Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 03:06 PM Dec 2014

Sorry PFOX… The model on the ‘ex-gay’ billboard is ‘out and proud,’ not a twin

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2014/12/sorry-pfox-the-model-on-the-ex-gay-billboard-is-out-and-proud-not-a-twin/

The “twins” whose photographs appear on a Virginia billboard declaring “nobody is born gay” is actually one “out and proud” gay man who is not a twin.

WWBT-TV spoke with Kyle Roux, the model from South Africa whose photographs were used in the billboard, who said he was shocked his image was used to promote gay-to-straight conversion therapy, especially because he is openly gay.

“It just seems like there no place in today’s world for an organization that is promoting this as being some kind of deviant or distasteful lifestyle, because I’ve lived my life openly gay and happy for my entire life,” he said.

Roux said the pictures were taken in a photo shoot nearly a decade ago. He said he signed away the rights and was told the pictures would be used in commercial and corporate ads and brochures.


36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry PFOX… The model on the ‘ex-gay’ billboard is ‘out and proud,’ not a twin (Original Post) KamaAina Dec 2014 OP
So much for thou shalt bear no false witness /nt dballance Dec 2014 #1
they lie all the time, then claim to have the truth Heather MC Dec 2014 #28
They are the Anti-Christ religion Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #29
Color me stupid, but... cyberswede Dec 2014 #2
Because it does .... end of story Botany Dec 2014 #7
- i.e., you go to the argument with the unknown unknowns you've got not the known knowns you want. xocet Dec 2014 #15
Why . . . OldRedneck Dec 2014 #14
One of the current hypotheses Nevernose Dec 2014 #25
I dunno...ask the dumbfucks who made the billboard. cyberswede Dec 2014 #26
There's also research WinstonSmith4740 Dec 2014 #30
No one even knows if sexual orientation is the result of one cause or many. Rozlee Dec 2014 #34
This is true, too. Nevernose Dec 2014 #35
Well, those same people believe the Earth is only 6k years old and that Jamastiene Dec 2014 #33
Hilarious underpants Dec 2014 #3
If that's a ten-year-old stock photo, I doubt anyone knew if the model was gay rocktivity Dec 2014 #4
We "believe"? jmowreader Dec 2014 #16
DING DING DING! Rocktivity, you're our grand prize winner! rocktivity Dec 2014 #20
For some real research being done mnhtnbb Dec 2014 #5
Conservatives always lie. Always. Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #6
And when they are not talking, they are lying to themselves... (n/t) Moostache Dec 2014 #11
They do not which you cannot prove so stop saying that! KamaAina Dec 2014 #31
So little words from PFOX, yet so very wrong ck4829 Dec 2014 #8
Wow, Bartlet Dec 2014 #9
When spreading hate, truth is irrelevant. mountain grammy Dec 2014 #10
They posted a statement about it on their FB page BuddhaGirl Dec 2014 #12
Well, if they KNEW the model is openly homosexual and not a twin rocktivity Dec 2014 #32
reading from left to right... SansACause Dec 2014 #13
With equal 'logic' it proves that nobody is born straight. onenote Dec 2014 #17
oh dear oh dear proud patriot Dec 2014 #18
The deception burns. Curmudgeoness Dec 2014 #19
God, dont these people ever give it a rest? Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #21
Homophobic bigots lying and deceiving the public? JDDavis Dec 2014 #22
By that logic nobody is born a sociopath either. mackerel Dec 2014 #23
I understand "free usage of a photo", up to a certain point. delrem Dec 2014 #24
why do theist have to lie so much? Heather MC Dec 2014 #27
How do you ever think you'll get away with this shit?? nt 7962 Dec 2014 #36
 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
28. they lie all the time, then claim to have the truth
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 05:26 AM
Dec 2014

And if you are disgusted by their "sin"
You are not suppose to jidge them
Turn the other check and of course understand they are imperfect humans so who can blame them?

And don't dare blame their god
For their "short comings"
What a load of shit

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
2. Color me stupid, but...
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 03:10 PM
Dec 2014

how does one twin being born straight and the other being born gay prove that there's no such thing as being born gay?

Botany

(70,505 posts)
7. Because it does .... end of story
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:38 AM
Dec 2014

Just like snow in winter proves global warming isn't true or that Iraq had WMDs
because Don Rummy said so.

xocet

(3,871 posts)
15. - i.e., you go to the argument with the unknown unknowns you've got not the known knowns you want.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 04:28 PM
Dec 2014

n/t

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
14. Why . . .
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 02:54 PM
Dec 2014

Why do you ask such questions?

Don't you know you're simply supposed to lie back and let great waves of hate wash over you??

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
25. One of the current hypotheses
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 01:22 AM
Dec 2014

Is that being gay definitely has a genetic component, but might actually be a genetic alteration that occurs in utero; they'd still be twins, but the straight one would be slightly different from the other one. Maybe the straight twin is in the closet, even to himself. Maybe this, maybe that.

But let's assume for a moment that the one twin wasn't born gay, and made a conscious decision to mate people with of the same sex. So what? What difference does it make? What difference does it make to anybody?

WinstonSmith4740

(3,056 posts)
30. There's also research
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 12:28 PM
Dec 2014

that shows, at least in the case of identical twin male homosexuality, that in the 3rd or so week of embryonic development, when the testosterone kicks in there isn't enough for both embryos to become fully male. One gets enough for both the secondary sex characteristics and brain to be male, but for the second twin, only enough for the physical, but not the mental.

