Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJindal: Amend Constitution To Stop Marriage Equality
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/01/25/3615196/bobby-jindal-marriage-amendment/Fuck you Bobby Jindal
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 694 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jindal: Amend Constitution To Stop Marriage Equality (Original Post)
sabbat hunter
Jan 2015
OP
He can rant and rave all he wants, but the haters will never get 3/4 vote of the states
OKNancy
Jan 2015
#1
They won't get the 2/3 of the House or Senate needed to send such an amendment to the states
onenote
Jan 2015
#4
It's 3/4 of the state legislatures to ratify, 2/3 vote in each house of Congress to send to states.
MohRokTah
Jan 2015
#7
And this is the same guy who urged Republicans to stop being the party of stupid.
mythology
Jan 2015
#10
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)1. He can rant and rave all he wants, but the haters will never get 3/4 vote of the states
Last edited Sun Jan 25, 2015, 02:17 PM - Edit history (1)
onenote
(42,715 posts)4. They won't get the 2/3 of the House or Senate needed to send such an amendment to the states
And, I suspect, Boehner and McConnell, will do all they can to keep it from coming to a vote to protect their members from having to go on the record.
Jindal is a trip. The more he talks, the stupider he sounds.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)6. They don't need 2/3 of the states, they need 3/4 of the states
After it gets 2/3 of the House and Senate.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)9. oops.. I'll edit
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)7. It's 3/4 of the state legislatures to ratify, 2/3 vote in each house of Congress to send to states.
Article. V.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)2. roflmao..re-thugs say the craziest things
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)3. There should be
a Constitutional amendment or clarification of existing law that keeps shit-for-brains shills like him from ever being eligible to hold office - even as dog catcher!
Freaking asshat!
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)5. If that's their last hope they might as well just give it up now.
No way do you get two-thirds of each house of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures to go along with that.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)8. I would prefer the Equal Rights Amendment myself. nt
mythology
(9,527 posts)10. And this is the same guy who urged Republicans to stop being the party of stupid.
Apparently he's too stupid to take his own advice.