General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsArne asked a pathetic question. He got way more responses than he expected.
I bet he wishes he had phrased his words differently.
From the Washington Post:
Arne Duncan asks what if? Heres the response.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan tweeted this to his followers on Dec. 30:
What if every district committed both to identifying what made their 5 best schools successful & providing those opps to all their students?
Arne Duncan (@arneduncan) December 30, 2014
What followed on Twitter in reaction to that tweet was probably not what he had hoped to see. Critics sent some of their own what if thoughts to Duncan #whatif. Heres a sampling:
#Whatif teachers were respected rather than disparaged by this countrys wealthy and elite Randi Weingarten (@rweingarten) December 31, 2014
#WhatIf the public realized that our @usedgov has plenty of money to properly fund schools but they choose to channel $ to corps instead? TeacherReality (@TeacherReality) December 31, 2014
... #WhatIf Every family & student boycotted @arneduncan s high-stakes testing & we moved to a well-rounded education w/ authentic assessment. Chris Cerrone (@Stoptesting15) December 31, 2014
Here's my own #what if:
As teacher was told to start teaching where the child is and take him as far as he can go. #whatif we did that now? @arneduncan #education
And another one or two from that #whatif twitter page:
Erin Rafferty Warner ?@Teachercat2 13m13 minutes ago
#whatif all the proud "rotten apples" rose up and fired @arneduncan? @BadassTeachersA @DianeRavitch
ProgTeacherCat! and 5 others retweeted
TeacherReality ?@TeacherReality Dec 31
#WhatIf the American public finally realized that Duncan's #edreform is a complete fraud full of moving cut scores, subpar tests, curriculum
0 replies 28 retweets 13 favorites
What if Arne Duncan and President Obama read the Politico article saying the Republicans may slash the number of federally required tests.
We are actively exploring the question of whether the federal mandate on annual tests is warranted, one GOP aide said. The goal is to give states more flexibility in how they track student progress, report those results to the public and hold schools accountable for all kids.
A bipartisan bill gaining momentum among lawmakers would give states grants to audit their testing regimes and weed out unnecessary exams.
Annual statewide assessments are critical to ensuring that all students are held to the same high standards and parents, teachers and communities have the information they need about how their children are doing every year, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said when the bill was introduced. However, in many places, the amount of testing that is redundant or simply not helpful for instruction has become a real problem.
While Duncan supports that bill, he and President Barack Obama oppose ending the annual testing requirements in NCLB, which was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2002. They argue that the yearly tests are vital for assessing student progress and holding schools accountable for making sure every child advances.
What if Arne admitted that the reason for all the overtesting is his own policy.
What if we were finally honest about the harm being done to public schools by corporations determined to get richer.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Were written by scientists instead of preachers?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)#fireArneDuncan'sAss
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Good one.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)instead of just following the money?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Instead he talks only in talking points given him by his corporate supporters.
fbc
(1,668 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I don't see that as being feasible.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)and average salary per teacher (2012 numbers) they were paid $209,579,100,000 (3.7 million teachers at approx $56600 per year) collectively. Major League Baseball cumulative payroll comes in at about $4,068,000,000 for about 1200 players (considering the forty man roster).
If we paid the teacher the average ballplayer salary of $3.39 million the payroll would balloon to $12,543,000,000,000... I think we could swing that.
sP
Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)Let's fund all the schools and let the military (ICC) hold bake sales.
ICC - (Military) Industrial Congressional Complex - from Eisenhower's first draft
lastlib
(23,248 posts)schools got all the money they needed, and the Pentagon had to hold bake sales to build bombers (or new stealth fighters that don't work)??
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I hate Fascists.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)What if we cared about educating our kids more than killing other people's kids?
What if we bailed out schools rather than banks?
What if we gave our students free higher education instead of indentured servitude?
What if we had a military the size of a European country like Denmark which is considering an answering machine instead? Think of all the nice things we could buy instead.
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)I like this.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)There are issues with school reform that won't be fixed by just throwing money at them.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But the only solution our elected officials seem interested in is more defense funding. I'd be willing to bet that better funding for education would solve all kinds of problems. More teachers paid more to attract good candidates, modernization of our schools, new schools built, smaller class sizes, improvements in curricula to bring back physical education, music appreciation, vocational and technical training and so forth. Why not start with that, then we can see about some of the reforms that the non-professionals are so interested in?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I do think, though, that redirecting and re-priortizing the funds that are currently available to public schools would be a critical step as well. Especially with respect to this "high stakes testing" nonsense.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)and recommended a whole bunch!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I can't stand Arne.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)My nephew just shared with me that his math professor (at a state university) was unable to help the entire class understand the basic concept of "u substitution." I think this is where fifty-plus years of corporate assaults on teaching has gotten us. Our children will continue to struggle with essential math and science concepts if we don't turn this around.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)..... kids who should have failed actually failed?
