Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:25 AM Apr 2012

GOP Just Like Any Other Nazi Group

If you look at Machiavelli's "The Prince" and look at Goebbel's tactics in Germany you find all the same strategies going on. That's what one talk show caller said today on a radio talk show. And I can't really argue with that because what the GOP is doing runs parallel to that book and those tactics. Attack all the vulnerable and demonize them. Go particularly hard on gay and transgenders. Mix in a good dose of fanatical religion. Take over the media and have it do all your bidding. Establish a repeatable line of hateful, racist and bigoted propaganda. Explode the military budget with all new weapons. Then scrap the economy to make the populace hungry and desperate. Stack the courts with fellow nazis to skew justice. Then broadcast as many lies as you can as quickly as you can. Paralyze government and demonize public workers. Empower a crazy outfit like the NRA. And it goes on and on.

Based on what we see in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Arizona, Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, Pennsylvania etc and we can see what the GOP thinks of freedom. We can see how they will rule and not represent. This election will truly be the election of our lifetime. The only thing left is to see what the Republicanazi party will replace the American flag with whenever they do get power.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Just Like Any Other Nazi Group (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Apr 2012 OP
Well said! The GOP are now terrorists and un-American IMO. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2012 #1
They saw 1984 not as a warning against a future dystopia, but a guidebook to bring it to pass. freshwest Apr 2012 #2
Reagan was re-elected in 1984. That was very eerie. Trading arms with the enemy to conduct Overseas Apr 2012 #4
I was mortified when he won in 1980. The GOP has controlled the USA most of my voting life. freshwest Apr 2012 #8
Iran-Contra story did not break until after Reagan's re-election, IIRC, although coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #17
Well said. Good description of GOP madness. Corporate madness knowing nothing but profit. Overseas Apr 2012 #3
Machiavellianism: The political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality Tennessee Gal Apr 2012 #5
I don't think the GOP learned anything useful from Machiavelli, Italian patriot that he was. dimbear Apr 2012 #6
Atwater and Rove Tennessee Gal Apr 2012 #10
I see your point, of course, but then they think they're following the teachings of Jesus too. dimbear Apr 2012 #11
oddly enough, I've been comparing it to the WW2 phenomenon of "Bushido" grasswire Apr 2012 #7
I hope my vote against them,stops them, yortsed snacilbuper Apr 2012 #9
I suggest you read a few history books before you try this again RZM Apr 2012 #12
Your Post is Bullpuckey. TheMastersNemesis Apr 2012 #13
You weren't "protecting" him at all... Marengo Apr 2012 #14
You could always try refuting what I actually said RZM Apr 2012 #15
I believe your post to be the least accurate one I've ever read on DU. nt ladjf Apr 2012 #16
I take it you never visited the old 9/11 forum then n/t RZM Apr 2012 #20
I read DU since it first started. nt ladjf Apr 2012 #21
Well then RZM Apr 2012 #22
Without the connivance of traditional German conservatives like Van Papen and coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #18
No argument here RZM Apr 2012 #19

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
2. They saw 1984 not as a warning against a future dystopia, but a guidebook to bring it to pass.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:49 AM
Apr 2012

I remember how apparent it was in 2004 when I saw bumper stickers that said, Bush in 1984. Just 20 years behind their grand plan, I guess.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
4. Reagan was re-elected in 1984. That was very eerie. Trading arms with the enemy to conduct
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:19 AM
Apr 2012

an illegal war and people still voted for him.

And then Bush was even worse. Beyond imagining for me. But I haven't forgotten. Torture on so many levels.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
8. I was mortified when he won in 1980. The GOP has controlled the USA most of my voting life.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:42 AM
Apr 2012

Most of the people I have voted for have not won. And I am really tired of it. But it is what it is.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
17. Iran-Contra story did not break until after Reagan's re-election, IIRC, although
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:36 PM
Apr 2012

we were involved in plenty of nasty business in Central America before then.

People voted for Reagan after he presided over the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. (Adult unemployment reached 12% nationally.)

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
3. Well said. Good description of GOP madness. Corporate madness knowing nothing but profit.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:15 AM
Apr 2012

Burn the house down if it makes you more money.

Tennessee Gal

(6,160 posts)
5. Machiavellianism: The political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:23 AM
Apr 2012

in political affairs and holds that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power.

For Machiavelli, politics was about one and only one thing: getting and keeping power or authority. Everything else, religion, morality, truth, honor, and integrity, that people associate with politics has nothing to do with this fundamental aspect of politics, unless being moral helps one get and keep power. The only skill that counts in getting and maintaining power is calculation. The successful politician knows what to do or what to say for every situation, no matter what it takes. It is only about winning and keeping power.

