Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:30 PM Jan 2015

Do you believe that Princeton, Harvard and Yale are fighting for their survival?

You should, what do you think is behind the free community college proposal?

This proposal has at least two main objectives; first, put the for profit
diploma mills out of business and second, to revive the study of the trades.

IMO, Main line universities have less than a decade to exist unless for
profits are wiped out. It will be a very tough sell with the current Congress but it will put the GOP to a test that I can't see them winning.

The biggest problem will be what to do with the current student loan debt.

Just my read on the proposal.....

79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you believe that Princeton, Harvard and Yale are fighting for their survival? (Original Post) CK_John Jan 2015 OP
How would they be put out of business? joeglow3 Jan 2015 #1
No kidding, not only will they retain their extreme prestige Warpy Jan 2015 #15
How would free community college madville Jan 2015 #2
A friend of mine did the CC-to-Stanford jump Recursion Jan 2015 #4
It's the for profit that is competing with main line universities. CK_John Jan 2015 #5
Not really. The for-profit schools aggressively recruit The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #12
I agree 100% with this. The Ivies have a whole different clientele -- the rich, the Nay Jan 2015 #34
+1. Ivies are in no danger; I hope to god for-profits are. But I fear state univerisities would NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #48
It's more likely to help the four-year state schools, I think. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #56
Harvard is an investment trust with a curio education sideline. It will do fine Recursion Jan 2015 #3
The Ivy League schools won't be affected by this proposal. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #6
This proposal will re-frame the whole university education system. CK_John Jan 2015 #8
I just hired a woman who went to a local community college for her first two years, Sheldon Cooper Jan 2015 #9
Pay her 100% instead of the standard 76%. CK_John Jan 2015 #16
I'll be honest... I've had terrible luck with halfsies graduates. Adrahil Jan 2015 #24
Here are my Counter Conspiracy Theories for You daredtowork Jan 2015 #7
No conspiracy just my opinion, Harvard accepted 2100 a year while The University of Phoenix CK_John Jan 2015 #10
Do employers even take "degrees" from U Phoenix seriously? cyberswede Jan 2015 #11
Yes, the federal government is one, also teacher graduate degrees are popular. CK_John Jan 2015 #13
Oh nonsense tkmorris Jan 2015 #23
I doubt very much that a degree from a for-profit online school The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #14
I'm concerned about the success of the proposed free community college not CK_John Jan 2015 #17
Not at my company. n/t Adrahil Jan 2015 #25
Yes, unfortunately. My former workplace did and it is started to suffer from Nay Jan 2015 #35
The resume scanner doesn't care. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2015 #78
How Many Kids Applied erpowers Jan 2015 #18
So. CK_John Jan 2015 #19
So, Harvard Is Not Struggling for Suurvival erpowers Jan 2015 #30
Harvard became more selective daredtowork Jan 2015 #22
No Harvard wants to stay exclusive. AngryAmish Jan 2015 #41
Harvard will be affect also since the states will have pony up about 25 % CK_John Jan 2015 #46
Congress will not determine accreditation or student transfers . The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #58
Your first sentence has grammatical errors AndreaCG Jan 2015 #68
