Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 03:03 AM Jan 2015

Response to Paris massacre is a Knee-jerk lefty reaction

Knee-jerk lefty reaction to Paris massacre: blame it on US foreign policy.
I'm not defending US foreign policy but killing journalists or killing school children, or pouring acid on school children, or beating, killing and raping women is not opposition to US foreign policy. If they want to mount a symbolic protest of US policy, why don't they attack a US army base?

Plenty of them around.
But it is easier to attack defenseless people.

Get real. These are not freedom fighters. These are murderers.

Does anyone remember El Salvador and Nicaragua in the '80's? Brutal US foreign policy did all it could to keep these countries under dictator's hands. People resisted the US. They did not kill journalists or school children.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Response to Paris massacre is a Knee-jerk lefty reaction (Original Post) ellenrr Jan 2015 OP
"They did not kill journalists or school children." NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #1
REVISE HISTORY MUCH? Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #2
Those were supported by the US RobertEarl Jan 2015 #3
I agree with that. The way the poster reads sounds different Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #5
The 'they' in 'they did not' refers to the previous plural noun, ie 'people' muriel_volestrangler Jan 2015 #7
I didn't hear the perps saying they were striking a blow against US foreign policy. didn't hear NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #4
+1 nt Live and Learn Jan 2015 #6
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
2. REVISE HISTORY MUCH?
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 03:15 AM
Jan 2015

Over the course of 1980, the Salvadoran Army and three main security forces (National Guard, National Police and Treasury Police) were estimated to have killed 11,895 people, mostly peasants, trade unionists, teachers, students, journalists, human rights advocates, priests, and other prominent demographics among the popular movement.

Human rights organizations judged the Salvadoran government to have among the worst human rights records in the hemisphere

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. Those were supported by the US
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 03:22 AM
Jan 2015

The people - the freedom fighters- didn't go around killing innocents. They got killed.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
7. The 'they' in 'they did not' refers to the previous plural noun, ie 'people'
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 06:30 AM
Jan 2015

I think that should be the usual way to interpret it at first glance, and even if you didn't read it that way at first, then it's worth re-reading something you think is wrong, before replying that you're outraged by it.

The last 2 sentences could be re-written as:

"People resisted the US, and did not kill journalists or school children. "

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
4. I didn't hear the perps saying they were striking a blow against US foreign policy. didn't hear
Sat Jan 10, 2015, 03:29 AM
Jan 2015

any "Knee-jerk lefty" (as opposed to the pragmatic -- what? Conservatives? at DU) saying that the perps killed the journalists in response to US policy. Didn't hear anyone here call them freedom fighters.

What I did hear is that US policy has set the muslim world on fire, and incidents like this are blowback to the sometimes deliberate, and sometimes inadvertent, radicalization sponsored by the US and other western actors.

PS: the US and its proxies kill journalists and school children.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Response to Paris massacr...