Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sun Dec 7, 2014, 11:12 PM Dec 2014

Attention elsewhere, Wall Street Lobbyists are writing the bills to weaken post-crash legislation

With Attention Elsewhere, Wall Street Lobbyists Push to Weaken Post-Crash Regulations
12/5/2014

With few Americans paying attention, financial interests trying to undo restrictions on risky trading that played large part in 2008 financial collapse

... Bank lobbyists are not leaving it to lawmakers to draft legislation that softens financial regulations. Instead, the lobbyists are helping to write it themselves.

One bill that sailed through the House Financial Services Committee this month — over the objections of the Treasury Department — was essentially Citigroup’s, according to e-mails reviewed by The New York Times. The bill would exempt broad swathes of trades from new regulation.

In a sign of Wall Street’s resurgent influence in Washington, Citigroup’s recommendations were reflected in more than 70 lines of the House committee’s 85-line bill. Two crucial paragraphs, prepared by Citigroup in conjunction with other Wall Street banks, were copied nearly word for word. (Lawmakers changed two words to make them plural.)

With Republicans in control of the House and many Democrats with ties to the financial services industry already backing the bill, the possibility of inclusion and passage of the measure looks strong. Less clear is what will happen if the budget extension bill arrives in the Senate with these deregulation mechanisms attached.


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/12/05/attention-elsewhere-wall-street-lobbyists-push-weaken-post-crash-regulations
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attention elsewhere, Wall Street Lobbyists are writing the bills to weaken post-crash legislation (Original Post) RiverLover Dec 2014 OP
Here we go again. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #1
Which was pitifully weak to begin with. aquart Dec 2014 #2
ROFL!!! One can dream... :) RiverLover Dec 2014 #7
Of course they would sakabatou Dec 2014 #3
Makes sense for them when the government acts as their backstop. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #4
They spent a lot of $$$ to buy the politicos they want.... radhika Dec 2014 #5
This time their looking for depositors money too newfie11 Dec 2014 #6
"They should have all gone to jail last time, now they own congress." RiverLover Dec 2014 #8
Not to worry. I'm sure President Obama will veto it, right? Scuba Dec 2014 #9
Human beings don't like limits The2ndWheel Dec 2014 #10
And humans shouldn't like companies writing legislation for their government. RiverLover Dec 2014 #11
It's not all that different from The2ndWheel Dec 2014 #13
Not satisfied with Regulatory Capture. Moving on to Congressional as well One_Life_To_Give Dec 2014 #12
K&R woo me with science Dec 2014 #14
K&R liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #15

aquart

(69,014 posts)
2. Which was pitifully weak to begin with.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 01:28 AM
Dec 2014

My evil mind (the part that doesn't mush over baby adorables) want to invite Wall Street for an adventure weekend. Have a canned hunt.

radhika

(1,008 posts)
5. They spent a lot of $$$ to buy the politicos they want....
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 02:14 AM
Dec 2014

Now its pay back time. whahahha

I have NO doubt, Wall Street will get everything they want over the next 2 years. It will come out out the backsides of working saps who obediently voted in the new crop of predators.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
6. This time their looking for depositors money too
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 07:42 AM
Dec 2014

IRA, retirement funds, even deposits are up for grabs if they push through their new rewrite of our laws.

They should have all gone to jail last time, now they own congress.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
10. Human beings don't like limits
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 08:55 AM
Dec 2014

Whether it's nature or Wall Street, we will try to find our way around, over, under, or through anything.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
11. And humans shouldn't like companies writing legislation for their government.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:01 AM
Dec 2014

The only people "represented" here are CEOs and stockholders.

And when we crash again, the unrepresented citizens will pay for their bailout, again.

Why can't "We the people" find a way to crash through that? How is that even legal? Why are we collectively passive about it?

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
13. It's not all that different from
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 11:48 AM
Dec 2014

trying to re-write the planetary rules that govern us as a species. Something like Monsanto is just what humans have been doing agriculturally for centuries, just on a larger, and at the same time smaller(molecular), scale.

And when we crash again, the unrepresented citizens will pay for their bailout, again.

Why can't "We the people" find a way to crash through that? How is that even legal? Why are we collectively passive about it?


My guess would be because there is no we the people. We don't really know what we want, but we want the best of everything, but not the downside of any choice. Collective action is the way to go! Express your individuality any way you want! We can't do both effectively at the same time. We try to, but that's why nothing seems to work.

Plus, and I would say this goes to a deeper and more fundamental level of life in general, you're not supposed to be a barbarian. You're not supposed to crash through it. You're just supposed to protest it.

Human beings haven't evolved beyond the tribe, but our society has. At least more and more of society has. "We the people" is vague and abstract, just like Wall Street itself. Fighting an abstraction with an abstraction. Is there anything real to hold onto, and not be passive about?

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
12. Not satisfied with Regulatory Capture. Moving on to Congressional as well
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:54 AM
Dec 2014
Regulatory capture is a form of political corruption that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Attention elsewhere, Wall...