Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:18 AM Apr 2012

Neighbors in Newton County, Ga. case are now in jail

"On Monday, Canoles and his son were summoned for another interview with Newton County officials, who told them to bring in their guns.

They turned themselves in about 10 p.m. Monday and were booked into the Newton County Jail just before midnight, according to sheriff's spokesman Mark Mitchell. They were being held without bond Tuesday, online jail records show.

"I don't know what they can charge me with," Canoles said late Monday afternoon, before the interview with authorities. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own.""

http://www.ajc.com/news/newton-county-neighbors-charged-1424231.html

159 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neighbors in Newton County, Ga. case are now in jail (Original Post) Kaleva Apr 2012 OP
And here are the Good 'Ole Boys....protecting 'the country' from peaceful black families. marmar Apr 2012 #1
Uncle Bubba will be questioned as a material witness. lpbk2713 Apr 2012 #5
Summer Teeth! HillWilliam Apr 2012 #74
I can think of several things they could be charged with. hobbit709 Apr 2012 #2
"...we protect our own." Iggo Apr 2012 #3
I thought that, too obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #12
When he says "our own", I suspect he's not including anyone who's not white. marmar Apr 2012 #13
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nt bonniebgood Apr 2012 #50
Rather telling, that there. Sentience FAIL. freshwest Apr 2012 #109
Stood out to me like a sore thumb. joshcryer Apr 2012 #131
Ignorance abounds. Laurian Apr 2012 #4
Too bad TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #6
...and they have cousins and cousins and more asjr Apr 2012 #7
Oh noes! It's true! Obama took their guns away and threw them in jail! tanyev Apr 2012 #8
Obama did this? When the DOJ goes after the police who arrested the Kalonjis, then AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #22
I'm just speculating on what the right wing spin will be. tanyev Apr 2012 #28
The Teabaggers were right all along! Run for the hills! It's the Apocalyse! freshwest Apr 2012 #111
Vigilante stupidity all wrapped up in a single quote: 99Forever Apr 2012 #9
+1000 Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #15
+1,000 TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #24
They can't think MattBaggins Apr 2012 #71
What, a Well Regulated millitia? Gold Metal Flake Apr 2012 #88
The statement also encapsulates the arrogance and selfishness _ed_ Apr 2012 #106
GOOD obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #10
"I don't know what they can charge me with" Assault for one ck4829 Apr 2012 #11
And branishing and trespassing obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #14
I wonder what their attitude was like during this whole ordeal. Ian David Apr 2012 #17
I've wondered that, too obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #30
"Shut up or I'll shoot," ronnie624 Apr 2012 #93
Yeah, it sounds like the Canoles are in a world of shit. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #94
Yep. See OJ. If they held them at gunpoint (or threats of gunpoint) it's VERY serious. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2012 #72
They did -- for about ten minutes obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #77
Orr false imprisonment, illegal detainment, harrassment maxrandb Apr 2012 #85
Kidnapping is what I was thinking. They held them prisoner. jwirr Apr 2012 #105
Trespassing, too, don't you think? They crossed the land onto their new neighbor's place. freshwest Apr 2012 #112
The trespassing charge is especially delicious, given the whole situation. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2012 #127
Yes, although I found all the charges satisfying, LOL. freshwest Apr 2012 #134
I suppose we should be thankful TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #16
I can't get that tune from Deliverace out of arthritisR_US Apr 2012 #18
What tune is that? Art_from_Ark Apr 2012 #70
That's the one! nt arthritisR_US Apr 2012 #100
This is the problem with having no regulations on gun ownership and carrying around loaded weapons. upaloopa Apr 2012 #19
last time i checked, the 2A says nothing about threatening people you don't like the looks of. KG Apr 2012 #20
Or leaving *your* yard to confront them in front of *their* front door. freshwest Apr 2012 #114
"We're waiting to move," Bruno Kalonji said. "We're still afraid of what the guy next door might do. AlbertCat Apr 2012 #21
In a just world, the entire staff of the Sheriff's department MineralMan Apr 2012 #27
They need to sue those idiots and the Sheriff obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #33
+1,000 freshwest Apr 2012 #118
They should include the cost of security guards. Seems like a pretty dangerous neighborhood sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #122
For real! obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #126
Welcome Wagon FAIL. I wouldn't want to live next to gun toting hot heads, either. freshwest Apr 2012 #115
now just imagine, after all this, having to live next to these morons. nt Javaman Apr 2012 #23
Reminds me of Palin not understanding that other amendment, the 1st. DeschutesRiver Apr 2012 #25
huh marshall gaines Apr 2012 #26
I think the sheriff was well aware that this could easily become a media circus Kaleva Apr 2012 #31
Damn liberal media. Gold Metal Flake Apr 2012 #89
No, no, liberal media good! LOL. freshwest Apr 2012 #117
When you can get it. Gold Metal Flake Apr 2012 #132
+1 freshwest Apr 2012 #133
I'm not Black, but I'm still going to stay out of Georgia. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #29
Considering that the Newton County sheriff is black hack89 Apr 2012 #34
And the fact that the sheriff is black will cease all racist activity in the department..... marmar Apr 2012 #38
No - but it is less likely to be ignored or condoned. hack89 Apr 2012 #43
Maybe. But what about Yankees? AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #39
Yankee fans deserve all they get ... oh wait, wrong subject. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #45
That's a joke, right? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #44
No. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #46
Insert appropriate Blazing Saddles quote here slackmaster Apr 2012 #54
WHy that's the finest example of frontier jibberish I've heard in a long time. hootinholler Apr 2012 #63
I'm just glad all these young people were here today to hear that. bluesbassman Apr 2012 #116
More palatable than Glenn Beck... freshwest Apr 2012 #120
Listening to rats gnawing on baseboards would be more palatable than listening to Beck. bluesbassman Apr 2012 #123
Him and Rush... Jabba the Hut and Clone drooling all over Planet Earth. freshwest Apr 2012 #124
