General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEpic takedown of the wingnuts' RAYGUN fantasy by Michael KINGSLEY
*********QUOTE********
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2015/01/ronald-reagan-policy-political-failure
[font size=5]The Irony and the Ecstasy
Every serious G.O.P. presidential aspirant invokes the glorious era of Ronald Reagan, to which the country must return. Ignore the fact that, for the likes of Paul Ryan and Rand Paul, Reagans actual recordfrom increased bureaucracy to higher deficitsshould be seen as a complete failure.[/font]
By Michael Kingsley
You can usually get a Republican to admit, if you beat him or her with a stick, that Reagans actual performance in office was a bit of a disappointment. But that, you see, is because the Democrats were so vicious in opposing Reagans policies. What you cannot get many Republicans to admit is that [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]the entire Reaganite golden age is a fantasy[/FONT]even if they really think so. Why burst the bubble?
What can people possibly mean when they say they want America to return to being a country ruled by the values of Ronald Reagan? [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: yellow"]When was this blissful time when thrift and hard work were rewarded and the government knew its place? Certainly not when Reagan was actually president[/FONT]. Under President Reagan (198189), the size of the federal government increased by any measure. Executive-branch civilian employment, which covers almost everything except the uniformed military and the Postal Service, was 2.109 million in 1981 and 2.129 million in 1989. Total federal-government employment rose during this period from 4.9 million to 5.3 million.
I could go on. Well, why not? Reagan inherited a federal budget of $599 billion in revenue, $678 billion in spending, and a deficit of $79 billion. He left office with a federal budget of $909 billion in revenue, a little less than $1.1 trillion in spending, and a deficit of $155 billion.
If youre looking for a good bureaucracy slasher, try Bill Clinton. In his eight years, the size of the executive-branch workforce dropped more than 10 percent, from 2.9 million to 2.6 million. Plus, Clinton has got a better overcoming adversity story than anyone was able to concoct for Reagan. Reagans life, like his disposition, was overwhelmingly sunny. He grew up middle-class in the Midwest, enjoyed relatively quick success in Hollywood, moved into politics, and triumphed there too. Clinton had a Southern Gothic upbringinghe famously had to stop his stepfather from beating his mother. Nothing that dramatic on Reagans résumé.
...Reagan wasnt president for 10 years (it just seemed that way). Inflation alone in Reagans eight years would have raised the value of $599 billion of revenue to $780 billion, even if the real economy had flatlined. Its true that the G.D.P. grew by a third during Reagans two terms. In the two terms that followed (George Bush and Clinton I), it rose by nearly as much, and in Clintons last term it soared. ....
*************UNQUOTE*************
underpants
(182,826 posts)They HATE the Kennedy's especially the mystique of Camelot. They needed something, literally a space holder, to take some room on the air/screen from JFK and FDR who they hate even more.