Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,704 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 07:47 PM Dec 2014

Google news, inquisitr.com, dinner time, and W (yes that W)


This was the LBN headline: Lightning Strike Allegedly Obliterates Car Full Of Robbers After Raiding Russian Church [Video]

So I was looking through google news. That headline popped up. As I clicked on it Marta called from the kitchen "dinner is ready". I don't think I'ver ever even heard of inquisitr. So I rushed through posting it in LBN.

By the time I had filled my plate and got the lap top on, the story was already debunked. So I self deleted it.

I owe several DUers for catching it.

That is why I prefer the AP before looking for news elsewhere.

That covers everything in the title except W.



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Google news, inquisitr.com, dinner time, and W (yes that W) (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP
Some stories just scream out "fake." That was one of them. Atman Dec 2014 #1
It was pretty easy to tell it was just a car crash. Watch it again, frame by frame. jmowreader Dec 2014 #2

Atman

(31,464 posts)
1. Some stories just scream out "fake." That was one of them.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 08:11 PM
Dec 2014

As much as we tend to despise the "mainstream" media, I always take a step back when I hear of one of these sensationalist stories on sites with names like inquisitor.com or crazynews.com, yet not one recognized news sources has picked it up. After all, they're all about the ratings and ad revenues, too, and a story like a carload of robbers getting struck by lightening after robbing a church, well...I'm thinking a revenue-dependent news outlet would find that to be a headline grabber. Instead, it's found on some notorious click-bait site. I saw the Russion lightening strike story when it posted, watched it a couple of times, and quickly determined that a) you couldn't even tell if it was lightening as opposed to a fiery car crash, and b) why hadn't any "legitimate" news source picked it up?

The internet can be a great source of entertainment on a slow day. Unfortunately, too many people don't apply a lot of common sense when they see "amazing" videos like this. In fact, a good rule if thumb is that if the teaser headline ends with anything like "...you won't believe what happens next!" it isn't really news at all. The resulting click may be amusing, it might even be "amazing." But it is almost always little more than click-bait.

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
2. It was pretty easy to tell it was just a car crash. Watch it again, frame by frame.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 09:13 PM
Dec 2014

Right after the fireball, there were two wrecked cars in the frame.

Besides...uhh...haven't we always been told the safest place to be in a thunderstorm was in a car with the windows up, because the body serves as a Faraday cage and the wheels insulate it from the ground?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Google news, inquisitr.co...