General Discussion

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts) Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:02 PM Dec 2014

GOP Runs The Kind Of Government That Does Not Care If Citizen Live Or Die.

If voters could ever understand that truth about the GOP Dems would win easily. What will it take for voters to get the message?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOP Runs The Kind Of Government That Does Not Care If Citizen Live Or Die. (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Dec 2014 OP

I'm not sure anything will jmowreader Dec 2014 #1

A thinking brain.. SummerSnow Dec 2014 #2

We're either cogs in the machine or just dead weight to them CanonRay Dec 2014 #3

Possibly dying themselves? world wide wally Dec 2014 #4

That's their outlook. Bigger problem is they support the predator class with glee on point Dec 2014 #5

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)

1. I'm not sure anything will

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:03 PM

Dec 2014

When Republican policies start killing more people than they already are, GOP policy is to demonize the dead.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)

2. A thinking brain..

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:08 PM

Dec 2014

CanonRay

(14,103 posts)

3. We're either cogs in the machine or just dead weight to them

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:20 PM

Dec 2014

and there are always more cogs.

world wide wally

(21,744 posts)

4. Possibly dying themselves?

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Mon Dec 22, 2014, 05:22 PM

Dec 2014

on point

(2,506 posts)

5. That's their outlook. Bigger problem is they support the predator class with glee

Reply to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)

Wed Dec 24, 2014, 02:39 PM

Dec 2014

That is, if you get victimized by someone, that is your fault. Government is not there to protect you against thieves, polluters, fraudsters, or bullies. To them that is your personal problem. That is one reason they are authoritarian at heart. Be one of the takers (i.e. predators), or be a victim.

Reply to this discussion