Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:33 PM Apr 2012

Five Reasons Why The Very Rich Have NOT Earned Their Money

Five Reasons Why The Very Rich Have NOT Earned Their Money
by Paul Buchheit
April 16, 2012



1. They've Taken All the Middle Class Wage Increases

In 1980 the richest 1% of America took one of every fifteen post-tax income dollars. Now, according to IRS figures, they take THREE of every fifteen (doc) post-tax income dollars. They've tripled their cut of America's income pie. That's a trillion extra dollars a year.

For every dollar the richest 1% earned in 1980, they've added three more dollars. The poorest 90% have added ONE CENT.

Yet the average American factory worker, according to Berkeley economist Enrico Moretti, produces $180,000 worth of goods a year, more than three times what he or she produced in 1978, in inflation-adjusted dollars.

So workers have TRIPLED their productivity over 30 years while the richest 1% have TRIPLED their share of income. Worker pay remained flat as the top 10% took almost all the productivity gains since 1980.

2. They've Mismanaged Key American Industries

3. They've Benefited from 50 Years of Public Research

4. They've Increased Their Incomes By Not Paying Taxes

5. They've Contributed Little to Society


Read the full article and details on reasons 2-5 at:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/04/16

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Five Reasons Why The Very Rich Have NOT Earned Their Money (Original Post) Better Believe It Apr 2012 OP
It's like an entitlement ,you buy in on orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #1
If Oprah was still on the air, she could do a show about why she's to blame. hughee99 Apr 2012 #2
The tripled productivity measure is simply wrong jenwilson Apr 2012 #3
I'm completely in agreement with this. If I wrote well, I'd have written this myself! lol nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #4
I bet you're a really good writer! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #5
Oh, not at all! I'm a horrible writer! Thank you though. Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #6
 

jenwilson

(47 posts)
3. The tripled productivity measure is simply wrong
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:42 PM
Apr 2012

It may have tripled in dollars, but after inflation productivity has actually decreased after twenty years of Republican "leadership" since 1978. When you have leaders that profess laziness and not working as a virtue, the people follow.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Five Reasons Why The Very...