General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Primary Process is already over.....even before it has begun.
Elizabeth Warren will not run. Sh will be too busy nonthelesd working her best in a GOP Senate.
Bernie Sanders will run...but he will never be nominated. He doesnt have any DC powerstructure on his side .
Biden? Dont think will run either
Kerry, Dean, Kuscinich , Gore, ......they all gave up their presidential ambitions
And no one seems to see another viable alternative. This time there is no potential freshman or freshwoman politician to enthusiast the crowd as Obama did
Or maybe there is....but she/he is too afraid of the momumental machine the Clintonians put in place, in the party, in the media, into grassroots Dems souls and in American politics is general.
How not to be a little afraid by this prospective of an Unique (or only two) canditates primary?
Bravo Mr and Mrs Clinton, and fellows people. You did a perfzct job by already entirely paved your way . And building unbreakable barriers behind you.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)I don't buy it. Someone will step up.
djean111
(14,255 posts)It IS weird as fuck to see all the attempts to declare Hillary the candidate and bypass primaries. Not her strong point, I guess.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)64% approval rating and polls ahead of ALL Republicans....
You got anyone who can make those claims?
Do you really want to win?
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)But I want a real fight of different ideas. Not an already done game.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)We have to keep Republicans from getting ALL Three Branches. You go with the strongest...
djean111
(14,255 posts)That seems to be the logical extension to the constant barrage of Yay Hillary posts.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and right now....you "Opposers" do not have anything even CLOSE....
whine harder!
djean111
(14,255 posts)try and run against her?
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)I have exactly the same sickening feeling regarding all those Clintonverse manoeuvers
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)the primaries should be skipped. And skipping the primaries seems to be the end game here.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Get used to it....
someone famous once said:
"You can't always get what you want....but if you try some time....you get what you need"
djean111
(14,255 posts)Yes or no.
The smug jeers really do not have the effect you think they have.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and we need her....she can beat all Republicans. She holds the pole position in a car with nitrous oxide.
djean111
(14,255 posts)cheer-leading. Getting a bit heavy-handed, and I doubt anyone will be swayed at this point.
The constant Hillary is great everybody else is a loser thing is like those annoying campaign ads on TV - they just get tuned out now.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)WE NEED a Winner ....and she has the cred to prove it
pangaia
(24,324 posts)We NEED a real, an honest progressive. If we can't get one, then in my view we are just STUCK with Hillary Clinton.
Fortunately I will not have to vote for her as I live in New York.
PS
And frankly, I have heard just too much about Hillary, Hillary, Hillary these last few years.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)even Jeb Bush.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)A progressive WINNER.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and she has 64% approval ratings and polls ahead of EVERY Republican including Jeb Bush.
Until YOU have a candidate that can do better....SHE IS the winner...
pangaia
(24,324 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Strongly Favors topic 1:
Abortion is a woman's unrestricted right
(+5 points on Social scale) Lift ban on stem cell research to cure devastating diseases: Favors topic 1
Respect Roe v. Wade, but make adoptions easier too: Favors topic 1
Alternatives to pro-choice like forced pregnancy in Romania: Strongly Favors topic 1
Must safeguard constitutional rights, including choice: Favors topic 1
Remain vigilant on a womans right to chose: Favors topic 1
Keep abortion safe, legal and rare: Favors topic 1
Being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion: Favors topic 1
Supports parental notice & family planning: Opposes topic 1
No abortion for sex selection in China: Opposes topic 1
Voted liberal line on partial birth & harm to fetus: Favors topic 1
Endorsed Recommended by EMILY's List of pro-choice women: Favors topic 1
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record: Strongly Favors topic 1
Expand embryonic stem cell research: Favors topic 1
Sponsored bill providing contraceptives for low-income women: Favors topic 1
Sponsored bill for emergency contraception for rape victims: Favors topic 1
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance: Strongly Favors topic 1
Provide emergency contraception at military facilities: Favors topic 1
Ensure access to and funding for contraception: Favors topic 1
Focus on preventing pregnancy, plus emergency contraception: Favors topic 1
NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion: Strongly Favors topic 1
NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP: Favors topic 1
NO on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life: Strongly Favors topic 1
NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime: Favors topic 1
YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives: Favors topic 1
NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions: Favors topic 1
YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines: Favors topic 1
Strongly Favors topic 2:
Legally require hiring women & minorities
(-5 points on Economic scale) Some world leaders are still misogynistic: Favors topic 2
Weve come a long way on race, but we have a long way to go: Strongly Favors topic 2
Apologize for slavery, but concentrate on civil rights now: Favors topic 2
Human rights are womens rights: Neutral on topic 2
Womens rights are human rights: Favors topic 2
OpEd: "18 million cracks" meant "lingering sexism": Strongly Favors topic 2
Equal pay is not yet equal: Strongly Favors topic 2
1988: Instituted gender diversity Report Card within ABA: Strongly Opposes topic 2
Argued with Bill Clinton about diluting affirmative action: Strongly Favors topic 2
Shift from group preferences to economic empowerment of all: Neutral on topic 2
Sponsored bill maintaining role of women in armed forces: Favors topic 2
Rated 96% by the NAACP, indicating a pro-affirmative-action stance: Strongly Favors topic 2
Recognize Juneteenth as historical end of slavery: Strongly Favors topic 2
Re-introduce the Equal Rights Amendment: Strongly Favors topic 2
Reinforce anti-discrimination and equal-pay requirements: Favors topic 2
Ban discriminatory compensation; allow 2 years to sue: Favors topic 2
Sponsored bill enforcing against gender pay discrimination: Strongly Favors topic 2
Strongly Favors topic 3:
Comfortable with same-sex marriage
(+5 points on Social scale) Increase Americas commitment against Global AIDS: Favors topic 3
DOMA discrimination holds us back from a more perfect union: Strongly Favors topic 3
I support gay marriage personally and as law: Strongly Favors topic 3
Let states decide gay marriage; theyre ahead of feds: Favors topic 3
2004:defended traditional marriage; 2006:voted for same-sex: Strongly Favors topic 3
Federal Marriage Amendment would be terrible step backwards: Favors topic 3
Gays deserve domestic partnership benefits: Strongly Favors topic 3
Military service based on conduct, not sexual orientation: Favors topic 3
More funding and stricter sentencing for hate crimes: Strongly Favors topic 3
Rated 89% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance: Strongly Favors topic 3
Provide benefits to domestic partners of Federal employees: Strongly Favors topic 3
YES on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes: Strongly Favors topic 3
NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage: Strongly Favors topic 3
No opinion on topic 4:
Keep God in the public sphere
(0 points on Social scale) Partner with faith based community in empowerment zones: Strongly Favors topic 4
Tap into churches to avoid more Louima & Diallo cases: Favors topic 4
Community involvement helps, but only in short term: Favors topic 4
Link payments to good parenting behavior: Opposes topic 4
Allow student prayer, but no religious instruction: Opposes topic 4
Character education: teach empathy & self-discipline: Favors topic 4
Change what kids see in the media: Favors topic 4
Co-sponsored bill to criminalize flag-burning: Favors topic 4
Rated 0% by the Christian Coalition: an anti-Family-Value voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 4
Rated 100% by the AU, indicating support of church-state separation: Strongly Opposes topic 4
NO on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration: Opposes topic 4
Strongly Favors topic 5:
Expand ObamaCare
