General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHRW: Human rights protections in Crimea have been severely curtailed since Russia began its occupation
of the peninsula in February 2014. In the past eight months, the de facto authorities in Crimea have limited free expression, restricted peaceful assembly, and intimidated and harassed those who have opposed Russias actions in Crimea. In particular the authorities have targeted the Crimean Tatar community, a Muslim ethnic minority that is native to the Crimean peninsula and that has openly opposed Russias occupation. At the same time the authorities have failed to rein in or effectively investigate abuses by paramilitary groups implicated in enforced disappearances and unlawful detention and ill-treatment of Crimean Tatars, activists, journalists, and other individuals who are or perceived to be pro-Ukrainian. By bestowing Russian citizenship on Crimea residents through a coercive process, the authorities have also engaged in discrimination against Ukrainian citizens in Crimea, laid the groundwork for the potential expulsion of some Ukrainian citizens, and violated their obligations as an occupying power under international humanitarian law in relation to protecting civilians rights.
In particular, authorities in Crimea have used Russias vaguely worded and overly broad anti-extremism legislation to issue several anti-extremist warnings to the Mejlis, the Crimean Tatar representative body, and have banned mass public gatherings by the Crimean Tatar community. Between August and October, authorities conducted invasive and in some cases unwarranted searches at mosques and Islamic schools and searched dozens of private homes of Crimean Tatars, including members of the Mejlis. The searches, which the authorities say were conducted to look for drugs, weapons, and prohibited literature, were carried out by both local police and Russias Federal Security Service (FSB) but also involved dozens of unidentified armed, masked men.
The authorities have harassed pro-Ukraine and Crimean Tatar media outlets, searched their offices, shut down some, and threatened others with closure. The FSB and Crimea prosecutors office issued formal and informal warnings to leading Crimean Tatar media outlets against publishing extremist materials and invited editors to their offices for meetings during which they threatened that the outlets would not be allowed to re- register under Russian legislation unless they changed what they called their anti- Russian editorial policies.
International human rights law also remains applicable to Crimea, including all treaties ratified by Russia, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Under the law of occupation, Russia has an obligation to restore and ensure public order and safety as far as possible while respecting, unless absolutely prevented from doing so, Crimeas and Ukraines laws in force prior to March 2014.5 Russia is also responsible for violations of international humanitarian and human rights law committed by local authorities or proxy forces and has a duty to prevent and prosecute such violations.
http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/crimea1114web.pdf
A long and detailed Human Rights Watch report on Crimea since its annexation by Russia.