That is ridiculous -- much of Georgia ia quite diverse obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #42
Diverse? Diverse doesn't mean safe for anyone not from the area. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #52
Yes, it does obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #57
Yea, well, if you look at the rest of the neighbors, I would bet that they are all cousins. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #59
I am nor black, but I live in Georgia and am not leaving. n/t RebelOne Apr 2012 #87
Thank you. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #95
Racist, gun toting neighbors might be expected, but racist cops? FailureToCommunicate Apr 2012 #32
I haven't read this before -- they better have kidnapping charges slapped on them obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #36
No it doesn't Meiko Apr 2012 #69
Yeah, nothing to see here, right? DiverDave Apr 2012 #99
Thank you obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #102
I am not a gambler Meiko Apr 2012 #135
Yes, it does obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #101
The Newton County sheriff is African American hack89 Apr 2012 #37
Okay...maybe that's why things changed a few day later. But it was FailureToCommunicate Apr 2012 #49
Sometimes it is nothing more than lack of imagination and rigid adherence to rules hack89 Apr 2012 #51
Rigid rules? Let us image if the police arrive and it is two black men with rifles trained FailureToCommunicate Apr 2012 #56
Lets imagine the police were black while we are at it hack89 Apr 2012 #60
Lacking common sense seems to be a job requirement, whether in Georgia or elsewhere. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #58
Difference: the sheriff is African-American; the husband was African NickB79 Apr 2012 #149
When you hold someone at gunpoint, you should probably go to the trouble... JHB Apr 2012 #35
There are on occasion situations in which holding someone at gunpoint is justified slackmaster Apr 2012 #55
Did 'we protect our own' ever mean all Americans malaise Apr 2012 #40
Or just those from the area? AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #53
Keep us updated on this case if you can obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #41
I've been following this since the story first broke Kaleva Apr 2012 #47
OMG I missed that one! obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author ecstatic Apr 2012 #61
They took their AR-15s, how will they be able to feed their family? A Simple Game Apr 2012 #62
It is not your "Second Amendment right" to terrorize your neighbors. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2012 #64
Charged with three felonies obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #65
Ouch! Meiko Apr 2012 #75
Yup obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #76
"we protect our own" drm604 Apr 2012 #66
I hope the Kalonjis decide to stay. kentauros Apr 2012 #67
They weren'y held without bond -- they bailed out obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #78
Yes, I meant the gunmen. kentauros Apr 2012 #79
Sorry, I was confused obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #81
Okay kentauros Apr 2012 #82
This story makes me sad MintyFresh Apr 2012 #68
Another couple of 'law-abiding gun owners'...right up to the moment they weren't. Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #73
Not anymore Meiko Apr 2012 #92
AR-15s...wtf... TeeYiYi Apr 2012 #80
What's even more perplexing kentauros Apr 2012 #83
Not just one, but TWO AR-15s... TeeYiYi Apr 2012 #84
That's a lot Meiko Apr 2012 #90
Me either -- that was a real wtf moment obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #86
Who knows Meiko Apr 2012 #91
Did they say anything after they found out you were in the service? obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #96
Yea they did Meiko Apr 2012 #136
As an observation only, kentauros Apr 2012 #98
Because they don't pay as much, and often have Sheriffs, not PDs obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #103
Even more than those mugshots, what really strikes me is that picture of the Kalonjis at the top. drm604 Apr 2012 #97
I know, they do NOT look like meth heads or scuzzy people obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #104
Well, these two goobers clearly ain't the sharpest hifiguy Apr 2012 #119
what idiots karnac Apr 2012 #107
Ideally, the old couple should have been armed too, so they could have "stood their ground" Speck Tater Apr 2012 #108
Well, it could happen. But these old folks had been traumatized before, so not likely. Hope their freshwest Apr 2012 #121
If you think someone is robbing your house by all means go grab a gun 4th law of robotics Apr 2012 #110
Brandishing a weapon nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #113
Yes, those expensive AR-15's are probably history Kaleva Apr 2012 #125
Yep Meiko Apr 2012 #137
aggravated assault with a weapon, menacing obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #128
Both are in for a heck of a wake up call nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #129
You bet -- and good! obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #140
Oh effing snappity-SNAP! Poll_Blind Apr 2012 #130
The ar-15 is simple to convert to full automatic DiverDave Apr 2012 #138
No, it is not. Kaleva Apr 2012 #139
Why AKs are easier to convert nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #143
Same applys to the AK Kaleva Apr 2012 #144
Yup, why the Carels have these converted nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #146
Can't buy a gun for hunting that's capable of firing a three round burts Kaleva Apr 2012 #148
Yup, the AR 15 has a funny selector nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #150
The ATF treats the burst fire kit the same as a fully functional machine gun. Kaleva Apr 2012 #151
Yup, why the cartels convert them regularly nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #152
Well, let us know when you do convert one. It's easy, right? Kaleva Apr 2012 #153
Why would I do that? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #154
Well, when I was in the Army DiverDave Apr 2012 #156
You may be right about that being the case in the 70's. Kaleva Apr 2012 #157
I was told by an ATF agent Meiko Apr 2012 #141
You can go to prison for a long time just for having certain parts of an M-16 Kaleva Apr 2012 #145
Yes it is, though the AK is easier nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #142
I haven't seen any kits lately Meiko Apr 2012 #158
I won't nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #159
The saddest thing of all is that Mr. Kalonji suffered through Mobutu's regime... Odin2005 Apr 2012 #147
The 2nd Amendment is about gun OWNERSHIP Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #155

