General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore Bad News For Don Siegelman
October 16, 2014
Today I received this e-mail from Former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, who is still in prison for a crime he did not commit, a victim of Karl Rove's machinations.
Dear Friends:
I'm sorry to tell you that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has postponed my oral argument yet again...Now it will be "after January"
My lawyers responded to this news with a motion to have me released on bond because if we win our appeal, I will have spent time in prison for charges that will have been reversed.
I regret to hear, as I know you do, that my trial judge has got himself into some trouble.
He was arrested when his wife, Kelli, told the police who were responding to her 911 call that she was beaten, kicked, and dragged around by her hair in their ritzy Atlanta hotel room.
(His first wife, Lisa, made such allegations in her complaint for divorce)
The accusations of substance abuse, domestic abuse, and promiscuous behavior in his courtroom do not give me pleasure..This is something no one should take pleasure from.
Especially the reports of Domestic Violence...DV hurts and it kills.
My concern with the issue of Domestic Violence is not new.
Because Domestic Violence is so destructive, I did a lot as Attorney General, Lt. Governor, and Governor, to prevent domestic violence and to punish those who commit such acts.
I would like to tell you a frustrating and painful story about a domestic violence victim,
Rhonda Hutto, that illustrates how dangerous DV can be.
I first met Rhonda when I was having a hearing on Victims' Rights in Huntsville, Alabama.
Mrs. Hutto came to my hearing and bravely stood and told her story.
She was scared and there were tears...She had done everything right, seeking protective orders, divorcing her abusive husband, moving out of state, changing her name.
To everyone's horror, about a month after Rhonda gave her testimony, Rhonda's ex-husband found her and killed her.
When I appointed a Commission on Victims' Rights, I devoted it to the frustrating and painful memory of Rhonda Hutto.
We should all pray for peace and justice, pray for victims and bullies, and demand appropriate punishment for those who commit these cowardly acts.
Despite my focus and all my efforts on Domestic Violence in my political career, clearly, there is still a lot more work to do.
With deep appreciation, I am, your friend, and so glad you're mine.
Don
Governor of Alabama, 1999-2003
Elected Twice, Inaugurated Once
Lt. Governor, 1995-1999
Secretary of State, 1979-1987
Federal Prisoner 'till June, 2018...Final discharge, 2021 (With your help, this will not stand)
Prisoner # 24775-001
FPC PO Box 5010
Oakdale, LA. 71463
For more information on the Don Siegelman Case,
or to sign the Change.org Petition To President Obama To Pardon Don Siegelman:
http://free-don.org
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)red dog 1
(27,849 posts)His oral argument has been postponed until "after January"
The only way that he could possibly be released that soon is if President Obama pardons him.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)successful in his oral arguments and released?
Obama really fecking pisses me off in this. The minute he won his first term, right after signing the ACA into law, Siegelman should have been pardoned and released!!!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Ted Stevens.
former9thward
(32,077 posts)Stevens was never pardoned. Holder dismissed the charges due to gross prosecution misconduct.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)former9thward
(32,077 posts)The judge held them all in contempt and Holder fired them along with the top people in their division.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 18, 2014, 12:41 AM - Edit history (1)
the Solicitor General (Elena Kagan) who argued that Siegelman should spend 20 years in prison.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)in the conspiracy against Don Siegelman.
Let Cass Sunstein explain it:
2. Rumors and speculation. Of course it is necessary to specify how, exactly,
conspiracy theories begin.. Some such theories seem to bubble up spontaneously,
appearing roughly simultaneously in many different social networks; others are initiated
and spread, quite intentionally, by conspiracy entrepreneurs who profit directly or
indirectly from propagating their theories. An example in the latter category is the
French author Thierry Meyssan, whose book 9/11: The Big Lie became a bestseller and
a sensation for its claims that the Pentagon explosion on 9/11 was caused by a missile,
fired as the opening salvo of a coup detat by the military-industrial complex, rather than
by American Airlines Flight 77. Some conspiracy entrepreneurs are entirely sincere;
others are interested in money or power, or in achieving some general social goal. Still,
even for conspiracy theories put about by conspiracy entrepreneurs, the key question is
why some theories take hold while many more do not, and vanish into obscurity.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)Democrat? Why would she want to participate in such a vile injustice?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)then you are starting from a false premise, thus explaining your confusion with the results.
Why do most people do what they do?
Answer: objective monetary incentives. They want to get paid.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)would fight for a fellow Democrat
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)However, as you have noticed, there are times when actors within the party seem not to care about the survival of the party.
Like, why do Democrats seem uninterested in electronic voting, when every time something unusual happens it benefits Republicans?
Or, why does Obama keep people like John Brennan, James Comey, Robert Gates, and Chuck Hagel around?
When all these WTF moments become predictable, look for another explanatory variable.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)baffles me and has me shaking my head or
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)I was happier before I knew what I know now. A warning would have been nice.
red dog 1
(27,849 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)who is a big fan of Monsanto.
Name me one single time when Seigalman ever praised Monsanto...
