General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders Grills Obama's Budget Chief: Why Should Huge Companies Pay ZERO Federal Income Taxes?
Last edited Sun Feb 8, 2015, 03:23 PM - Edit history (1)
He cited examples of some of the most profitable corporations in America which in some years paid no federal income taxes. General Electric made nearly $34 billion in profits in the United States from 2008 through 2013 but paid no federal income taxes. Instead, GE received a tax rebate of nearly $3 billion from the Internal Revenue Service. Verizon made more than $42.5 billion in U.S. profits during the same period, paid no federal income taxes and got $732 million from the IRS. And in 2013, Citigroup made $6.4 billion in profits, paid no federal income taxes and claimed a $260 million rebate from the IRS.
Instead of cutting programs for some of the most vulnerable people in our society, we have got to make sure that the largest, most profitable corporations pay their fair share in taxes.
The panel heard testimony from Shaun Donovan, President Barack Obamas budget director. In an exchange with Sen. Sanders, Donovan outlined the White House plan to close corporate tax loopholes.
"Many of my Republican colleagues believe that what is best for the country in the future is basically to cut, cut, cut, cut, cut," Sanders said. "Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, nutrition etc. ect. others of us don't think that is what is best for working families in this country."
WATCH:
LINK: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/recent-business/corporate-tax-loopholes
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)He's not saying anything radical; he's just saying that companies should pay their fair share. No political expediency, no 'corporations are people' pretzel logic. Just fair is fair. Simple really. It would take Fox a whole lot of overtime to spin all the plain logic that would come out of President Sanders mouth.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)gonna happen.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)That's why we always play the What Obama Really Meant game all the time. On the other hand, I've never had to do that with Bernie.
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Its called having a "poker face" you fault him for that?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)A president is meant to lead the nation, to represent and communicate with the people of this country. By sharing his vision and his values, that's how a leader leads. We are not supposed to guess what he or she really intends to do. Communication is a common characteristic among the very successful presidents. And I would expect it from someone who campaigned on transparency. The constant obfuscating is one of the very exasperating things about President Obama.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Its part of the reason he succeeds against them.
Sorry he doesn't do your will!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Politics for politics' sake is sinking this country. Don't bother answering this post.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)And don't tell me what to "bother" to do!
tech3149
(4,452 posts)I think Obamas actions speak much louder than his words. That doesn't make me a happy camper.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)President Obama has been saying the same thing (albeit with slightly different words) for his entire Presidency?
Cut tax breaks that are inefficient, unfair, or both so that the American people and businesses spend less time and less money each year filing taxes and cannot avoid their responsibility by gaming the system.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/economy/reform/tax-reform
ChosenUnWisely
(588 posts)See the difference?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Bernie's speeches are better than President Obama's, even though they're saying the same thing.
lark
(23,102 posts)Bernie is pushing back against the TPP every bit as much as Obama is pushing for this corporate boondoogle.
Bernie is consistent, Obama isn't.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Initech
(100,079 posts)We could pay off the deficit in like 10 years. The free ride is over. Go Bernie, make 'em pay!
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)You nailed it solid.
This times a googolplex.
calimary
(81,297 posts)Let's make THESE human "hogs" squeal!!!
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Try some math.
Current Debt is 18.1 Trillion dollars.
So, to pay off the debt in 10 years, you would have to collect 1.81 trillion dollars in taxes each year.
At 50% tax rate, that would require the "churches" and the billionaires to make 3.62 Trillion dollars a year.
Thats the entire federal budget.
So you think that the churches (which no politician will ever agree to tax - ever) and half the profits from billionaires is going to raise as much capital as the entire rest of the federal government?
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)the budget of the government is irrelevant to the math, so im not sure why you brought it up.
As best I can determine, the total income of people in the US is 13 trillion per year.
http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=a7jenngfc4um7_#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=personal_income&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=country&idim=country:US&ifdim=country&hl=en_US&dl=en_US&ind=false
And the top 10% received over 45% of the total income.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101025377
So that would be nearly 6 trillion per year. If we were to tax them at the proposed 50%, that would be.. 3 trillion per year. So your 18.1 trillion would take 6 years to pay off.