(-5 points on Economic scale) Outcry if AIDS were leading disease of young whites: Favors topic 5
Lower costs and improve quality and cover everybody: Strongly Favors topic 5
Supply more medical needs of families, & insure all children: Strongly Favors topic 5
Medicare should be strengthened today: Favors topic 5
Smaller steps to progress on health care: Favors topic 5
Guaranteed benefits & focus on prevention: Neutral on topic 5
2006: If I can't do universal coverage, why run?: Strongly Favors topic 5
Universal health care will not work if it is voluntary: Strongly Favors topic 5
Universal health care coverage by the end of my second term: Strongly Favors topic 5
We need a uniquely American solution to health care: Favors topic 5
Health care initiatives are her first priority in Senate: Strongly Favors topic 5
Establish "report cards" on HMO quality of care: Favors topic 5
Invest funds to alleviate the nursing shortage: Favors topic 5
Let states make bulk Rx purchases, and other innovations: Opposes topic 5
Rated 100% by APHA, indicating a pro-public health record: Strongly Favors topic 5
Preserve access to Medicaid & SCHIP during economic downturn: Strongly Favors topic 5
NO on means-testing to determine Medicare Part D premium: Favors topic 5
NO on funding GOP version of Medicare prescription drug benefit: Favors topic 5
NO on $40 billion per year for limited Medicare prescription drug benefit: Opposes topic 5
YES on increasing Medicaid rebate for producing generics: Favors topic 5
YES on negotiating bulk purchases for Medicare prescription drug: Strongly Favors topic 5
YES on expanding enrollment period for Medicare Part D: Favors topic 5
NO on limiting medical liability lawsuits to $250,000: Opposes topic 5
YES on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D: Favors topic 5
YES on overriding veto on expansion of Medicare: Favors topic 5
Strongly Opposes topic 6:
Privatize Social Security
(-5 points on Economic scale) 1997: Hillary warned against privatizing Social Security: Strongly Opposes topic 6
Soc.Sec. one of greatest inventions in American democracy: Strongly Opposes topic 6
Social Security protects families, not just retirees: Strongly Opposes topic 6
All should join the debate now to preserve future solvency: Opposes topic 6
Create Retirement Savings Accounts: Favors topic 6
Rated 100% by the ARA, indicating a pro-senior voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 6
NO on establishing reserve funds & pre-funding for Social Security: Opposes topic 6
Strongly Opposes topic 7:
Vouchers for school choice
(-5 points on Economic scale) OpEd: Common Core recycled from Clintons in 1980s and 1990s: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Fully fund special education & 21st century classrooms: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Supports public school choice; but not private nor parochial: Opposes topic 7
Vouchers drain money from public schools: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Fight with Gore for public schools; no voucher gimmicks: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Charter schools provide choice within public system: Opposes topic 7
Vouchers siphon off much-needed resources: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Parents can choose, but support public schools: Opposes topic 7
Supports public school choice and charter schools: Favors topic 7
Solemn vow never to abandon our public schools: Strongly Opposes topic 7
Offer every parent Charter Schools and public school choice: Opposes topic 7
Rated 82% by the NEA, indicating pro-public education votes: Strongly Opposes topic 7
YES on funding smaller classes instead of private tutors: Opposes topic 7
YES on funding student testing instead of private tutors: Opposes topic 7
YES on $5B for grants to local educational agencies: Opposes topic 7
Strongly Opposes topic 8:
No 'rights' to clean air and water
(+5 points on Social scale) $5B for green-collar jobs in economic stimulus package: Opposes topic 8
Voted against and consistently opposed to Yucca Mountain: Strongly Opposes topic 8
Scored 100% on Humane Society Scorecard on animal protection: Strongly Opposes topic 8
Remove PCBs from Hudson River by dredging 200 miles: Opposes topic 8
Rated 89% by the LCV, indicating pro-environment votes: Strongly Opposes topic 8
EPA must do better on mercury clean-up: Opposes topic 8
Grants for beach water pollution under Clean Water Act: Opposes topic 8
Strengthen prohibitions against animal fighting: Strongly Opposes topic 8
Opposes topic 9:
Stricter punishment reduces crime
(+2 points on Social scale) Longtime advocate of death penalty, with restrictions: Strongly Favors topic 9
Address the unacceptable increase in incarceration: Opposes topic 9
Mandatory sentences have been too widely used: Strongly Opposes topic 9
Give kids after-school activities to prevent gangs: Opposes topic 9
Spend more time with kids to prevent violence: Opposes topic 9
Supports citizen patrols & 3-Strikes-Youre-Out: Favors topic 9
Supports Three Strikes and more prison: Strongly Favors topic 9
End hate crimes and other intolerance: Favors topic 9
Require DNA testing for all federal executions: Opposes topic 9
Increase funding for "COPS ON THE BEAT" program: Opposes topic 9
Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance: Strongly Opposes topic 9
YES on reinstating $1.15 billion funding for the COPS Program: Opposes topic 9
Strongly Opposes topic 10:
Absolute right to gun ownership
(-5 points on Economic scale) Rein in idea that anybody can have a gun anywhere, anytime: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Against illegal guns, crack down on illegal gun dealers: Opposes topic 10
Get assault weapons & guns off the street: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Background check system could prevent Virginia Tech massacre: Opposes topic 10
Congress failure at Littleton response inspired Senate run: Opposes topic 10
Limit access to weapons; look for early warning signs: Opposes topic 10
License and register all handgun sales: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Gun control protects our children: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Dont water down sensible gun control legislation: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Lock up guns; store ammo separately: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Get weapons off the streets; zero tolerance for weapons: Opposes topic 10
Prevent unauthorized firearm use with "smart gun" technology: Opposes topic 10
NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence: Strongly Opposes topic 10
NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers: Strongly Opposes topic 10
Strongly Favors topic 11:
Higher taxes on the wealthy
(-5 points on Economic scale) Rescind tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 a year: Strongly Favors topic 11
Pay down debt & cut taxes within balanced budget: Favors topic 11
GOP tax plan would hurt New Yorks students: Favors topic 11
Rated 21% by NTU, indicating a "Big Spender" on tax votes: Strongly Favors topic 11
Rated 80% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on raising the Death Tax exemption to $5M from $1M: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on allowing AMT reduction without budget offset: Favors topic 11
YES on reducing marriage penalty instead of cutting top tax rates: Favors topic 11
YES on spending $448B of tax cut on education & debt reduction: Favors topic 11
NO on $350 billion in tax breaks over 11 years: Strongly Favors topic 11
YES on extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends: Strongly Opposes topic 11
YES on $47B for military by repealing capital gains tax cut: Favors topic 11
YES on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends: Strongly Opposes topic 11
NO on permanently repealing the `death tax`: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on supporting permanence of estate tax cuts: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on raising estate tax exemption to $5 million: Strongly Favors topic 11
NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax: Strongly Favors topic 11
Favors topic 12:
Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens
(+2 points on Social scale) Introduce a path to earn citizenship in the first 100 days: Strongly Favors topic 12
Consider halting certain raids on illegal immigrant families: Favors topic 12
Deporting all illegal immigrants is unrealistic: Strongly Favors topic 12
Illegal immigrants with drivers licenses puts them at risk: Opposes topic 12
Oppose granting drivers licenses to illegal immigrants: Opposes topic 12
More border patrolling on both Mexican AND Canadian borders: Opposes topic 12
Anti-immigrant bill would have criminalized Jesus Christ: Strongly Favors topic 12
Sanctuary cities ok; local police cant enforce immigration: Favors topic 12
Comprehensive reform to get 12 million out of shadows: Strongly Favors topic 12
Sponsored bill covering child resident aliens under Medicaid: Favors topic 12
Sponsored bill funding social services for noncitizens: Favors topic 12
