"Stop the War on Terror, we want to get off."

[kpete]

"Stop the War on Terror, we want to get off."

Right about now seems like the right time to contend with the following analysis from Tom Engelhardt:

Despite the several thousand Americans who died on September 11, 2001, the dangers of terrorism rate above shark attacks but not much else in American life. Even more remarkably, the national security state has been built on a foundation of almost total failure. Think of failure, in fact, as the spark that repeatedly sets the further expansion of its apparatus in motion, funds it, and allows it to thrive.

It works something like this: start with the fact that, on September 10, 2001, global jihadism was a microscopic movement on this planet. Since 9/11, under the pressure of American military power, it has exploded geographically, while the number of jihadist organizations has multiplied, and the number of people joining such groups has regularly and repeatedly increased, a growth rate that seems to correlate with the efforts of Washington to destroy terrorism and its infrastructure. In other words, the Global War on Terror has been and remains a global war for the production of terror. And terror groups know it.

It was Osama bin Laden’s greatest insight and is now a commonplace that drawing Washington into military action against you increases your credibility in the world that matters to you and so makes recruiting easier. At the same time, American actions, from invasions to drone strikes, and their “collateral damage,” create pools of people desperate for revenge. If you want to thrive and grow, in other words, you need the U.S. as an enemy. ... This has, in other words, proved to be a deeply symbiotic and mutually profitable relationship.

From the point of view of the national security state, each failure, each little disaster, acts as another shot of fear in the American body politic, and the response to failure is predictable: never less of what doesn’t work, but more. More money, more bodies hired, more new outfits formed, more elaborate defenses, more offensive weaponry. Each failure with its accompanying jolt of fear (and often hysteria) predictably results in further funding for the national security state to develop newer, even more elaborate versions of what it’s been doing these last 13 years. Failure, in other words, is the key to success.

the rest:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175939/tomgram
via:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2015/1/9/194723/7410

[BillZBubb]

1. There is a lot of truth in that analysis.

As I wrote in another thread, there are puppet masters on both sides who thrive on the conflict and profit from it. Their objectives aren't usually the objectives of the people who support the cause and perform the violence.

[NYC_SKP]

2. "response to failure is predictable: never less of what doesn’t work, but more."

So true, and not just with the war on terror.

I happens with the war on drugs and it happens in schools and in police departments everywhere.

[Octafish]

3. The National Security State as a Self-Perpetuating Machine

From Englehardt:

In this sense, think of Washington’s national security structure as a self-perpetuating machine that works like a dream, since those who oversee its continued expansion are never penalized for its inability to accomplish any of its goals. On the contrary, they are invariably promoted, honored, and assured of a golden-parachute-style retirement or -- far more likely -- a golden journey through one of Washington’s revolving doors onto some corporate board or into some cushy post in one complex or another where they can essentially lobby their former colleagues for private warrior corporations, rent-a-gun outfits, weapons makers, and the like. And there is nothing either in Washington or in American life that seems likely to change any of this in the near future.

[GeorgeGist]

4. I'm afraid that 9/11 may have activated ...

the human self-destruct sequence.

[NewDeal_Dem]

5. "global war for the production of terror. And terror groups know it."

the real terror groups are those behind the scenes, who manipulate populations for their own ends.

[femmocrat]

6. Here is a great article about how the "war on terror" increased terrorism:

Recommended reading! "We" tried to warn them!

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/10/u-s-war-on-terror-has-increased-terrorism.html