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
2. I can think of several things they could be charged with.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:24 AM
Apr 2012

Maybe next time time they'll ask questions first before holding someone at gunpoint.

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
4. Ignorance abounds.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:28 AM
Apr 2012

I am so sick of vigilantes and their "second amendment" rights. I hope these people face some real justice, but I doubt they will.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
22. Obama did this? When the DOJ goes after the police who arrested the Kalonjis, then
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:02 AM
Apr 2012

we can be impressed.

What are the odds that this will happen?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
9. Vigilante stupidity all wrapped up in a single quote:
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:33 AM
Apr 2012
"I don't know what they can charge me with," Canoles said late Monday afternoon, before the interview with authorities. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own.""

Screw everyone else's rights, you redneck twerps, you got'sa have your surrogate penis.

When are we going put a minimum IQ requirement on owning deadly weapons?

MattBaggins

(7,905 posts)
71. They can't think
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:07 AM
Apr 2012

Where does the constitution say you can draw that gun and point it at people legally moving into their own houses.

_ed_

(1,734 posts)
106. The statement also encapsulates the arrogance and selfishness
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 04:41 PM
Apr 2012

of the average NRA-type: The second amendment supposedly trumps all other laws, standards, and codes of human decency.

Translation: "It's my right to do whatever I fucking want with my killing machine."

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
10. GOOD
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:35 AM
Apr 2012

How can those people stay there now? They can't. But they spent their money on this house.