Rated 8% by USBC, indicating an open-border stance: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on continuing federal funds for declared "sanctuary cities": Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on establishing a Guest Worker program: Favors topic 12
YES on building a fence along the Mexican border: Strongly Opposes topic 12
YES on eliminating the "Y" nonimmigrant guestworker program: Neutral topic 12
NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government: Strongly Favors topic 12
YES on comprehensive immigration reform: Strongly Favors topic 12
Opposes topic 13:
Support & expand free trade
(-3 points on Economic scale) Smart, pro-American trade: NAFTA has hurt workers: Strongly Opposes topic 13
No fast-track authority for this president: Opposes topic 13
Defended outsourcing of US jobs to India: Favors topic 13
1980s: Loved Wal-Mart's "Buy America" program: Opposes topic 13
Globalization should not substitute for humanization: Opposes topic 13
Supports MFN for China, despite concerns over human rights: Strongly Favors topic 13
Build a rule-based global trading system: Favors topic 13
Rated 17% by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on removing common goods from national security export rules: Favors topic 13
YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam: Favors topic 13
NO on extending free trade to Andean nations: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore: Favors topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile: Favors topic 13
NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on free trade agreement with Oman: Strongly Favors topic 13
Opposes topic 14:
Maintain US sovereignty from UN
(-3 points on Economic scale) US support & no-fly zone, but UN troops on ground in Darfur: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Support UN reform because US benefits: Opposes topic 14
2002 Iraq speech criticized both Saddam and U.N.: Opposes topic 14
Urged President to veto UN condemnation of Israel: Favors topic 14
Engage in world affairs, including human rights: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Keep Cuban embargo; pay UN bills: Opposes topic 14
2002: Attacking Iraq "not a good option" but authorized it: Favors topic 14
Voted against Levin Amendment: it gave UN veto over US: Favors topic 14
Dems believe in fighting terror with cooperation: Strongly Opposes topic 14
Restore habeas corpus for detainees in the War on Terror: Opposes topic 14
YES on preserving habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees: Strongly Opposes topic 14
YES on requiring CIA reports on detainees & interrogation methods: Strongly Opposes topic 14
NO on removing need for FISA warrant for wiretapping abroad: Strongly Opposes topic 14
No opinion on topic 15:
Expand the military
(0 points on Social scale) There is no safe haven for the terrorists: Favors topic 15
Our troops are stretched; so increase size of military: Favors topic 15
Rated 100% by SANE, indicating a pro-peace voting record: Strongly Opposes topic 15
Extend reserve retirement pay parity back to 9/11: Favors topic 15
Improve mental health care benefits for returning veterans: Favors topic 15
YES on requiring on-budget funding for Iraq, not emergency funding: Opposes topic 15
YES on limiting soldiers' deployment to 12 months: Opposes topic 15
Strongly Favors topic 16:
More enforcement of the right to vote
(+5 points on Social scale) Voter suppression revives old demons of discrimination: Favors topic 16
Stand for public financing and getting money out of politics: Strongly Favors topic 16
Presidents should reveal donations to their foundations: Strongly Favors topic 16
Move to public election financing, not banning lobbyists: Strongly Favors topic 16
Verified paper ballot for every electronic voting machines: Favors topic 16
Called for ban on all soft money in 2000 campaign: Favors topic 16
Prohibit 'voter caging' which intimidates minority voting: Favors topic 16
YES on banning campaign donations from unions & corporations: Favors topic 16
YES on banning "soft money" contributions and restricting issue ads: Favors topic 16
NO on establishing the Senate Office of Public Integrity: Opposes topic 16
NO on allowing some lobbyist gifts to Congress: Strongly Favors topic 16
Favors topic 17:
Stay out of Iran
(+2 points on Social scale) Smartest strategic choice is peace: Favors topic 17
Extend peace treaties to Palestinians, Syrians & Lebanese: Favors topic 17
Foreign aid spending is only 1%; lead by remaining engaged: Strongly Favors topic 17
Up to the Iraqis to decide the future they will have: Favors topic 17
Demand Bush to explain to Congress on his plan on Iraq: Favors topic 17
Deauthorize Iraq war, and dont grant new war authority: Strongly Favors topic 17
Phased redeployment out of Iraq, beginning immediately: Strongly Favors topic 17
Withdraw troops within 60 days after taking office: Strongly Favors topic 17
Voted for Iraq war based on available info; now would not: Favors topic 17
Progressive Internationalism: globalize with US pre-eminence: Favors topic 17
No troop surge: no military escalation in Iraq: Strongly Favors topic 17
Require Congress' approval before military action in Iran: Favors topic 17
YES on authorizing use of military force against Iraq: Strongly Opposes topic 17
NO on redeploying troops out of Iraq by July 2007: Strongly Opposes topic 17
YES on redeploying US troops out of Iraq by March 2008: Strongly Favors topic 17
Strongly Favors topic 18:
Prioritize green energy
(-5 points on Economic scale) $100B per year by 2020 for climate change mitigation: Strongly Favors topic 18
Remove energy dependence on countries who would harm us: Strongly Favors topic 18
Stands for clean air and funding the EPA: Favors topic 18
Reduce air pollution to improve childrens health: Favors topic 18
Ratify Kyoto; more mass transit: Strongly Favors topic 18
Supports tradable emissions permits for greenhouse gases: Favors topic 18
Keep efficient air conditioner rule to conserve energy: Strongly Favors topic 18
Establish greenhouse gas tradeable allowances: Strongly Favors topic 18
Rated 100% by the CAF, indicating support for energy independence: Favors topic 18
Designate sensitive ANWR area as protected wilderness: Favors topic 18
Set goal of 25% renewable energy by 2025: Strongly Favors topic 18
Let states define stricter-than-federal emission standards: Strongly Favors topic 18
Gas tax holiday for the summer: Opposes topic 18
NO on terminating CAFE standards within 15 months: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on targeting 100,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles by 2010: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill: Favors topic 18
YES on reducing oil usage by 40% by 2025 (instead of 5%): Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on disallowing an oil leasing program in Alaska's ANWR: Strongly Favors topic 18
YES on banning drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Favors topic 18
YES on factoring global warming into federal project planning: Favors topic 18
YES on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies: Strongly Favors topic 18
Opposes topic 19:
Never legalize marijuana
(+2 points on Social scale) Medical marijuana maybe ok; states decide recreational use: Opposes topic 19
Divert non-violent drug offenders away from prison: Strongly Opposes topic 19
Address drug problem with treatment and special drug courts: Strongly Opposes topic 19
End harsher sentencing for crack vs. powder cocaine: Opposes topic 19
Require chemical resellers to certify against meth use: Favors topic 19
Strongly Favors topic 20:
Stimulus better than market-led recovery
(-5 points on Economic scale) Wealthy should go back to paying pre-Bush tax rates: Favors topic 20
Want to restore the tax rates we had in the 90s: Favors topic 20
Help people facing foreclosure; dont just bail-out banks: Strongly Favors topic 20
Minimum wage increases havent kept up with Congress wages: Strongly Favors topic 20
Co-sponsored bills totaling $502B in spending thru 2005: Strongly Favors topic 20
End Bush tax cuts;take things away from rich for common good: Favors topic 20
Social issues matter; wrong time for tax cuts: Strongly Favors topic 20
Use tax dollars to upgrade infrastructure, not for stadium: Strongly Favors topic 20
America can afford to raise the minimum wage: Strongly Favors topic 20
Just Say No to GOP tax plan: Strongly Favors topic 20
YES on increasing tax rate for people earning over $1 million: Strongly Favors topic 20
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I see you have this saved as a word doc and you just copy and paste.
Here's another--from you know where..
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (/ˈhɪləri daɪˈæn ˈrɒdəm ˈklɪntən/; born October 26, 1947) is a former United States Secretary of State, U.S. Senator, and First Lady of the United States. From 2009 to 2013, she was the 67th Secretary of State, serving under President Barack Obama. She previously represented New York in the U.S. Senate (2001 to 2009). Before that, as the wife of President Bill Clinton, she was First Lady from 1993 to 2001. In the 2008 election, Clinton was a leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.
