General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGordon Parks' Never-Before-Seen Photos Of 1950s Segregation
Gordon Parks was only a teenager when he left his hometown of Fort Scott, Kansas. The youngest of 15, Parks chose to make a living for himself after his mother passed away, and wound up becoming the first African American photographer for Life Magazine.
Only two years after his first Life assignment, Parks returned home for a photo essay on segregated education. Journeying to Fort Scott and other Midwestern cities nearby, Parks photographed his childhood classmates, capturing their faces, families and homes while recording details about their occupations and incomes. The photo essay, for reasons that remain unknown, was never published, and most of the images went unseen.
And then Karen Haas, curator at MFA Boston, stumbled upon an image of Parks' that changed everything.
"The museum decided to do a rather major publication on our African American collections across all our departments," Haas explained in a phone conversation with The Huffington Post. "I was asked to write the entries on the African American photographers because it was a particular interest of mine. One of the photographs by Gordon Parks was sort of a mystery -- it's simply titled 'Outside the Liberty Theater' and depicts a young couple outside a segregated movie theater. I contacted the Gordon Parks foundation and together we sorted out the fact that this was a photograph taken in Fort Scott, Kansas and related to a larger story that's widely unknown because it was never published in Life Magazine. That's really where it all began."
"They've never been exhibited together before, many of them have never been shown at all. They're completely unknown; the foundation didn't know the picture, no one knew what it really was. It's not that surprising that for a magazine photographer. Without that anchor to a story there's no reason for them to see the light of day again. There was this trail, this little thread I was following to figure out the story from this picture.
Mrs. Jefferson, Fort Scott, Kansas, 1950
Untitled, St. Louis, Missouri, 1950
Uncle James Parks, Fort Scott, Kansas, 1950
Read More http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/16/gordon-parks_n_6489120.html
brer cat
(24,578 posts)I love to look at pictures like Mrs. Jefferson. Her face and hands are so expressive, you know she has stories to tell.
This was a great find, sheshe. Thanks for posting.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)I would love to see the exhibit at the MFA Boston. A car drive that is easy, parking is about $25. Admission is up there to( free on MLK day, but I can't make that one). I might be able to get a discount from my library. If I can swing it I want to go.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)He worked on the same Farm Security Administration photography project that produced Dorothea Lange.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)I did not know that.
brooklynite
(94,603 posts)These are great photos. Not one shows an instance of segregation.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/16/gordon-parks_n_6489120.html
I am sure there will be a lot more at the MFA exhibit in Boston.
I guess a lot has to do with your interpretation of segregation seen and harshly experienced through a black persons eyes. If you didn't live it can you truly understand it?
Here
The photos were for his personal piece about segregated education, which Parks decided to tell through the lens of his own experience as a poor child, the youngest of 15, in Fort Scott, Kansas.
The MFAs curator of photography Karen Haas says Park often got assignments about social issues that his white counterparts did not.
In the end, the story didnt get told in the magazine, she explains, but what Im very excited about is that we can show it here and in many ways I think it really resonates with people today as much as it would have at the time.
Haas says the series of black and white photos got bumped more than once, presumably because they were seen as potentially controversial.
The intimate portraits show tight-knit African American families throughout the South and Midwest that contrasted with the predominantly white, middle-class imagery that typically dominated Lifes pages.
http://artery.wbur.org/2015/01/17/gordon-parks-mfa
So go with it. UNREC away. Since you don't see it or feel it, then it does not exist. Got it.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)UNREC a thread that shows pictures from 1950's segregation (it's not just something to be seen obviously up front all the time, only an idiot would think that way). Really mature, but totally predictable by certain posters.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)segregation. the title would express the point of the thread, I'd think.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Really what a disgusting response or you are just really ignorant to the subject completely.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)you the thread title:
"Gordon Parks' Never-Before-Seen Photos Of 1950s Segregation"
And here's one of the pictures: It has nothing to do with segregation.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Have a great day not understanding simple concepts like 'segregation in the 1950s'. If you ever figure it out, let us know.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)It was segregated.
