General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's be clear about the leaked "middle class" tax cuts
The vast majority, in fact almost all of it only benefits those who are married and / or have children.
Suich
(10,642 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)They will never happen, nor were they intended to ever be implemented, which is why they weren't actually leaked until after the republicans took control of the senate. They are a political ploy to try to gain some leverage on the republicans.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)It would increase taxes on the rich by, among other things, instituting a tax on stock trades, to finance credits aimed at the middle class, including "extending the earned income tax credits to families without children, which would benefit an estimated 13 million low-income workers."
Also,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/17/obama-sotu-taxes_n_6493144.html
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)they've changed the rules to do it and the democrats are pretending there's nothing they can do about it -- and you really think there's a will to get any of the presidents' proposals?
the only thing that's going to get passed is more necrophilia for the rich.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)But in the meantime, he just might get some of these proposals passed, like taxes on the big banks, which have bipartisan support.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/17/obama-sotu-taxes_n_6493144.html
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)took down the economy. job 1.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)THE Obama administrations $500 billion or more proposal to deal with Americas ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal. Actually, it is a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win and taxpayers lose.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/opinion/01stiglitz.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Perhaps you can link me to what was actually passed regarding the 2011 proposal these opinion pieces are talking about. Either way, the bank bailout was in 2008.
Obama's legacy will be the ACA.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)was Obama's appointee.
Under the plan by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, the government would provide about 92 percent of the money to buy the asset but would stand to receive only 50 percent of any gains, and would absorb almost all of the losses. Some partnership!
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)On March 23, 2009, Geithner announced a Public-Private Investment Program (P-PIP) to buy toxic assets from banks' balance sheets. The major stock market indexes in the United States rallied on the day of the announcement rising by over six percent with the shares of bank stocks leading the way.
P-PIP has two primary programs. The Legacy Loans Program will attempt to buy residential loans from bank's balance sheets. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) will provide non-recourse loan guarantees for up to 85 percent of the purchase price of legacy loans. Private sector asset managers and the U.S. Treasury will provide the remaining assets.
The second program is called the legacy securities program, which will buy residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) that were originally rated AAA and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS) which are rated AAA. The funds will come in many instances in equal parts from the U.S. Treasury's TARP monies, private investors, and from loans from the Federal Reserve's Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF).
The initial size of the Public Private Investment Partnership is projected to be $500 billion.[27
On April 19, 2009, the Obama administration outlined the conversion of Banks Bailouts to Equity Share.[32]
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)TARP passed on Oct.3, 2008.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)isn't that the way it always is?
Autumn
(45,109 posts)It's an old bone.