Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
1. At least there are those
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 05:47 PM
Feb 2015

who see a competitive advantage in offering coverage for owners of any breed/mix. I can't get into the breed argument, our dog thinks we are sheep, (maybe we are).

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
4. I think some of this is abuse of statistics
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 08:21 PM
Feb 2015

Insurance companies want to sell as much coverage as they profitably can so they are running a kind of casino of chaos with each policy being a bet on whether or not some set of events will occur and how much they would cost under insurance versus not under insurance. They have huge data sets that tie personal stats to health, auto accidents, home owners claims, etc and what emerges from multi-variate analysis is a premium.

Insurance companies can cut dog bite claim statistics by breed. They don't hate any particular breed or have feelings on the matter any more than Harrah's gives a crap whether snake eyes is a cool dice throw. They just set pay offs based on odds while cutting themselves a percentage. The formula for this is based on literally millions of real world events over decades.

But here's the problem: the best predictor of whether a dog will be involved in a costly and damaging attack on a human being is not the breed of the dog but the gender, male, and whether or not it is neutered. Over 93% of fatal to a human attacks are done by non-neutered male dogs of any breed.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
7. The insurance companies may or may not be right. But if you need homeowners insurance
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 03:01 AM
Feb 2015

you probably need to know whether the insurance will cover your dog.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/business/personal-finance/claudia-buck/article9466880.html

“The presence of some dog breeds may make a home ineligible for insurance coverage,” said Heather Serignese, spokeswoman for The Hartford, a nationwide property and casualty insurance company, in an email. “Each customer’s situation is different and we encourage homeowners to speak with their insurance company or agent for more information.”

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
6. However, if you need homeowners' insurance a personal finance writer could give better advice
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 03:00 AM
Feb 2015

on obtaining and keeping it than an animal behaviorist.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/business/personal-finance/claudia-buck/article9466880.html

“The presence of some dog breeds may make a home ineligible for insurance coverage,” said Heather Serignese, spokeswoman for The Hartford, a nationwide property and casualty insurance company, in an email. “Each customer’s situation is different and we encourage homeowners to speak with their insurance company or agent for more information.”

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
8. The OP likes to post out of context bits from our local paper
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 03:03 AM
Feb 2015

to justify his stupid ideas about dogs.

Last week it was an article about funding problems for the municipal shelter's spay neuter program that meant that pit bulls are the devil.

Next week it might be a sale on kale from the Sprouts flyer, at this rate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»pit bull reality........