The mind boggles at what we could do with the other 4 years worth. For 12 trillion, you can build some pretty major infrastructure, forgive a whole lot of student loans. The possibilities are pretty extensive. And then.. its not like they would suddenly stop having income. Although they might stop stripping businesses and start building instead, so the numbers might drop a bit. Although it would mean more income for everyone else, and a wider tax base over time.
Initech
(100,079 posts)But think about this:
- Religious institutions and mega churches make billions every year. They pay no taxes.
- Religious institutions own businesses that pay no taxes.
- Publicly traded corporations stack trillions in overseas bank accounts and pay no taxes.
- CEOs make 475:1 what the average employee makes and pay no taxes.
We could collect taxes on all of these and pay down the deficit. If we're going to get serious about paying off debt, we need to bring in revenue. That's how it works.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Because religious institutions don't profit that much - they have plenty of expenses.
Same with religious owned institutions.
Trillions in overseas accounts? Really? Amazing. I'd love to hear more about these magical trillions.
CEO's pay taxes. They may not be at the rate you desire, but most pay taxes. If you don't like the tax code, elect a president and congress to tackle it. Oh wait, we did and they did jack.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)All warm and fuzzy for some parts of the old days ...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/07/992184/-Greenspan-in-2001-We-re-paying-down-the-debt-too-fast-VIDEO
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)aspirant
(3,533 posts)It's time the 1% gives back involuntary contributions to the IRS.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I kid.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,653 posts)K & R!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)When people found out that Nixon and Agnew paid almost no taxes despite having million in income, even Republicans got pissed off enough to demand changes to the tax code.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)Points the irony out with rapier-like wit.
ChazInAz
(2,569 posts)But given that there are about 300,000,000 people in this country, if Verizon's rebate had been divided equally to every citizen (All of us having done just as much as Verizon to earn it!), every one of us would have gotten a check for about $2,000,000. We could have really made the economy soar with sort of spending power.
But then, I'm just a cranky old socialist who's tired of all this bullshit.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)You are not a mathematician.
$732 million divided by 300 million = $2.44
$2 million per person would be $600 TRILLION. And I disagree that giving everyone $2 million would make the economy soar. Unless you consider mega inflation as economic soaring.
"Hey, everyone has $2 million!" "Hey, Subway is selling $500 footlongs!"
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Indydem
(2,642 posts)How would you spend your $.49?
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)why's that?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)So that's about $2.33 per person. But I take your point. My small business paid hundreds of thousands in taxes. Tired of these greedy corporations paying nothing.
(I was doing math in my head. $2.44 is correct).
There are times the "Do Math" part of my brain refuses to function. Low caffeine levels are often involved.
Lurker Deluxe
(1,036 posts)I'll be generous and say you make a 20% profit on everything you do.
I'll assume you pay an effective tax rate of 40%, again pretty generous.
To get to "hundreds of thousands in taxes" you would need to be pulling in several million in revenue. I would not consider that "small business".
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Look, I have never voted for a republican in my life. But that doesn't mean I don't recognize the know it all attitude that some Democratic voters express about business when they actually have zero experience owning a business.
I am NOT pulling in several million a year. In fact not even pulling in ONE million a year. You have no clue how many different taxes small businesses pay. None.
As soon as you are ready and willing to give almost half of what you make to the government (as you work 50-60 hours a week for decades on end, with no real vacation because a business owner is ALWAYS on call) then let me know.
In the meantime I would like to see multi-billion dollar corporations pay some fricking taxes.
Lurker Deluxe
(1,036 posts)I have owned several.
Last one was a welding/machine shop.
I know all about the taxes a small business pays. I also know that to pay "several hundred thousand" in taxes you would need to be doing well over the million mark in revenue. That is revenue, not profit. You pay taxes on profit. Sure you have all sorts of things that cost you money, even taxes that individuals would not pay ... these all all expenses that are tax deductible, lowering your income taxes.
So tell me, since I know nothing. You incorporated and filing SubS, or just running as a DBA? Just throw out some general numbers that show me how you get to $300,000+ in taxes doing under a mil in revenue. I think you need a CPA.
Lurker Deluxe
(1,036 posts)Either you have no idea the difference between revenue and profit, or you're lying.
