Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 07:38 PM Dec 2014

I work in the Bronx courts

I process cases where people are arrested for selling cigarettes illegally. Generally they get a violation not a misdemeanor, and maybe a fine and/or community service. Very rarely jail, even with a history of past convictions. This execution by cop is just horrific. My coworkers that I've seen post about it agree. They are blaming the DAs office. Unfortunately in NYS grand jury proceedings are secret. We will probably never know what happened. But we do know the other cops were granted immunity, which in itself is fucked up, so I have no confidence that the DA presented the case trying to get an indictment.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I work in the Bronx courts (Original Post) AndreaCG Dec 2014 OP
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #1
Thanks for your input Andrea nt okaawhatever Dec 2014 #2
Kick! riqster Dec 2014 #3
Thanks for this info. HappyMe Dec 2014 #4
REC! SammyWinstonJack Dec 2014 #5
Thanks for the insight. elleng Dec 2014 #6
The DA played defense for the cop is what most are speculating in my circle. herding cats Dec 2014 #7
don't believe black females get off AngryAmish Dec 2014 #16
I agree. herding cats Dec 2014 #20
Isn't Holder getting into this now? panader0 Dec 2014 #8
Not unless the cops are smoking pot FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #21
Holder said after the decision not to indict panader0 Dec 2014 #22
I hope he follows through FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #27
The DOJ always says that after a controversial decision. former9thward Dec 2014 #37
I think he is negotiating with Wall Street for his next job. nm rhett o rick Dec 2014 #33
Attorney General Eric Holder Plans ‘Institute of Justice’ to Address Protest Concerns Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #36
That sounds swell. He has been a US Atty General or Deputy US Atty General rhett o rick Dec 2014 #41
I don't know what he's been doing for ten years, but I'm not presuming it's nothing. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #42
His top priority has been to bust LEGAL medical marijuana dispensers. Sending them to rhett o rick Dec 2014 #44
I guess you don't like him much. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #49
Having a top priority of sending medical marijuana dispensers (legal in the state) to prison rhett o rick Dec 2014 #50
Despite all the B.S. responses attacking Holder that you got ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #40
input greatly appreciated ellennelle Dec 2014 #9
Thanks, Andrea KMOD Dec 2014 #10
Thanks for the information. Appreciate you taking the time to let us know what you and your greatlaurel Dec 2014 #11
Thank you for posting. amandabeech Dec 2014 #12
What is the typical fine out of curiosity? davidpdx Dec 2014 #13
There are two types of charges AndreaCG Dec 2014 #25
seems like for a misdemeanor they should just issue a ticket, passiveporcupine Dec 2014 #14
did they even need an arrest? treestar Dec 2014 #15
Why not a simple, friendly warning? world wide wally Dec 2014 #38
I bet a Bronx Grand jury would indict, regardless of the DA. rug Dec 2014 #17
The Bronx is not Staten Island. branford Dec 2014 #18
And the Bronx is the poorest county in the state. rug Dec 2014 #19
Not only cops, Dorian Gray Dec 2014 #32
No question. NT LiberalElite Dec 2014 #23
The Bronx has indicted cops AndreaCG Dec 2014 #24
For one the violated their own PD rules using the choke hold... Historic NY Dec 2014 #26
Everybody dies. Sweeney Dec 2014 #28
Maybe NYC should cease with the ridiculously high cigarette taxes? VScott Dec 2014 #29
Thank you for parroting Rand Paul RoccoR5955 Dec 2014 #60
What makes you think that I didn't come up with the idea first and on my own? VScott Dec 2014 #62
im not suprised....ham sandwich shallwechat Dec 2014 #30
no noiretextatique Dec 2014 #31
As far as I know sunnystarr Dec 2014 #34
The DA was trying to get an indictment. former9thward Dec 2014 #35
"I process cases where people are arrested..." brooklynite Dec 2014 #39
What was the probable cause to arrest him? KMOD Dec 2014 #45
"Misdemeanor cases over alleged untaxed cigarettes preceded fatal police incident with Eric Garner" brooklynite Dec 2014 #46
No. What happened in March, does not give police the right KMOD Dec 2014 #47
Wow!! So they killed him for cigarette taxes. I remember when Canada made cigarettes illegal sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #52
Once again, no. They ARRESTED him for cigarette taxes. brooklynite Dec 2014 #53
The article says he was free on bail. He had been arrested in May, but why was he being arrested uppityperson Dec 2014 #55
He had been charged multiple times on multiple instances... brooklynite Dec 2014 #56
So he broke up a fight, cops showed up and decided maybe he was selling again? uppityperson Dec 2014 #57
And they wouldn't have been there if the State he lives in wasn't engaging in more draconian sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #59
stop and frisk gone wild? Andrea CG librechik Dec 2014 #43
Possibly AndreaCG Dec 2014 #54
thx for your opinion! n/t librechik Dec 2014 #58
Duh. DeSwiss Dec 2014 #48
Thanks so much for posting this MissDeeds Dec 2014 #51
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #61

