you do not actually see her genitalia in any way, shape, or form.

And as others have noted, it's not the first time they've run pictures showing that move, either:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6193705

dhol82

(9,353 posts)
69. Sorry
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:30 PM
Feb 2015

Really do think that it is far enough down to have needed to be airbrushed to clean up the top of the labial cleft.

Just not necessary.

Would like to know the thinking behind this. Can't get over the thought it was a bunch of guys saying 'how low can we go?'

Can't imagine many parents being happy with this cover on the racks at the supermarket.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
79. I think the anecdotal horrified parent in the supermarket checkout line thing is overplayed.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:00 PM
Feb 2015

I haven't seen it in the supermarket checkout line, usually the magazines they have anywhere near where the kids can see them is crap like "Us" or the National Enquirer, and personally the most annoying thing my kids see at the supermarket is big bright boxes of gum and candy, which inevitably spur a debate over buying or not buying said items, and WHY NOT

The dreaded labial cleft-laden magazine cover has never, actually, been a problem.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
57. I disagree. Babies dying of measels is sad. Fundamentalists murdering cartoonists is sad.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:10 PM
Feb 2015

World poverty and hunger, polar bears on shrinking ice floes, homeless vets... sad, sad, sad.

An attractive young woman in a bikini on a magazine cover, to my mind, is not "sad".

 

Augustus

(63 posts)
70. You are also a prude
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:30 PM
Feb 2015
prude
noun
a person who is or claims to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity.


Usually, when one starts a sentence with "I am not an X, but...", it's an indication that that person is, indeed, an X.
 

Augustus

(63 posts)
68. I'm sorry to say that you are a prude
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:29 PM
Feb 2015
Prude
noun
a person who is or claims to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity.
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
83. It didn't used to be 'empowering' to feminisits for women to show off skin;
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:13 PM
Feb 2015

it used to be seen as a sign of a male-dominated society.

when did it become 'empowering' among 'feminists'? when did the people who questioned it become 'not feminists'?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
87. It's certainly not for me to decide...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:38 PM
Feb 2015

who is or is not a feminist, but I think it's sad that some criticize this young woman for showing off her body.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
141. You're absolutely right.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:56 AM
Feb 2015

Children being bombed is sad. People starving is sad. Attacking people for displaying their sexuality is also sad. Attacking people for enjoying that display is equally sad.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
143. no, it's not a bit sad.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:00 AM
Feb 2015

Sadness is emotional pain associated with, or characterized by feelings of disadvantage, loss, despair, helplessness and sorrow. An individual experiencing sadness may become quiet or lethargic, and withdraw themselves from others. Crying is often an indication of sadness.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadness

prayin4rain

(2,065 posts)
88. I guess the flesh trade can be empowering to
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:39 PM
Feb 2015

some individual women who find themselves in the right situation. But for women, or society for that matter, as a whole, I don't see any positive effects.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
91. Well, I fail to see how it has any NEGATIVE effects.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:47 PM
Feb 2015

The human body is a beautiful thing, and the human animal is a sexual animal. What is the harm in acknowledging, and even celebrating that?

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
89. I have never understood why some feminists believe ....
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:45 PM
Feb 2015

They should have some sort of veto power over what other women choose to do in life. I have never understood the concept of pushing individual choice, but then having to get approval from the group over what you do.

The old adage "my body, my choice" would apply here, too. Just like it does for reproductive choice.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
97. It's the Andrea Dworkin syndrome.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:00 PM
Feb 2015

Supposedly females who express their sexuality are "tools of the patriarchy" who are looking for "a pat on the head."

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
101. Where the fuck were you last year when I got hammered
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:14 PM
Feb 2015

for posting? I saw it on the news and was all straight up yes.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
120. the andrea dworkin syndrome is fat middle-aged male pornography consumers' pretense that all
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:07 AM
Feb 2015

criticism of their habit is made by ugly feminists and therefore laughable.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
136. I don't think I should have veto power. But I do have, and will continue to always have
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:49 AM
Feb 2015

the right to my opinion that it is just really sad to market your meat for money.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
184. that is not the point
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 07:43 PM
Feb 2015

it's the choices women have to make in a sexist society. Choices men don't have to make. It's not a privilege to have the choice of being exploited. It's not a chance. Better chances would be there in an equal society.

The choice to be exploited for men's entertainment is not a great privilege.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
197. "Choices men don't have to make."
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:30 PM
Feb 2015

Actually, it's more like "an opportunity that men don't have." Plenty of men would love to be on the cover of the SI Swimsuit issue and collect a huge paycheck for it, but that's going to happen because it wouldn't sell.

This young lady landed the dream job of any model, and yes, I would say that's a great privilege.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
206. Holy cow
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:25 AM
Feb 2015

so you are defending exploitation as an "opportunity?" No just no. Men would not love that chance if they had it. The very reason they don't have it is their superiority, that they get to pursue being themselves, not objectification. Claiming they want it is a way of trying to make the women feel better about it, when they know they'll never have to do it.

No it is not a great privilege. Just no. Being the best looking woman is the best you can do, rather than being the best artist or scientist? No.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
208. Who says women can't be the best artists or scientists?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:15 PM
Feb 2015

You didn't read that in my post.

As for my reply, I stand by what I said.

Hekate

(90,743 posts)
95. Yeah, sure it is. I don't think it's "degrading," but all it does is use sex to sell whatever...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:52 PM
Feb 2015

Which has been going on for a hundred years in the world of advertising. And how, exactly, is that empowering? You're just being used.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
111. Empowering for her if she says so; made me want to barf
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:55 PM
Feb 2015

because I say so. Tacky and low class, but it's the cover of the swimsuit issue, so I guess I'm entitled to my own opinion.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
127. LOL...my "selfie" would undoubtedly be hidden.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:31 AM
Feb 2015

Fortunately I go out of my way to make sure there are no pictures of me on the internets.

hunter

(38,321 posts)
151. There are pictures of my naked hot young self on the internet...
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:23 AM
Feb 2015

... among the earliest and fairly anonymous internet naked people. Not my own doing.

