General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould someone please explain "Silent Thread" to me?
I get that people do not respond in words, if they agree, they...
hence "silent".
I get that.
I assume (correct me if my assumption is wrong) that in posting and adding to this thread, one is expressing sympathy for a death or deaths.
So if I am right, one would assume that silent threads - REALLY long silent threads - would appear for 635 Palestinian children killed by Israel.
for 172 people killed by the bomb in Peshawar.
for people killed by Ebola.
for people in Haiti dying of cholera.
for 8 children killed by their mother.
Somehow 2 dead cops warrants a silent thread, but not any other death(s)?
Why?
I'm not asking a rhetorical question - I'm asking for someone who posts or adds to that thread - what makes these 2 deaths so obviously meaningful to you?
Over other deaths?
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)I'm glad that was the first reply.
840high
(17,196 posts)unblock
(52,243 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)I don't think butane lighters were invented.
we used candles.
unblock
(52,243 posts)the cutover to butane happened in the fifties....
riqster
(13,986 posts)First time a crowd did that to me, I damn near died laughing. A few hundred cell phones waving at us, all with little images of flickering Bics...
After recovering, I gave props to the people whose apps displayed Zippos.
i'll just stick with the flashlight app, though i've never felt a need to wave anything luminous at a rock concert.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)"caring" they are.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)A yellow ribbon brings awareness as does a silent thread. I think it is great to see it. Awareness is good.
Phentex
(16,334 posts)and ruins the sentiment. I am fine with them. I just always wonder why someone HAS to post a phrase in them. Maybe they don't know what a silent thread is?
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)I think both - silent thread and yellow ribbons - express a knee-jerk reaction which has been spurred by the media.
On the one hand, I should leave it alone - what do I care?
But on the other, this is DEMOCRATIC underground, and imo - and maybe this is mistaken - but in my opinion, a person who calls themself a democrat ought to try to think independently of the mass media.
that is my association with "democratic", and it is why I am here, and perhaps it is a faulty association.
lamp_shade
(14,834 posts)Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)I use Google and it works fine using Google.
Type the following including quotes:
"silent thread" site:www.democraticunderground.com
Go open the scores/hundreds of "silent thread" posts put up on DU over the years.
Some were sincere. Some were for DUers. Some were mocking. Some were stupid. Some were for celebrities/actors. Some were for politicians. Some were for values that appear to have disappeared. Some were for Iraqis. Some were for ... Well, perhaps you get the idea.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)It's a strange world as far as what really resonates or not with people. I think in large part what we see here sometimes is a reaction to what people experience through TV programming.
It's likely a GD silent thread for gaza would get locked.
The eight kids killed in Australia are probably too far away to resonate with many.
The cholera epidemic in haiti is as slow motion tragedy caused by the UN not likely to resonate with many.
The tragedy needs to be a sharp shock, plane crash, shooting, other senseless loss of life.
What made it meaningful for me was with all the talk of brutal white cops killing our beautiful black children we have a idiot who not only started his political rampage by shooting a beautiful black woman he went on to shoot a asian cop and a I believe puerto rican or dominican cop both oppressed minority cops.
The silent threads I think are a way of expressing solidarity without having to endlessly RIP etc. Nothing more.
Next time you see a tragedy that resonates with a lot of DU start that silent thread.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)I guess most people who responded do not have sufficient thinking skills to answer a question, all they can do is express vitriol.
Not exactly a surprise.
I would not start a silent thread bec. what resonates with me are tragedies, not 2 dead cops.
Also bec. I don't really get it. What does it mean to ... to a thread. I mean who cares?
Is it sharing information with people? Is it even sharing an opinion?
But I totally agree with you re what moves people is what they see on the news.
And the more they see it, the more they respond.
Which is unfortunate.
It is unfortunate that many people respond in a knee-jerk manner, instead of thinking.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)And you won't have to get your knickers in a twist.
WTF is your problem?
Lex
(34,108 posts)Why the fuck are you even here at DU if this is your level of contempt for DU'ers? Go somewhere else.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I don't know if Orwell said it or not "but some ideas are so bizarre only an intellectual can believe them."
Response to ellenrr (Original post)
ArcticFox This message was self-deleted by its author.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Geesh! Let ellenrr have her outrage.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)What telling people that they were fetishists and shouldn't be sad about the deaths in the original thread wasn't enough?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)lame54
(35,292 posts)And not play defense
every protest leader should strongly denounce this and be clear that this will not be tolerated
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Just as it was easy for you to start this thread, you could also start any "silent" threads that you want. Any that you want! Isn't that amazing?!?!
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)This line just stood out to me: "Now his enemies couldn't laugh but his friends couldn't cry." Maybe silent threads are when one ahs been made speechless by the event. Now as to why no silent threads for those people you sited well I just can't say anything.
(Traditional, arranged by the Dubliners)
Copyright 1964 Heathside Music Ltd.
Come all you young fellows and listen to my song,
It's all about a young man and he did a great wrong.
His name was Willie Gannon and he lived down in Bray,
Well he killed a policeman and the law made him pay.
The law watched young Gannon, each turn that he made,
When he broke one bylaw with a belt of his spade.
(or: When he brought one boy low with a belt of his spade.)
