General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse GOP to fill empty seats with staffers to ensure 'standing ovations' for Netanyahu speech
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/11/1363815/-House-GOP-to-fill-empty-seats-with-staffers-to-ensure-standing-ovations-for-Netanyahu-speech?detail=hide#Wed Feb 11, 2015 at 10:48 AM PST
House GOP to fill empty seats with staffers to ensure 'standing ovations' for Netanyahu speech
by Hunter
He can practically taste his new war.
Because having him speak was intended as theater from the outset, of course.
@dylanotes
The standing ovations bit is a nice touch, since it implies the Republican chair warmers will be instructed specifically to applaud wildly at whatever the visiting foreign leader says. Again, it all makes for a curious bit of theater; Netanyahu and the Republicans want to sabotage negotiations between the sitting American president and Iran, a move that required working behind the White House's back in the first place. Now that complications have arisen, the Republicans are working to ensure the visual appearance of support for this act of minor sedition by attaching a Potemkin audienceby God, this foreign leader will receive standing ovations for his dispute with our president.
I have no strong feelings either way on whether Democrats should skip the speech. It would be hilarious to see Netanyahu give a speech to rows full of staffers and interns, but it would be equally karmic to see the churlish leader's reaction to an audience that had the audacity to not applaud his over-the-top pronouncements. House Speaker Boehner seems to make a special point of looking dull-eyed and uninterested when the American president comes to visit; perhaps Joe Biden could rearrange his schedule to come after all, but bring a pillow and a blanket in case he finds Netanyahu's version of events equally dull.
If nothing else, we know that Republicans are insistent not just that the foreign leader will be heard from, but that he will get an approving response even if they have to put ringers in the seats to ensure that. They're quite dedicated to the thought of going to war with IranIraq and Afghanistan didn't get it out of their system, and if anything only made it worse because Iraq and Afghanistan did not go according to neoconservative plans and now they're bitter and pissed off about thatand if it means Benjamin Netanyahu gets to come to Congress and ask them for a declaration of war that their own president won't yet give them, that's what they'll do.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Turbineguy
(37,359 posts)And announce it. Like a Magician telling you how he intends to fool you.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
deminks
(11,017 posts)I said he had come to collect his faelty in person. I don't think I was wrong.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)rather boycott the talk by pretending to be 'busy,' as Nancy Pelosi said.
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)session of Congress. I always assumed that if that was allowed, Congress would just round up homeless people off the streets, and fill the empty seats behind whatever Congressman is blathering to an empty house, so that the poor attendance wouldn't be so visible on C-SPAN.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...so that means they're selected bozos, not random.
- Random bozos would probably be better come to think of it.....
[font color=red]on edit: I call ''Random Bozos'' for my next garage band name![/font]
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)Good name, but very 1980s. That's okay, I guess. It would qualify as 'retro' these days.
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)And is it true that the RANDOM BOZOS were members of the "RANDOM MOB" that egged Richard Prebble in New Zealand?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R