Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:00 PM Apr 2012

the Student Loan Forgiveness Act

the Student Loan Forgiveness Act

On March 8, Congressman Hansen Clarke (D-Mich.) introduced H.R. 4170, the Student Loan Forgiveness Act of 2012.
Total outstanding student loan debt officially surpassed total credit card debt in the United States in 2010, and is on track to exceed $1,000,000,000,000 during 2012;

Excessive student loan debt is impeding economic growth in the United States. Faced with excessive repayment burdens, many individuals are unable to start businesses, invest, or buy homes;

Because of soaring tuition costs, students often have no choice but to amass significant debt to obtain an education that is widely considered a prerequisite for earning a living wage."

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the Student Loan Forgiveness Act (Original Post) lovuian Apr 2012 OP
Thanks for posting. a la izquierda Apr 2012 #1
Why not ammortize over 30 years and cut your payments substantially? taught_me_patience Apr 2012 #3
how much do you end up paying lovuian Apr 2012 #4
So what? It's better to have the cash flow now taught_me_patience Apr 2012 #6
explain more please. a la izquierda Apr 2012 #23
It was a subject brought up in the Occupy Wall Street Movement lovuian Apr 2012 #2
This isn't a bad thing, but it only addresses the symptoms mythology Apr 2012 #5
Agree the tuitions have gotten out of hand lovuian Apr 2012 #7
Actually, enlightenment Apr 2012 #8
You can't get an advanced degree on $42,500... Leftist Agitator Apr 2012 #10
Not arguing that - just pointing out what the bill says. enlightenment Apr 2012 #16
nah... the corporate crowd wants indentured servitude fascisthunter Apr 2012 #9
Agreed this is what the Occupy Wall street brought out lovuian Apr 2012 #11
Why introduce it now? Just wondering. lonestarnot Apr 2012 #12
The Occupy movement were for absolving lovuian Apr 2012 #13
Yes, I know, but isn't the timing very bad? Why not wait until after the election? lonestarnot Apr 2012 #14
Well lets see the Republicans vote against it lovuian Apr 2012 #15
which generation is going to pay to have bigapple Apr 2012 #17
Does it have a plan to pay the investors in the loans? RB TexLa Apr 2012 #18
I think this is a plan to bail out those investors lovuian Apr 2012 #19
Defaults are rising BUT SATIRical Apr 2012 #30
Not going to happen until those idiots in the house get voted out. YellowRubberDuckie Apr 2012 #20
I just let them take my income tax returns every year. Marrah_G Apr 2012 #21
Please do exercise caution, b/c some loans allow for coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #22
Thanks Marrah_G Apr 2012 #24
That's why I call the current student loan situation 'the new indentured servitude' because, coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #25
yup Marrah_G Apr 2012 #27
yeah- I was one of those Marrah_G Apr 2012 #26
I can't see this passing until we regain control of Congress. MineralMan Apr 2012 #28
Would this be retroactive?? cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #29

a la izquierda

(11,797 posts)
1. Thanks for posting.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:03 PM
Apr 2012

My federal loans have been traded around so many times that it is becoming a real pain to figure out who owns what in order to get them consolidated. The language of loan documents is incredibly confusing, loans are sold off without the borrowers consent. It's a mess.
I have in excess of $100K in debt from three degrees. I can pay them off in 10 years, but they payments will eat up about 1/3 of my monthly income.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
3. Why not ammortize over 30 years and cut your payments substantially?
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:09 PM
Apr 2012

You could cut your payment nearly in half, so they only take up 1/6 of your income.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
6. So what? It's better to have the cash flow now
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:13 PM
Apr 2012

instead of paying a whopping 30% of income to student loans. You can always pay more in the future if your income rises (which it typically will).