"The museum decided to do a rather major publication on our African American collections across all our departments," Haas explained in a phone conversation with The Huffington Post. "I was asked to write the entries on the African American photographers because it was a particular interest of mine. One of the photographs by Gordon Parks was sort of a mystery -- it's simply titled 'Outside the Liberty Theater' and depicts a young couple outside a segregated movie theater. I contacted the Gordon Parks foundation and together we sorted out the fact that this was a photograph taken in Fort Scott, Kansas and related to a larger story that's widely unknown because it was never published in Life Magazine. That's really where it all began."
What about segregation do you not understand? And!
Read the article. I can only post 4 paragraphs. Read it!
READ IT! STOP TRYING TO BE BLIND. IT HAPPENED.
The poignant images depict everyday life for African Americans in the 1950s -- playing pool, reading a book, watching a baseball game -- all under the regulations of segregation. Along with the images, Parks recorded details about his former classmates current lives, for example, that Norman Earl Collins was doing quite well, making $1.22 an hour at Union Electric of Missouri.
"What I love about the pictures is the way I feel as though when I look at the expressions on their faces I can see the pride each of these families felt standing in front of their houses," explained Haas. "Parks made an effort to pose his subjects in front of their houses with these strong nuclear families -- the way so many families in Life Magazine are posed to begin with. That white middle class family pose. To pose African American families in front of their homes, I think, would have been quite startling to the readership. I'm fascinated by the gaze. Each of them trusting their friend, not only this fellow African American, but someone who'd grown up in Kansas with them. What they'd experienced together, the poverty, the childhood struggles. And now he's the famous New York photojournalist, he's a success story. And each of them is trusting him, telling him their stories."
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)It wasn't.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The impact of recs is to put a thread on the greatest page and thereby give it higher visibility on DU than it might otherwise have . To unrec a thread with these fantastic photos because of alleged inconsistency between the photos in the OP and the thread title misapprehends that. Besides, I see segregation in every single one of these photos. These photographs are art, and art makes its point in many ways. I often wish I could rec threads more than once and this is certainly one of those times.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I knew who unrec'd the thread when I drafted my reply to you.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)from the very beginning.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Your post was part of a subthread about brooklynite's "UNREC." Ergo, yes, replies directly to your post and only to your post may refer to the so-called unrec of brooklynite.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)They don't experience it. Then it is not true. They don't have the compassion to feel what went on. Then they are blind, deaf and dumb.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Is about the dumbest fucking thing I've ever read by a poster on any forum. EVER.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)segregation exhibit.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Yet if they went to the link they would have seen this.
And why does the poster need obvious segregation. I don't get that. The first image is a couple outside OUTSIDE a segregated theater.
The rest speaks for itself. If they wish to ignore the facts, then so be it.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Pathetic.
merrily
(45,251 posts)matter what the great photos show or how consistent or inconsistent the photos supposedly are with the thread title.
The effect of recs is to get a thread more visibility, via the greatest page, and these photos are of a quality that certainly merits visibility. Are you sorry you clicked on the thread title because the photos supposedly do not show what you expected? If not, what sense does your "UNREC" make? I would REC this thread multiple times if I could.
However, as to the art work itself, I could not disagree with you more as to your interpretation. I see segregation in most or all of those photos.
RandiFan1290
(6,238 posts)Peeling away another layer of the onion.
Peeyew
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)NBachers
(17,122 posts)The character, the dignity, the styles, and the lives we see represented were all affected by that segregation.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Well done.
Cha
(297,323 posts)What a Lucky find from Karen Haas, curator at MFA Boston, .. I'll bring this one over from your link..
Untitled, Fort Scott, Kansas, 1950
The "youngest of 15".. wow! What a life he lived!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Parks
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Here is Gordon Parks.
