Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,758 posts)
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:33 PM Feb 2015

Eric Holder: Gun lobby 'simply won' by killing Sandy Hook reforms


The inability to enact new gun safety laws after the Sandy Hook school shooting ranks as "the single failure" of his tenure, Atty. Gen. Eric Holder said in a televised interview.

"The gun lobby simply won, you know?" Holder said in an interview with MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry which aired Sunday. In the interview, Holder reflected on his more than six years as the nation's top law enforcement officer.

Holder has called his visit to the site of the December 2012 massacre of 20 first-graders and six educators the worst day he had in office. In the aftermath of the shooting, President Obama appointed Vice President Joe Biden to lead a task force that would make recommendations for how to avoid such tragedies.

The shooting spurred an effort in the Senate to enact new, stricter gun laws, particularly a broader requirement for background checks for gun purchases proposed by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a conservative with a strong gun-rights record, and Republican Sen. Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/la-pn-holder-guns-20150208-story.html
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eric Holder: Gun lobby 'simply won' by killing Sandy Hook reforms (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Feb 2015 OP
One failure? jen1980 Feb 2015 #1
and they could have very well got it done Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #2
And in the end, not only did they fail with their agenda VScott Feb 2015 #6
It wasn't just the gun lobby that won VScott Feb 2015 #3
The failure of UBCs had little to do with anything pipoman Feb 2015 #9
"stood their ground"? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2015 #50
Good to see that... bobclark86 Feb 2015 #4
I guess those are minor Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #8
Nah, because he only had a "single failure." lol n/t bobclark86 Feb 2015 #20
Not continuing to imprison nonviolent offenders and busting pharmacies? pipoman Feb 2015 #5
It's not that simple seveneyes Feb 2015 #7
The trash prevailed alcibiades_mystery Feb 2015 #10
Actually, in this case, pipoman Feb 2015 #11
This age of gun fascism will not last. onehandle Feb 2015 #12
Can't happen soon enough. nt SunSeeker Feb 2015 #13
Been hearing that for over 20 years, GGJohn Feb 2015 #16
Gosh. It's as if you have a predilection for gun fascism. onehandle Feb 2015 #18
Not a student of history I see.... pipoman Feb 2015 #21
but "any day now" Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #25
my partner and me sweetapogee Feb 2015 #29
They have been steady for years. .. pipoman Feb 2015 #31
"gun fascism"? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #32
You've been losing steadily in the courts and legislatures for 20+ years now Lurks Often Feb 2015 #41
I see the gun nuts are out in force with flamin lib Feb 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Feb 2015 #15
And this is why you and your kind constantly lose the gun control debate, GGJohn Feb 2015 #17
'your kind' onehandle Feb 2015 #19
this from the one with the Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #22
why you do not want be lumped with controllers? Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #26
Your kind, as in, gun controllers, GGJohn Feb 2015 #33
They do not care Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #23
Glad to see you and your cohorts expressing such poorly-disguised glee at the situation. (nt) Paladin Feb 2015 #35
As usual, you misrepresent what our comments are about. GGJohn Feb 2015 #36
Kinda like how I feel about traditional marriage laws getting struck down and for the same reason. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #39
Not millions and millions of gun owners, flamin lib Feb 2015 #38
Define "gun nuts" or is that one of those terms that is supposed to Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #40
a gun nut imho is someone who rushes out to buy yet another semi-auto carbine.. frylock Feb 2015 #43
We didn't lose the "debate" Nevernose Feb 2015 #52
IOW, you lost the debate. GGJohn Feb 2015 #53
so you ARE Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #24
"Intrastate commerce? Idiots." Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #34
The Constitution is plain enough for anyone with half a brain! pocoloco Feb 2015 #48
Yeah, half a brain. Me, I've got a whole brain. And it isn't clear which is why decisions are flamin lib Feb 2015 #49
I guess the "brainwashing" didn't take. beevul Feb 2015 #27
I guess most people don't want the U.S. to turn into "Little Chicago." NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #28
High violent crime areas are more due to poverty than gun laws, Darb Feb 2015 #46
Yes, there was a big window open for gun control because of the horrible riversedge Feb 2015 #30
Gun control advocates in Congress made it that much easier for the gun lobby hack89 Feb 2015 #37
The bankers... they are saved... MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #42
...and the war criminals and torturers.... They are saved and are magnificently unrepentant! n/t xocet Feb 2015 #51
So, the Bundy thing was a win?...nt freebrew Feb 2015 #44
"The gun lobby simply won, you know?" Shamash Feb 2015 #45
The gun lobby and the racists and the fraidy cats won, Darb Feb 2015 #47
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
2. and they could have very well got it done
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:49 PM
Feb 2015

if they had not started by attempting to load it up with feel good laws that do nothing but piss off the most motivated groups.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
6. And in the end, not only did they fail with their agenda
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:00 PM
Feb 2015

it had the opposite effect and backfired resulting in many states passing even more pro 2nd amendment
legislation and protections.