elleng

(131,159 posts)
6. Thanks for the insight.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 07:56 PM
Dec 2014

I've been wondering about the DA and the office too. Hope we'll hear/see more soon.

herding cats

(19,568 posts)
7. The DA played defense for the cop is what most are speculating in my circle.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 07:57 PM
Dec 2014

Which seems to go along with what your people feel. I'm not saying he shouldn't have had a chance of a rigorous defense at trial, but the grand jury is not the time, nor the place, for any sort of defense case. That's where a DA is supposed to be giving it their all to get an indictment.

The system is rigged against the victims of police violence, most especially if you're black and male.

herding cats

(19,568 posts)
20. I agree.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 10:19 PM
Dec 2014

I almost left it as gender generic then thought about how many black males are victims of police violence, and changed it. In general, though, you're the one correct here. If you have dark skin in this country you're just screwed.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
22. Holder said after the decision not to indict
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 10:54 PM
Dec 2014

that the Justice Department would investigate a possible civil rights violation.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
37. The DOJ always says that after a controversial decision.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:07 PM
Dec 2014

It is a way to keep the heat off of them. After a year or two when everyone is off to other things they will issue a report with no charges. It is very difficult to bring federal charges because they have to prove the cop intended to deprive the person they killed their civil rights. Nearly impossible to prove that.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
36. Attorney General Eric Holder Plans ‘Institute of Justice’ to Address Protest Concerns
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dec 2014
http://time.com/3617425/ferguson-garner-eric-holder-attorney-general/

Attorney General Eric Holder has begun drafting plans to continue his work rebuilding the relationship between local law enforcement and the black community after he leaves public office next year.

“This whole notion of reconciliation between law enforcement and communities of color is something that I really want to focus on and to do so in a very organized way,” he said Tuesday in an interview with TIME. “Not just as Eric Holder, out there giving speeches—though certainly that could be a part of it—but to have maybe a place where this kind of effort is housed and to be associated with that kind of an entity.”

His preparation comes at a time when the nation’s top law enforcement officer has launched a national tour to meet with black leaders and law enforcement around the country, amid daily protests over grand jury decisions in New York City and Ferguson, Mo., to not bring charges against police officers who killed unarmed black men. On Monday, Holder spoke at Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, a civil rights landmark, and on Thursday he will travel to Cleveland, where a police officer recently shot a 12-year-old black boy, Tamir Rice, who was playing with an air gun.

-more at link-
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
41. That sounds swell. He has been a US Atty General or Deputy US Atty General
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:13 PM
Dec 2014

for almost 10 total years. I am not at all impressed with his accomplishments. He certainly talks the talk.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
44. His top priority has been to bust LEGAL medical marijuana dispensers. Sending them to
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:23 PM
Dec 2014

prison for 20 years. He other priority has been to go easy on Wall Street corruption. He is looking forward to that "Swinging Door" Wall Street job.

