General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Holder: Gun lobby 'simply won' by killing Sandy Hook reforms
The inability to enact new gun safety laws after the Sandy Hook school shooting ranks as "the single failure" of his tenure, Atty. Gen. Eric Holder said in a televised interview.
"The gun lobby simply won, you know?" Holder said in an interview with MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry which aired Sunday. In the interview, Holder reflected on his more than six years as the nation's top law enforcement officer.
Holder has called his visit to the site of the December 2012 massacre of 20 first-graders and six educators the worst day he had in office. In the aftermath of the shooting, President Obama appointed Vice President Joe Biden to lead a task force that would make recommendations for how to avoid such tragedies.
The shooting spurred an effort in the Senate to enact new, stricter gun laws, particularly a broader requirement for background checks for gun purchases proposed by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a conservative with a strong gun-rights record, and Republican Sen. Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/la-pn-holder-guns-20150208-story.html
jen1980
(77 posts)Uh huh.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)if they had not started by attempting to load it up with feel good laws that do nothing but piss off the most motivated groups.
VScott
(774 posts)it had the opposite effect and backfired resulting in many states passing even more pro 2nd amendment
legislation and protections.
Only in the more predictably, rabidly anti 2nd amendment/anti gun states were they successful... states that
would have passed legislation even without Sandy Hook.
VScott
(774 posts)People give the NRA too much credit at times.
Gun owners, 2nd amendment advocates everywhere (without any prodding from the NRA), simply stood
their ground, 'said enough is enough', and overwhelmed their representatives with emails and phone calls.
There wasn't one firearms related web forum that I'm aware of, that wasn't lit up like a Christmas tree with
angry (rightfully so), gun owners organizing and providing input toothers that had large impact on blocking
the proposed legislation.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)But the unconstitutional aspect of UBCs...interstate commerce and all that. ..
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)Nice.
90% of the American public wanted expanded background checks at minimum. Its obvious they listened more to the powerful gun lobby. The NRA, you well know, is not simply a firearms information organization, they are front for the massively huge gun manufacturers industry. That is who most legislators listened to at the expense of public safely, unfortunately.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)failing to close Gitmo and failing to stop massive data collections of the NSA don't count...
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)bobclark86
(1,415 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)Not continuing to imprison humans without charges? Hmm Mr. Holder, somehow I think history will remember it differently. .. "the single failure" of his tenure"...yeah
Oh yeah....the NSA bullshit.... lol...
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)As long as there are those pure in heart, with a desire to defend themselves against the unknown, reform is simply a word to be defined by the pure of heart.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)An old story in America.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)The constitution prevailed. ...the federal government has no jurisdiction to regulate intrastate commerce of used legal to own goods....if it would have passed, it would have been struck down almost as quickly as it passed. ..
onehandle
(51,122 posts)All of this gun nuttery will be buried with its racist roots.
Tick-tock...
SunSeeker
(51,724 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)so far, bupkus.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)That can't be. This is a librul forum. Unpossible.
The age of gun fascism started on June 26th, 2008.
Arming the modern Klan for a war that only exists in their racist minds.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)"The age of gun fascism started on June 6th, 2008."
Well, aside from the veiled Hitler reference. ..apparently you have forgotten the first term of Bill Clinton. ...more modern firearms and ammunition sold to the public than any other time in history...
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)sweetapogee
(1,168 posts)just happened to have Friday off so we went to Cabelas to look at fishing gear. The line at the gun counter was 3 people deep and the NICS terminals had long waiting lines. There wasn't any 22 ammo and no shotgun or pistol powder for reloaders. If anything, I believe a case could be made that guns are more popular now than ever. As mentioned, this was on a Friday.... before noon. From what I can tell, sales have been steady for years.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)It didn't start when Obama became president as the poster was pretending....it started when the Clinton administration started pushing for a bunch of gun control measures.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Assuming you mean fascism in the context of a violent, aggressive ideology that is not deterred by social convention and assuming, for the moment, that your point is something more than you just stringing buzz-words together then what you're claiming is the remedy for fascism is --
-- disarmament.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)It seems more likely that the age of gun control extremists is coming to an end.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)their own special Constitutional interpretation. Intrastate commerce? Idiots.
