Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeet the “experts” using bogus science to prop up nationwide abortion restrictions
A group of 14 individuals have made more than $600,000 offering their medically discredited "expertise"
There is no such thing as post-abortion syndrome. It is not a medical diagnosis, and has been discredited by the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association. But this faux-mental illness nonetheless found its way into Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedys majority opinion in a 2007 case upholding a ban on an abortion procedure called dilation and extraction. (The law in question, the so-called Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, was another piece of legislation that rejected medical accuracy in favor of messaging from the National Right to Life Committee.)
Despite conceding that the court had found no reliable data that abortion causes women emotional distress, Kennedy argued that it was self-evident that some women who have abortions would suffer severe depression and other negative mental health outcomes. Because Kennedy couldnt point to a credible scientific study to support his position, he instead cited the work of an electrical engineer named David C. Reardon.
This same kind of bogus science has only further poisoned the public discourse, shaped policy in state legislatures and influenced court opinions as lawmakers across the country advance an ever increasing number of abortion restrictions. An investigative reporting project released Thursday by RH Reality Check took an in-depth look at 14 men and women who, like Reardon, have established a powerful racket as antiabortion experts, each paid handsomely to offer up pseudoscience and outright lies to prop up abortion bans.
. . .
These men and women have testified before countless state legislatures and courts to defend abortion restrictions ranging from TRAP laws to pre-viability abortion bans. Among the misinformation spread by these experts are claims that abortion is a dangerous procedure (it is safer than a colonoscopy), abortion causes breast cancer (discredited by the National Cancer Institute), fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks (discredited by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others) and abortion causes mental illness (discredited by the American Psychological Association and others).
There is no such thing as post-abortion syndrome. It is not a medical diagnosis, and has been discredited by the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association. But this faux-mental illness nonetheless found its way into Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedys majority opinion in a 2007 case upholding a ban on an abortion procedure called dilation and extraction. (The law in question, the so-called Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, was another piece of legislation that rejected medical accuracy in favor of messaging from the National Right to Life Committee.)
Despite conceding that the court had found no reliable data that abortion causes women emotional distress, Kennedy argued that it was self-evident that some women who have abortions would suffer severe depression and other negative mental health outcomes. Because Kennedy couldnt point to a credible scientific study to support his position, he instead cited the work of an electrical engineer named David C. Reardon.
This same kind of bogus science has only further poisoned the public discourse, shaped policy in state legislatures and influenced court opinions as lawmakers across the country advance an ever increasing number of abortion restrictions. An investigative reporting project released Thursday by RH Reality Check took an in-depth look at 14 men and women who, like Reardon, have established a powerful racket as antiabortion experts, each paid handsomely to offer up pseudoscience and outright lies to prop up abortion bans.
. . .
These men and women have testified before countless state legislatures and courts to defend abortion restrictions ranging from TRAP laws to pre-viability abortion bans. Among the misinformation spread by these experts are claims that abortion is a dangerous procedure (it is safer than a colonoscopy), abortion causes breast cancer (discredited by the National Cancer Institute), fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks (discredited by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others) and abortion causes mental illness (discredited by the American Psychological Association and others).
THE REST:
http://www.salon.com/2014/11/14/meet_the_experts_using_bogus_science_to_prop_up_nationwide_abortion_restrictions/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 878 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet the “experts” using bogus science to prop up nationwide abortion restrictions (Original Post)
Triana
Nov 2014
OP
Since when have these man-childs actually ever cared about a woman's depression!?
Dont call me Shirley
Nov 2014
#3
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)1. Kick.
Plus, meet these "women's rights experts":
http://issuehawk.com/igor/2014/08/04/hilarious-photos-couple-trolls-anti-abortion-protesters-with-way-funnier-signs.html
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)4. I wish he had another sign pointing out that they
Think they are medical experts.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)2. It's probably a hormone shift that would also cause baby blues
or postpartum depression after giving birth if they continued the pregnancy. In other words, pregnancy is the cause, not abortion.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)3. Since when have these man-childs actually ever cared about a woman's depression!?
All they know how to do is ridicule women with depression (which is usually caused by the man-childs ugly behavior in the first place).