He struck the death blow when he turned his broad back,
And he left him there lying where the Dargle runs black.
Willie Gannon was convicted and sentenced to die,
Now his enemies couldn't laugh but his friends couldn't cry.
When he brought down the uniform on that bright summer day,
Farewell Willie Gannon, now you sleep 'neath the clay.
Sung by Ronnie Drew of the Dubliners
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)all the things for which you think they should be created.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)thread. Yes, I know I can, that is obvious but that is not the point.
I was trying to understand why people start them, and why people add to them.
You see, steven, I can want to understand something, without necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with it.
I can be curious about it, and wonder about how people think.
I'm (relatively) new here.
And when I'm curious about something, I ask.....
If that is a crime, pls tell me.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)How a simple question can trigger some pretty defensive and snotty replies.
As for myself, I've always wondered why people bother with "DU this poll please" crap.
And I'm not talking about on-site polls here at DU, which can be fun, and interesting.
I'm talking about off-site polls where it's Democrats vs Republicans responding on some issue or another.
What's the point? It's not going to change anything, and it's not even all that interesting if people on both sides are sending their friends and relatives over to vote one way or another in order to skew the results.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)motives.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)I clicked on the link you provided and didn't see anything that raised a red flag in my mind.
A couple of posts on an internet discussion group don't give a complete picture of who a person is in totality. Yes, I know that people will be disappointed by that statement, and probably even indignant as well, because they really really want to be able to judge someone (and their motives) based on what the person says in a couple of posts over the course of 24 to 48 hours.
People like to think they're so adept at judging others based on a few words. And you know what? Sometimes the judging is based on words that are completely misunderstood or twisted to fit the reader's biases.
In any case, even if people are right about someone's "motives", what's wrong with being honest but civil when someone asks a question?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)They don't seem to be trying particularly hard to hide it, much as their protests under this OP would indicate otherwise.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I don't know why you would think folks wouldn't get it right away. Your OP here and other comments you wrote explain it http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5991447
I think the likelihood that you didn't understand 'silent threads' is pretty low. I think this is a passive-aggressive way for you to continue complaining that some DUers expressed sympathy for the two police that were shot.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)and show everybody how brilliant you are, and wait for the applause!
I love it!
get a life: take a walk, eat a meal, make a friend, have a relationship, make love, ....
I am seeing now why so many people like DU and stay around:
bec. even tho there are a handful of people (who shall remain un-named - haha)
who cannot add anything to the conversation except personal attacks,
there are a greater number who make thoughtful comments.
fortunately.
and remember- "The Ignore Button is Your Best Friend"
Lex
(34,108 posts)funny how that works
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Maybe the pretense that your question was not rhetorical?
Possibly that your question could have easily been answered with a quick site search?
Just asking, of course.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)just asking, of course.
I "detect" an accusatory tone because there is one.
Thanks for asking.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,838 posts)...as calls for violence against them rather than calls for reform. I think a silent thread in respect for their loved ones is not only a kind and human gesture but politically helpful in making our position clear.
Lex
(34,108 posts)Or troll the site bitching and complaining about DU and DU'ers, as the case may be.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Moments of silence are frequently called for when a tragedy occurs and lives are lost. It is a symbol of mourning and/or respect.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)They take an oath to protect citizens, and take a dangerous job with crappy hours that is nor conducive to family life for meh pay.
We generally only hear about the police in the news four circumstances - when they solve a big case; when they kill a criminal; when they get hurt or killed; or when they do something wrong. 98% of what they do is routine and helps keep homes and streets be safer.
If 635 American children were dead, there would be a thread with 1000 posts. 635 Palestinian children dying in Gaza is BAU.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 03:12 AM - Edit history (1)
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5733164Elizabeth Warren Defends Israeli Shelling of Gaza Schools, Hospitals
Warren, in defending her vote to send funds to Israel in the middle of its war with Hamas, said she thinks civilian casualties are the "last thing Israel wants."
"But when Hamas puts its rocket launchers next to hospitals, next to schools, they're using their civilian population to protect their military assets. And I believe Israel has a right, at that point, to defend itself," she said.
Response to ellenrr (Original post)
NCTraveler This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Sweeney
(505 posts)Ask those people under a death sentence in foreign lands what they think of the death of two cops in New York.
In a world where very often people must starve to death or die with violence because some share holder at long distance demands it; the resolution of our problem may be the resolution of their problems. One does what one can. It is impossible to save the world. If enough people save their little part of the world, the world will be saved. It is not rocket science, and it isn't brain surgery. It is the willingness to resist. It is the williness to be conscious, and it is the willingness to act on the certainty that the injustice we resist is universal and endemic to our economy.
Thanks.
JI7
(89,250 posts)Why are they not as worthy of mention as the ones you menTioned ?
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)I understand where you're coming from.
But there are threads for victims of cops and for cops. It may have appeared to you that DUers were making these 2 cop deaths more important than civilian deaths, but that's not the case here.
They were men with wives and one had kids and it's sad no matter who they were. I am disgusted with the way NYPD is making cops lives more important than anyone's. It sickens me.
But people on DU aren't using that thread to do the same. They are just silently showing respect.
Welcome to DU