Response to flamin lib (Reply #14)
hack89 This message was self-deleted by its author.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)you resort to insulting millions upon millions of gun owners, Dems and Repubs alike.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Careful... Careful.......
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)childish penis reference in his signature
Yep, such nice polite dialog from you
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You seem fine with them lumping all firearms owners as killers, future murderers, gun humpers, delicate flowers, ammosexuals and of course as you even have in your signature the mandatory childish penis reference.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)but, you already knew that.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)but "any day now"
Paladin
(28,275 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)But, then again, you knew that.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Only the gun nuts. And idiots.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)remain undefined to the employers of the term can trot it out to save themselves from losing an open debate?
frylock
(34,825 posts)immediately following one of these tragic incidents for fear that Clinton Obama is going to confiscate everyone's guns. a gun nut is someone who hordes ammo, and then complains of some vast govt conspiracy because it's fukcing near impossible to find a brick of .22 LR. a gun nut is somebody who whines and cries about their Constitutional rights being infringed upon because they can no longer tote their AR-15 at the Starbucks. as someone who owns several firearms, that's my definition of a "gun nut."
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)The gun lobby simply -- and legally -- bribed congress and used fear & propaganda to gin up support among the loudest, most ignorant swaths of America.
More guns sold than ever before, to a smaller number of people than ever...
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)How do you know that it's a smaller number of people than ever?
Because some poll says so?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)calling other DU members that disagree with you position "gun nuts"
It must just piss you off you or EM can not censor us outside your little "safe haven"
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Perhaps you might pause from your erudition to exposit the as to reasons why the intrastate commerce is not applicable. I myself had never heard the argument offered until this thread. I'm interested in seeing the issue hashed-out.
Or you could just go on being a big ol' meanie-head.
pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Unfortunately, some claim it's only a "God Dammed Piece of Paper".
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)overturned and debated ad infinitum.
Take your half a brain and play with someone else with a half a brain.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Or is C-span2 lying...
Holders position on guns in general, is completely relevant to the topic.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)You remember Chicago - that gun-free, non-violent haven where there is absolutely no gun violence thanks to their handgun ban.
Oh wait - people were shot every day in Chicago when the ban was in place, and it's now been struck down.
Darb
(2,807 posts)just sayin'. Now you know that any gun law in a city, say Chicago or DC, is only as effective as the laws surrounding it, eg Virginia and Wisconsin/Indiana. So you can go ahead and pretend that the crime rates are high because of strict gun control laws, or you can join the reality based community.
riversedge
(70,306 posts)event of Sandy...and Holder is right--the gun lobby won. It takes an event--horrible gut retching event--to get changes...but the big change at the National level did not happen.
hack89
(39,171 posts)by dragging out every gun control measure they had ever dreamed of, many of which would have not prevented Sandy Hook, instead of a measured approach that started with a realistic assessment of what they could pass and what was impossible.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Holder and Obama deserve a ticker-tape parade down Wall Street.
xocet
(3,873 posts)freebrew
(1,917 posts)Shamash
(597 posts)NRA lobbying expenditures, 2012: $2,980,000
American Dental Association lobbying expenditures, 2012: $2,560,000
total lobbying expenditures, all sources, 2012: $3,310,000,000
So, the "gun lobby", at least in the corporate person of the NRA, spent only slightly more on lobbying than that other massively influential scourge on society, the fiendish fluoridators of the ADA, both of which are less than one-tenth of one percent of the money spent on lobbying each year. I'd hate to see how Holder stacked up against the big spenders. Oh, wait...
Darb
(2,807 posts)he should have said. That better?