A native of Illinois, Hillary Rodham was the first student commencement speaker at Wellesley College in 1969 and earned a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1973. After a brief stint as a Congressional legal counsel, she moved to Arkansas and married Bill Clinton in 1975. Rodham cofounded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families in 1977. In 1978, she became the first female chair of the Legal Services Corporation, and in 1979, the first female partner at Rose Law Firm. The National Law Journal twice listed her as one of the hundred most influential lawyers in America. As First Lady of Arkansas from 1979 to 1981 and 1983 to 1992 with her husband as Governor, she led a task force that reformed Arkansas's education system. During that time, she was on the board of directors of Wal-Mart and several other corporations.
In 1994, as First Lady of the United States, her major initiative, the Clinton health care plan, failed to gain approval from the U.S. Congress. However, in 1997 and 1999, Clinton played a leading role in advocating the creation of the State Children's Health Insurance Program, the Adoption and Safe Families Act, and the Foster Care Independence Act. Her years as First Lady drew a polarized response from the American public. The only First Lady to have been subpoenaed, she testified before a federal grand jury in 1996 regarding the Whitewater controversy, but was never charged with wrongdoing in this or several other investigations during the Clinton presidency. Her marriage endured the Lewinsky scandal in 1998.
After moving to the state, Clinton was elected the first female Senator from New York; she is the only First Lady ever to have run for public office. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, she supported military action in Afghanistan and the Iraq War Resolution, but subsequently objected to the George W. Bush administration's conduct of the war in Iraq and continued to oppose most of its domestic policies. Clinton was reelected to the Senate in 2006. Running in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries, Hillary Clinton won far more primaries and delegates than any other female candidate in American history, but narrowly lost the nomination to Senator Barack Obama, who went on to win the national election.
Obama nominated Clinton to be Secretary of State and she was confirmed by the Senate in January 2009. She was at the forefront of the U.S. response to the Arab Spring, including advocating for the U.S. military intervention in Libya. As Secretary of State, she took responsibility for security lapses related to the 2012 Benghazi attack, which resulted in the deaths of American consulate personnel, but defended her personal actions in regard to the matter. Clinton visited more countries than any other Secretary of State. She viewed "smart power" as the strategy for asserting U.S. leadership and values, by combining military power with diplomacy and American capabilities in economics, technology, and other areas. She encouraged empowerment of women everywhere and used social media to communicate the U.S. message abroad.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Was I supposed to write it all in my own voice to suit you? See it for yourself...
http://ontheissues.org/hillary_clinton.htm
pangaia
(24,324 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)did you borrow her toothbrush too?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:09 AM - Edit history (1)
was dat about?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)why the obscenity?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I met Clinton once. Just once.
Very briefly at a fund raiser for someone locally. I was with my then new Chinese wife who had only been in the states maybe 3-4 months... It was her first chance to meet real 'American politicians,' as she expressed it. Actually, Eliot Spitzer was there, as well. I was impressed with how Spitzer related to people, including me, and my wife. He wanted to know about her and gave her his undivided attention for a minute or so..even with a bunch of well-to-doers and power brokers nearby.
Later that same month, I think it was, I met Howard Dean, again with my wife with me, at another fund raiser for a local. He showed the same genuine interest in her that Spitzer had, only even more so.. And again, he talked with her for, oh maybe 2-3 minutes while all the 'important' ones just stood by and listened. His interest was real, his smile was real. Jing could feel it.
Later she said to me that she could feel his sincere attitude toward her. And she had felt the same from Spitzer. She did not feel it meeting Clinton. She said, "Her smile is on her face."
Jing has a sixth sense about things..
It's just a brief story.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I have met Oprah Winfrey...4 times....I don't claim to KNOW her!!!!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)'fucking' arrgghhh.
I didn't claim to know Clinton. You accused me of claiming to know Clinton..
kersplitt.. fucking.... big nasty word.....
meeting someone..... feeling... instinct aarrggg.. useless.... psychology... fucking...... perception....eyes.... waste of time... body language aaarrrgg doesn't fucking matter,,,,
pissed off.... aarrggg.... happy day....
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)Like
YES on requiring on-budget funding for Iraq, not emergency funding: Opposes topic 15
YES on limiting soldiers' deployment to 12 months: Opposes topic 15
What the fuck does this even mean?
Or this
Progressive Internationalism: globalize with US pre-eminence: Favors topic 17
Or
NO on establishing the Senate Office of Public Integrity: Opposes topic 16
Or
YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam: Favors topic 13
NO on extending free trade to Andean nations: Strongly Opposes topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore: Favors topic 13
YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile: Favors topic 13
Who decides how to weight Consider halting certain raids on illegal immigrant families: Favors topic 12 ? Does this even mean anything? Considering certain gets 12 but actually doing something like Sponsored bill providing contraceptives for low-income women: Favors topic 1, gets a one?
Why is Keep God in the public sphere or Never legalize marijuana proof of being liberal?
Why are we supposed to be impressed with Supports MFN for China, despite concerns over human rights: Strongly Favors topic 13?
This wall of randomly weighted, often extrapolated, and anything goes crap is utterly meaningless.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Getting sick of that one.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)How did we come to that obligatory "get used to it"
How came the democratically frightening truth that a whole political powerstrucre and its corrollary mediabases has become the intrument witch serves the goals of one political family and surrounderings ones?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Are you OK with the fact tgat ONE FAMILLY AND ITS CLIQUE rules a whole party?
Pretty monarchic dont you think? Or really Bushes like.....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I go with our strongest candidate....and that is Hillary Clinton....by far!
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Until some others would threw their hats in the game...
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)64% popularity and polls higher than any Republican including Jeb Bush....
Who you got that can compete with that? Who you got that even has above single digits?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)AT the present moment there is ONE. Clinton. SAt the moment she is not the best, she is the only.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)and putting Clinton in the white house to keep a republican out is a lot like putting ferrets in the henhouse to keep foxes away.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I know that YOU are not like the rest of the American voting public....
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you are a minority among the voting public....but soo am I. But then again....I am a Realist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)do you call outspoken men that too?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)All the time!!! You must think I'm a man. Nope. Black woman.
Still think you're bossy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and is it okay for women to call each other bitch because they are both women? Is that word ever okay to call a woman....no matter what the gender? Is that your position?
regardless....I'll wear moniker as a badge of honor.....it means its all you got! Its what women get called when they get all "uppity"....I think you understand that concept.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)What made your mind go there? I don't use that type of language, and I'd advise you not to use such filthy sexist language yourself, either.
Funny how I say bossy, and you turn to discussing the word bitch. Seems like you have things inside you that you need to figure out.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)No I did not....
I explained it very well...and you know VERY well how the word "bossy" is used against women....it is almost ALWAYS used against women solely.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You tried to pretend that I was being sexist by calling you bossy. I mean, you just spend the entire thread making demands, deriding, and demanding that people vote for your candidate, but you object to being called bossy? Amazing. But, oops, I'm a woman and a Feminist and I call bossy people bossy not women who have big mouths.
I have a big mouth too. But I do not make demands of others or ridicule them when they disagree.
And then you drop the profanity bomb with the anti woman language in it and i don't quite believe you are sincere.
You seem to have 'dish it out can't take it' syndrome.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you just bought into it...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You are being bossy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)funny the Guardian seems to agree with me...
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/sep/01/feisty-flounce-bossy-words-put-women-down
As the Ban Bossy campaign puts it: When a little boy asserts himself, hes called a leader. Yet when a little girl does the same, she risks being branded bossy. Words like bossy send a message: dont raise your hand or speak up. The campaign to make people think before using the word (and basically stop it), launched this year by Sheryl Sandberg, and supported by lots of high-profile women including Condoleezza Rice, Michelle Obama and Beyoncé, was predictably met with the charge that it was authoritarian and, well, bossy. Wrong. Often the simplest and most useful test is: would this word be applied to a straight, white man? In the case of bossy, almost certainly not (Margaret Thatcher was called bossy; it would be unthinkable to describe any other British prime minister as bossy). See also: pushy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You are making demands of others and trying to bend them to your will. Sometimes bossy means bossy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)when I just showed you why you should retire it....especially to another woman.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The way other people may have used it has nothing to do with the way I just used it.
boss·y1
ˈbôsē,ˈbäsē/
adjectiveinformal
fond of giving people orders; domineering.