Photography career
At the age of twenty-five, Parks was struck by photographs of migrant workers in a magazine and bought his first camera, a Voigtländer Brillant, for $12.50 at a Seattle, Washington, pawnshop.[11] The photography clerks who developed Parks' first roll of film, applauded his work and prompted him to seek a fashion assignment at a women's clothing store in St. Paul, Minnesota, that was owned by Frank Murphy. Those photographs caught the eye of Marva Louis, the elegant wife of heavyweight boxing champion Joe Louis. She encouraged Parks to move to Chicago in 1940,[12] where he began a portrait business and specialized in photographs of society women.
Over the next few years, Parks moved from job to job, developing a freelance portrait and fashion photographer sideline. He began to chronicle the city's South Side black ghetto and, in 1941, an exhibition of those photographs won Parks a photography fellowship with the Farm Security Administration (FSA).
Working as a trainee under Roy Stryker, Parks created one of his best-known photographs, American Gothic, Washington, D.C.,[13] named after the iconic Grant Wood painting, American Gothic. The photograph shows a black woman, Ella Watson, who worked on the cleaning crew of the FSA building, standing stiffly in front of an American flag hanging on the wall, a broom in one hand and a mop in the background. Parks had been inspired to create the image after encountering racism repeatedly in restaurants and shops in the segregated capital city.
A later photograph in the FSA series by Parks shows Ella Watson and her family
Upon viewing the photograph, Stryker said that it was an indictment of America, and that it could get all of his photographers fired.[14] He urged Parks to keep working with Watson, however, which led to a series of photographs of her daily life. Parks said later that his first image was overdone and not subtle; other commentators have argued that it drew strength from its polemical nature and its duality of victim and survivor, and so has affected far more people than his subsequent pictures of Mrs. Watson.[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Parks
Thank you Cha.
Cha
(297,323 posts)"At the age of twenty-five, Parks was struck by photographs of migrant workers in a magazine and bought his first camera, a Voigtländer Brillant, for $12.50 at a Seattle, Washington, pawnshop. The photography clerks who developed Parks' first roll of film, applauded his work and prompted him to seek a fashion assignment at a women's clothing store in St. Paul, Minnesota, that was owned by Frank Murphy..."
I'm all Verklempt
Mahalo to you, she
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)?w=900
Cha
(297,323 posts)And, these additional photos are Magnificent~
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)I have to find a way to see it. Sadly it makes for an expensive day. Hmmm maybe I can get my sister to give me an early Bday present.
Thanks Cha, the pictures are breathtaking in there depth.
PS glad your computer is up and working again.
Cha
(297,323 posts)be out of the question!
Mahalo again she for Gordon Parks' amazing life and pictures.
callous taoboy
(4,585 posts)Just one of the best photographs in history. The grace of the subject, her white dress perfectly obscuring the White Only fountain is deeply touching / poignant. Brilliant photos.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Or a troll. Take your pick.
You are making it hard for me to chose. Idiot or troll to miss the point.
more
Thank you Rex. tears.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It's just really hard for me to believe someone doesn't understand a very simple concept like segregation. At least for grown adults.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)allies.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)On a message board, we are allowed to link to other images.
I linked to an article that you and another have an issue with. It did not portray enough segregation for you? Did you live it, do you know it? Did you feel it? You have no compassion for those that do. That's sad.
You said
Sad you have no wish to be an ally because your fee fees were hurt. I am white and I am an ally and I always will be. History matters. So does the life of black men and women slaughtered.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)unlike yourself, I gather.
and you're white; even more ironic.
I was referring to allies of the democratic party.
but that's ok; the party doesn't want people like me anymore; it gets more obvious everyday.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)And do not believe that the pics shown segregation?
This?
unlike yourself, I gather.
and you're white; even more ironic.
I was referring to allies of the democratic party.
but that's ok; the party doesn't want people like me anymore; it gets more obvious everyday.
Why is my being white an issue for you? Why is that ironic to you? The Democratic party does not want you anymore? Why is that?
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)You cannot even tell me what segregation means!
Seriously, keep being totally clueless it is cute.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)that's what you want to do.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Seriously, it is okay not to know something fundamental to a topic in a thread. It happens and can be a learning experience.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)if not more, than yourself.
I just know that no matter what I say, you've decided to mock me and degrade me, for reasons known only to yourself and the other poster. You decided to make a big deal and insult me over a minor turn of phrase.