I have a conspiracy theory too. When I was a kid, my right wing relatives used to laugh at NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #50
Well 1/2 of graduates are unemployed or underemployed and the rest are CK_John Jan 2015 #52
A rider to your Conspiracy Theory daredtowork Jan 2015 #55
I have no idea what you are trying to say. My opinion is about the reason behind CK_John Jan 2015 #61
How big is Harvard's endowment? Retrograde Jan 2015 #20
Will Congress pass this proposal for free 2yr college plan? CK_John Jan 2015 #21
Not multimillions, multi billions Krytan11c Jan 2015 #26
Probably astronomical. CTyankee Jan 2015 #44
Think out of box, this is about the whole higher ed system. CK_John Jan 2015 #47
The first word is more important than the next three. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2015 #60
The Ivies will be just fine. The diploma mills should and will die. Personally, I think this is a napi21 Jan 2015 #27
Ivy folk do not go to community college. oldandhappy Jan 2015 #28
Wrong again ... GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #29
lmao. i know, laughing some more. i know. i am pondering what it really is about. nt seabeyond Jan 2015 #39
They aren't for profit SteveG Jan 2015 #31
Thanks for that list. It shows what the mainline universities are up against. CK_John Jan 2015 #33
They'll survive SteveG Jan 2015 #36
When just 1 of those for profits has 227,000 enrolled you have to be alarmed CK_John Jan 2015 #37
U Of Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State University & so on irisblue Jan 2015 #67
No. n/t tammywammy Jan 2015 #32
you put out the most outrageous statements ignoring so much of an issue, to arrive at an extreme. seabeyond Jan 2015 #38
Your opinion, which I think is head in the sand thinking. CK_John Jan 2015 #40
mmm hmm seabeyond Jan 2015 #42
Do you have any clue what TBF Jan 2015 #43
with Harvard rejecting 96% of applicants, Yale and Princeton 93%, I doubt DrDan Jan 2015 #45
Not quite Algernon Moncrieff Jan 2015 #49
Yes, as posted in the OP. CK_John Jan 2015 #51
The Ivies are picking up even more steam right now if anything. Exultant Democracy Jan 2015 #53
People who attend Yale, Harvard and Princeton are not paying for the education notadmblnd Jan 2015 #54
That's largely true. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #63
George W. AWOL Bush, a high-functioning imbecile, has a degree from Yale tabasco Jan 2015 #57
W was a legacy admission. All colleges are stuck with a few of those. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2015 #62
Um....no. jeff47 Jan 2015 #59
Free Communitty College wont even hurt for profits. spyker29 Jan 2015 #64
no. spanone Jan 2015 #65
Are you kidding? Harvard. e.g., has a $36-BILLION-dollar endowment! WinkyDink Jan 2015 #66
Yale owes and runs New Haven. bigwillq Jan 2015 #69
I think the four-year schools will be better off under a universal CC regime jmowreader Jan 2015 #70
not to mention the decrease in the number of sections of remedial skills classes. salin Jan 2015 #71
Are you nuts? salin Jan 2015 #72
What? MFrohike Jan 2015 #73
But this proposal is DOA WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jan 2015 #74
They are all quaking in their boots because of competition from the University of Phoenix! FSogol Jan 2015 #75
The Ivy League is in trouble DonCoquixote Jan 2015 #76
Harvard had 30 billion dollars in their endowment. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2015 #77
Those schools have enormous endowments BainsBane Jan 2015 #79
 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
1. How would they be put out of business?
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:38 PM
Jan 2015

