General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI was reading Kathleen Parker's column this morning complaining about how the Seamus incident
wasn't relevant to how Romney would govern as president. She went on and on about dogs and in the final paragraph described Romney as a man with "a knack for economic recovery". If she thought the "dog issues" were being overplayed she should have written one paragraph about dogs and the rest of the column about how Romney's support for more tax cuts for the 1%, the defunding of Planned Parenthood, increased defense spending, destruction of safety nets for the poor, etc, etc, etc would help the econmomy recover.
highplainsdem
(48,998 posts)She believes voters don't identify with Mittens because he's "too perfect":
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romneys-trouble-is-his-near-perfection/2012/01/31/gIQAyv4pfQ_story.html
Whisp
(24,096 posts)omg
where's the puke bucket.
what is it with the right and how they define beauty and good looks, Palin and Romney are butt fucking ugly.
but maybe I see the soul through their veneer and see them for what they really are inside. can't be any other explanation because just for those two examples: oiy oiy, they are repulsive!
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)I really don't care if my Fearless Leader has no compassion for his own dog. You know--the same lack of compassion that lets you joke about closing factories and advocate cutting the social supports out from under those in greatest need.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Every once in a blue moon she says something reasonable, then realizes she said something reasonable, and rushes to cover up her mistake by releasing a torrential downpour of unreasonable crap. I think she said something that made a good point last month, so she's catching back up now.