So it ain't worth talking to you, and I'll stop now. Way to win friends and influence people for the common good.
Rex
(65,616 posts)You are so right, no reason to talk to you whatsoever if you cannot even handle being wrong about something. It lets me know you are untrustworthy.
Have a great day now!
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)up your mind to mock and degrade me from jump street.
Says more about you and the kind of person you are than about me.
Rex
(65,616 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... then and it exist now.
These pictures bring out the overt "diet racism" in people... (people of color included if they're not taught properly)
It's "diet racism" to proclaim that these pictures don't show segregation when there's a black couple looking at a theatre... when did theatres at that time become desegregated!!?!?!??!?!?
It would be the exception that these theatres were NOT segregated
"...it's simply titled 'Outside the Liberty Theater' and depicts a young couple outside a segregated movie theater..."
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)'never before seen photos of 1950s segregation'
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... sit?!
The train pic is loud to us who have been taught about segregation at that time.
I understand a lot of school districts have stop teaching about segregation
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)BS doesn't wash.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... I'm thinking it went along with the times.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)this is all very tedious and nasty and I'm done.
don't worry, i'll leave any comment on segregation and civil rights to all of you; people who weren't there, didn't experience it, and are white. the real experts and judges of we lesser mortals.
here's a photo of a concentration camp for you:
don't see the camp? well, it's Germany in the 40s; the camp is there.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Wow you are a sad person, really nice to see you leaving a good thread since all you did was stink it up. Think about this - that we are not all friends, we all just told you that you are wrong. Maybe one day when you get older, you will understand that nobody is perfect. Not even you.
Have a great day!
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... NOT segregated isn't what America was going through at that time.
The micro agression here is that if it's not overt then it doesn't exist...
That's not reality
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)goodbye to all of you.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)of segregation.
I don't buy it. and I don't think you do either.
and now, I've really spent too much time with unpleasant company.
Rex
(65,616 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)De jure and de facto segregation was going on. Now, the segregation that does on is de facto. That sucks. However, de jure plus de facto simultaneously sucks worse.
montana_hazeleyes
(3,424 posts)I look at these beautiful people and think about what they have been through. Magnificent people treated less than human because of race.
The picture of the man in overalls, you don't need to see a sign to know what he thinks of black people.
And how outrageous, the elegant woman and her little girl should be considered too low to drink from whites damn fountain.
What an amazing find. Absolutely wonderful photography.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... people wont teach it any longer
callous taoboy
(4,585 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I love the fact that Mr. Parks captured these pictures of that time period forever!
Older, historical pictures like his are fantastic finds as they are examples of the kind of proof of the atmosphere that prevailed in America at that time.
The truth in these pictures can't be denied by other people, say less colored people, some who are decades removed from that time period, that seem so typical of so many of the Republicans of today.
As we roll into the Martin Luther King holiday this weekend, this is one of the most important aspects of having a photographic history that explains many of the reasons why Martin Luther King is so revered to this very day!
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)I want to see this exhibition at the MFA in Boston. If I can figure out how to afford it I will go.
Thank you Major. Damn it would be awesome to see.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Like all incredible art, they speak emphatically to the heart, mind and eyes all at once.
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)To think he started it all with a camera from a pawnshop at $12.50.
The images are hauntingly beautiful.
JI7
(89,252 posts)i always wonder what happened to the people and if they are still around
Cha
(297,323 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)I'll bet that pic of the little girl reading makes the racists blood boil.
BumRushDaShow
(129,129 posts)The man was a true master photographer.
mtngirl47
(990 posts)Daughter and I caught it at the High Museum in Atlanta a few weeks before Christmas. They also had another exhibit--Leonard Freed: Black in White America.
kcr
(15,317 posts)I'm glad these pictures were found. It would have been such a shame for them to have remained hidden.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Ramses
(721 posts)Thank you for the history and photographs posted at the link you gave.
xocet
(3,871 posts)Here is another link in which you might be interested:
sheshe2
(83,793 posts)Wonderful.