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Seriously. Siegelman took money from CEO of HealthSouth who was then appointed to the hospital regulatory board, which approved of HealthSouth's payment schedules.
Is it absolutely impossible to concede that this was wrong?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I've no idea why Democrats won't help him.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)otherwise why won't the President pardon him?
n2doc
(47,953 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I think that the President will pardon the Gov when he pardons Cheney. Make everyone happy.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)He will never be charged with anything. He admitted that he co-opted the entire Democratic leadership in his torture scheme, and they can't charge him without admitting they were complicit.
He is evil, but not stupid.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I just thought it would be a nice gesture to put all that behind us.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)"angry black man". That was actually posted on du once.c
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)in that thread. To me Obama pardoning DS would make him look like someone who believes in righting injustice.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)during his first year as president in 2009, Obama was going to pardon Don Siegelman. Man oh man, was I wrong about Barack "Jamie Dimon is my golfing buddy" Obama.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)mtasselin
(666 posts)President Obama could make this whole thing go away if he wanted to, President Obama I have supported you twice and you have disappointed me in so many ways. Please President Obama do the right thing and get Don Siegelman out now, and don't wait until you are leaving office.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)LoisB
(7,230 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Depending on your definition of massive.
red dog 1
(27,849 posts)I mean..how, exactly would we go about starting such a campaign?
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)I sign petitions fro the Humane Society and I wish I knew the ins and outs of setting up links and such. I'm hoping someone will come along who knows how it's done and take the reins. Sorry mate, full of ideas here with no abilities to execute.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Blue Owl
(50,494 posts)Rove remains on some bizarro-world moral high ground which is completely sickening. Justice is being raped and pillaged.
arthritisR_US
(7,291 posts)Response to red dog 1 (Original post)
MontyPow This message was self-deleted by its author.
MontyPow
(285 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)wants him to remain in prison. Maybe the Bush Crime Family has more power than most think. As far as whether the President will pardon him at the end of his term is doubtful. We know of no reason not to pardon him now. The President seems to have a reason.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)American Oligarchs. The Republican leaders are fools and are puppets of the American Oligarchy. The President is most likely afraid of the ruling Oligarchs. They control the NSA/CIA and the economy. They can make the President look very bad.
summerschild
(725 posts)Fuller's dirty history goes all the way back to the Reagan White House and the Iran Contra shennanigins. We'll never know how much Oliver North and his merry band of thieves were able to steal above and beyond what went to the California drug cartels.
MontyPow
(285 posts)"crimes" is that he did exactly what previous governors had done. The prosecutor is a friend of Carl Rove.
If a Republican is elected President 2016 there is no way he receives a pardon. I'm hoping that President Obama will pardon him, but I don't know that he will.
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)This is judicial corruption at it's worst when you look at this case!
Don...I'm rooting for Y O U !
KoKo
(84,711 posts)for all he has gone through...
Thanks for posting and those other DU'ers who are keeping on top of Sieglman's unfair incarceration.
red dog 1
(27,849 posts)She is probably one of the few Senate Democrats courageous enough to ask President Obama why he hasn't pardoned Don Siegelman yet.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Ebola, and Beyonce?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Worst disappointment in my lifetime
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)When we have a supposedly "liberal" Democratic POTUS in the White House????
Recursion
(56,582 posts)that approved of state payments to hospitals.
At least that's what a jury found.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)a railroad job if ever there was one.
Do you not agree?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)that regulated his own industry.
How is that OK?
red dog 1
(27,849 posts)that approved of state payments to hospitals...At least that's what a jury found."???
No, that's NOT "what a jury found."
(From transcript of September 11, 2012 Democracy Now interview with Don Siegelman):
AMY GOODMAN:
"Explain..what exactly happened to you."
SIEGELMAN:
"Well, I was raising money to get a state referendum passed that would establish a lottery so Alabama's less fortunate kids would have a chance to go to college for free.
Jack Abramoff, in his book, admits that he put $20 million of Indian casino money in Alabama,
first to defeat me in 1998, and to defeat the lottery campaign in 1999, and then to defeat me again in 2002.
There was a confluence of both the casino interests to get rid of me, to target me, and to stop me, as well as Karl Rove and his best friend and his best friend's wife, who was the U.S. Attorney
(who prosecuted the Siegelman case), as well as Karl Rove's client, who was the state Attorney General.
I was raising money (for the lottery referendum) and I had asked a gentleman to raise money for this state referendum...He did, and later I appointed him to the same board on which he had served through three previous governors. (An unpaid position)
And it's interesting to note that all three of these previous governors had received contributions from this CEO.
I received a contribution, but it went to a referendum campaign, yet I was targeted, and convicted..for bribery.
The other interesting note here is that the judge lowered the standard by which juries can convict to not an expressed 'quid pro quo' or an explicitly asserted 'quid pro quo', but, in my case, an implied 'quid pro quo'.
So, now we have a standard in Alabama where people can be convicted not on evidence that they actually got together and decided to swap money for favors, but to allow the jury to assume or to imply that there was such a deal."
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/9/11/former_alabama_gov_don_siegelman_speaks#transcript