"she was headlong, bossy, scared of nobody, and full of vinegar"
synonyms: domineering, pushy, overbearing, imperious, officious, high-handed, authoritarian, dictatorial, controlling; informalhigh and mighty
"we're hiding from his bossy sister"
antonyms: submissive
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)just like the B word is also a female dog.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But not in this conversation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Bossy
As the Ban Bossy campaign puts it: When a little boy asserts himself, hes called a leader. Yet when a little girl does the same, she risks being branded bossy. Words like bossy send a message: dont raise your hand or speak up. The campaign to make people think before using the word (and basically stop it), launched this year by Sheryl Sandberg, and supported by lots of high-profile women including Condoleezza Rice, Michelle Obama and Beyoncé, was predictably met with the charge that it was authoritarian and, well, bossy. Wrong. Often the simplest and most useful test is: would this word be applied to a straight, white man? In the case of bossy, almost certainly not (Margaret Thatcher was called bossy; it would be unthinkable to describe any other British prime minister as bossy). See also: pushy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and I pointed it out immediately....you denied that it was such a word....and I proved you wrong....there is an entire campaign to eliminate its usage.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but not buying.....
I proved that there is a campaign to stop using the word "bossy"...because it is sexist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You cannot handle critisism and will break your neck to try to get out of admitting the real.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)bossy is a sexist word...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But not when I used it abou you.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and that is why is IS a sexist term. Much like slut is....
http://time.com/22004/how-to-not-sound-like-a-sexist-jerk-even-if-youre-a-woman/
Dont Call Girls Bossy. Or Grown Women Aggressive.
Seriously, dont do it. And while youre at it, dont call them pushy, angry, brusque, ballbusters, bitchy, careerist, cold, calculating you get the point. Also: shrill and strident, both of which imply high-pitched and screechy women a la your mother, finger pointed, scolding you to clean your room. Bossy is the subject of the new Sandberg campaign, but its something linguists have written about for decades. The reality is that these words are rooted in stereotype, and they are only applied to women. Think about it: girls are bossy, boys have leadership qualities. Women are deemed aggressive, while men are simply decisive (or just, um, bosses). From Ruth Bader Ginsburg (called a bitch by her law school classmates) to the ball-busting Hillary Clinton, historians will tell you: women in power have long been punished for exhibiting qualities of assertiveness, because it veers from the feminine mold. And yet, isnt it precisely those assertive qualities that will help women get ahead? If you wouldnt call a dude these words, dont say em of a lady.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And if a woman is bossing people around and demanding things of them I will let them know they are bossy too. They can take it. I deal with much more bullshit than being called bossy. Like racism. I am still strong and bursting with energy and my mouth speaks loudly.
I find it sexist to only be able speak truth to men. Women are not weak creatures and do not need to be coddled against people disagreeing with their overbearing methods, if those are the type of methods they use.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)unfortunately....my links belie your position. Even Michelle Obama agrees with mine...
Never call another woman bossy...period.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That seems like you are telling me what to do. Sort of, like a boss. Hmmm.
I say what the hell I please in the manner I please. Nobody tells this black woman how to speak. Tired of that shit in this country.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Unless you don't mind being thought sexist.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I was talking to another woman as far as I am concerned.....or are you trying to say something here?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Don't ever tell me how to talk, sister. I have seroiusly had enough of being trained on how to talk in a manner that is pleasing to a 'certain' demographic. How often do black women tell white women which words they are allowed to use?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)your race or mine had nothing to do with it.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Turnabout is fair play. Never tellme how to speak. You do not rule over me. You better learn how to suggest things rather than making demands. You go to far. And it is a pattern for people to think it is their right and duty to correct black folks speech. Would you like links? I can do links too on how racist it is to constantly correct black people's speech.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)11 Ways To Avoid Sounding Like a Sexist JerkEven If Youre a Woman
http://time.com/22004/how-to-not-sound-like-a-sexist-jerk-even-if-youre-a-woman/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)even though I keep proving it to you...would you just over look it if I had used a racial slur?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You haven't said you are not trying to tell people what to do , or that you are not very demanding. You hate the word bossy and you have a couple of links that I don't care about. It does not mean I was wrong. You are.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)back up my claim. So it is YOU who cannot admit when they are wrong....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Have fun chasing phantom sexists and 'independents'. Hahaha!! You'll convince somebody that Hillary will save us from Doom, soon. And if they don't agree, find a way to call them names. You've been doing it all over the place so I take your opinion with a grain of salt. Ta ta!!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and supported it with evidence...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hahahaha!! That proves nothing except some people want to ban a word.
I used it properly on you. Hahaha!!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)It says the section is Living and the category is Feminism in the Time article....nothing about it being in the Editorial section...
By the way the articles REPORT that there is an actual campaign going on against usage of that word...and even Michelle Obama supports it....
but but but...its JUST a little "editorial"...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You indicated that the articles 'proved' my using the word is sexist. They do not. They show that some group of feminists find the word sexist and want to ban it. Along with a long series of other words that mean the same thing.
Like I said before. You. Proved. Nothing. With. Your. Articles.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Like I said before...the word is...S.E.X.I.S.T.
here is another one...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/9767680/Only-women-are-called-bossy-claims-Clare-Balding.html
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like i said before. Bossy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)"I don't care what someone else thinks....like I said before "insert racist term here"
that an okay statement in your mind?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)apparently you didn't realize it was....and needed it pointed out (repeatedly)
This is not a racial attack....as hard as you are trying to make it one...it is not.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)like I said...as hard as you are trying to make it seem so.....its about sexism.
Condoleeza Rice, Beyonce and Michelle Obama all seem to agree with me that it is....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)use.
Then they bring up Oprah, Beyonce, Michelle, or Rihanna to make their point more palatable.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)by asking you NOT to use that term too? You kept bringing up race...I am just trying to show you that support for NOT using that term....crosses racial divides.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)People do this all the time to us. It's pretty textbook.
They say something, you say no. They say so and so (rich back woman) thinks like them so I should be like (rich black woman).
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Now its a class thing too? Do I have to also find poor women to tell you its a sexually charged word? It has nothing to do with race or class...it has to do with GENDER!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Just because some people decide something, doesn't mean they are right or that it applies in every circumstance.
Bye. Vanilla.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You refuse to retract soo...
Do you understand that racists or homophobes would say something like that too?..(In fact I have heard them say very similar)
"Just because some people decide something, doesn't mean they are right or that it applies in every circumstance. "
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And try to 'correct' me. They have been doing it for so many centuries they don't even notice that they are thinking too highly of their own opinion and have respect only for themselves.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am sure Gay people do too...
I would tell you or any other person who used that word....the same thing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And you demanded I stop using one and then tried to bully me by calling me names afterward.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I called a term you used SEXIST....and you denied it and refused to retract it....what would you call someone who refused to retract a racial term?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)not just a term...a slur!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You constantly berate, demand, put down, and tell others to leave the party and firm their own. You ridicule anyone with an opinion on another candidate. You call people names when you don't get your way. Bully.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Your bullying me!
That is what my White racist family members say when I tell them not to use racist terms....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Such a victim of the black woman 'sexist' who called you bossy. Lol!!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)even if you are a woman ...
11 Ways To Avoid Sounding Like a Sexist JerkEven If Youre a Woman
http://time.com/22004/how-to-not-sound-like-a-sexist-jerk-even-if-youre-a-woman/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Using force doesn't always work.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Grandmom always said..."a poor excuse is better than no excuse"
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You are not forcefull at ALL.