Last edited Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:36 AM - Edit history (1)

I can honestly say I do not know a single intelligent person who has gone to a for profit school. I knew a few idiots who did.

Warpy

(111,291 posts)
15. No kidding, not only will they retain their extreme prestige
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:28 AM
Jan 2015

they will also continue to attract the best, the brightest and the richest.

I've known a lot of brilliant people who graduated Harvard and only a few fools. A few of the brilliant ones were also from serious money, so don't hold that against all of them.

A Harvard degree will always mean more than one from Podunk U, if only for the lifetime contacts one develops at Harvard--or any of the Ivies.

The schools that will struggle are the ones like U of Phoenix and ITT Tech. With free 2 year college programs, those schools will have to adapt a great deal.

madville

(7,412 posts)
2. How would free community college
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:39 PM
Jan 2015

Hurt private Ivy League schools? It's not like someone is going decide against attending Harvard to instead get an AA degree at the local CC.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. A friend of mine did the CC-to-Stanford jump
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:45 PM
Jan 2015

She works at NASA now. I don't know... mass community college for the first two years might be a good thing, and provide an easier transition for a lot of students.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
12. Not really. The for-profit schools aggressively recruit
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:23 AM
Jan 2015

among (or prey upon, if you like) students who don't have the grades or the money to go to a main line university. The for-profit schools persuade students to apply for student loans; those schools couldn't survive and wouldn't even exist if students had to pay out-of-pocket. The education offered is often marginal, and many of the students don't graduate but they are nevertheless stuck with huge student loans and no degree, so they are worse off than they were to start out with. The main line schools have minimum GPA requirements and are expensive, but also offer scholarships - but the students that the for-profit schools are after would never qualify, either with respect to grades or scholarship opportunities. They want an education but can't get into the "good" schools. The for-profit schools, which go after an entirely different market and do not compete in any respect with main line schools, are a sham and a ripoff.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
34. I agree 100% with this. The Ivies have a whole different clientele -- the rich, the
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

intelligent, the very hard workers. Yeah, there are some legacy admissions, but that happens everywhere.

In my experience with coworkers who went to "college" at such places as Bible colleges online, Phoenix U., etc., it was quite obvious that these students didn't even have the English skills (and we're talking about native English speakers here) to understand college texts, write essays and term papers, understand algebra, etc. The actual work they produced (I occasionally helped them with some assignments) would not have been acceptable in my high school's sophomore English class. IMO, the degrees were useless, but the workplace was paying the tuition. When they finally got degrees, they were promoted. Unfortunately, they were promoted over people who had better skills but no or lesser degrees.

Also IMO, the students didn't want an education -- they wanted that piece of paper that said they had gotten an education, and the for-profits AND workplaces have pushed this attitude of just getting the paper. Most of those who went to for-profits did not, and still do not, know what a true education is, nor do they care. This attitude has contributed mightily to the degradation of the English language and rational thought in our society at large. It's just a racket, like everything else; when nothing is untouchable when it comes to money, you have just destroyed the society you live in.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
48. +1. Ivies are in no danger; I hope to god for-profits are. But I fear state univerisities would
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:26 PM
Jan 2015

be too, as most people would take advantage of two free years rather then go the full four -- I think.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
56. It's more likely to help the four-year state schools, I think.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jan 2015

People who probably couldn't have gone to college at all will be able to get their first two years free (or nearly free), and could then transfer to a state school to get their four-year degree. A two-year degree isn't good for much other than to get a certificate for a trade, so those students who want a white-collar job will have to get a bachelor's degree. But with the first two years paid for, those students will probably finish the last two at a state university, to the university's benefit.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. Harvard is an investment trust with a curio education sideline. It will do fine
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:42 PM
Jan 2015

I do hope this brings the diploma mills to a screeching halt, though.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
6. The Ivy League schools won't be affected by this proposal.
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:47 PM
Jan 2015

There are enough wealthy alumni, and enough 1%-er offspring of same who can afford to attend those schools, that their survival is not in jeopardy. Community colleges are not competing for those students, who wouldn't be caught dead attending a two-year college with hoi polloi.

I do think the intent is to provide a good alternative for those who can't go to an expensive four-year private college, and to give those students a start on an education that won't put them in debt forever and will keep them away from those parasitic for-profit schools. Current student loan debt is a big problem - there's a potential bubble there that could have almost as disastrous consequences as the real estate crash. 30 years ago you could discharge student loan debt in bankruptcy. That should be made possible again.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
8. This proposal will re-frame the whole university education system.
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:57 PM
Jan 2015

Free community college, undergraduate 2 yr colleges and smaller elite private college that may or may not work within the new framework.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
9. I just hired a woman who went to a local community college for her first two years,
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:01 AM
Jan 2015

and then The University of Pittsburgh to finish her Bachelors degree. Her diploma say University of Pittsburgh and that's probably about half of what a four-year degree from Pitt would have cost. Maybe not Ivy League, but pretty good for PA. Win for her, win for me.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
24. I'll be honest... I've had terrible luck with halfsies graduates.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:26 AM
Jan 2015

IMO, the CC's are great for vo-tech type training and less good for academic training.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
7. Here are my Counter Conspiracy Theories for You
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 11:47 PM
Jan 2015

1) Sending more students to college stealthily creates a lot of jobs (administrative as well as for all those unemployed academics out there) under the clever cover of "education".

