Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Elizabeth Warren does not run
Would DU be satisfied with her in a cabinet position of another Democrat's administration?
I'd love to see her heading up Treasury.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 762 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Elizabeth Warren does not run (Original Post)
tabbycat31
Jan 2015
OP
I would rather not see Warren have to do the bidding of a corporatist president.
djean111
Jan 2015
#4
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)1. If she doesn't run,
I'd rather see stay as senator.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)2. Me too.
djean111
(14,255 posts)4. I would rather not see Warren have to do the bidding of a corporatist president.
No one speaks for all of DU, but "satisfied" is such an amorphous term. I will not be satisfied about anything if we end up with a DINO president.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)5. No, if she doesn't run she needs to stay in the Senate.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)6. Well, she's not running, so the 'if' is moot. nt