General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums12 things to keep in mind on the Torture report
1) Youre not actually reading the torture report. Youre just reading an executive summary. The full Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on the CIAs interrogation and detention program runs upward of 6,000 pages. The executive summary is 480 pages. So youre missing more than 80 percent of it.
2) The CIA got to cut out parts. The summary has been redacted ostensibly by the White House, but in practice by officials of the CIA, which, lest we forget, is the agency that is being investigated, that spied on and tried to intimidate the people conducting the investigation, and whose director has engaged in serial deception about the investigation. The original redactions proposed by the White House included eliminating even the use of pseudonyms to let readers keep track of major recurring characters, and appeared intended to make the summary unintelligible.
3) Senate Democrats had their backs to the wall. Senate Intelligence Committee chair Dianne Feinstein faced enormous pressure to get the summary out in some form, before the incoming Republican Senate majority could do the White House a solid and squelch it completely.
4) The investigation was extremely narrow in its focus. Committee staffers only looked at what the CIA did in its black sites; whether it misled other officials; and whether it complied with orders. That is somewhat like investigating whether a hit man did the job efficiently and cleaned up nicely.
5) The investigation didnt examine who gave the CIA its orders, or why. The summary doesnt assess who told the CIA to torture despite the abundant evidence that former vice president Dick Cheney and his cabal architected, choreographed and defended its use, with former president George W. Bushs knowing or unknowing support.
6) Torture was hardly limited to the CIA. In fact, the worst of it was done by the military. Want to read a quality investigation of the U.S. torture of detainees? Go read this 2008 report from the Senate Armed Services Committee. That committees inquiry didnt just expose the horrific, routinized abuse of detainees at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere, it also laid out a clear line of responsibility starting with Bush and exposed his administrations repeated explanation for what happened as a pack of lies. For some reason, it never got anywhere near the attention it deserved.
7) Senate investigators conducted no interviews of torture victims. As the Guardian reported in late November: Lawyers for four of the highest-value detainees ever held by the CIA, all of whom have made credible allegations of torture and all of whom remain in US government custody, say the Senate committee never spoke with their clients.
8) Senate investigators conducted no interviews of CIA officials. As the Washington Times reported in August, committee staffers never spoke to either the senior managers of the torture program or the directors who oversaw it.
9) In fact, Senate investigators conducted no interviews at all. We did not conduct interviews, but did make significant use of transcripts of interviews done by the CIA IG [Inspector General] and others during the program, a Senate Intelligence Committee staffer emailed me recently. That, together with the literally millions of pages of contemporaneous documents, emails, chat sessions, etc. make us confident in the accuracy and comprehensive nature of the report. So its basically aggregation.
10) Bush and Cheney have acknowledged their roles in the program. Bush and Cheney have both publicly acknowledged approving the use of waterboarding and other abusive forms of interrogation that are nearly universally considered torture. Cheney said in 2008 that he was involved in helping get the process cleared. Yeah, we waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Bush said in 2010. Id do it again to save lives.
11) The reports conclusion that torture didnt do any good is a big deal. You may argue, as I do, that even if torture sometimes worked, its still immoral, criminal and ultimately counterproductive. As I wrote during the Zero Dark Thirty furor, torture is not about extracting information, its about power, revenge, rage and cruelty. Its about stripping people of their humanity. Throughout its history, its only reliable byproduct has been false confessions. But the pro-torture argument is simple: The ends justify the means. So if the evidence is overwhelming that torture achieves nothing or less than nothing then we win the argument by default.
12) No one has been held accountable. Aside from a handful of low-level soldiers at Abu Ghraib, no one has been held accountable for the U.S.s embrace and widespread use of torture after the terror attacks of 9/11. And there are no signs that anyone will be. As a result, torture critics conclude that despite President Obamas decision not to torture, there is no reason to assume that we wont do it again in the future.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/12/02/x-things-keep-mind-ever-get-read-torture-report/
I CAN'T BREATHE
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)CYA.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Says Ray McGovern.
https://soundcloud.com/rttv/torturereport-itn
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)who gave Bush a green light to do as he pleased, because they were afraid they might look bad politically.
Karl Roved played congress like a two dollar fiddle after 9/11.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It's kabuki theater for the unwashed masses.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Those complicit in torture and defending it. And there is great complicity across our corporate and MIC-owned government now.
Note how many of these discussions are now missing from DU. I had to go looking for many of the original sources online. This is why it's important to title articles with the actual titles of the sources...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025347198
Obama Justice Department indicts ex-CIA agent for exposing torture
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002528908
Obama has stated flat out the USA does not Torture, BUT does it ...