This is exactly what the Republican Party is all about and it is exactly what is behind the lies of Mitt Romney.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
6. I don't think the GOP learned anything useful from Machiavelli, Italian patriot that he was.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:26 AM
Apr 2012

For instance, Signor Machiavelli didn't care much for torture, having been himself stretched on the rack.

Goebbels, hell yah.

Tennessee Gal

(6,160 posts)
10. Atwater and Rove
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 02:38 AM
Apr 2012

Kevin Phillips, former Republican strategist, wrote in his book "American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush" about Carl Rove and the late Lee Atwater, George H. W. Bush's political strategist, following the teachings of Machiavelli.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
11. I see your point, of course, but then they think they're following the teachings of Jesus too.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 04:14 AM
Apr 2012

Machiavelli is revered as a great patriot by many Italians, perhaps we should let the Italians judge whether our Republicans have been paying him any careful attention.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
7. oddly enough, I've been comparing it to the WW2 phenomenon of "Bushido"
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:39 AM
Apr 2012

Bushido was the Japanese warrior code that allowed/encouraged the Japanese people and the Imperial Army to consider its enemies as lesser beings, deserving only of barbaric, inhumane treatment. Vivisection, cannibalism, starvation, torturous medical experiments, extreme physical and mental deprivation and manipulations -- all of that and more was carried out on tens of thousands of these lesser beings -- all in the name of hatred of the *other*. The Japanese were propagandized; atrocities were the result.

There is a similar property in the Republican attacks on Americans. They are propagandized. They hate America for its freedoms. The thuggery, the attacks, the thumb in the eye -- that's all part of the same ruthless barbarism.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
12. I suggest you read a few history books before you try this again
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 04:36 AM
Apr 2012

You make a few accidentally accurate points, but most of this is bunk.

The Nazis were certainly not about 'fanatical religion.' Quite the opposite. They sought to undermine traditional Christianity because they disagreed with its basic premises.

The GOP has not 'taken over the media' - that's demonstrated by the intense conservative hostility to the MSM. DU hates to hear this, but the MSM really is liberal, at least culturally. The difference is it's not the type of liberalism DU likes (the media is more 1 percent elite liberal).

The 'scrap the economy' line is particularly laughable. Without the Great Depression, the Nazis probably couldn't have ever come into power. In 1928 they were pulling a whopping 2.6 percent of the vote. By 1932, they were the largest party in the Reichstag. The tanking of the economy put them in power, not the other way around. Hitler actually helped put Germany back to work. That was one of his claims to fame at the time and major reason for his broad support. Your take on this is 100 percent backwards.

Try reading about this shit before posting about it next time.

 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
13. Your Post is Bullpuckey.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:15 AM
Apr 2012

I can't believe I wasted my time serving in Vietnam to protect the likes of you.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
14. You weren't "protecting" him at all...
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 07:59 AM
Apr 2012

Vietnam was not a war for the purpose of defense against an aggressor, WE were the aggressor. Inductee or volunteer, you were killing people fighting for national independence from colonial powers and the right of self determination.

I have not read all of your posts, but a many of those I have reference your service in Vietnam. Why do you consider this so currently relevant?

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
15. You could always try refuting what I actually said
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 11:40 AM
Apr 2012

That's kind of how this thing is supposed to work.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
22. Well then
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 10:03 PM
Apr 2012

If you think that what I wrote was less believable than mini-nukes and holograms, I'm pretty sure we're done here

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
18. Without the connivance of traditional German conservatives like Van Papen and
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:45 PM
Apr 2012

Hindenburg, the Nazis could not have ever come into power, since the Nazis never polled above 34% in any free and fair election. But your points otherwise are well taken.

There is one parallel that bears mentioning: 9/11 and the Reichstag Fire. Hitler used the latter to ram through the Enabling Act and we all know how Bush and his Junta used 9/11.

The French scientist Louis Pasteur said that 'Fortune favors the prepared mind" and I really think that can be said about both Bush\Cheney and Hitler. Each took advantage of a paradigm-shifting event that fortune thrust into their laps to consolidate their power.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
19. No argument here
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 02:53 PM
Apr 2012

Hitler played the establishment German right like a fiddle. Their plan was to use him for their own purposes before he self-destructed (which they thought was inevitable). They had no idea what kind of tiger they were riding.

But Hitler went way further than Bush and co. ever dreamed of. Hitler completely wiped out democracy in a matter of months. Bush got the patriot act, but our political system is still fundamentally the same as it was. Hitler pretty much dismantled the whole Weimar system.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Just Like Any Other N...