2) Conservatives defunded public education because too many poor (in their minds "uppity black folk&quot were getting an education and competing with white folks for a good job. Obama is giving those people who were excluded from competition (whatever their race is) a chance to compete again.

3) Conservatives have just been talking out of their posteriors for a long time about how "socialist" ideas like public infrastructure don't work. This is Obama's secret plan to actually implement some infrastructure to see whether it works or not.

4) Smaller 4-year colleges will have to lower the tuition burden they've been imposing on students to compete. Who will want to take out all those loans when they can get the first 2 years for free and transfer?

If this all happens to kill those rip-off for-profit colleges and proves to be a great way to invest the next generation with productive skills - BONUS!

Ps. For profit trade schools were a threat to Harvard? WTF have you been smoking...

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
10. No conspiracy just my opinion, Harvard accepted 2100 a year while The University of Phoenix
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:12 AM
Jan 2015

attained a peak enrollment of almost 600,000 students in 2010, but its numbers have declined to 227,000 as of 2015.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
23. Oh nonsense
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:14 AM
Jan 2015

NO ONE thinks a degree from the U of P is worth the day it's printed on. Because it isn't.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
14. I doubt very much that a degree from a for-profit online school
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:28 AM
Jan 2015

is at all competitive. Some employers might not care much where you got your degree, but if you have to compete with applicants with degrees from even a respected state university - wouldn't have to be Ivy League - you would probably be at a disadvantage. The biggest problem, though, is that the for-profit schools are really quite expensive, and if a student runs out of loan money they have to drop out and are still stuck paying the loan back. The graduation rate for these schools is quite low; a lot of students wind up horrendously in debt and with no degree at all.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
17. I'm concerned about the success of the proposed free community college not
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:33 AM
Jan 2015

if for profits goal is profits or education.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
18. How Many Kids Applied
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:36 AM
Jan 2015

Do you realize how many kids apply to Harvard each year? Harvard accepts 1%-5% of the students who apply each year. I think University of Phoenix accepts everyone who wants to attend.

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
30. So, Harvard Is Not Struggling for Suurvival
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 11:15 AM
Jan 2015

According to Harvard, nearly 35,000 students applied to be a part of Harvard's Class of 2018. That 35,000 number was not just a one time thing. For years Harvard has received nearly 35,000 appliants. The school only accepted 1%-5% of those applicants. That means Harvard turned away more than 30,000 of the students who wanted to attend the school. The point is the school is not at the point where it has to go around begging for students.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
22. Harvard became more selective
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:11 AM
Jan 2015

And I believe at the same time they started guaranteeing full need-based scholarships? I don't see how this signals Harvard's decline?

Phoenix on the other hand is a Diploma Mill: the more students they rake in, the more US-backed student loan money they can get their claws on.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
41. No Harvard wants to stay exclusive.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:16 PM
Jan 2015

They have the means to triple enrollment but will not to keep out the scum.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
46. Harvard will be affect also since the states will have pony up about 25 %
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:22 PM
Jan 2015

and will require that all credits be transferable from community college to full university.

How and if this makes it through Congress will determine the details.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
58. Congress will not determine accreditation or student transfers .
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:21 PM
Jan 2015

That's handled by regional accreditation authorities and the universities. No private school will be required to accept transfers from a community college, although state schools in the same network normally will accept credits from CCs if the student is in good academic standing. (I know what I'm talking about; I once worked at a state U. and was involved in evaluating student transfers). The Ivies and other private schools will not be required to accept CC transfers and will not be part of this program. The President's proposal makes it very clear that this is to be a state-administered program for the state-run CCs and universities.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
50. I have a conspiracy theory too. When I was a kid, my right wing relatives used to laugh at
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:31 PM
Jan 2015

people who worked in government jobs -- education and the like. That was when a fair amount of working class people got into government work.