If you don't know what he has been doing for ten years, it's probably nothing.

Oh yeah, he increase the prison term for the good Gov Siegelman. A political prisoner railroaded by the KARL ROVE AND THE REPUBLICANS.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
50. Having a top priority of sending medical marijuana dispensers (legal in the state) to prison
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 02:27 PM
Dec 2014

isn't the action of someone fighting for the 99%. Further more he has looked the other way from Wall Street crime.

We are in a class war and Mr. Holden is on the wrong side.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
40. Despite all the B.S. responses attacking Holder that you got ...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:11 PM
Dec 2014

There is really very little Holder can do!

Civil Rights prosecutions are VERY difficult because in order to bring one, there has to be evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the killing was BECAUSE the victim was (in this case) Black. Absent some racist rant during the confrontation, or a clear history of the officer being a racist, there just is no there there.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
9. input greatly appreciated
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:20 PM
Dec 2014

but so everyone is reminded here, GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS ARE ALWAYS SECRET!

at least, they are supposed to be.

think about it; if no true bill is issued, then the person accused should never have to be publicly humiliated or condemned.

not trying to protect wilson here, but the rest of us. this is a good arrangement, and should be respected and kept that way.

however, when an incident involves a killing at the hands of a police officer, imho an independent prosecutor should ALWAYS be brought in to conduct the grand jury proceedings; this should be the law.

making the ferguson grand jury docs public was damn near unprecedented; it was mccullough's best bet for protecting wilson at all costs, while maintaining the appearance of legality and fairness.

nothing could be further from fair or even legal. mccullough conducted this grand jury as if it were a full court, but without any adversarial representation for the victim, so there was no cross-examination.

this is what made the whole thing so perverse; typically the prosecutor uses the grand jury to indict someone of a crime so they can be charged and the prosecutor can prosecute him or her. in this case, he was defending wilson. just twisted.

i'll bet everyone here can think of a gazillion questions they'd have loved to ask wilson under cross-examination, and under oath. like oh, i dunno, how tall are you, sir? and you felt how puny? how long has this fear for your manhood been a problem? does that gun help?

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
10. Thanks, Andrea
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:21 PM
Dec 2014

It boggles my mind that they would even detain him for this. Why not just write a citation.

It's so sad that Mr. Garner is dead, suffocated by the police, over a couple of cigarettes.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
11. Thanks for the information. Appreciate you taking the time to let us know what you and your
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:22 PM
Dec 2014

coworkers are thinking. I am so ashamed that there will be no justice for Mr. Garner. I am outraged that the national media is mostly ignoring the murder of Tamir Rice in Cleveland. The murder of this child is beyond belief.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
12. Thank you for posting.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 08:24 PM
Dec 2014

The officers' actions were reprehensible. There is no way that Mr. Garner should receive the death sentence for selling untaxed cigarettes. Thank heavens that the take-down was filmed, and there can be no doubts.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
13. What is the typical fine out of curiosity?
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 09:59 PM
Dec 2014

I would think that most of the people doing that wouldn't be able to afford the fines and would have that hanging over their head because of a lack of ability to pay them (kind of like the tickets in Ferguson).

I saw the video and it was horrific. Unfortunately the outcome is what I expected.

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)
25. There are two types of charges
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:30 PM
Dec 2014

Fines and mandatory surcharges. The mandatory surcharge for a misdemeanor is 200. For a violation it's 120. This can be waived for indigence and go as a judgment against your credit till you pay. Fines are generally 100 or less from what I see. Depending on the charge and the details of the case. These are not waived for indigence but people are given numerous chances to pay, even if they've missed a court date and warranted. The judges are aware that most defendants are poor.