You evidence is opinion articles, and the fact that rich black ladies agree with you.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Aren't you the one telling people to leave and form their own party? Telling them they are not Democrats? Telling them who they should vote for? Being nasty about it? Seems kinda bossy. But the word bossy kills your vibe. Bullcrap. You are using sexism to win the fight. And Michelle Obama for some reason. And Oprah and Beyonce. Phony tactics get called phony. It was phony and obvious what you were doing.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and yet you are still denying it.....that is the point.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And sadly wrong and bossy.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and there is an entire campaign to get people NOT to use that word....and I proved that....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You and Michelle. I better agree, or else!! LOL!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)then you will elect not to use that term.....because it is based on stereotypes....I think you of all people understand about certain terms being associated with racists..how do you feel about the Army still using the term "negro"? They seem to be more enlightened than you are....they have changed their mind about using it now...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kinda getting old.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I would tell you the same thing if you were purple with green polka dots...
I am telling a woman that she is using a sexist term....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You haven't been correcting the speech of white people for hours and demanding they speak a certain way.
You don't want to seem, well, you know. Like one of those.
And I am telling you woman to woman you are using an old tactic used by the majority for many year to control the speech and manners of blacks. The constant correction, the modeling of wealthier blacks to show them what you think they should be like, the berating, the name calling for lack of agreement. Old tactic.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)It is DEFINITELY a sexually charged slur.....period. YOU never use it but particularly to women...it is based on stereotypes....and I know you KNOW this....and that is why I won't let you off the hook.
Or since you seem to think NO ONE should dare point out to you that you said something sexist....but I bet you reserve the right to tell someone they are using a racist term....How is this any different than that?
and if it were a slur of homosexuals...I would do the same....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I hope to see you correcting the speech of white people soon just as forcefully. Otherwise I'll know exactly what's up.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)somehow...because I pointed out YOUR use of a sexual slur.....its all because I am a racist???? Is that your logic?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)When there are plenty of other worse words in use right now. Black people constantly get monitered for speech errors. And then they get corrected. Constantly.
Your opinion is not fact. The words means what it means and I used it appropriately. Anyone can find an article and a few people who support their position. But you seem to think that your opinion should be law and that it is up to you to berate and correct me for hours. Seems kinda odd. Kinda Jim crowish. If you had just said something once, I could believe you. But the fact that you are demading sonething of me and threatening to correct me in the future if i do not bend to your will, seems so imposing and privileged. You would never ever talk to me in that way to my face. You would be afraid to tell me what I better not say. You are a chat banger.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)are you so bossy?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)You lose.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Note to self....start polling poor women so that Bravenak can understand that "bossy" is a sexist term...based on stereotypes directed almost exclusively towards those of the female persuasion.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bet you don't know many poor women at all if you think the word bossy is at the top of the list of problems for them to ponder.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)There the not so subtle dog whistle of racism the Clinton's made famous in 08
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)it was about making a point in that sexism is not that much different....that's why I used quotation marks....
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I never knew if vanilla was a man or a woman. Now I know. She thought you were a man, and therefore sexist because...??
BUT, turns out you are NOT a man...
In fact you are..black.. and black but not a man is...a black woman.. oh my goodness.
And I am a 71 year old white man. Now SHE knows that, also.
But I was once married to a black woman...which means.. ? I have no idea what it means..
OK, now I will read the rest..
PS Bossy ain't the word for it... entertaining....
I'm trying to have a discussion with HER, but.. it is not easy....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Such a demanding person. I was amusing myself after a while, though.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I do the same thing.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Very interesting sub-thread. Answered some of the questions roaming around in my mind.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Very Bossy.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)LOL!
keep on keeping on, you amuse me to no end.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)NOBODY is going to be President in 2 yrs! (Even if polls suggest otherwise)
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)NoBody Is In the Game Yet, Offically.
get it? So don't take that winning ticket you think you have to cash in quite yet.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You taking the over or under on dear Gilligan?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)he's not that smart as well, but he is honest.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)anyways?
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)take that!
I know who I am. You don't get to define me.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and yes I can define what an Independent is......and if you are not committed to vote for the Democrat after the Primary.....then you are actually an Independent. It is all pretty simple really.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)omg this is better than tv.
something IS pretty simple, REALLY!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its very simple....either you are or you aren't....
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how about that....
The reason you are playing this game....is because you KNOW that if it were truly revealed that you are an Independent....you understand that your opinion is not really important to actual Democrats anymore you are not a reliable member....you cannot be counted on...you are "INdependent" afterall.......fair weather friend. You obviously know and understand this.....but you are trying very hard to be obtuse....too hard...it gives you away.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I am independent, I have my own thoughts that lean way into the liberal and democratic spectrum, I don't have your thoughts. I have mine. Understand?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Primary...you are STILL an Independent Understand? Democrats will gladly tell you that they support whomever their fellow DEMOCRATS elect in the Primary....
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I am not.
This does matter.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am committed to vote for the winner of the Primary...
Hillary has 64% support AND beats ALL Republicans....she is head and shoulders the best candidate....until you can produce one that can show numbers better.....she is in the catbird seat....just because you don't like her...doesn't negate reality. And I for one do NOT want to risk a President Bush or Cruz.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)I'm just guessing now, not absolutely positively like you are with your crystal ball (ocks). Reality will show
There are other people involved in this! I hazard a thought there might *gasp!!! be others on stage besides HILLARY!!!!
Hillary is a loser. She coming out so early in the game just wears the boredom down to, GO AWAY. whatever graphs W. Wall says or Money Me.comClinton says
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You do not have anyone that can compete with her numbers....and besides...you are not committed to vote for the Democratic Primary winner regardless who it is....so your opinion doesn't mean very much to me.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)the Clintons, the big shots, DA MACHINE, LOST,
to a BLACK MAN with a terroristy kinda name.
I love Obama, I always will for the many things he represents in the goodness of people. He shows it all the time. But yeh, i understand he is just a hood ornament on a dangerous machine. I get that. I also get that a Clinton is not into that vibe at all. History.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)If EW or Bernie wins the primary will you vote for them?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ANY Democrat will readily admit to being able to vote for WHOMEVER wins our Primary....you apparently cannot. So again...I don't care about your thoughts.....you don't respond like a Democrat would.
djean111
(14,255 posts)It is ludicrous to think you can "demand" things.
Anyway, once a thread hijacking gets this hilarious, no one is inclined to even pay attention to what you are sputtering on and on about, methinks.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)We're here in the middle of a period shortage and there you are using three of them at the end of every sentence.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i hope you get paid well for your work.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Its pretty frickin easy to understand...
My grandparents who voted for FDR voted Democrat all their lives and wouldn't consider anything else.....was there something wrong with that? Were they obligated by oath?
There is nothing in writing...you are free to vote however you want....just don't expect to be called a Democrat if you cannot vote for whom fellow Democrats elect in a Primary....that's called Democracy....
"You can't always get what you want.....but if you try some time....you get what you need"
And by the way....when the election season starts....DU holds us to that "oath".
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i am a green party member, and i have been for over twenty years. i support democratic candidates, and i will probably continue to do so. but, i am not taking any damn oath, and i will be supporting the most liberal candidate in the primary. if that person is an independent, so be it. i certainly hope the nominee is not clinton because i don't believe she will win.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)She very well may be. If so, then she's gotcha....
One thing we know, she sure is... bossy !
Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #148)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)In that no alternative to this family is possible.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)64% to all single digits....
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)do you want Hillary or do you want whowho to clamup?
I think I might vote for Hillary in that case. Tough choice.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It's the "Hillary is the only one that can save us" meme.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)What you holding....show your hand please!
You got nada!