Only in the more predictably, rabidly anti 2nd amendment/anti gun states were they successful... states that
would have passed legislation even without Sandy Hook.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
3. It wasn't just the gun lobby that won
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:52 PM
Feb 2015

People give the NRA too much credit at times.

Gun owners, 2nd amendment advocates everywhere (without any prodding from the NRA), simply stood
their ground, 'said enough is enough', and overwhelmed their representatives with emails and phone calls.

There wasn't one firearms related web forum that I'm aware of, that wasn't lit up like a Christmas tree with
angry (rightfully so), gun owners organizing and providing input toothers that had large impact on blocking
the proposed legislation.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
9. The failure of UBCs had little to do with anything
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:03 PM
Feb 2015

But the unconstitutional aspect of UBCs...interstate commerce and all that. ..

LiberalLovinLug

(14,176 posts)
50. "stood their ground"?
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 02:54 PM
Feb 2015

Nice.

90% of the American public wanted expanded background checks at minimum. Its obvious they listened more to the powerful gun lobby. The NRA, you well know, is not simply a firearms information organization, they are front for the massively huge gun manufacturers industry. That is who most legislators listened to at the expense of public safely, unfortunately.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
4. Good to see that...
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:54 PM
Feb 2015

failing to close Gitmo and failing to stop massive data collections of the NSA don't count...

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
5. Not continuing to imprison nonviolent offenders and busting pharmacies?
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:54 PM
Feb 2015

Not continuing to imprison humans without charges? Hmm Mr. Holder, somehow I think history will remember it differently. .. "the single failure" of his tenure"...yeah

Oh yeah....the NSA bullshit.... lol...

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
7. It's not that simple
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:01 PM
Feb 2015

As long as there are those pure in heart, with a desire to defend themselves against the unknown, reform is simply a word to be defined by the pure of heart.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
11. Actually, in this case,
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:12 PM
Feb 2015

The constitution prevailed. ...the federal government has no jurisdiction to regulate intrastate commerce of used legal to own goods....if it would have passed, it would have been struck down almost as quickly as it passed. ..

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
12. This age of gun fascism will not last.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:19 PM
Feb 2015

All of this gun nuttery will be buried with its racist roots.

Tick-tock...

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
18. Gosh. It's as if you have a predilection for gun fascism.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 12:29 AM
Feb 2015

That can't be. This is a librul forum. Unpossible.

The age of gun fascism started on June 26th, 2008.

Arming the modern Klan for a war that only exists in their racist minds.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
21. Not a student of history I see....
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 12:58 AM
Feb 2015

"The age of gun fascism started on June 6th, 2008."

Well, aside from the veiled Hitler reference. ..apparently you have forgotten the first term of Bill Clinton. ...more modern firearms and ammunition sold to the public than any other time in history...

sweetapogee

(1,168 posts)
29. my partner and me
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 08:45 AM
Feb 2015

just happened to have Friday off so we went to Cabelas to look at fishing gear. The line at the gun counter was 3 people deep and the NICS terminals had long waiting lines. There wasn't any 22 ammo and no shotgun or pistol powder for reloaders. If anything, I believe a case could be made that guns are more popular now than ever. As mentioned, this was on a Friday.... before noon. From what I can tell, sales have been steady for years.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
31. They have been steady for years. ..
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:34 AM
Feb 2015

It didn't start when Obama became president as the poster was pretending....it started when the Clinton administration started pushing for a bunch of gun control measures.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
32. "gun fascism"?
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:43 AM
Feb 2015

Assuming you mean fascism in the context of a violent, aggressive ideology that is not deterred by social convention and assuming, for the moment, that your point is something more than you just stringing buzz-words together then what you're claiming is the remedy for fascism is --

-- disarmament.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
41. You've been losing steadily in the courts and legislatures for 20+ years now
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:53 AM
Feb 2015

It seems more likely that the age of gun control extremists is coming to an end.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
14. I see the gun nuts are out in force with
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 09:51 PM
Feb 2015

their own special Constitutional interpretation. Intrastate commerce? Idiots.