Most of the cigarette cases I see are not people selling "loosies" like Garner but stores selling untaxed ones from other states. Yes the cops check the stores. They also go around to stores for knock off merchandise, which doesn't particularly bother me, but also to try to sell "stolen" merchandise which kind of does. And they also send auxiliary police who are underage to buy liquor illegally. They may try this with cigarettes too now that the sale age is 21.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
14. seems like for a misdemeanor they should just issue a ticket,
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 09:59 PM
Dec 2014

not try to arrest someone. The whole thing was fucked up.

world wide wally

(21,755 posts)
38. Why not a simple, friendly warning?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:08 PM
Dec 2014

How much revenue do they really think this was costing the state of NY?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
18. The Bronx is not Staten Island.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 10:09 PM
Dec 2014

A LOT of cops live in Richmond County (Staten Island), and it is VERY pro-police.

To even many long-time residents of NYC like myself, Staten Island sometimes feels like another country.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
19. And the Bronx is the poorest county in the state.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 10:11 PM
Dec 2014

If nothing else, poverty sniffs out bullshit.

Dorian Gray

(13,503 posts)
32. Not only cops,
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:46 AM
Dec 2014

but firemen. I know quite a few from NJ who wanted to become NYC firemen, so they moved to Staten Island... close to the Outerbridge Crossing... so they're right close to their families but can work in Manhattan as a fireman.

I think SI attracts a lot of working class city employees, as well. It's cheaper than any other boro.

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)
24. The Bronx has indicted cops
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:19 PM
Dec 2014

The DA I believe is still Rob Johnson who is black. There are things you can criticize about his office (like incompetence of many of his staff, which contributes to our terrible backload of cases, though it's not the only reason) but he's not loath to indict cops. I would say in general the Bronx jurors are quite suspicious of cops, understandably so with the racist stop and frisk policy. Which has officially stopped but I'm not really seeing reduced numbers in my department yet.

Sweeney

(505 posts)
28. Everybody dies.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:08 AM
Dec 2014

Not everybody kills. If I have to be on one side or the other of that, I think I'll die. I may have contributed to some deaths. I never actually killed anyone. That means there is one of the ten commandments I have not deliberately trampled on. Just about everything rotten a person can do in one life can be made up for. I don't know if anyone has ever made murder right, and If I am going to hell then, that is fine. I am just not going to punch my own ticket to get there.
Sweeney

 

VScott

(774 posts)
29. Maybe NYC should cease with the ridiculously high cigarette taxes?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:14 AM
Dec 2014

They're the ones responsible for creating a black market for this kind of activity.

shallwechat

(13 posts)
30. im not suprised....ham sandwich
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:59 AM
Dec 2014

As one nyc er stated here that staten island tends to be very pro-police. And if staten island is only richmond county ny?...small population to draw from in a jury pool and they are very pro police, would the sample be biased? and furguson is a glimpse into how the DA pursues cop crimes in a grand jury.....is any one suprised?

sunnystarr

(2,638 posts)
34. As far as I know
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:56 PM
Dec 2014

it has not been established that he was selling loosies that day. Only that he had a record for selling loosies. I read somewhere that he was at the store helping to break up some sort of fight. Of course that could be solved by knowing if he had any loosies on him to sell or if there is any evidence that he was observed trying to sell them that day.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
35. The DA was trying to get an indictment.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:03 PM
Dec 2014

That is exactly why the other cops were granted immunity. He wanted their testimony.

brooklynite

(94,746 posts)
39. "I process cases where people are arrested..."
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:08 PM
Dec 2014

Okay, this is what troubles me. Nobody supports use of the chokehold in this case, or the failure to indict the officer for doing so. But I keep seeing "he was killed for selling cigarettes". Wrong. He was ARRESTED for selling cigarettes, just as, apparently, he would have been arrested in the Bronx. From the video, he appears to have resisted arrest (he certainly resisted being handcuffed) which led to inappropriate actions to subdue him. But let's not go so far back as to say he shouldn't have been arrested in the first place, or that the police has no legitimate reason to engage him.. Argue that the law shouldn't be on the books if you want to; but it is.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
45. What was the probable cause to arrest him?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:37 PM
Dec 2014