Now all their kids do that work, and the kids of the former working class are often working at walmart.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
52. Well 1/2 of graduates are unemployed or underemployed and the rest are
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:39 PM
Jan 2015

working just to payoff student loans. Returning to live with parents, and can not afford a home or families.

Productivity is not producing the jobs and this bubble is about to bust.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
55. A rider to your Conspiracy Theory
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jan 2015

The savage eagerness to cut down on Big Government to get those kids fired and to reduce public infrastructure so they have nothing to fall back on when they lose their work: a childish "who has the last laugh now"...?

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
20. How big is Harvard's endowment?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 12:58 AM
Jan 2015

Multimillions, last I checked: they're not hurting for money, and they have more applicants than they can accomodate.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
44. Probably astronomical.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:20 PM
Jan 2015

I was a Major Gifts Officer at a nonprofit organization. My best donor pool was in Greenwich, CT. The very rich there loved my organization but their biggest gifts went to their prep school and their (usually Ivy) undergrad school. These people are all about making sure their kids continue to have the best breaks that money can buy so they perpetuate their wealth by donating huge amounts to the school's endowments.

They are also mindful of their reputations. That is why Naming Opportunities is such a popular item among fundraisers. The ultimate is having a school of something named after you and that comes with a hefty price tag. However, you can get the lesser Naming Opportunities with endowment gifts to libraries, hospitals of course, and museums. Even such items as fountains and parks. Sweet deals...

napi21

(45,806 posts)
27. The Ivies will be just fine. The diploma mills should and will die. Personally, I think this is a
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:56 AM
Jan 2015

terrific idea and I HOPE Congress and the States adopt it.

I have a personal reason to love the idea. My granddaughter graduates from HS this year and has already planned to attend a CC for her core classes and then transfer them to a four year college for the final two years. Her parents can't afford to pay for four years at a regular college and they nor she want her to end up with student loans higher than the cost of a house! It will be a big help to her (and her brother who graduates next year) as I'm sure it will be for millions of other students in the US.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
28. Ivy folk do not go to community college.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:05 AM
Jan 2015

Ivy folk are not interested in trade jobs.
Ivy folk are mostly unaware of the people who will benefit from free community college opportunities.
The Ivies are a separate universe and I fear not for them.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
33. Thanks for that list. It shows what the mainline universities are up against.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jan 2015

I used the Ivy League schools just as an example, if the top tier are threated by the "for profits", just how will UM, MSU, Ohio State, etc survive.

SteveG

(3,109 posts)
36. They'll survive
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 01:57 PM
Jan 2015

because they offer a superior product to the for profit schools, most of which are diploma mills, and are generally less expensive than the for profit schools and offer much higher quality programs.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
37. When just 1 of those for profits has 227,000 enrolled you have to be alarmed
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:08 PM
Jan 2015

by the numbers. They are also paying professors 2 to 3 times what the mainline are paying to mentor their online students.

In NY SUNY just announced and online college to fight the "for profits".

irisblue

(32,996 posts)
67. U Of Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State University & so on
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:39 PM
Jan 2015

and all the big name state universities are Land Grant Universities, from Wikipedia..."The purpose of the land-grant colleges was:
without excluding other scientific and classical studies and including military tactic, to teach such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and the mechanic arts, in such manner as the legislatures of the States may respectively prescribe, in order to promote the liberal and practical education of the industrial classes in the several pursuits and professions in life."....With a few exceptions (including Cornell University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), nearly all of the Land-Grant Colleges are public." Those universities are not going anywhere, ever. They operate from a federal law base, they are waaaayyyy too enmeshed in their local states, they will only close when that state does.
What is this about , really?

