General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat would DU look like in 1970 the day after "the movie" Patton came out?
I imagine my computer would literally have caught fire, and I would have spent the next 16 hours replacing tubes and cards and such.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)isobar
(188 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)I said, "Huh? Patton was gay? Thought he died."
Nevertheless, the effect on DU would be about equal in either situation.
benz380
(534 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)benz380
(534 posts)Patton and Gay were seated in the back seat of the staff car, en route to a hunting lodge when a traffic accident resulted in General Patton sustaining spinal injuries which later cost his life. General Gay was uninjured. After Patton's death, Gay assumed command of the US 1st Armored Division Europe serving until 1947.
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=34160263
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Just imagine the havoc a movie about General Patton could have wreaked.
benz380
(534 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Shrek
(3,981 posts)benz380
(534 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)It was an anti war movie without a doubt. At that time, even DU's rather simplistic cinema critics would have instantly understood that. If they had bothered to see it.
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)benz380
(534 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)The brilliance of it is you can take the movie at face value and see a patriotic glorification of war and a most famous war hero, but if you scratch the surface, it is overflowing with cynical anti-war sentiment...
The great part is "Patton" is an equally engaging movie no matter which mindset you view it through...
Enrique
(27,461 posts)while the Vietnam War was still raging, it would only be natural to question a war movie.