And, your 2nd Amendment rights doesn't mean you can break gun laws.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
14. And branishing and trespassing
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:37 AM
Apr 2012

And maybe kidnapping, and maybe menacing, which is worse than assault.

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
17. I wonder what their attitude was like during this whole ordeal.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:49 AM
Apr 2012

Were they screaming and yelling at their victims, or did they calmly tell them, "Let's just wait until the sheriff gets here, and we'll let him sort it out?"

Somehow, I don't imagine these guys were very calm or respectful.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
30. I've wondered that, too
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:10 AM
Apr 2012

I bet either the former, or a mixture of the two.

And, the Sheriff's Deputies are just as at fault. They could have called the Realtor or bank. or allowed the owners the chance to produce the closing papers.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
93. "Shut up or I'll shoot,"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 01:15 PM
Apr 2012
Canoles allegedly told the couple after they tried to explain that their son now owned the modest home sitting on 11 acres.

maxrandb

(15,359 posts)
85. Orr false imprisonment, illegal detainment, harrassment
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 12:20 PM
Apr 2012

trespassing, etc.

Like they always say; "ignorance of the law is no excuse". Hopefully, this state has rules against felons possessing firearms, and when they are convicted of a felony, they will see the "limits" of the 2ND Amendment.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
112. Trespassing, too, don't you think? They crossed the land onto their new neighbor's place.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:53 PM
Apr 2012

These guys still have some whine left in them:

'But, yer honer, we wuz jes..'.

We should mail some cheese to them.


TheCowsCameHome

(40,169 posts)
16. I suppose we should be thankful
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:49 AM
Apr 2012

they didn't shoot the new property owners.

Canoles sounds like a real loser.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
19. This is the problem with having no regulations on gun ownership and carrying around loaded weapons.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:53 AM
Apr 2012

It gives the gun nuts a feeling that they can do what ever they feel like with their guns. It lets them act out the fantasies which are the reason they want guns in the first place. I don't buy this self protection meme. What is really happening is acting out of a paranoid delusion that probably effects all the cop wannabe gun totters.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
114. Or leaving *your* yard to confront them in front of *their* front door.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:57 PM
Apr 2012

Learn some boundaries, folks!

A little personal space, please!




 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
21. "We're waiting to move," Bruno Kalonji said. "We're still afraid of what the guy next door might do.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 08:57 AM
Apr 2012

Mission accomplished, I guess.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
27. In a just world, the entire staff of the Sheriff's department
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:05 AM
Apr 2012

should be turned out to help that family move into their home. Combine that with each one of the Sheriff's deputies explaining to those neighbors that anything those neighbors do to harass that family will be treated very, very seriously.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
33. They need to sue those idiots and the Sheriff
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:12 AM
Apr 2012

To pay for their home and all their moving expenses. I don't blame them -- they'll be burned out, have their pets killed, etc.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
115. Welcome Wagon FAIL. I wouldn't want to live next to gun toting hot heads, either.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:59 PM
Apr 2012

Last edited Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:03 PM - Edit history (1)

Bet he and his wife didn't sleep for a while after that. Imagine the memories they had in Zaire...

DeschutesRiver

(2,354 posts)
25. Reminds me of Palin not understanding that other amendment, the 1st.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:04 AM
Apr 2012

The 2nd amendment hasn't a thing to do with why they were arrested. Sounds like they are Palin-dumb with regards to their understanding of the constitution. It is almost always the constitution-wavers that understand the least about such things.

That bit about protecting their own - well, yeah, the criminal way they went about doing that is the reason why. Of course there are things they can be charged with - I am wondering if it will happen.

 

marshall gaines

(347 posts)
26. huh
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:04 AM
Apr 2012

well, in this day and age, it's good to see some fairness at work. I wonder what pressure was brought to bear for this to happen. Oh no, did the authorities follow the law?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
34. Considering that the Newton County sheriff is black
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:13 AM
Apr 2012

I suspect that African Americans are perfectly safe in Newton County.

marmar

(77,091 posts)
38. And the fact that the sheriff is black will cease all racist activity in the department.....
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:16 AM
Apr 2012

...... and the county?


hack89

(39,171 posts)
43. No - but it is less likely to be ignored or condoned.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:19 AM
Apr 2012

these numnuts are in jail after all - that should tell you something.

bluesbassman

(19,379 posts)
123. Listening to rats gnawing on baseboards would be more palatable than listening to Beck.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 07:49 PM
Apr 2012

I can't even stand to see images of that guy.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
42. That is ridiculous -- much of Georgia ia quite diverse
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:19 AM
Apr 2012

And, Atlanta is very, very diverse. These yahoos are a disgrace.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
57. Yes, it does
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:40 AM
Apr 2012

Every single state and region has its share of bigots and criminals, but in areas with a diverse population, those who "different" are not targeted for that difference. It is truly barely registers.

