Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flying rabbit

(4,636 posts)
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 10:10 PM Jan 2015

How the 'ban' on images of Muhammed came to be.

snip~

"In the wake of the attack on Charlie Hebdo, a flurry of articles have explored whether images of the Prophet Muhammad are “banned” in Islam. While some Muslim voices are adamant that this is strictly the case in Islamic law, others (both Muslim and non-Muslim) have cautioned that it is not so."

~snip



http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/how-the-ban-on-images-of-muhammad-came-to-be/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the 'ban' on images of Muhammed came to be. (Original Post) flying rabbit Jan 2015 OP
The Koran does not prohibit images of the Prophet. It's a newish development. nt NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #1
It's all there in the article. nt flying rabbit Jan 2015 #2
Fascinating article... TreasonousBastard Jan 2015 #3
The ban is neither here nor there. Muslims need to accept that non-Muslims are not bound by Islamic Coventina Jan 2015 #4

Coventina

(27,169 posts)
4. The ban is neither here nor there. Muslims need to accept that non-Muslims are not bound by Islamic
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 11:35 PM
Jan 2015

law, period.

Having said that, the article is interesting, for the purposes of Islamic history.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the 'ban' on images o...