Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:10 AM Jan 2015

Trans-Pacific Partnership was written by corporations

From Campaign for America's Future

There was a reason corporations spent so much money on the last election and it wasn’t ideology. It wasn’t a gift. It was an investment.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a massive trade deal. It is being negotiated in secret, with citizens locked out.  Big corporations and banks literally sit at the negotiating table. They spent millions on election contributions and lobbyists and they are getting their money's worth.

The pharmaceutical industry inserted patent rules into the TPP that will allow them to keep cheaper generics off the market for years by making minor changes to their drugs. This will hike industry profits, even as it prices the vulnerable out of drugs they need.

That's no exaggeration. Gleevec, a breakthrough drug against leukemia, cost $2,500 a month in the U.S. The patent holder was able to extend its patent by claiming a new use and raised the price to almost $8,000.  That's $96,000 a year!

We have to stop this. 

Right now, the president has lined up with Republican leaders in Congress and the corporate lobby to push for “fast track” authority that will grease the skids for the TPP. But they don’t have the votes...yet.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

shraby

(21,946 posts)
2. Who has actually read the treaty and knows what is in it? I don't believe very many people know
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:19 AM
Jan 2015

yet. It also won't be a treaty until congress ratifies it which means they get input also.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
3. Not if they get Fast Track Authority...
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:23 AM
Jan 2015

Congress gets NO input. No amendments or filibusters allowed. They can vote for it or against it. That's all the input they'd get.

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
5. Not only does Congress get no input, but once ratified and into effect, it would require unanimous
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:59 AM
Jan 2015


approval by all participant countries to make any change, which makes it virtually un-fixable.








 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Nobody knows what it says because it is far from finished. Fast-track is not likely to happen,
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 01:12 AM
Jan 2015

notwithstanding the panic. Obama isn't going to endorse a bad agreement. For something that is supposedly secret, everyone seems to know it is going to screw us.


 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
10. Most MSM outlets have not done a good job of explaining the consequences for a reason.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 02:37 AM
Jan 2015

They don't want the public to know about it! Because it's another twist of the screw to all working Americans.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trans-Pacific Partnership...