You know the old saying....A bird in the hand is worth three in the bush! And this one even beats "the Bush"
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)and has a huge chip on their shoulder that claims that only one candidate can win. How long before your kind start playing the sexist card? More inevitability from the inevitability police.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I saw that. That is some ugly ugly shit.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)a term she used against me....WAS sexist....and I called her on it...it had nothing to do with her support or lack thereof...for Hillary Clinton...
You have already been wrong once tonight...
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)get real!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It just stating my opinion on your ways of demanding obedience.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I do recall...Michelle Obama requests it be retired as well...I am just stating who else agrees with me....but Michelle is just trying to "oppress your speech" right?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That is why you got called that. It fits.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you denied and denied it again...THAT is why it FEELS like you got demanded...
Did you call me that? Because I do know some real actual racists that think someone calling THEM a racist...makes the other person a racist...its the same logic. Because I DARE point out to you that you used a sexist term...therefore ipso facto...I MUST be racist!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and the truth shall set you free...
Dont Call Girls Bossy. Or Grown Women Aggressive.
Seriously, dont do it. And while youre at it, dont call them pushy, angry, brusque, ballbusters, bitchy, careerist, cold, calculating you get the point. Also: shrill and strident, both of which imply high-pitched and screechy women a la your mother, finger pointed, scolding you to clean your room. Bossy is the subject of the new Sandberg campaign, but its something linguists have written about for decades. The reality is that these words are rooted in stereotype, and they are only applied to women.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and a lot of racists and homophobes don't like being told what to do either.....when you point out their use of language...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you can call me it till the cows come home...doesn't change the fact that it IS a sexist term...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)For hours.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because of your race....
Thats ridiculous....and you can do that till the cows come home too...for the most part I don't know what color or gender most people on this board are....if not for your words and avatar I would not know yours either...Everyone that criticises you...is not a racist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Exactly...thank you...you didn't know....so therefore...probably best not to use that term.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am sold I tell ya!
Its still a sexist term....and turns out I AM a woman....so I called you on your error!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I just calls em like I sees em...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Do know you seem to have other issues.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)that we know for sure...because that person continues to use the same sexist term....after the error was pointed out repeatedly....
If you checked out the Army manual...and it called African Americans Negroes.....would you say something or let it slide? Would you protest that term? Or would you just overlook that error?
THAT is the point I am trying to make to you.....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But only for women. We can still call men whatever we like. Wtf? You're the boss maam. Yes maam! You decide who to vote for, who is a Democrat, who is independent, who needs to leave DU, what to say, hiw to say it, who is sexist, who is the winner, you decide everything. And you demand to not be called bossy while bossing people around. Then bully anyone who disagrees.
You member that thing you said about racists getting mad when you call them racist? You're like that with bossy.
Btw. We live in a sexist world. It affects all of us. Even me.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Yes it is sexist...just like it is racist....and homophobic....but we don't have to stand by and accept it now do we? I have thrown people out of my home for using a racial epithet...more than once in fact....Why should I overlook a fellow Democrat using a sexist one?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Does not make my use of the word sexist. Sorry. I was describing what you were doing. You were bossing people around all day long. Very forcefully telling them they did not belong here. Telling me what not to say. Deriding people. Bullying. Own it. Don't hide from yourself.
Google the song Bossy. That's how I use the word. Don't care what a bunch of rich ladies say. That word is not holding me down. In my culture strong women are respected. We head the family. And yes, I'm bossy my damn self. It is a good thing. I run my own program and I'll run other's too if they let me.
Keep feeling beatdown by the word bossy. I bet you would just shrivel if you got called half the names I have been called if this is the worst thing in the world to you.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)doesn't prove that the word is sexist??? What would? Does Rush Limbaugh have to say it? OOOHHHH I get it....Only when YOU say it its not!!!
Often the simplest and most useful test is: would this word be applied to a straight, white man? In the case of bossy, almost certainly not (Margaret Thatcher was called bossy; it would be unthinkable to describe any other British prime minister as bossy).
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Does that mean the drug war is a good thing? Please.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Call a little girl bossy and she starts to avoid leadership roles because shes afraid of being seen as unlikeable. People are already wary of assertive women at work, but call a woman aggressive out loud and they will probably like her less. Call a female politician a ballbuster enough times, and people may actually be less likely to vote for her. Words tell us something about the way our culture perceives women in power, and whether we believe theyre supposed to be there.
and
http://time.com/22004/how-to-not-sound-like-a-sexist-jerk-even-if-youre-a-woman/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Must be a generational difference. I boss my husband around often. He tries to boss me but I am THE boss. Sorry. I like being the boss. So do my daughters. Sorry you don't feel empowered by being bossy. I do.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I don't even care if mixed groups of kids use it back and forth. Generational differences.
My white friends do call me up,and say, 'What up, n$gga?" And i be like 'What up?"
Why should I be all sensitive with people who mean nothing negative by it? Throw an er on the end and it means sonething different. We know what's meant by how it's said. I take it case by case and give people benefit of doubt.
Our cultures are blending. There will be cultural appropriation. Period. Fight it and it stays around forever.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)OHHHH so you think YOU should get a pass on the term? Well I and alot of other folks...including the Girl Fucking Scouts....beg to differ!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Nobody cares what I think. And what do the girl scouts have to do with anything? Now I need kids bossing me too?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You should banish it from your vocabulary...
Some people do not care about the name of the Washington DC football team either....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)This campaign will bear no fruit.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)your campaign thus far is bearing no truths...
I am woman hear me roar!!!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You have so many on your side, you should make it official. Tell DU the word bossy is banned. Let people know you will be on them like white on rice if the step out if line and ever say a woman is any version of the word bossy. Only men can be bossy. It is known.
What is the appropriate word for women who constantly berate and tell others what to do? I thought we used tge same word for both genders but I guess we have a female specific term? Or is there just no term for women and we just pretend not to notice when they do it?
Because I never got the memo, and I don't think it's on any master list of things we can only call men on DU.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)whoops there's that Girl Scout logo again!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have to go back to being THE Boss in my family right now. Things to do. Ttyl.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I feel sorry for you. To have that big of a chip on your shoulder must be hard.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)seriously???
quote:
I have a rude person who goes around thinking they know it all
and has a huge chip on their shoulder that claims that only one candidate can win. How long before your kind start playing the sexist card? More inevitability from the inevitability police.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I thought it was a response to what I said to Bravenak.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and has a huge chip on their shoulder that claims that only one candidate can win. How long before your kind start playing the sexist card? More inevitability from the inevitability police.
that is a pretty big "edit"
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I essentially responded to the wrong post. It happens. My edited post fixed that.
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)that show her at 64% approval (the pack are still in single digits)
and ahead of EVERY Republican including Jeb Bush...
I am sure that rings your bell!
LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)See, you don't get it. Hillary might not even throw her hat in and here yar, wasting energy and personal capital.
The media sure wants her as a front runner for many reasons (huggy huggy big money), and all none to do with the betterment of anything for the rabble.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)If you have one with better numbers.....put up!
Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #86)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)should we just pick her because she is polling good or do we elect someone because they believe in what we believe in?
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)corporate stooge as won the 2016 nomination.
Seriously, you're cracking me up.
babylonsister
(171,090 posts)daily. I hope there are some viable challengers. She needs to earn it.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Someone that demands people leave the party without blind devotion to a party....where have I heard this before?
That alone should tell people about HRC.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)craigmatic
(4,510 posts)until the votes are counted.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)is an exceptional choice. I think he has a chance.
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)I would have concurred, and in fact had heard he would run a "friendly" campaign against Hillary. But the Republicans won MD by campaigning on his record. He's damaged goods at this point.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Or Dems are going to lose the Presidential election. I'll vote for her if she's the nominee, but donating time or money to her campaign? Not going to happen. I'm not the only person that feels that way, either. If you think she can sway enough independents without the enthusiastic support of the base, good luck, you will need it!
