Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Just One Millionaire Followed the Buffett Rule (Original Post) bigtree Apr 2012 OP
But we know Dokkie Apr 2012 #1
You have two separate problems confused. Scuba Apr 2012 #2
that would apply to all revenue, then bigtree Apr 2012 #3
Those millionaires don't want to do anything that is going to increase "Public" employees liberal N proud Apr 2012 #4
I am all for the wealthy paying their fair share. jschurchin Apr 2012 #5
 

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)
1. But we know
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:46 AM
Apr 2012

it wouldn't be used to pay down the national debt or pay back the billions stolen from SS trust fund. It most likely would be used to fund another military adventure or fund some rebel group trying to overthrown some non compliant govt. This is why I am not crazy about the Buffett rule

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
3. that would apply to all revenue, then
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:57 AM
Apr 2012

That's not an excuse for upper-income folks to not pay their fair share. We're fighting over crumbs and there are allocations for 'entitlements' and other benefits and programs which have nothing at all to do with war. In fact, our major expense is entitlements. We need to find revenue somewhere and it shouldn't come in the form of cuts to the programs and benefits average income Americans rely on.

liberal N proud

(60,335 posts)
4. Those millionaires don't want to do anything that is going to increase "Public" employees
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:19 AM
Apr 2012

They are all about privatizing and make a profit from that privatization.

 

jschurchin

(1,456 posts)
5. I am all for the wealthy paying their fair share.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:47 AM
Apr 2012

But I don't kid myself into thinking that by Increasing their taxation that, that will solve our deficit spending problem.
This year alone we will spend more than 1 Trillion dollars more than we collect in taxes. I am a big fan of levying a transaction tax on the stock market for every share traded daily. Go to where the money is, right?
On average 1.5 Billion shares are traded daily on Wall Street. If a 1 cent a share tax was levied it would bring in 15 million a day. Now that sounds like a lot until you figure there are approx. 220 trading days a year so it would bring in 3.3 Billion a year.
As a nation we spend $12.3 Billion each and every day so a $.01 a share levy would fund us for about 8 hrs. Now 10 cents a share and we will get 80 hours of Washington, or in other words, 3 days and 8 hours, woohoo!!!!
Now if we increase the levy to a dollar a share, for each and every share, then we can make a real dent. We would bring in 330 Billion a year while we continue to spend over a Trillion more than our budget.

Do you see, all those words equal these three WE ARE FUCKED.

And no amount of taxation on any one group will change that until the 535 stop spending.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Just One Millionaire F...