Interesting theory, and it could explain a lot.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
34. No one even knows if sexual orientation is the result of one cause or many.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 10:49 PM
Dec 2014

If some people have sexual preferences due to hormonal, chromosomal, adrenal, brain chemistry or even, yes, even personal choice. Studies now say that women get more sexual interest in their own gender as they age. I guess I have something to look forward to.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
35. This is true, too.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 11:35 PM
Dec 2014

That's actually added the part about what if this what if that.

I have a close, beloved relative that chose to be a lesbian for decades because of the absolutely horrific things that men had done to her, things really far too disturbing to repeat.

I had a very close friend who decided he was gay after a four year stint in a NY prison for marijuana.

It should make no difference, but it does. I just feel for my gay brothers and sisters: I know what their difficulties are like very well, but nothing to their severity.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
33. Well, those same people believe the Earth is only 6k years old and that
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:14 PM
Dec 2014

God talked to a man from a burning bush and that a snake talked a woman into eating fruit and that God asked a man to murder his own son.

Don't even get me started on the story they use from the Bible to explain their anti-gay hatred. Apparently, Lot taking his daughters up to a cave and letting them take turns having sex with him is preferable to someone who is gay.

The people who think that way are twisted, sick fucks. No way around it. So, if you don't think like them, I would not color you stupid, just not a twisted, sick fuck.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
4. If that's a ten-year-old stock photo, I doubt anyone knew if the model was gay
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 03:49 PM
Dec 2014

Last edited Thu Jul 2, 2015, 04:18 PM - Edit history (2)

But wouldn't you think that experts at gay conversion therapy would be able to spot one from a mile away? Aside from that, what made them think they thought they could get away with calling him a twin?

P.S: By any chance, would the straight twin is the one in the suit.



P.P.S: If one identical twin was gay and the other was not (which I am sure exist), wouldn't that PROVE that it's possible to be born gay?


rocktivity

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
16. We "believe"?
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 05:09 PM
Dec 2014

They also believe an imaginary man created the earth and everything on it in 144 hours, people used to live for 900 years when there were no doctors and it was legal to kill ya for giving someone the stink eye, a guy who magically created 400 gallons of wine to rescue a party from alcohol starvation doesn't want anyone to drink, and thirteen single men in their early 30s who lived in an era when they issued you your first wife five years after puberty weren't openly gay.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
20. DING DING DING! Rocktivity, you're our grand prize winner!
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 07:35 PM
Dec 2014
"If one identical twin was gay and the other was not (which I am sure exists)..."




rocktivity

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
8. So little words from PFOX, yet so very wrong
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:41 AM
Dec 2014

This assumes that one's genes completely decide everything, a person could have a gene that is linked to being gay (I'm pretty sure there is more than one though), and yet they will be completely straight. It's simply a predisposition.

There is a similar field of research for identical twins and schizophrenia, some twins both have schizophrenia; but about half of identical twins studied, one has it and the other does not. Yet, nobody disputes that there is some sort of genetic link to schizophrenia.

PFOX and other right wingers want biological determinism, they want the idea that your genes determine who you are from birth, but at the same time they don't want people to be gay, so they have to cook up these things so they can deal with their cognitive dissonance.

Bartlet

(172 posts)
9. Wow,
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:00 PM
Dec 2014

who's surprised that an anti-gay "conversion therapy" organization would completely fabricate information for an advertising campaign? I guess when your entire career is spent lying to yourself, lying to others just becomes second nature.

BuddhaGirl

(3,607 posts)
12. They posted a statement about it on their FB page
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:50 PM
Dec 2014

claiming they knew about it.

"*NOTICE - PFOX is well aware that the model used on their new billboards is openly homosexual and not a twin. The individual's image was used by advertising agencies per his contract like any other advertising deal. To see real twin stories visit the PFOX website."


https://www.facebook.com/pages/Parents-and-Friends-of-Ex-Gays-and-Gays-PFOX/45168666591

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
32. Well, if they KNEW the model is openly homosexual and not a twin
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:00 PM
Dec 2014

WHY did they claim that he WAS? And if PFOX really has a supply of "real twins" in their human arsenal, why not do an ad based on one of THEIR stories?

Methinks PFOX hath just handed Mr. Roux grounds for a libel case -- stock photo or not.


rocktivity

SansACause

(520 posts)
13. reading from left to right...
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 02:46 PM
Dec 2014

If you read "One gay. One not." from left to right, doesn't that imply the one with the suit is the gay one? I think that's the opposite of what they were intending.

Really, they need a big arrow or giant scarlet "A" to make sure Americans don't get this confused. You don't want Americans to think that all those "makers" on Wall St. are all gay.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
19. The deception burns.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 07:19 PM
Dec 2014

Incredible that they would not use "real" identical twins who were supposedly gay/not gay, instead of using a photo of the same man.

Honestly, this gives them zero credibility!

 

JDDavis

(725 posts)
22. Homophobic bigots lying and deceiving the public?
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:38 PM
Dec 2014

WHO would have guessed?

I'm SHOCKED, I tell you, just shocked that they would do such a thing!

/snark

Edit to add a serious note, if the model's photo that was used is a guy guy, can't he have grounds to sue for their using his image? Lawyers, let us know if there are firm legal grounds for litigation here.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
24. I understand "free usage of a photo", up to a certain point.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 01:12 AM
Dec 2014

But this usage seems to be so personally damaging to Kyle Roux, focussed to present a lie about him, as an individual and not just as a photograph, in such an intimately personal way, that if there isn't a law then then there ought to be a law that allows him public redress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sorry PFOX… The model on ...