Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 03:49 PM Nov 2014

In accepting the new leadership position, Warren is ensuring smooth sailing for Hillary to win

R.I.P., Elizabeth Warren ’16 fantasy: Why she’s really (probably) not running for president now

The liberal star will now be an official Senate Democratic message-maker. Here's why Hillary can breathe easier now



JIM NEWELL
FRIDAY, NOV 14, 2014 04:00 AM PST


Congratulations to Elizabeth Warren! She has been knighted as a member of the Senate Democratic leadership, just in time for Democrats to hand over power to the Republican Party.

She will serve in a newly created position as a “liaison to liberal groups.” Her official title will be “strategic policy adviser to the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee,” where she will “[help] craft the party’s policy positions and priorities.” (Just in time for the Democratic Senate leadership to bring up a vote on building the Keystone XL pipeline.)

What does this mean? First thing is that “Elizabeth Warren raises a lot of money for the Democratic Party and is being rewarded with a title.” As it happens, she addressed the Democracy Alliance of wealthy liberal donors yesterday, and this time, it was as an emissary from the Senate Democratic leadership.

So one of the party’s top fundraisers is being given a more visible perch. But how influential will she be? She’ll still rank behind Sens. Harry Reid, Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, the sort of people who feel plenty confident in their own abilities to “craft the party’s positions and priorities.” The main positions and priorities that the new Senate minority will have to decide is: do we filibuster this thing or not filibuster this thing? No small task, but the question of determining which bills to bring to the floor no longer rest in this leadership’s hands.

The biggest signal that this sends is that Warren, who has said she’s not running for president about 50 million times but you never know, is … still not running for president. In accepting this leadership position, she’s helping craft the party’s top position and priority, all right, ensuring smooth sailing for Hillary Clinton to win the Democratic presidential nomination.

http://www.salon.com/2014/11/14/r_i_p_elizabeth_warren_16_fantasy_why_shes_really_probably_not_running_for_president_now/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In accepting the new leadership position, Warren is ensuring smooth sailing for Hillary to win (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Nov 2014 OP
Warren has suppoted Clinton for some time. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2014 #1
Well, someone has to make Hillary look less GOPLite n/t leftstreet Nov 2014 #2
+1 L0oniX Nov 2014 #7
while i agree that she's not running, i don't think mere acceptance of this position shows that unblock Nov 2014 #3
Hillary is nailed down where she is - there is no moving her. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #9
ATE wyldwolf Nov 2014 #4
LOL Cali_Democrat Nov 2014 #6
The appointment is a transparent placebo to the left. Where will they put Bernie? Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #5
Once Bernie becomes a Dem we can decide. nt. hack89 Nov 2014 #8
Bernie hired a Dem strategist Cali_Democrat Nov 2014 #11
Hillary isn't capable of following a subordinate message, IMO Ruby the Liberal Nov 2014 #10

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
1. Warren has suppoted Clinton for some time.
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 03:57 PM
Nov 2014

I think the post she has taken crafting the senate's message and strategy is a good choice.

unblock

(52,253 posts)
3. while i agree that she's not running, i don't think mere acceptance of this position shows that
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 03:59 PM
Nov 2014

she can't run without allies, but if she did decide to run and had support within the senate leadership, then she could use this position to create senate positions that could embarrass hillary.

it would give her the opportunity to make speeches and advance amendments that suited her message, that drew sharp distinctions between herself and hillary.


in fact she's likely to use the position rather like that anyway, not intending to derail and replace hillary but simply trying to move her more to the left.

 

LawDeeDah

(1,596 posts)
9. Hillary is nailed down where she is - there is no moving her.
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 04:56 PM
Nov 2014

Let us please understand that.

She is cozy with the Republicans and with the Large Money Groups, this is whom she serves. She can say whatever left sounding sound bytes she wants when it's convenient for her, but that means nothing as she, ahem, has been known to 'exaggerate' a lot then chalk it up to a whole short story of, ahem, 'fabrications' as 'misspeak'!

If this is brought up to show what character she is made of, it's called a Right Wing Talking Point. Hillary's own actions and words are a RW Talking Point. You gotta laugh.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. The appointment is a transparent placebo to the left. Where will they put Bernie?
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 04:13 PM
Nov 2014

And, whatever other leftist decides to try and derail the smelly baggage ridden unstoppable train of the Goldman Sachs bought Hillary?

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
10. Hillary isn't capable of following a subordinate message, IMO
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 05:51 PM
Nov 2014

Look at how bad Mark Penn fucked up her 2008 chances - and she just stuck with him regardless of the advice to lose that ass and tighten her message. She will surround her campaign with yes-people and Ms Warren is anything but.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In accepting the new lead...