Failing used to be a great motivator.
hunter
(38,317 posts)When I was teaching I had kids who did nothing. Literally no schoolwork. They didn't care, and worse, their parents didn't care.
There were usually much bigger issues at home, often actual survival issues.
This society's dysfunction runs much, much deeper than the schools.
It was the most difficult job I've ever had, and I've had some really rough jobs.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)times in college. never better than a C-. Finally asked for the ability to take a stats class instead. Scored an A first time through. First time in decades that I succeeded in math class. After all the algebra failure, I still never figured it out. No, I think my failure didn't serve to motivate me at all. It really just eroded my confidence. I'm not sure where you get the idea that low academic achievement is simply a product of a lack of motivation. I think that's just plain wrong in many/most cases.
https://www.ted.com/talks/carol_dweck_the_power_of_believing_that_you_can_improve?language=en
This really resonated with me. She talks about teachers at one school replacing the "F" as in "failure" with not yet. She talks about rewarding process and in learning instead of evaluating results. What she said made me think back to second grade when I noticed that my math performance seemed to lag behind my classmates. I wish I would have had the idea that "I just don't get it yet" instilled in me rather than what I ended up with . . . the idea that if I failed math, I would become forever behind. the situation would continue every year to rub in the idea that I just didn't work hard enough to get it. Failure served to make me math-phobic. Is that a failure of a second grader who couldn't quite understand story problems or is that a failure of failure being an inadequate motivator? I now believe the problem was that failure is a horrible motivator. Especially repeated failure.
Have you ever failed, starcat?
MyOwnPeace
(16,928 posts)instead of paying to rebuild half of the world that we destroyed.....
...we rebuilt our own schools?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)What if the President picked someone qualified for cabinet posts rather than his basketball buddies and sycophants?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That sends a message of sorts.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I just wish President Obama had supported education so every parent in America could do that. Do I think the President could have fixed education completely in two terms? No. Do I think he and his buddy did more harm than good? YES. This has been one of the worst administrations in terms of education that I can remember in my lifetime which includes three of the worst Republican presidents. That's abysmally bad.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I certainly understand why a parent would want to send their child to the best school possible. Unfortunately, though, our system is set up so that only fairly wealthy people have that option in many cases. Most have to settle for their local public school district.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Your local school should be as good as any private school. The difference is usually smaller class sizes, no testing, a lot of parental involvement and much higher expectation for students. It leads to a different experience and a different outcome.
We need to make our public schools great and one of the fastest ways to do it is reducing class size. That unfortunately means more teachers and more buildings. I have taught 20-and-under and 40-and-over sized classes and the difference is night and day. In the small class sizes, the majority of the time can be spent teaching. In the larger classes, the majority of time and energy is spent dealing with behavior. It's the difference between teaching and being basically a prison guard keeping the inmates from killing each other.
We also have a major change in educational philosophy that took the onus off the student to achieve and put it on the teacher. We're the only country in the world that blames the teacher when students perform poorly. It's crazy and it's stupid and it will never achieve the desired outcome.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)and not just 'supporting the team'?
Because D or no D, Obama -- and others like him -- are never going to do the right thing.
There isn't enough money in that.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Democrats had always, at least given lip service to education. Often it is a Democrat's job to clean up and reverse the awful programs a Republican has put into place. Clinto did it, so that was the assumption with No Child Left Behind. The teacher's union supported candidate Obama in the primaries. That is why they are feeling so mad and betrayed. They were lied to and screwed over by the basketball buddy.
Come to think of it, I remember all the "small donors" who donated to the Obama campaign to raise $1 billion dollars for his 2008 run. How did he get so much more this time and not a word about those small donors? It's funny no one talked about the mask coming off.
So the President owes those people, and those people want to privatize public education and suck it dry. He's not only not stopping them, he's helping.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)And yet there was no primary challenge.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)every day for the new year.
Me, too.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and other signs of the Revelation and the end of the mortal world...
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Good to know that the social media has some very wise souls out there texting and tweeting.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)And that's a good thing. Their numbers seem to be growing every time Arne opens his mouth and lets the platitudes out.
Skrups
(18 posts)we ended poverty, taught, and encouraged students to work for the better good rather than to work at some bullshit job that works against the common good in order to make profits for someone else.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Good ones!!
FloriTexan
(838 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Opportunities? Why can't he spell all the words out or just short hand the entire thing? It makes him look as if he didn't know how to spell the word correctly or meant 'oops' or sneezed while typing.
