General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHunger Games: Western Terror Warriors Spurn Their Innocent Victims
Hunger Games: Western Terror Warriors Spurn Their Innocent Victims
By Chris Floyd
December 06, 2014 "ICH" - " So now there is no money left for the Syrian refugees created by the civil war fomented and fanned for years on end by Western governments. (Who, bizarrely, then prosecute any of their citizens who go off to fight in the war their governments promote as a noble and worthy cause.) For want of $64 million the amount of money the US spends in an eyeblink on its drone campaigns and death squads, the kind of money thats just chump change for, say, oligarchs who prowl the world destabilizing governments and monetizing misery for their own pockets the UN says it must halt a vital support program for Syrian refugees.
What is happening in Syria is sickening and surreal. Almost all of the public discourse surrounding this vast and vile slaughterhouse has been completely divorced from reality. The critical work of Asad AbuKhalil, the Angry Arab, has been one of the very few places where one can thread the labyrinth of bullshit that all sides in this shameful conflict spew forth.
Today, AbuKhalil points us to this pertinent piece by Simon Jenkins in the Guardian:
Now the cash vouchers that supply liquidity to the camps and sustain food supplies are to end. Some £500m has been pumped into the Jordanian camps by the UN alone and money has run out. Food rations are to be cut and host governments, facing an apparently ceaseless human migration, are starting to close their borders. The means by which the world relieves such suffering are seizing up.
The US, Britain and Nato played a major part in disrupting the region, indulging in wars of choice in Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. For a decade they toppled regimes and either fought or backed insurgents with bombs and troops. Peace they did not bring.
There was always money for military action. America spent $3tn fighting in Iraq. Britain spent £40bn on Afghanistan alone, under the obscene rubric of humanitarian intervention. David Cameron yearned to go to war in Syria. Yet Britains eagerness for war contrasts with an aversion to the consequences, whether frantic young Afghans in Calais camps, Libyans adrift in the Mediterranean or Iraqi translators desperate for asylum.
More at...........
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40400.htm
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Should we NOT CARE about Starving INNOCENTS in our WARS ABROAD? Because...OUR STARVING CHILDREN are the RESULT of Congress NOT Taking CARE OF OUR OWN....as we CREATE MORE AND MORE WAR...and the STARVING CHILDREN are the WORLD's CHILDREN ....AND, Our OWN with our WAR in the Middle East that is ENDLESS.
How is this HUMANITARIAN?