General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsViolence Against Women Act takes center stage
By Steve Benen
We first began reporting two months ago on the legislative fight surrounding the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which has traditionally enjoyed bipartisan support. This year's effort has drawn Republican opposition, however, because the bill includes provisions to bolster LGBT protections, defenses for victims of domestic abuse who are undocumented immigrants, and expand the authority of Native American tribes to prosecute crimes.
In previous years, VAWA sailed through the Senate with nary a discouraging word. This year, when the Senate Judiciary Committee took up the bill, literally every Republican on the committee voted against the bipartisan bill.
To put it mildly, Democrats aren't backing down on this. Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) held a press conference yesterday to condemn Republican efforts to delay the bill; Attorney General Eric Holder said yesterday he finds it "inconceivable" that the bill has been held up; and Vice President Biden, who helped write the bill in 1994, delivered impassioned remarks on the subject yesterday.
&feature=colike
<...>
And what does the presumptive Republican presidential nominee think of the bill? I'm glad you asked.
In 2004, reporters asked Mitt Romney during his first presidential campaign whether or not he supports the Violence Against Women Act. At the time, he said he wasn't "familiar" with the law and didn't have a position.
This year, Romney is familiar with it, but is afraid to take a firm stand.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/19/11285117-violence-against-women-act-takes-center-stage
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)If this doesn't pass. I was an intern to a Congress woman in 1994 when this passed - and did leg work on it. It cannot go away. When I caught a 'bunny boiling man' after 3 dates in 2004 - this law gave the authorities the ability to stop him in his tracks. It cannot go away - and truthfully? Having a female friend whose GIRLfriend was abusive? It MUST be extended to all women.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)The police cited it and told her it made no difference that it was a gay situation. That is how it should be. I suppose these Repukes think it should only apply to married straight women??????
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)U Visa, which would be granted in these cases, would not only allow the victim to gain legal status for up to 4 years, but also most of their extended family. I'm wondering why this is being added at this time? Why not reauthorize this valuable law, but without the contentious additions?
http://www.usimmigrationsupport.org/visa-u.html