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
2. It was a subject brought up in the Occupy Wall Street Movement
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:05 PM
Apr 2012

and it is a big issue for young people
America will face a massive brain Drain if they don't fix this problem
I know kids who have flown the country looking for jobs

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
5. This isn't a bad thing, but it only addresses the symptoms
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:13 PM
Apr 2012

Instead there should be more funding going into education and financial aid so that the costs of going to college are lowered. Allowing for this loan forgiveness only encourages more tuition increases.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
8. Actually,
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:38 PM
Apr 2012

the bill tries to address that problem.

The repayment plan (of total debt) is for current borrowers. Future borrowers would be capped at $42500 (I think - I'm not looking at it right now).

The idea is that the cap on forgiveness will encourage borrowers to not run up as much debt AND encourage schools to stop raising tuition every time the wind shifts.

Not sure if it would work, since we're not changing the fundamental issue of viewing education as a commodity, but it's a start at least.

 

Leftist Agitator

(2,759 posts)
10. You can't get an advanced degree on $42,500...
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:26 PM
Apr 2012

And unless you get a B.S. in Engineering or pursue a health sciences degree, you absolutely cannot get a well-paying job, period, end of story.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
16. Not arguing that - just pointing out what the bill says.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:32 PM
Apr 2012

I suspect the belief is that this will force schools to lower tuition (using the market based approach: students can't afford to enroll; schools lose money because fewer students enroll; schools lower tuition to get more students . . .)

Problem with that, of course, is that it is relying on the commodity concept (not to mention that flawed free-market model).

As for the rest of what you said - gee, thanks. I guess I'll take my terminal degree in something other than engineering or health sciences and go live under a bridge. *kidding - you're not too far off base with the comment*

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
9. nah... the corporate crowd wants indentured servitude
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:49 PM
Apr 2012

they have rationalized its justification... just ask them.

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
11. Agreed this is what the Occupy Wall street brought out
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 10:31 PM
Apr 2012

the servitude of our young educated ....being in debt and not given jobs and not good paying ones either

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
13. The Occupy movement were for absolving
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:04 PM
Apr 2012

US student loans
they felt Wall street got a break so they should too

 

bigapple

(99 posts)
17. which generation is going to pay to have
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:34 PM
Apr 2012

every student getting their tens of thousands written off?

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
19. I think this is a plan to bail out those investors
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:39 PM
Apr 2012

defaults are going to happen on those loans

if they don't have jobs then they can't pay

this is the next huge default

YellowRubberDuckie

(19,736 posts)
20. Not going to happen until those idiots in the house get voted out.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:44 PM
Apr 2012

While I'm optimistic, realistically, it could go either way, what with their ignorant populace.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
21. I just let them take my income tax returns every year.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:47 PM
Apr 2012

Maybe some day I will be able to afford to pay them off.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
22. Please do exercise caution, b/c some loans allow for
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:54 PM
Apr 2012

wages to be garnished (and even, I have heard, Social Security checks).

At my last position, one of my staff was losing 25% of her gross pay (that's right, gross before withholdings) to student loan garnishments. I was really pissed about it and wrote my rep (at the time Diane Watson). Really smart young woman in her mid-20s who had been sold a bill of goods by a very expensive proprietary trade school while at the ripe old mature age of 19. I still get steamed when I think about it.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
24. Thanks
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:56 PM
Apr 2012

but if they want to do that...there isn't much I can do to stop them. I make just enough to get by.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
25. That's why I call the current student loan situation 'the new indentured servitude' because,
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:59 PM
Apr 2012

most of the time, the loans cannot be discharged through a routine bankruptcy and creditors can hound borrowers until the latter die.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
27. yup
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:00 PM
Apr 2012

I don't answer the phone anymore unless I know who is calling. The student loan collectors get nasty.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
26. yeah- I was one of those
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:59 PM
Apr 2012

I went to a school for administrative asst, certificate program. I was to young and stupid to realize I could have gotten an associates for half of what they charged me if I had gone to community college. The course was also alot more expensive then I thought it would be after all was said and done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»the Student Loan Forgiven...