Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 07:18 AM Nov 2014

Saudis block OPEC output cut, sending oil price plunging

VIENNA (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia blocked calls on Thursday from poorer members of the OPEC oil exporter group for production cuts to arrest a slide in global prices, sending benchmark crude plunging to a fresh four-year low.

Brent oil fell more than $6 to $71.25 a barrel after OPEC ministers meeting in Vienna left the group's output ceiling unchanged despite huge global oversupply, marking a major shift away from its long-standing policy of defending prices.

This outcome set the stage for a battle for market share between OPEC and non-OPEC countries, as a boom in U.S. shale oil production and weaker economic growth in China and Europe have already sent crude prices down by about a third since June.

"It was a great decision," Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said as he emerged smiling after around five hours of talks.

OPEC said in a statement that members had agreed to roll over the ceiling of 30 million barrels per day, at least 1 million above OPEC's own estimates of demand for its oil next year.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/low-expectations-oil-output-cut-082000197.html

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Saudis block OPEC output cut, sending oil price plunging (Original Post) mfcorey1 Nov 2014 OP
I can't remember where I read it JonLP24 Nov 2014 #1
correct sir! quaker bill Nov 2014 #2
That's only part of it. Sen. Walter Sobchak Nov 2014 #3
Unless you are Russia davidn3600 Nov 2014 #4
Would a Russian attitude adjustment be a bad thing? Sen. Walter Sobchak Nov 2014 #6
Markets like this tend to lead to bad attitudes JonLP24 Nov 2014 #8
The fall of the USSR occured at the same time that oil prices crashed in the 80s. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #24
I remember that. safeinOhio Nov 2014 #5
Saudi oil production has peaked, they won't be able to do this much longer. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #23
The Saudi contingent said they can sustain JimDandy Nov 2014 #30
Good news / bad news Bagsgroove Nov 2014 #7
The free market will fix it BootinUp Nov 2014 #11
A free market invisble hand job? Thor_MN Nov 2014 #14
Additional good news? Dale Neiburg Nov 2014 #26
That was my first thought: slow the development of alternatives truebluegreen Nov 2014 #29
This will be unpopular, but I prefer high oil prices FLPanhandle Nov 2014 #9
Understood. But it hurts poor and middle classes Ilsa Nov 2014 #10
That's precious. Do you also like to see food prices climb so that the poor will not overeat? Bluenorthwest Nov 2014 #13
Maybe they should try sustainable foods (/sarc) Recursion Nov 2014 #18
There is a good news/bad news to this JonLP24 Nov 2014 #19
Fine and dandy if one lives in a dense urban setting. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #17
Then increase the gasoline tax FBaggins Nov 2014 #28
And we need $80/bbl. Canadian oil and a pipeline WHY? n/t ColesCountyDem Nov 2014 #12
Ironic, isn't it, that OPEC has made Keystone XL unprofitable? (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #16
Irony so thick you could cut it with a knife. n/t ColesCountyDem Nov 2014 #20
The last thing OPEC wants is a self-sufficient western hemisphere. Venezuela was their first target Recursion Nov 2014 #21
OPEC appears to me reacting normally JonLP24 Nov 2014 #25
It should be pointed out Keystone wouldn't have done a thing for gas prices JonLP24 Nov 2014 #22
They will continue this, until Canada/US/Venezuela agree to cut output Recursion Nov 2014 #15
WTI was under $70 a barrel yesterday Gothmog Nov 2014 #27
Whence 'The Ghawar is Dying'? IDemo Nov 2014 #31

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
1. I can't remember where I read it
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 07:31 AM
Nov 2014

But Saudi Arabia employed this strategy before, mid 80's I think. It is a long term strategy but it worked out in their favor, putting pressure on the world's other oil producers.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
3. That's only part of it.
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 07:51 AM
Nov 2014

Much of OPEC is in a very precarious state, they can't afford to cut production and wait for prices to rise, maybe. They have to produce and fight for market share to keep their revenue flowing. It isn't a bad outcome globally.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
8. Markets like this tend to lead to bad attitudes
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 08:11 AM
Nov 2014

Saddam (heads of states in that region tend to be paranoid of neighboring heads of states) thinking Iran might be vulnerable from the Iran revolution started a war, incurring massive debt. Unable to pay off the debt due to the low oil prices, took Kuwait's unwillingness to slow down production as an act of aggression and started a war over it. US got involved of course (after helping him against Iran) because of their 'protect Saudi Arabia' foreign policy since Chevron found oil there.

safeinOhio

(32,714 posts)
5. I remember that.
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 07:56 AM
Nov 2014