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
38. you put out the most outrageous statements ignoring so much of an issue, to arrive at an extreme.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:10 PM
Jan 2015

TBF

(32,071 posts)
43. Do you have any clue what
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:18 PM
Jan 2015

kind of an endowment Harvard has? It will be around a lot longer than any of us.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
45. with Harvard rejecting 96% of applicants, Yale and Princeton 93%, I doubt
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:22 PM
Jan 2015

they consider this proposal a threat.

To suggest they have less than a decade to exist is just silly.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
49. Not quite
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jan 2015
IMO, Main line universities have less than a decade to exist unless for profits are wiped out.


The Ivies are private, not for profit entities, but nice try.

This proposal has at least two main objectives; first, put the for profit diploma mills out of business and second, to revive the study of the trades.


I'll agree with that, in part. However, the schools you're thinking of are not Princeton, Harvard, and Yale. You would be referring to schools like University of Phoenix, DeVry, and ITT Tech.

E.T.A.: this is a link to the financial aid of Brown University, a member off the Ivy League, and hence a very expensive and very prestigious school. A high percentage of students receive aid packages of over $40K per year with no expectation of repayment.

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)
53. The Ivies are picking up even more steam right now if anything.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:46 PM
Jan 2015

Knowledge economics are using these institutions and the cities that host them as development hubs. Even without their absurd endowments these institutions have become major organs in every city that hosts them and with the way the knowledge economy is growing the feedback cycle between these Universities, major corporations and the municipalities and states in which they reside has long been self sufficient.

Even without their massive endowments and with no federal monies these institutions would be just fine.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
54. People who attend Yale, Harvard and Princeton are not paying for the education
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jan 2015

They are paying for the label. No, they will never be put out of business.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
63. That's largely true.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jan 2015

Those schools can be as choosy as they want, and most of the students they admit have high GPAs and SAT scores, so (with the occasional exception of legacy admissions like George Bush the Dumber) those kids are generally pretty smart. However, you can probably get just as good an education at any number of state universities and less well-known private colleges (some of which are just about as expensive as Harvard). The difference is the label, as well as the connections with other elite types that can get you the plum job on Wall Street.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
57. George W. AWOL Bush, a high-functioning imbecile, has a degree from Yale
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:17 PM
Jan 2015

Many graduates of community college have learned much, much more than the Chimp from Yale.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,761 posts)
62. W was a legacy admission. All colleges are stuck with a few of those.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:24 PM
Jan 2015

The loser offspring of big shot or big donor alumni will be admitted as long as they are not actually in prison. This is a situation the colleges accept in exchange for the cachet and/or donations from their important alumni.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
59. Um....no.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:22 PM
Jan 2015

First and most superficial, none of the ivy league schools are for-profit. They're all non-profit.

Second, the ivy league schools are not threatened by free community college. Their student body is made of up an entirely different class of people who would never attend a community college. Too many tongues would wag at the next dinner party.

In addition, each of the schools you list has a massive endowment. Harvard has more than $30 billion. They could afford to charge $0 tuition for decades.

Free community college is a slight threat to for-profit 4-year schools. But a 2-year degree is not a 4-year degree. There are plenty of fields where an associates degree would not be considered enough.

Plus, for-profits are paid per student. It doesn't particularly matter if they're freshmen or juniors. So if a free 2-year with transfer becomes the norm, they'll accept 1/2 as many freshmen and twice as many juniors. Resulting in the same size student body and the same income.