I also bet that if you look at the rest of the neighbors out there, lots of them cannot stand this jerk and his family.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
59. Yea, well, if you look at the rest of the neighbors, I would bet that they are all cousins.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:47 AM
Apr 2012

Was the couple targeted because one of them was Black? Or because they were not from the area?

FailureToCommunicate

(14,023 posts)
32. Racist, gun toting neighbors might be expected, but racist cops?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:12 AM
Apr 2012

"The deputies, demanding proof the home was theirs, handcuffed the Kalonjis" (instead)

"For roughly 10 minutes, the Kalonjis -- who moved to the U.S. from Zaire in the late 1990s to escape persecution from the brutal Mobutu regime -- stood nervously, arms lifted over their heads, backs turned to the gunmen."

And then the deputies arrested the couple.

Welcome to America.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
36. I haven't read this before -- they better have kidnapping charges slapped on them
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:15 AM
Apr 2012

You are not allowed to hold people at gunpoint, except someone who just broke into your home or something like that. WTF.

This needs to be prosecuted as a hate crime.

DiverDave

(4,887 posts)
99. Yeah, nothing to see here, right?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:23 PM
Apr 2012

I'll bet you 500 bucks, meiko, that if the man was WHITE, they would have busted out the
jug of shine and welcomed him home.

This IS a HATE CRIME, and you telling people it isn't is just wrong.

Put yourself in the guys shoes for a minute, guns at your back, hands up.
And them telling you to shut up or I'll shoot.
When you are just trying to explain.


Then tell me it isnt a hate crime

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
135. I am not a gambler
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 03:59 AM
Apr 2012

but thanks for the offer. The reports I have read offered no evidence that any racial slurs were uttered.If there would have been I would have to agree you have a point. From what I have seen from the photos posted is that the mans wife is white, do we have white on white hate crimes now? We need to get over the assumption that just because more than one race is involved in an incident that it is automatically a hate crime.

We have no idea what is in a mans heart. It could very well be that the two AR15 toting men do hate blacks and that race was their primary motivator for accosting the man and his wife but the evidence at hand doesn't prove that. It is reported also that one of the men said this:

[quote]"I don't know what they can charge me with," Canoles said late Monday afternoon, before the interview with authorities. "This is my Second Amendment right. Look, this is the country out here, and we protect our own."[/quote]

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here, is he referring to blacks? or is he referring to locals in general. As far as your last statement, I have had guns pointed at me, I have been shot at and on one occasion even shot. It never crossed my mind during any of these incidents that the man on the other side of the gun loved me, so in that sense I was the victim of a hate crime I guess, even though all party's involved were white. I tend to believe that all crimes of violence are hate crimes regardless of the victims skin color, so that being said I guess this was a hate crime based solely on the fact that the man and his wife were outsiders, not because one was black.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
101. Yes, it does
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:28 PM
Apr 2012

Interracial couple, and they are also foreign.

I am not getting "carried away."

I live in the South. These yahoos wouldn't have done this to a good ole boy and gal driving a pickup with a rack in the back. They wouldn't. Hell, they wouldn't even do it to someone driving a Prius. Unless they were Black.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,023 posts)
49. Okay...maybe that's why things changed a few day later. But it was
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:24 AM
Apr 2012

more likely pressure from the couple's lawyer (and recent headlines about Zimmerman)

If the deputies didn't react with racial profiling, than what would it be called? Stupidity?
Remember the cops "lauded" the gun wielding father and son at the time.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
51. Sometimes it is nothing more than lack of imagination and rigid adherence to rules
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:27 AM
Apr 2012

that make people in authority take leave of their common sense.

