General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs sex only for rich people?
By Catherine Rampell
America has decided: Sex is for rich people. Non-procreative sex in particular.
How else would you explain the trap were laying for poor people who deign to get it on?
Our country apparently doesnt want low-income Americans to have free access to birth control, either by compelling all insurance plans to offer it or by adequately funding public reproductive health programs. In many schools predominantly located in low-income, high-teen-pregnancy areas we dont even teach kids how contraception works. We also dont want them to have easy access to abortions when they inevitably get pregnant because theyre not using birth control, with states such as Texas and Mississippi trying to shutter their few remaining abortion clinics.
Then we dont help them very much after they birth those unplanned kids, instead publicly chastising irresponsible single mothers for having babies they cant afford and offering little assistance in the form of child care, education or cash. Dumping unwanted children onto the child welfare system isnt exactly celebrated, either.
By process of elimination, the solution for low-income people is to never, ever have sex. So seems the logic behind many of these policies: If only we make it harder for people to have access to family planning services, and financially painful to raise children who predictably result from sex in the absence of those services, people who cannot afford to raise children will choose celibacy.
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catherine-rampell-family-planning-shouldnt-be-limited-to-the-well-to-do/2014/10/16/862f0e0e-5570-11e4-892e-602188e70e9c_story.html
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)in procreation, you need to widen your horizons
But the reality on the ground is that rich or poor, people DO continue to have sex, and have kids, whether they can afford them or not.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)but to be fair, whips, chains, lube, and edible undies can put a dent in your budget too.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)poor and middle classes.
localroger
(3,634 posts)So I guess that yes, fun of any kind is reserved for the rich in this country.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Birth control is a great investment for society as a whole. If unplanned pregnancies in the US are 49%, think about how high they are in other countries. We need cheap, safe, pleasant 100% effective birth control NOW.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Are they really having all this marital and extra marital sex without birth control. I kind of doubt it. If they were then there would be more families like the Duggars, not to mention a few love children born of extra marital affairs. You know when you look at all the policies that are coming out that try to intentionally hurt low income people it makes you wonder. Is there a true hatred for low income people? I think there probably is.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)However, birth control and abortions should be free for all. It's less expensive than having children that can't be cared for or are unwanted.
IronLionZion
(45,562 posts)conservatives are completely detached from the consequences of their policies.
And yes, they do openly state that people should not have sex. Some people like to think they know what's best for other people.
maced666
(771 posts)Too poor to afford a condom - that nearly all health clinics will give away for free? Then, once you get it - you don't know how to properly use?
Sad that the poor have to be painted flat stupid to prove a point.