Response to flamin lib (Reply #14)

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
17. And this is why you and your kind constantly lose the gun control debate,
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 11:39 PM
Feb 2015

you resort to insulting millions upon millions of gun owners, Dems and Repubs alike.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
22. this from the one with the
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 01:00 AM
Feb 2015

childish penis reference in his signature

Yep, such nice polite dialog from you

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
26. why you do not want be lumped with controllers?
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 01:12 AM
Feb 2015

You seem fine with them lumping all firearms owners as killers, future murderers, gun humpers, delicate flowers, ammosexuals and of course as you even have in your signature the mandatory childish penis reference.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
40. Define "gun nuts" or is that one of those terms that is supposed to
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:56 AM
Feb 2015

remain undefined to the employers of the term can trot it out to save themselves from losing an open debate?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
43. a gun nut imho is someone who rushes out to buy yet another semi-auto carbine..
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 02:49 PM
Feb 2015

immediately following one of these tragic incidents for fear that Clinton Obama is going to confiscate everyone's guns. a gun nut is someone who hordes ammo, and then complains of some vast govt conspiracy because it's fukcing near impossible to find a brick of .22 LR. a gun nut is somebody who whines and cries about their Constitutional rights being infringed upon because they can no longer tote their AR-15 at the Starbucks. as someone who owns several firearms, that's my definition of a "gun nut."

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
52. We didn't lose the "debate"
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 10:38 PM
Feb 2015

The gun lobby simply -- and legally -- bribed congress and used fear & propaganda to gin up support among the loudest, most ignorant swaths of America.

More guns sold than ever before, to a smaller number of people than ever...

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
53. IOW, you lost the debate.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 10:40 PM
Feb 2015

How do you know that it's a smaller number of people than ever?
Because some poll says so?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
24. so you ARE
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 01:02 AM
Feb 2015

calling other DU members that disagree with you position "gun nuts"

It must just piss you off you or EM can not censor us outside your little "safe haven"

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
34. "Intrastate commerce? Idiots."
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:49 AM
Feb 2015

Perhaps you might pause from your erudition to exposit the as to reasons why the intrastate commerce is not applicable. I myself had never heard the argument offered until this thread. I'm interested in seeing the issue hashed-out.

Or you could just go on being a big ol' meanie-head.

 

pocoloco

(3,180 posts)
48. The Constitution is plain enough for anyone with half a brain!
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:29 PM
Feb 2015

Unfortunately, some claim it's only a "God Dammed Piece of Paper".

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
49. Yeah, half a brain. Me, I've got a whole brain. And it isn't clear which is why decisions are
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:44 PM
Feb 2015

overturned and debated ad infinitum.

Take your half a brain and play with someone else with a half a brain.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
27. I guess the "brainwashing" didn't take.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 02:17 AM
Feb 2015



Or is C-span2 lying...


Holders position on guns in general, is completely relevant to the topic.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
28. I guess most people don't want the U.S. to turn into "Little Chicago."
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 08:13 AM
Feb 2015

You remember Chicago - that gun-free, non-violent haven where there is absolutely no gun violence thanks to their handgun ban.

Oh wait - people were shot every day in Chicago when the ban was in place, and it's now been struck down.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
46. High violent crime areas are more due to poverty than gun laws,
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 08:02 PM
Feb 2015

just sayin'. Now you know that any gun law in a city, say Chicago or DC, is only as effective as the laws surrounding it, eg Virginia and Wisconsin/Indiana. So you can go ahead and pretend that the crime rates are high because of strict gun control laws, or you can join the reality based community.

riversedge

(70,306 posts)
30. Yes, there was a big window open for gun control because of the horrible
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:12 AM
Feb 2015

event of Sandy...and Holder is right--the gun lobby won. It takes an event--horrible gut retching event--to get changes...but the big change at the National level did not happen.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
37. Gun control advocates in Congress made it that much easier for the gun lobby
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 10:30 AM
Feb 2015

by dragging out every gun control measure they had ever dreamed of, many of which would have not prevented Sandy Hook, instead of a measured approach that started with a realistic assessment of what they could pass and what was impossible.

 

Shamash

(597 posts)
45. "The gun lobby simply won, you know?"
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 03:48 PM
Feb 2015

NRA lobbying expenditures, 2012: $2,980,000
American Dental Association lobbying expenditures, 2012: $2,560,000

total lobbying expenditures, all sources, 2012: $3,310,000,000

So, the "gun lobby", at least in the corporate person of the NRA, spent only slightly more on lobbying than that other massively influential scourge on society, the fiendish fluoridators of the ADA, both of which are less than one-tenth of one percent of the money spent on lobbying each year. I'd hate to see how Holder stacked up against the big spenders. Oh, wait...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Holder: Gun lobby 's...