But I'll not tell how to find them.

We used to upload pics from German magazines, my girlfriend and I, and we communicated in German well enough. Alas I've lost most of my German, along with the Latin Binomial nomenclature of California Flora. Occasionally I can say, hey, that's a California Coastal Live Oak, Quercus agrifolia or something somewhat intelligent like that, but not always.

Anyways, a university librarian found out what we were about so she'd put her big black ink university library "received" stamp on all the naughty bits.

Mind you, it was all one bit graphics, or at best four bit EGA then.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
134. I hope to live long enough to see a discussion on here about a man in such a pose on the SI cover.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:48 AM
Feb 2015

And have him say how 'empowering' the experience was.

And read the comments on DU.

LOL.


NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
138. I can guarantee you won't see...
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:51 AM
Feb 2015

all the vitriol and condemnation that you see for female models.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
140. To be honest, if you read my other comments, I don't think much of them myself.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:56 AM
Feb 2015

Just my opinion, and I'm entitled to that.

There are things I could have done in life when I desperately needed money,
but I valued other things more. My choice.

Her choices are not those I'd ever want to see my grand-daughter make.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
150. Of course you're entitled to your opinion...
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:21 AM
Feb 2015

just as I'm entitled to my opinion that this woman's display is perfectly acceptable and even healthy.

I think the Puritan-type shaming of sexuality is what's unhealthy.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,869 posts)
166. We do seem to be going thru a wierd nudity thing
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 11:35 AM
Feb 2015

right now.

I think it's kind of "in" to do something "nude and shocking." Miley Cyrus is showing her nipples daily right now. It's really kind of odd.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
142. Good catch! When I clicked on it, the one in the top row far right
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:57 AM
Feb 2015

is almost the same pose!

On edit: But I doubt there are any quotes about how the model found this to be 'empowering'.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
146. Because no one cares when a male model does it
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:04 AM
Feb 2015

No one cares when a man is on the cover of these magazines.

When it's a woman, there is controversy from every angle. To attack that backlash is what's empowering. She's basically saying, "It is my life, and I'm going to do this no matter what you say."

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
193. That's a great point. You hit the nail on the head.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:04 PM
Feb 2015

I think it's also a way of saying "Hey, I don't have to cover up, and I'm not going to do so just to satisfy anyone's Puritan tendencies."

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
145. actually, supposedly playgirl was for men more than women -- had more male subscribers.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:01 AM
Feb 2015

or so I read at some point.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
207. We have been taught from the cradle
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:27 AM
Feb 2015

that we are the objects, not men. A few poses like that are not something we are used to. Of course they aren't popular. We are taught to respect men as people, more than just their bodies.

prayin4rain

(2,065 posts)
144. The buyers and sellers will both defend it.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 01:00 AM
Feb 2015

I just wish they'd buy and sell a little less publicly, but alas.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
156. Me either.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 06:51 AM
Feb 2015

If I still looked like that, was given the opportunity and could make that kind of money you can bet your sweet patootie I'd be showin' it off a little. If I had a daughter or son that wanted to do the same ........ no problem. Looks like that don't last forever, it's not going to be something she'll regret later, and hopefully, she'll have made enough money to help herself out for a while. People model hands for commercials, faces for cosmetics, feet for pete's sake ......... why not bodies? Also, this isn't just a men's magazine, I used to read it all the time. I don't see what the problem is, other than trying to control what other women do with their own bodies as part of shaming them, for some reason.

Bettie

(16,116 posts)
163. Look, it is a magazine
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 09:56 AM
Feb 2015

If she feels like it empowers her, fine, that's great. She also probably made a lot of money out of the deal.

But I can still look at it and see both her right to feel that way AND how it demonstrates the lens that our society sees women through.

Why is it threatening to so many to acknowledge that our society at large views women in a highly sexualized and rather distorted way? That no matter what a woman accomplishes, the first thing that is usually commented on is how she looks.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
172. I suppose in some small way it is.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:03 PM
Feb 2015

Without some such outlet, the model might have to work for a living.

Objectification, however, is pretty much the opposite of empowerment.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
191. How is it the opposite of empowerment?
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 08:56 PM
Feb 2015

I would imagine it's very healthy for this models self esteem at the very least. If she says it's empowering for her, I think we should take her at her word.

Ninga

(8,276 posts)
177. Seriously. It is what it is. Her pose clearly invites viewers
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:29 PM
Feb 2015

to join her in further disrobing. It is not a feminist state,net. It is hers. Just sayin.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
204. Yes. but it wasn't my pool.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 10:14 PM
Feb 2015

On edit, my buddy's son who is my age and CC's age was a photobug and still is. He put the thing together. My buddy just thought this hs girl was real tall and went back to writing his books.

Ex Lurker

(3,815 posts)
194. Meanwhile, my fundy SIL went ballistic over the "pornographic" swimsuit issue
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:14 PM
Feb 2015

and cancelled my 11 year old nephew's subscription.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
196. I know it's a stereotype...
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 09:23 PM
Feb 2015

but I really think a large majority of fundamentalists are sexually repressed and don't consider that it's unhealthy to think about perfectly normal sexual desires as sinful. It's the whole "Puritan" thing I keep talking about.

My old professor told us that Puritanism is the absolute terror that somebody, somewhere, might be having fun.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sports Illustrated Swimsu...