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)...and that's before the Republicans are pushed to the right in their Primary process. I know a lot of people here don't like her or downgrade her chances, but she scored 17 million votes in the Democratic Primary against arguably one of our most popular Presidential candidates, and she was particularly competitive in the more conservative battle ground states.
Personally, I'm happy to have Bernie run, but present a serious case about how a candidate who's political experience is getting 250,000 votes in a liberal state where he'd well known translates that into winning a national election.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Present a serious case where a candidate doesn't have much support from the base that DOES vote and influences others to vote still wins. Any Democratic candidate is going to have a hard battle against Republicans - that's a given. If the base isn't thrilled about her and half-heartedly votes for her because they have to, not because they want to, it certainly doesn't bode well for getting Independent turnout/votes.
Gman
(24,780 posts)From 08 have patiently waited for going on 7 years. We accepted nominee Obama. It's going to be Hillary's turn.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)get this right of "it is my turn"..
Well Hillary Clinton had already a huge opportunity by serving at State. She was also infamous and powerfull in minds even before.
Why would she have a special free pass?
For instance Gore didnt get that "it is my turn now, I had enough waited"...
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)Serious early speculation surrounded Bill Bradley, a U.S. Senator and former basketball player for the New York Knicks, who had long been considered a potential Democratic contender for the presidency. In December 1998, Bradley formed a presidential exploratory committee and began organizing a campaign.[2] Gore, however, had been considered the favorite for the Democratic nomination as early as 1997, with the commencement of President Bill Clintons second term.[3] Though numerous candidates for the Democratic nomination tested the waters, including Senator John Kerry, Governor Howard Dean,[4] Representative Richard Gephardt, and Reverend Jesse Jackson, only Gore and Bradley ultimately entered the contest.
...
Although both Gore and Bradley showed comparable success in terms of fund-raising, Bradley lagged behind Gore in many polls from the start and never gained a competitive position. Despite the late endorsement of the Des Moines Register,[8] Bradley went on to be defeated in the Iowa Caucus; Gore garnered 64% of the votes, while Bradley received only 35%.[9] Gore won the primary competition in New Hampshire as well, though by a significantly smaller margin, receiving 52% to Bradleys 47%. After a resounding defeat on Super Tuesday, with Bradley failing to carry the majority of delegates in a single state, he withdrew from the race on March 9.[10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationwide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_2000_presidential_candidates
Gman
(24,780 posts)And that's pretty much the way it is. Sorry.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)I don't care. But she's the next nominee.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)dflprincess
(28,082 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Did you not see how disastrous her book tour was?
This is not a Monarchy. There are no 'turns'. That is a turn off.
There are people who were not even old enough to vote last time she ran, do they just have to accept her because you supported her before? No.
She needs to earn new votes like she earned yours or lose.
Gman
(24,780 posts)It's not my fault you weren't old enough to vote that's the politics of it regardless of how old you are.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Can't just tell us it's her turn, when she's been in politics since before we we're born.
Very condescending to just tell people that it's her turn because of seven years ago.
Can't win alone. Need the votes.
And it's not our fault people older than us allowed the crap to build up with the conservative revolution.
And it won't be our fault if she loses. It will be because she lost her turn again.
Gman
(24,780 posts)In the unlikely event they do, they're pretty much gravy. Campaigns try to turn out the youth vote because they're extra. They fight for the older voters. You'll be there one day. That's just the way it is.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I see the youth as important humans, not extra, like an afterthought. No wonder they tell me they don't care who wins. Neither side has one iota of respect for them, but expect respect from them.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)No one should say that your vote doesn't count or that we should take it for granted. That is just pure and unadulterated bullshit. It is too bad that people on DU, especially those who support Clinton are so rude.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They'd rather lose than give us a voice or try to win our votes. Quite nasty about it too. I though Republicans were the mean ones.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We will perservere!
Gman
(24,780 posts)And groups are valued in votes rather than dollars. Some are worth more than others. The more education and money a person has the more likely they are to vote. And those things come with age.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And those with out the votes lose. And those who ignore the voters, lose the voters. We are ascending. Time to listen to us.
What makes you think that Hillary is enitiled to it. Hillary ran for office and LOST, and lost because she would not shuit her bigmouthed husband up.
Hillary's turn to screw things up, and heaven forbid she loses to Jeb. Then you fools will nominate someone well to her right!
Gman
(24,780 posts)And frankly, that's good enough.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)we would still be selling slaves at markets.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Sounds too much like Anne the freak..
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Jesus Christ!
America tried to get away from ruling families when we fought the revolution, but we keep going back to it.
We need a LOT of new blood in Washington. Otherwise this will continue to be the same old shit every time.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Some people just aren't that smart.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It is not over at all.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)They're going to pee themselves over the GOP.
So far I'll vote for Hillary but someone else could rise up. I don't think hillary is entitled to the nomination and I support her. I can think of several dems who would make good candidates other than hillary.
Niko
(97 posts)That man was an actual liberal who stuck to his principles.
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Nothing but negativity.
Name the ninth 'Democrat' you have in mind.
You do have a ninth, right?
A Democrat.
Hmm...
*Bernie is not a Democrat, but caucuses with them.
mylye2222
(2,992 posts)Mr or Mrs Averagage Middle Class ordinary American and Grassroots Registered Dem whi id fed up with this clanic and cirporate take over of his/her party and who has a passion for politics and a real knowledge ofwhat life is.
donco
(1,548 posts)change of faces.Time for the Bushes and Clinton's to go fishing.Enjoy their retirement.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)She was a lock! The sure thing! It would be a cakewalk to the presidency! She was inevitable!
Unbeatable!
Except she wasn't.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Hillary's time has come and gone.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)have good ideas. That much I do know.
Marr
(20,317 posts)She's a proven loser.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)still_one
(92,394 posts)Overwhelming odds against him, but the issue is beyond winning or losing, it is about bringing focus to the issues that matter, and win or lose, that is what Bernie will do, and it will make whoever is the Democratic nominee a better candidate for the general election
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)I mean, since when does getting 17 million people to vote for you in the last election scare off prospective opponents?
Response to mylye2222 (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)LawDeeDah
(1,596 posts)Response to LawDeeDah (Reply #238)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Warner? Nixon? Tester?
Reformed Bully
(43 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Possible Candidates are: Jim Webb, Brian Schweitzer (very unlikely), Bernie Sanders (Will need to change party to run in the Democratic Party Primary), Ed Rendell (Will run if Hillary doesn't), Martin O'Malley, Hillary Rodham Clinton (You can look her up yourself), Joe Biden (I look out on that field, and first thing I think is, Coach, put me in, man, Im ready to play,)
Howard Dean (I hope Hillary Clinton becomes president) has joined Warren to support Hillary Clinton. Why do they think that Clinton is the best Candidate? No one talks about that.
Joe Manchin (Gag me with a spoon) has been mentioned, but there is nothing recent. If he does enter the Democratic Primary, he will be running in the wrong party's primary.
If someone is too afraid of the Clinton Machine, then they don't deserve to be President.
I will vote for the best candidate in the Presidential Primary. Currently, that is Vermin Supreme. I may change my mind when I see other candidates who have the courage and conviction to run.
In the general election, sadly, there will be no choice. Allowing a Republican the power to appoint the next two to four Supreme Court Judges, and to appoint dozens of judges to lower courts, is unacceptable.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I can't agree with your acceptance.
As the defiant idealist that I am, I will not go gently into that good night.
Old Nick
(468 posts)"drops mic"
TBF
(32,090 posts)dems want to run and I think that is VERY presumptuous.
So this can be one of two things -
1) Hillary supporter who can not accept anyone else
2) Hillary hater who is stirring things up in hopes of angering dems
Frankly, I'm not buying what you're selling either way. I'm waiting for the primary season to see which names are really on the ballot and who gets attention in Iowa. It may be someone who isn't even on our radar yet.