It may have been racism but I suspect the Sheriff will deal with it appropriately - I am sure he does not appreciate the national attention.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,023 posts)
56. Rigid rules? Let us image if the police arrive and it is two black men with rifles trained
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:36 AM
Apr 2012

on a white couple...



hack89

(39,171 posts)
60. Lets imagine the police were black while we are at it
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:51 AM
Apr 2012

that doesn't automatically mean their decision would be the right one.

NickB79

(19,274 posts)
149. Difference: the sheriff is African-American; the husband was African
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 03:16 PM
Apr 2012

There is prejudice even within the black community; I've known several African-Americans that were not too fond of African immigrants.

JHB

(37,162 posts)
35. When you hold someone at gunpoint, you should probably go to the trouble...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:14 AM
Apr 2012

...of being right.

Your 2nd Amendment right is to own the gun, not to point it at people.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
55. There are on occasion situations in which holding someone at gunpoint is justified
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:36 AM
Apr 2012

This wasn't one of them.

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
47. I've been following this since the story first broke
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:22 AM
Apr 2012

Also been trying to look for updated info on the case of the woman in Texas who drove her SUV into the kid's go-cart.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
48. OMG I missed that one!
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:24 AM
Apr 2012

I've also missed the update on the GA case, so I appreciate your postings on it.

Response to Kaleva (Original post)

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
62. They took their AR-15s, how will they be able to feed their family?
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 09:56 AM
Apr 2012

I mean that's the only thing an AR-15 is good for, shooting food, right?

Did the new owners have the keys to the house? Seems as if they must have to change the locks. Nobody wondered how they had the keys?

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
65. Charged with three felonies
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:17 AM
Apr 2012

Criminal trespass, aggravated assault with a weapon, and false imprisonment.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
66. "we protect our own"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:18 AM
Apr 2012

We all know what they mean by "their own".

They might as well just come out and say it. "We don't want no *** in our neighborhood."

Assholes.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
67. I hope the Kalonjis decide to stay.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:27 AM
Apr 2012

Because if these two knuckle-draggers go to prison, they won't be neighbors any longer. And he'll get to build that soccer field

For those of you that know law, would getting charged (and held in jail without bond) like that jeopardize their (the Canoles') mortgage? Seems like it would do a real number on their credit rating at the very least. As I understand such things, a bad credit rating causes banks to have second thoughts about those with mortgages...

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
78. They weren'y held without bond -- they bailed out
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:30 AM
Apr 2012

They gunmen are being held without bond right now.

They bought a foreclosed house, so no, but being arrested wouldn't make a difference anyway.

 

MintyFresh

(29 posts)
68. This story makes me sad
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 10:33 AM
Apr 2012

All over America a certain group of people are being accosted by people with guns or in some cases in public places verbally assaulted to provoke to anger so an argument or fight will ensue so the police can be called & the innocent person put in jail.
It's happened to me at least 4 times already & now I'm getting nervous just going to a grocery store.
They can be charged with false imprisonment. Living in this country is getting more & more dangerous each day as people are being judged by superficial things like what they look like on the outside.
I have a few horror stories myself & being verbally assaulted in public places is just the tip of the iceberg.
Can we do anything to keep ourselves from being killed for no reason in this country ? We can't call the police because in many cases the police have the same mindset as the accosters. As seen here by the actions the deputies took when these gun toting neighbors called them and how the deputies praised the gun toters.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
73. Another couple of 'law-abiding gun owners'...right up to the moment they weren't.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:12 AM
Apr 2012

Every day, more and more.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
83. What's even more perplexing
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 11:59 AM
Apr 2012

is that the deputies thought they did a good job!

You know, I can't be absolutely certain (as I'm not a law-enforcement officer), but if I came upon two men holding AR-15s against the necks of an older couple, I probably would not have reacted by patting the two guys on the back for a job well done.

I'm glad the deputies are also under investigation.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
84. Not just one, but TWO AR-15s...
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 12:11 PM
Apr 2012

...used to terrorize a defenseless older couple. I hope the sheriffs lose their jobs.



TTY

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
90. That's a lot
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 12:50 PM
Apr 2012

of firepower just to keep a couple from changing their locks. They won't have to worry about owning any more AR15's if they are convicted. Dumbasses.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
86. Me either -- that was a real wtf moment
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 12:29 PM
Apr 2012

Along with the deputies just arresting the couple for absolutely NO reason.