After very high pump prices and lines at the stations the price of gas dropped. Unemployment in the oil patch skyrocketed to about 9%, while the rest of the country did great. It was also a period of lower rainfall in Texas and there was talk of pipe lines for water from the Great Lakes. Folks in Michigan were telling people to let those Texans drink their oil as the Mid-west suffered from unemployment in the auto business because of the high fuel prices. Now all of those repub governors in the oil states that have bragged about how great their economies have been doing because of their policies will have some explaining to do. Sorry about that Rick Perry. What goes around, comes around.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
23. Saudi oil production has peaked, they won't be able to do this much longer.
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:56 AM
Nov 2014

They are terrified that American energy independence will make the US not need them, anymore, and the Saudi people will overthrow them.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
30. The Saudi contingent said they can sustain
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 11:48 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Fri Nov 28, 2014, 02:37 PM - Edit history (1)

this level of production for at least 3 or 4 years. They must be confident that they can squeeze Russia and halt America's shale oil production in that time frame in order to recapture market share.

The cost of a barrel of oil is already down to about $72/barrel today, due to their strategy. Oil shale production is only profitable above $82/barrel. The Saudis can definitely hurt America's oil industry at those prices.

An interesting window of opportunity presents itself for increasing the federal gas tax as retail prices drop, though. An increase in that tax could kick start the rebuilding of our crumbling transportation infrastructure. The GOP is going to have to contend with the deep rumblings of discontent with our infrastructure, until they do something in Congress to rectify the situation. It's been more than 20 years since the gas tax was increased

Bagsgroove

(231 posts)
7. Good news / bad news
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 08:09 AM
Nov 2014

The good news, for consumers, is that in the short term gasoline prices may continue to fall.

The bad news is that the economic incentive to develop and use efficient or renewable energy decreases. It's amazing how just a short period of high gas prices drives everybody to buy high mpg or hybrid cars, and a short period of low gas prices gets people back into gas guzzling SUVs.

We are a very short-sighted people.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
14. A free market invisble hand job?
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:26 AM
Nov 2014

or a job for the invisible hand of the free market or something. 'cause leeburty and freedum.

Dale Neiburg

(698 posts)
26. Additional good news?
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 10:16 AM
Nov 2014

I've been wondering (tin foil alert?) whether the low oil prices on the world market might be the result of bilateral finagling by the USA and Saudis, to reduce ISIL's ability to capitalize on the oil fields/refineries they've captured.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
29. That was my first thought: slow the development of alternatives
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 10:56 AM
Nov 2014

by making them less attractive economically. It is what OPEC has done for years--not allowing the price of gas to get too high--and I'm sure it will work in the short run, and be a disaster for us all in the long run.

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)
9. This will be unpopular, but I prefer high oil prices
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 08:11 AM
Nov 2014

High prices encourages people to drive less, makes alternative energy sources more economically viable, and promotes jobs in the oil industry here in the USA.

Eventually, we have to get off of fossil fuels. Cheap oil just delays the inevitable and fills our atmosphere with CO2 in the meantime.

Ilsa

(61,697 posts)
10. Understood. But it hurts poor and middle classes
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 08:32 AM
Nov 2014

pretty bad budget-wise. But yes, it helps conservation efforts, and we need to prioritize: planet survival over everything else.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. That's precious. Do you also like to see food prices climb so that the poor will not overeat?
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:02 AM
Nov 2014

High food prices encourage people to eat less. Thus food should be really expensive. For their own good.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. Maybe they should try sustainable foods (/sarc)
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:30 AM
Nov 2014

Unfortunately, petro fertilizers are so commonly used that the basic barrel price does affect staples (which I'm sure you know, just putting out there for the lurkers to connect the dots).

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
19. There is a good news/bad news to this
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:36 AM
Nov 2014

I think we can all agree the low prices are good for consumers who have more money in their pocket - though the rise in SUV sales is a fair criticism.

Bad news is production will eventually slow down in the US leading to job loss for those who work in the industry. Worldwide it leads to political tensions, especially from countries whose economies rely on oil production.

It also increases our carbon footprint.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
21. The last thing OPEC wants is a self-sufficient western hemisphere. Venezuela was their first target
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:47 AM
Nov 2014

They play dirty.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
25. OPEC appears to me reacting normally
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 10:03 AM
Nov 2014

Oil markets prefer the higher prices so slowing the production is a normal reaction. Saudi Arabia is fighting a price war which they have the oil to survive which many of the OPEC nations do not. OPEC is a little different since it is an agreement among competitors but not much different than individual oil markets adjusting supply & demand on their own. OPEC also would prefer if there were less suppliers and the works vice versa.

When it comes to oil everyone plays dirty

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
22. It should be pointed out Keystone wouldn't have done a thing for gas prices
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:53 AM
Nov 2014

For one, it would have took a long time to built and the oil market will be very different by then. Canada will slow or push production as they see fit. They are already pushing tar sands by rail as well as North Dakota showing no regard to safety or potential spill disasters.

The main impact would be the jobs, mainly construction & refineries but it would have led to job loss for the oil-by-rail refinery hubs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Saudis block OPEC output ...