You say in a different post, "It made me nervous as hell to have 20 plus people depending on me to pay their paychecks every 2 weeks"
Then, "good jobs. 2.5 to 3 times WA state minimum wage".
WA state min wage = $9.47. 2.5X$9.47=$23.67. 2080 hours in a year = $49,244 X 20 employees = $984,880. Damn near a million in payroll not even including matches on SS, insurance, and "29 days PTO. 100% employer paid health, dental, vision, life insurance, plus quarterly bonuses".
You've busted the million in costs just in basic payroll, so I damn sure hope you are pulling in several million in revenue otherwise you are crazy broke.
But then again, "I only expanded to a new business because I thought people are hurting".
So, I am assuming you have that kind of cash laying around to cover all these costs for the first few months ... or was your business profitable from day one?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Give me a list of all the different taxes I pay at the specific percentages. Don't miss any now. Also list all the government fees. Keep in mind that I run a service business and 90% of my costs are labor.
When you're done with that give me a list of all the tax breaks I can take advantage of. If you can come up with one I'll fire my CPA and hire you.
I don't believe you've ever owned an actual business that employs anyone except yourself. You can call being self employed a "business" I guess, but you really don't seem to understand what running a real business costs.
The problem many Democratic voters have is that they want workers treated well, but hate the small businesses that bust their ass to do that. You think we should sacrifice our lives working our tails off and give 90% of the revenue to workers and half the profit to the government.
WE DONT NEED TO RAISE TAXES. We need to make multi billion dollar companies pay some.
Adam051188
(711 posts)Huge companies should pay zero federal income taxes because they control everything the government does. That's how democracy works.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Working class taxpayers are funding ridiculously wealthy corporations that give nothing back in return.
We are so past what would be fair by any stretch of the imagination (unless you're a 1%'er, a sociopath, or both).
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)our party publicize this fact?
oh, yeah...don't bite the hand...etc.
Triana
(22,666 posts)The proposed one-time tax is aimed at just one of the various loopholes and maneuvers that domestic businesses use to offshore their profits, beyond the reach of Internal Revenue Service. The best known trick is so-called tax inversions: US companies can move their headquarters abroad, avoiding the taxman while keeping executives stateside, scoring government contracts, and taking full advantage of public benefits for employees. Walgreens, which makes a quarter of its money from Medicaid and Medicare, proposed moving to Switzerland last year, only to change plans following a public outcry.
. . .
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Inversions aren't the only way to dodge the taxman. Foreign profits aren't taxed until they are "repatriated," so companies can hoard earnings in subsidiaries or divisions abroad. (Ireland just shut down the "double Irish" offshoring trick used by Apple, Google, Twitter, and Facebook.) Between 2008 and 2013, American firms held more than $2.1 trillion in profits overseasthat's as much as $500 billion in unpaid taxes.
Accumulated offshore profits at end of 2013:
General Electric: $110 billion
Microsoft: $76.4 billion
Pfizer: $69 billion
. . .
THE REST:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/02/foreign-overseas-tax-inversion-evasion-obama
Ramses
(721 posts)Imagine a politician actually standing up for Democratic principles is a sea of sell out frauds. And that he would be considered a moderate in many European countries speaks loudly how far right the 1% have bought off and shoved this country
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)99 more Bernies!
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Excellent post, k&r.
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)(Running as a Democrat of course)
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/sep/26/bernie-s/sanders-one-out-four-corporations-pay-no-taxes/
Bernie is on the Thom Hartmann Show one hour every week,
in a segment called called "Brunch Wth Bernie"
http://www.thomhartmann.com/
red dog 1
(27,816 posts)How about a Sanders/ Warren ticket in 2016?
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)The narrative, the baseline, the "conventional wisdom" has shifted steadily rightward when it comes to matters of economics. I don't like it, not one bit. Social issue bullshit doesn't even come close to assuaging the gutting of the working class.
Senator Sanders is a national treasure.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I agree, Bernie. But President Obama has repeatedly stated that American corporations have the highest tax rate in the world. He has made it clear that he is no fan of making corporations pay their fair share.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Chemisse
(30,813 posts)Too bad everybody is already paid off by these tax evaders.
antigop
(12,778 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)Run Bernie run!