As WTF Moment as cops can be, deputies can be so much worse. A Police Chief is a professional who oversees officers who at least have had real training and some employment standards. Sheriffs are elected, and can hire any good ole boy or girl they want, as long as certain legal standards are adhered to (US citizen, 21 years old, whatever).

Trust me, even people who live in the country and like their guns don't like neighbors like these yahoos. They're the kind who would shoot your dog if it wandered an inch onto their property.

I was surprised to see them held without bond (for now). Good.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
91. Who knows
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 01:00 PM
Apr 2012

what really goes on in certain parts of the country. There is all kinds of nonsense going on we never hear about. When I was a young man in the military a friend and I found ourselves on a road trip to Lubbock Texas. We got stopped for speeding and jailed in Muleshoe Texas, no shit Muleshoe. We were scared shitless. We had no idea what was going to happen to us. The local cops were not nice guys at all. No lawyer, no food, no water, handcuffed in a cell. My story certainly isn't as bad as what happened in Georgia but I'm just saying this kind of shit goes on all the time. We just happened to hear about this one.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
136. Yea they did
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:05 AM
Apr 2012

I thought soldiers boys were tough, shut up. I had asked for some water is was very hot that day.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
98. As an observation only,
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:15 PM
Apr 2012

this seems to be endemic of small towns, be they in Texas, or Georgia, or Pennsylvania, or Washington. It happens everywhere, and mostly outside of the larger cities. I don't know why the residents of small towns end up with the worst in the way of a police force, but it sure seems to happen more often there, and thus my observation.

obamanut2012

(26,142 posts)
103. Because they don't pay as much, and often have Sheriffs, not PDs
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:32 PM
Apr 2012

Education standards are also generally lower, and they don't look for diversity. I also think there's more of, "This is my buddy," or "My uncle's cousin's friend who lets me hunt on his property. He's a good guy." Or even,"I'm not giving my wife's boss a DUI. No way!"

Like you said, it happens all over in small towns. I wonder, are Sheriffs more "popular" in the South? What do small towns in the NE have? Constables? Use State Troopers? Or Sheriff Deputies?

drm604

(16,230 posts)
97. Even more than those mugshots, what really strikes me is that picture of the Kalonjis at the top.
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 03:12 PM
Apr 2012

Who would feel threatened by that harmless looking older couple? If I was concerned about who my new neighbors were going to be and saw them, I'd be relieved.

Those two young men felt it necessary to hold this couple at gunpoint?

What did they think was going on anyway? Burglars were changing the locks?

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
119. Well, these two goobers clearly ain't the sharpest
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 06:02 PM
Apr 2012

knives in the drawer. And those respectable-looking people just happened to be black, so better safe than sorry, Gomer.

 

karnac

(564 posts)
107. what idiots
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:42 PM
Apr 2012

Not even threatened or punched before pointing guns at others.

They deserve what they get in court.

 

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)
108. Ideally, the old couple should have been armed too, so they could have "stood their ground"
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:42 PM
Apr 2012

and gunned down the obnoxious neighbors.

(Sarcasm tag added just in case somebody thinks I'm actually from the NRA and takes me seriously)

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
121. Well, it could happen. But these old folks had been traumatized before, so not likely. Hope their
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 06:08 PM
Apr 2012

Health didn't suffer from this. They could have had a heart attack or stroke or something.

They indicated that they were terrified, it gave them a flashback of what happened to them in Zaire.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
110. If you think someone is robbing your house by all means go grab a gun
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:45 PM
Apr 2012

but not for the neighbors house.

Call the cops if you're that worried.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
113. Brandishing a weapon
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 05:55 PM
Apr 2012

entering

False detainment,

Kidnapping.

Help me out DU'ers, since he really has no clue what he can be charged with, and if convicted he can kiss them guns good bye

DiverDave

(4,887 posts)
138. The ar-15 is simple to convert to full automatic
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 04:52 AM
Apr 2012

I would be curious to see if these have been tampered with.

If so, I think it's a federal crime to own a machine gun w/o a permit

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
139. No, it is not.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 08:53 AM
Apr 2012

The AR-15 is specially made to not be easily converted to full auto. While it looks like an M-16, there are important differences on the inside.

A well equipped, skilled gunsmith could do it but then he'd be looking at serious time in Federal prison if he were to be caught just having it.