OTOH, we need a lot more people working in the trades. Free community college would be an excellent way to help more people enter those fields.

spyker29

(89 posts)
64. Free Communitty College wont even hurt for profits.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:26 PM
Jan 2015

Even if Congress would pass it, no way they would leave out the for-profit schools.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
66. Are you kidding? Harvard. e.g., has a $36-BILLION-dollar endowment!
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jan 2015

Harvard University’s largest-in-the-country endowment saw returns of 15.4 percent in the last year, and now stands at $36.4 billion. That’s a lot of money.
http://www.boston.com/business/news/2014/09/25/harvard-endowment-bigger-than-half-the-world-economies/UAOY9V4lg6fcjArrSyCgWJ/story.html

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
70. I think the four-year schools will be better off under a universal CC regime
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:45 PM
Jan 2015

If EVERYONE shows up at university with fourteen years of schooling under his or her belt, two things will happen: class sizes will be able to be increased without adding more dorm rooms or seats in the mess hall, and you can convince more people to go for their Master's degrees..."Joe, you were already going to pay for a four-year education here, why not get your MA and really set yourself apart from the crowd?"

salin

(48,955 posts)
72. Are you nuts?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 09:42 PM
Jan 2015

For third and fourth tier colleges this could be a concern. However, for the top elite? Where the prestige and networks open doors for its students even before they are alum? For the HUGE endowments set aside for scholarships? Top students are going to forgo the prestige and opened doors to spend two years at a community college - in such droves that the top schools will close within ten years?

Be serious.

Your final point per a main challenge being current student debt - is salient and huge. Start an OP on that - and let's have a real conversation - rather than an absurd "thought provoker" (and it was weak on that) lead in to the main point. And if the main point was top tier - extremely wealthy institutions going out of commission in ten years - well then there isn't even a real conversation to be had around that.

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
73. What?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:31 PM
Jan 2015

I like bullet points, so I'll use them.

1. The named schools are not in danger of going out of business. More's the pity, since their increasingly incompetent alums continue to dominate this country. If those schools were worth a damn, the world would be in better shape.

2. If the idea is to get rid of for-profit schools, it's an odd way to do it. Community colleges don't offer bachelor's degrees.

3. The trades are not in danger of extinction. The much-decried skills gap is a myth. The sector with the greatest need to fill positions is retail. If a degree is ever required for a retail job, that will be the final, unassailable sign that our society has incurably ossified and is in imminent danger of decline.*

4. I have no idea how you think universities are in any danger whatsoever. As long as the federal loan and corporate donation teats are flowing, they will be fine. It makes no sense to claim they're in danger when their primary funding sources are intact.

5. Student loan debt is simply not taken seriously by those in power because they haven't seen a tuition bill in decades, nor had to make payments while making squat. Anyone who hasn't seen one in the last ten years is completely unqualified to speak on the issue.

*Required means that a checklist item needs to be marked. It doesn't mean it's actually needed, it just means the employer decided to add another hurdle to the pool of job seekers. It's like the vast majority of degrees today that require, without needing, a degree of some sort.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
76. The Ivy League is in trouble
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 11:31 PM
Jan 2015

but for a different reason.

namely, thanks to folks like W., people realize that these places do NOT produce the smart people anymore. They are more a social function where Biff and Buffy can hook up with Brad and Tiffany to maximize the social connections they had, or in the case of minorties, where Carlos or Jing-Wei or Sadaf can cash in their years being the best test taker to sell themselve to Brad and Tiffany, in the hopes of getting that tech job in San Francisco and that apartment with the high rent. People realize that the Ivies have charge people arms and legs, and for WHAT? A love of learning?, please.

The only thing floating the Ivies is that a lot of foriegn people go there to get that cred that will enable them to get hired in the "Global economy", but one the shareholders of the world realzie that they can outsource CEO's as well, then an American education will not have the Imperial value it does. Indeed, wait until American students start to realize they might get a better education in Europe or Asia, and one that will help them get a job, because they learned to speak Chinese or Urdu or even Russian.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
79. Those schools have enormous endowments
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 06:43 AM
Jan 2015

and benefit from financial support from the nation's wealthiest Americans. They most certainly are not fighting for survival. State universities, however, are in a constant struggle with legislatures for adequate funding.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you believe that Princ...