(original discussion missing)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8817920
Obama's Torture Problem (Cover-up of torture at Guantanamo and CIA black sites)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9640662
(original discussion missing)
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/nov/18/obamas-torture-problem/
Fellow Nobel Peace Laureates to Obama: Stain of US Torture Your Job to Repair
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025722026
Obama's Torture Bind (Torture, CIA "black sites"
(original discussion missing)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5454518
What Is Obama Doing At Bagram? (Part One): Torture Under the Obama Administration
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x540433
Target of Obama-era rendition alleges torture
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6277906
(original discussion missing)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/11/target-of-obama-era-rendi_n_256499.html
The ACLU on Obama and Core Liberties
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2069714
(original discussion missing)
http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/liberties_3/
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)You are pointing out very inconvenient truths.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Response to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Otherwise they might...oh...nm.
underpants
(182,826 posts)GeoSquared
(5 posts)There has been a change in attitude since the American Revolution, when things were much more desperate for U.S.
Should any American soldier be so base and infamous as to injure any [prisoner]. . . I do most earnestly enjoin you to bring him to such severe and exemplary punishment as the enormity of the crime may require. Should it extend to death itself, it will not be disproportional to its guilt at such a time and in such a cause
for by such conduct they bring shame, disgrace and ruin to themselves and their country. - George Washington, charge to the Northern Expeditionary Force, Sept. 14, 1775
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)Bush and Cheney proved that they were as sick as the people the USA had fought off, for over 200 years. The Hitlers the Saddams and the like.
Now we have become "Them." the abusers of human rights)(and now it's manifesting itself on our own city streets) Give barbarism and inhumanity a chance and they will take over our world. The founders knew it. We need to replace the complicit corporate political zombies and stooges in Washington, with patriots, to salvage our "nation of laws."
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)malthaussen
(17,200 posts)niyad
(113,327 posts)calimary
(81,304 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Glad you're here! These bastards need to PAY for their crimes. WAR crimes. Now THIS is an impeachable offense. THIS, dear republi-CONS, is what constitutes high crimes. Not even misdemeanors. Don't even bother with the misdemeanors. High crimes. The HIGHEST of high crimes. They have endangered all of us Americans with this horrifying and utterly mortal-sin level CRIMES. They have smeared us all with blood and excrement and disgrace and sin.
They need to be brought to justice. I know what I'M going to be bothering my reps about when I call Congress.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)an (early) American historian, I was relying only on dim and distant memories.
Thanks for finding the quote and the citation. Copying for future use
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)The only articles I have seen about the torture memo are only about people's negative reactions to the memo, not about the memo itself.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)We will see only the parts they can rationalize away, if that at all.
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)Maybe our government is afraid of reaping the whirlwind, for the evil they have sown at home and abroad.
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)We can't even imagine what has been and is done in our name. Our country has no moral high ground whatsoever.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)I don't think there's an ounce of hope left in me.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Because.......so MANY want us to DO THAT!
It's what THEY WANT!
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... but I'm a team player and won't give up the fight until there is no kick left in this jerky knee (figure of speech only, there's nothing wrong with my knee.)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)malaise
(269,026 posts)Good to see you - I was asking for you
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Solly Mack
(90,769 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Locrian
(4,522 posts)11) The reports conclusion that torture didnt do any good is a big deal. You may argue, as I do, that even if torture sometimes worked, its still immoral, criminal and ultimately counterproductive. As I wrote during the Zero Dark Thirty furor, torture is not about extracting information, its about power, revenge, rage and cruelty. Its about stripping people of their humanity. Throughout its history, its only reliable byproduct has been false confessions. But the pro-torture argument is simple: The ends justify the means. So if the evidence is overwhelming that torture achieves nothing or less than nothing then we win the argument by defaul
That's the key - the true purpose is ALWAYS to manufacture false confessions. The purpose of which is to continue justification for more war, more war, more war. Both as a functional feedback of the system itself and for public propaganda purposes.
xocet
(3,871 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)samsingh
(17,599 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They figure she was kicked out of the army along with the other guilty soldiers and think Dems and Liberals only bring torture up as a political attack against Republicans and Conservatives who had nothing to do with it but feel a loyalty to defend their former President.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)We've heard for years on DU about other, horrific things that were done to detainees and their families. Their children. I've not seen any of THAT addressed, at least in what little I've seen or heard today via media outlets.
It's simply hard for me to process the absolute EVIL that had to be involved in all of this.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)rape/murder in the version we're not allowed to ever know about. These goons get off on torture. Sociopaths.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I didn't realize this, beyond that disgusting duo from Abu Ghraib who got prosecuted (sort of).
marble falls
(57,099 posts)come or need to come.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I say this from several years of reading what you post.
Thank you and have a great Christmas holiday/new year.