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
144. Same applys to the AK
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:00 PM
Apr 2012

For a semi-auto AK to be legal in the US, it has to be very difficult to convert to full auto. It's been illegal for many years now to import or manufacture in this country a semi-auto AK-47 that can be easily converted to full auto.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
146. Yup, why the Carels have these converted
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:13 PM
Apr 2012

Regularly in under two hours. Most of those weapons did not come from other places. They were bought in the US and brought down in the Camino de Hormigas.

I know this is not popular, but they are fairly easy, both of them, to convert if you know what you are doing. There is a difference in ease in pre-1994 and post-1994 weapons. But it was mostly the, see Feds...we are trying. Now buzz off.

Also the reality is...fire discipline says you do not mostly fire in auto...or you will run out of ammo much, much faster. Why the semi selector went into the M 16-A1 to begin with.

Of course another minor difference is how fast barrels heat up.

But for god sakes kits to convert both were for sale online for years. I have not checked if they still are, i suspect they no longer are...that open about it though. Which reminds me, why does anybody need a three round burst to bring down large game? I never really got that one. Stands to reason a well placed shot should do it...why they make zero sense unless your game has two feet.

Yup, the underbelly of this ain't nice and them kits were very popular with them militia boys.

Some of us ain't ignorant of this.

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
148. Can't buy a gun for hunting that's capable of firing a three round burts
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 03:06 PM
Apr 2012

Well, I guess one could if they are willing on taking the chance of going to prison for a very long time.

Your comments:

"Also the reality is...fire discipline says you do not mostly fire in auto...or you will run out of ammo much, much faster. Why the semi selector went into the M 16-A1 to begin with.

Of course another minor difference is how fast barrels heat up. "

You've given a couple of very good reasons why criminals don't use automatics in this country that much. Add to that the risk of serving a long prison sentence just for having an unregistered auto in your possession.

On the other hand, it's fairly easy to legally purchase a semi-auto WASR-10 and 30 round magazines and you don't have to worry (in most states) about being arrested for having it.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
150. Yup, the AR 15 has a funny selector
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 09:23 PM
Apr 2012

The M-16 has three steps, the AR two.

But whatever...

As to criminals no using them...yup, we all margined the la shoot out...

For the record, not a regular event yet.

Kaleva

(36,354 posts)
151. The ATF treats the burst fire kit the same as a fully functional machine gun.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 09:34 PM
Apr 2012

You seem to be arguing that weapons that are full auto or capable of burst fire are easy to obtain or that's it's simple to convert a semi-auto to such a weapon. I challenge you to try it. Most prisons have internet access and you'll be able to tell us just how easy it was.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
152. Yup, why the cartels convert them regularly
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 09:36 PM
Apr 2012

Mexican prisons don't have Internet access either.

You are arguing it's not done, because of penalties. It is done in spite of penalties.

And not just in Mexico where it also adds years to a sentence.

Yup, if you are caught you are going to so some hard time...in that we agree.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
154. Why would I do that?
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 10:22 PM
Apr 2012

I have no interest, motivation or drive to do that. But you are saying it's not done. Well the ATF and the Policia Federal disagree.

Have a good day.

DiverDave

(4,887 posts)
156. Well, when I was in the Army
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 09:58 PM
Apr 2012

we were issued the m-16 and we were told to NOT do something ( I wont tell you what).
And,of course, we did.

It was VERY easy to convert the weapon we were given.
Unless they have changed them since.

If it is the same as in the mid '70's anyway.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
141. I was told by an ATF agent
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 11:12 AM
Apr 2012

That if you have an AR15 and all the parts to covert it to full auto you are in possession of a machine gun, regardless if it has been modified or not. They take this shit pretty seriously.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
142. Yes it is, though the AK is easier
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 11:40 AM
Apr 2012

They used to sell the kits online even if gunnies will tell you otherwise.

It is a crime, federal, but not for converting to a machine gun, it is tampering with the weapon. An M-16 is a battle riffle not a machine gun.

By the way the cartels convert them both regularly.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
147. The saddest thing of all is that Mr. Kalonji suffered through Mobutu's regime...
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:20 PM
Apr 2012

...in Congo, and then has those horrible memories come back to him because of these racist assholes.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
155. The 2nd Amendment is about gun OWNERSHIP
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 10:25 PM
Apr 2012

NOT about the right to threaten people with guns.

Gawd almighty, these people are idiots.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Neighbors in Newton Count...