Sorry, I get hung up on stupid shit like that. Glad he got a dose of RL, I bet he believes the bullshit he helps create daily with flowcharts and think tanks.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Pretty stupid thing to get hung up on. It is the nature of Twitter and has nothing to do with his ability to spell.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Sorry I guess you will have to live with it.
spanone
(135,844 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)the current public education policies.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)and stood up for social values beyond greed and profit while differing from Republicans beyond the margins of wedge issues?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)sue cavanaugh ?@sueecavanaugh
#whatif you underestimated the power of a bunch of pissed-off teachers? @arneduncan
https://twitter.com/sueecavanaugh
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)Seems the exclusive purpose of the federal Dept. of Education is to siphon education funds off to large political donors.
If you look at the DoE's own mission statement and evaluate its performance over the period of its existence, it is a complete, unmitigated failure. http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/focus/what_pg2.html
We need to reconnect government agency missions with actual benefits received by Americans. Seems many agencies are either diverted to private purposes or exist primarily to self-perpetuate, with the stated/official mission secondary at best.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The statements that madfloridian references, for the most part, do not imply opposition to Obama, but decry the usual problems of funding, lack of teacher authority to manage our own classrooms, over testing, and disrespect for teachers.
I cannot help but notice the back-handed calls in this comment section to remove federal funding education, stifle education reform, and criticize of the Obama family.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)fire Arne Duncan?
If you want to get rid of crypto-conservative backwash, start by flushing out the White House.
NewDeal_Dem
(1,049 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)His policies harm children and enrich billionaires in education.
Arne is his messenger.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)and condemning the same things if done by a republican.
Do you support the actions of President Obama's secretary of education?
Do you believe that this administration has a good record for education?
What parts of arne's program do you find most laudable?
If arne were appointed by a republican, would you still praise his work?
Answer those and then you will be a part of the conversation about education.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)As an animated rabbit once remarked, "You don't know me very well."
My point here, isn't whether I support anything. The point is that many of the people responding to this thread are using it as a subtle way to promote the conservative agenda of ignorance, racial discord, and divisiveness.
So, Jakes Progress, the real question is whether you support the back-handed calls in this comment section to remove federal funding education, stifle education reform, and criticize of the Obama family?
Do you?
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)The point is whether you support anything. You see no calls for stopping education on my post.
I see the desire to just let arne continue his quest in your post.
Your uninformed post is just another in the line of "My hero - right or wrong" posts that pop up whenever the clay feet are pointed at. I know you well.
So do you support arne and Obama's attempts to "reform" education? That is the real question.
Do you?
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)~kick
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)God, I hope he's not paying attention. The alternative to inattention is mean and or stupid. I prefer inattention.
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)as stupid and useless as George W Bush?
That and the fact that, some corporate fat cat somewhere along the line, can afford to manipulate our government, in order to make far more money than he's expended bribing a few political "TAKERS."
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)buddies in the Testing Publishing Business?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)It'd be a different nation and planet.
Instead, we've gotten more of the same old, same old:
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Actually some news sources are now pointing out that the charter schools are leading to resegregation.
BTW what was the date on that article? Interesting about Meese.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)WASHINGTON President Reagan's first secretary of education says mid-level Reagan Administration officials made racist jokes and other scurrilous remarks during civil rights discussions at the White House.
Terrel H. Bell, in a memoir of President Reagan's first term, said the slurs included references to the late Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as "Martin Lucifer Coon" and calling Title IX, a federal law guaranteeing women equal educational opportunity, "the lesbian's bill of rights."
Bell's memoir is titled "The Thirteenth Man: A Reagan Cabinet Memoir." In it, he says that "since I had heard Ronald Reagan speak out convincingly against all forms of discrimination, I felt that my own dedication to enforcement of the civil rights laws as they applied to education would have the full support of the President."
SNIP...
Elsewhere in his book, he depicts Edwin Meese III, the former White House counselor and now attorney general, as "a man who literally detested the federal government." He calls Meese "the champion of the far right in the White House."
Bell, now a professor at the University of Utah, said Meese led a group of "movement conservatives" who operated "almost like a secret society" and fought to abolish the Department of Education and steer Administration policies to the right.
CONTINUED...
http://articles.latimes.com/1987-10-20/news/mn-14822_1_white-house
WillyT
(72,631 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)issue. I know their reasoning for wanting less testing is not altruistic but neither is the reason for Democrats' support of more testing.
left is right
(1,665 posts)If the congress critters from the poorest states receive the same salary as the ones from our richest states, why shouldt teachers from our poorest districts earn the same salary as those from the richest districts? Further, why should there be any disparities in conditions/values of their buildings or books