It looks to me like he was arrested for being a large black man, who dared to question why they were harassing him.

brooklynite

(94,746 posts)
46. "Misdemeanor cases over alleged untaxed cigarettes preceded fatal police incident with Eric Garner"
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:57 PM
Dec 2014
Staten Island Advance:

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. Eric Garner had run afoul of the law several times for allegedly selling untaxed cigarettes before his fatal confrontation with police on Thursday, court records show.

...snip...

Seven months later, while out on $1,000 bail, Garner was busted on March 28 for allegedly selling unstamped cigarettes on the street outside of 200 Bay St., Tompkinsville. He had 24 packs of untaxed smokes in his possession, police said.

The location is next door to 202 Bay St., where the fatal confrontation occurred Thursday between cops and Garner.
 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
47. No. What happened in March, does not give police the right
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 02:05 PM
Dec 2014

to arrest and kill him on July 17th.

Where was the probable cause on July 17th?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
52. Wow!! So they killed him for cigarette taxes. I remember when Canada made cigarettes illegal
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 02:47 PM
Dec 2014

After six months airc, the law was rescinded because it resulted in crime. NYS's draconian Drug Laws, and now its draconian cigarette taxes, which target the poor and minorities more than the wealthy, and create a climate where cops can target minorities and the poor AGAIN.

Too bad he wasn't a Wall St Banker where he could have stolen BILLIONS from the tax payers and his Government would have not only looked the other way, but bailed him out.

He made a few dollars and deprived the state of a few cents per cigarette and they send out the cops to get him.

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
55. The article says he was free on bail. He had been arrested in May, but why was he being arrested
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:41 PM
Dec 2014

in July since he was out on bail?

At the time of his death, the Port Richmond resident had three misdemeanor cases pending in Stapleton Criminal Court. He was free on $2,000 bail.

(clip)

Garner last appeared in court to answer the three cases on July 2. The matters were all adjourned then to Oct. 7, online state court records show.

brooklynite

(94,746 posts)
56. He had been charged multiple times on multiple instances...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:43 PM
Dec 2014

...presumably the suspicion was that he was selling again.

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
57. So he broke up a fight, cops showed up and decided maybe he was selling again?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:44 PM
Dec 2014

I wonder what cause they had beyond "he did it in the past".

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
59. And they wouldn't have been there if the State he lives in wasn't engaging in more draconian
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:05 PM
Dec 2014

'laws' on the pretext of 'concern' for the well being of its citizens. No one would be out there trying to buy cheap cigarettes if these horrific taxes, which mostly affect the poor, had not been imposed by NYS.

And the cops would never have come in contact with him. Another racist 'war on drugs', just like the other one.

librechik

(30,676 posts)
43. stop and frisk gone wild? Andrea CG
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:19 PM
Dec 2014

since Giuliani, isn't there a drive by "the public" i.e., shopkeepers and NYC investors, to clear the streets of certain types of people who who might scare tourists away? Was Garner's visible location an issue, where he needed to be removed, not merely given a citation?

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)
54. Possibly
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:22 PM
Dec 2014

I process arrests in the Bronx for aggressive panhandling (not the official charge, usually disorderly conduct along with an administrative code misdemeanor I forget the exact name of). This is usually people panhandling on one of the highway entrance ramps and disturbing the flow of traffic. Less often someone panhandling in front of a business keeping people from entering and leaving. The arrests for what could be called loitering are usually for being in a park after hours or a building you don't live in. How it works on Staten Island I am not sure.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
51. Thanks so much for posting this
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 02:29 PM
Dec 2014

Too much power to too few, all in secrecy. Wow. What country is this?

K&R

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I work in the Bronx court...