Juan Cole: Top 7 Ways Assassination Fails USA as Policy
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/27608-top-7-ways-assassination-fails-usa-as-policy
Below I consider the CIAs cautions about the drawbacks of such assassination tactics in the context of the rise of Daesh (ISIS or ISIL) in Iraq.
Potential negative effects of HVT [high value target] operations include:
increasing the level of insurgent support,
This happened with what is now Daesh (ISIS or ISIL). The US killed the leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in spring of 2006. His successor was Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, who was killed by the Iraqi army in 2010. The new leader was Ibrahim al-Samarrai, who styled himself Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and took over 42% of Iraqs land area. Each assassination seems to have increased the level of insurgent report among Iraqi Sunnis.
causing a government to neglect other aspects of its counterinsurgency strategy,
The Shiite government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Iraq failed to reach out to Sunni Arabs to include them in the new system. The alienated people of Mosul thus allied even with Daesh against al-Maliki.
altering insurgent strategy or organization in ways that favor the insurgents,
The heat in Iraq on Daesh caused the fighters to go off to Syria, instead. They were able to take and hold al-Raqqah Province there, allowing them to establish a state with ordinary institutions.
strengthening an armed groups bond with the population,
The USA/ Shiite leaders of Iraq scared the Sunni Arab population so badly, with its prejudice and discrimination, that it pushed them into the arms of al-Qaeda.