General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen Charter Schools Are Nonprofit in Name Only
http://www.alternet.org/education/when-charter-schools-are-nonprofit-name-onlyA couple of years ago, auditors looked at the books of a charter school in Buffalo, New York, and were taken aback by what they found. Like all charter schools, Buffalo United Charter School is funded with taxpayer dollars. The school is also a nonprofit. But as the New York State auditors wrote, Buffalo United was sending virtually all of the Schools revenues directly to a for-profit company hired to handle its day-to-day operations.
Charter schools often hire companies to handle their accounting and management functions. Sometimes the companies even take the lead in hiring teachers, finding a school building, and handling school finances.
In the case of Buffalo United, the auditors found that the school board had little idea about exactly how the company a large management firm called National Heritage Academies was spending the schools money. The schools board still had to approve overall budgets, but it appeared to accept the companys numbers with few questions. The signoff was essentially meaningless, the auditors wrote.
In the charter-school sector, this arrangement is known as a sweeps contract because nearly all of a schools public dollars anywhere from 95 to 100 percent is swept into a charter-management company.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)and be self-sufficient. They never should have been given public money. Never!
sendero
(28,552 posts).... it simply means there are no shareholders to serve. But there are administrators, CEOs, CFOs, accountants, brothers, sisters, uncles, companies providing "services" owned by brothers, sisters and uncles and on and on and on. There are as many ways for a "non-profit" company to provide an exorbitant profit to a select cadre of insiders as there are trees in the forest.
The idea that a non-profit company is automatically more well run or fiscally careful is ludicrous, in fact without shareholders watching what is to stop it from paying the CEO 5 times the going rate? Nothing is, and so that happens a lot.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)by mainstream Democratic politicians and by Democratic voters since the beginning.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)WTF?
This is why I hate Third Way. I guess Third Way will have to change their name again now that we understand their mission was to destroy the Democratic Party.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Era. They made America #1 in all aspects of business and technology. The only glaring problem was the unequal distribution in poor and minority areas. The idiots that have bought into this Charter School scam are the ones that need to either go back to school or straight to prison!
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)are no better, and usually worse, than public schools. It has become simply another avenue for public money to speed to private companies. No accountability necessary. Who suffers from failed schools? Everyone.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)That is horrible.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)It ain't always the corporations that are gaming the system.