Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:13 PM Jan 2015

News Outlets Are Censoring Images of Cartoons That May Have Incited Charlie Hebdo Attack

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/01/07/charlie_hebdo_cartoons_self_censorship_by_several_major_outlets.html

The French magazine Charlie Hebdo was attacked this morning by gunmen, possibly al-Qaida members, who were apparently upset by its history of printing cartoons mocking radical Islam. While much of the response to the attack has celebrated the notion of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, some news outlets have chosen to self-censor images of controversial Charlie Hebdo cartoons.

From the New York Daily News:




The original image:



From the U.K. Telegraph:




An image from what appears to be the original photo shoot:




An image of a Charlie Hebdo cover just displayed on CNN was blurred. A just-broadcast segment about Charlie Hebdo's history of controversy on the network itself did not display any images of the cartoons. The CNN International site's story on Charlie Hebdo likewise does not display the cartoons.*

The Al-Jazeera America network has blurred images of the magazine during its coverage.

Outlets including Gawker, Vox, and the Free Beacon have reprinted a number of uncensored Charlie Hebdo covers.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
News Outlets Are Censoring Images of Cartoons That May Have Incited Charlie Hebdo Attack (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2015 OP
According to one of the BBC reports (website) enlightenment Jan 2015 #1
Heckler's veto. Or should I say, murderers' veto. (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #2
Cowards. Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #3
The explicit, sexually themed ones should not be displayed any further than need be. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #4
Why not? I think they should be everywhere and now they will be. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #5

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
1. According to one of the BBC reports (website)
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:21 PM
Jan 2015

one of the Egyptian papers ran a series of the cartoons today, in response to the bombing. Not all and perhaps not the most inflammatory (though I'm uncertain what offends whom and why . . .) - but they ran them.

http://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/623371







edited to change who to whom . . .

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. The explicit, sexually themed ones should not be displayed any further than need be.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jan 2015

The posts reposting The Rude Pundit's links show some of these cartoons, which are on Gawker.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. Why not? I think they should be everywhere and now they will be.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:46 PM
Jan 2015

Not only that, but there will be an endless stream of such artwork. Because fuck them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»News Outlets Are Censorin...